Special Offer for Online Readers

Would you like to add this to your personal library?

Choose from Print, PDF, or both
BUY NOW
Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK + PDF
your price: $70.50
add to cart

PAPERBACK
list:$59.95
Web:$53.96
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $46.00
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $4.20
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Nutrient Requirements of Nonhuman Primates: Second Revised Edition (2003)
Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources (BANR)

Page
18
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Nutrient Requirements of Nonhuman Primates: Second Revised Edition, 2003

G. g. graueri

Eastern lowland gorilla

Pith, shoots, and stems of herbs and shrubs 19% (11-33%), leaves 41% (17-51%), bark 13% (0-29%), root 2% (0-5%), flowers 2% (0-3%), fruit 23% (9-47%), miscellaneous 1% (0-29%)

Diurnal, arboreal and terrestrial, 1 male, multifemale group

71-75 kg females, 140-168 kg males

Casimir, 1975; Goodall, 1977; Silva & Downing, 1995; Yamagiwa et al., 1992, 1994, 1996

Pan

P. paniscus

Bonobo or pygmy chimpanzee

Fruit 52% (1-100%), flower 2% (0-7%), seed 3% (0-6%), leaves 14% (0-28%), terrestrial herbaceous vegetation 24% (0-55%), bark or root 2% (0-11%), prey 2% (0-3%), fungus, honey; do not hunt or eat monkeys

Diurnal, arboreal and terrestrial, multimale/ multifemale group size 6-15 foraging parties, communities 50-120 individuals

31-34 kg females, 39 kg male

Badrian et al., 1981; Badrian & Malenky, 1984; Hashimoto et al., 1998; Kano, 1983; Kano & Mulavwa, 1984; Malenky & Stiles, 1991; Nishida a & Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, 1987; Silva & Downing, 1995; Uehara, 1990; Wolfheim, 1983

P. troglodytes

Chimpanzee

Fruit 64% (19-99%), seeds 3% (0-30%); flowers 2% (0-18%), leaves 16% (0-56%) (mostly young), pith, stem, and stalk 7% (0-27%), bark/ cambium 2% (0-26%), gum, gall, root, wood, fungus, miscellaneous 2% (0-41%), and all prey items 4% (0-28%); will eat monkeys

Diurnal; arboreal and terrestrial; multimale/ multifemale group size 7-25 females, 5-16 males, fission-fusion

32-68 kg females, 40-80 kg males

Conklin-Brittain et al., 1998; Galdikas & Teleki, 1981; Ghiglieri, 1984; Goodall, 1996; Hladik, 1973, 1977; Isabirye-Basuta, 1989; Kuroda, 1992; Kuroda, et al., 1996; Matsumoto-Oda & Hayashi, 1999; McGrew et al., 1981; Newton-Fisher, 1999; Peters & O’Brien, 1981; Sabater-Pi, 1979; Sugiyama & Koman, 1987; Suzuki, 1969; Tutin & Fernandez, 1993; Tutin et al., 1984, 1991, 1997; van Lanwick-Goodall, 1968; Wrangham, 1977; Wrangham et al., 1998; Yamagiwa et al., 1992

aDiet format: mean (range).

bBody weights in ranges whenever possible; single numbers are not averages but indicate that only one individual of the species has been weighed in the wild.

cNo data available from the wild but assumed to be similar to congenerics.

is not directly visible but the researcher is close enough to identify the species on which it is feeding. When the animal has moved on, the feeding location can be investigated and food remnants characterized (Tutin et al., 1991, Tutin and Fernandez, 1993; Rogers et al., 1996).

Reporting Feeding Behavior

Once collected, feeding-behavior data may be reported in various ways. The following are some examples.

FEEDING TIME

Feeding time may be reported as a percentage of all daily activities or as a percentage of feeding time. For example, 35% of the day might be spent in foraging for insects, 19% feeding on plants, 25% in traveling, and the remainder in other activities. Within the time spent on plants, 60% of it may have been on fruit, 40% on leaves.

MASS OF FOOD AS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL DIET MASS

The contribution that each food category makes to the total diet in mass terms may be expressed as a percentage of dry weight or of wet weight. The estimated grams consumed of each type of food may also be reported.

Feeding-Ecology Tables

The feeding ecology of all extant primates that have been studied is summarized in Tables 1-1 through 1-6. The data in these tables were derived from studies that used nearly all the above methods. Although the methods varied, grand averages (with ranges in parentheses) were calculated because no correction factors have been developed to make data gathered with different methods comparable. We assumed that the predominant food items (such as fruits, leaves, and insects) would remain predominant regardless of the method used and that the variability in diets due to habitat and seasonal differences would overwhelm most differences due to methods. Studies of some

Page
18