. "4. Clinical Scientists." Addressing the Nation's Changing Needs for Biomedical and Behavioral Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
ADDRESSING THE NATION'S CHANGING NEEDS FOR BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENTISTS
TABLE 4-1 NIH and ADHRQ Comoeting Awards by Type of Research and Degree of Investigator, Fiscal Year 1997
NOTE: NIH data exclude training grants and predoctoral fellowships. AHRQ data exclude training grants, predoctoral fellowships, innovation awards, and conference grants.
a This category includes dentists and veterinarians, as well as investigators for whom no degree information was available.
SOURCES: Data are from the NIH CRISP and IMPAC systems and the AHCPR State List of Active Grants.
perhaps reflecting the fact that dentists are included in this group), followed by M.D.-Ph.D.s (21.3 percent). As a group, Ph.D.s were least likely to conduct clinical research: only 18 percent did so.
DEFINING CLINICAL RESEARCH AND THE CLINICAL RESEARCH WORKFORCE
Previous NRC analyses of clinical research have generally assumed that Ph.D.s conducting clinical research were trained in the health science disciplines listed in Appendix E , including fields such as environmental health, epidemiology, health services, nursing, and pharmacy. Yet the data on federally funded clinical research collected over the last few years reveal a workforce that is much more complex than previously recognized. According to this new information, the pool of investigators conducting clinical research supported by the NIH and AHRQ includes many who were trained in the behavioral and social sciences and, to a lesser extent, the basic biomedical sciences.
Among those whose fields of study could be identified, more Ph.D.s conducting clinical research received their degrees in clinical psychology (13.4 percent) than in any other discipline. Other fields producing large numbers of clinical investigators (listed in Table 4-2 ) included such traditional disciplines as epidemiology and nursing, as well as those less commonly associated with clinical research, including sociology, biochemistry, and physiology.
By adopting a definition of clinical research that encompasses behavioral and social science studies, the
TABLE 4-2 Ph.D.s Receiving NIH Awards for Clinical Research, by Field of Degree, 1998
Field of degree
Number
Percent
Clinical psychology
142
13.4
Experimental psychology
60
5.7
Sociology
52
4.9
Epidemiology
42
4.0
Nursing
40
3.8
Biochemistry
36
3.4
Psychology, general
36
3.4
Social psychology
35
3.3
Developmental and child psychology
31
2.9
Physiology
26
2.5
Genetics (human and animal)
23
2.2
Molecular biology
23
2.2
Speech-language pathology and audiology
23
2.2
Physiological psychology/psychobiology
21
2.0
Bioengineering and biomedical engineering
21
2.0
Anthropology
19
1.8
Other Fields
437
41.4
Total identified
1,056
100.0
Unknown fields
347
Total
1,403
SOURCES: Principal investigators were identified from the NIH CRISPand IMPAC Systems and matched against data from the Survey of EarnedDoctorates to determine the fields in which they earned their doctoraldegrees.