National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

NATIONAL RESEARCH INITIATIVE

A VITAL COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM IN FOOD, FIBER, AND NATURAL-RESOURCES RESEARCH

COMMITTEE ON AN EVALUATION OF THE US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATIONAL RESEARCH INITIATIVE COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM

BOARD ON AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, DC

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20418

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

This material is based upon work supported by the US Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service under agreement 97-COOP-2–5045. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for this project.

ISBN 0-309-07083-X

Copyright 2000 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

National Academy of Sciences

National Academy of Engineering

Institute of Medicine

National Research Council

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M.Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A.Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I.Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A.Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

COMMITTEE ON AN EVALUATION OF THE US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATIONAL RESEARCH INITIATIVE COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM

THOMAS N.URBAN, Chair,

Des Moines, Iowa, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Retired

PETER J.BARRY,

University of Illinois, Urbana

FRANCIS F.BUSTA,

University of Minnesota, St. Paul

MARY-DELL CHILTON,

Novartis Seeds, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

DARYL E.CHUBIN,

National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia

ROBERT J.COLLIER,

University of Arizona, Tucson

NOEL T.KEEN,

University of California, Riverside

MICHAEL R.LADISCH,

Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

G.PHILIP ROBERTSON,

Michigan State University, Hickory Corners

RONALD R.SEDEROFF,

North Carolina State University, Raleigh

WILLIAM W.SIMPKINS,

Iowa State University, Ames

ROBERT E.SMITH,

R E Smith Consulting, Inc., Newport, Vermont

FREDRICK STORMSHAK,

Oregon State University, Corvallis

ANNE K.VIDAVER*,

University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Staff

GREGORY H.SYMMES, Study Director (since August 1999)

MICHAEL J.PHILLIPS, Study Director (through July 1999)

LUCYNA KURTYKA, Research Associate

SHIRLEY B.THATCHER, Senior Project Assistant

NORMAN GROSSBLATT, Editor

*  

Resigned from committee

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

BOARD ON AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES

T.KENT KIRK, Chair,

University of Wisconsin, Madison

DAVID H.BAKER,

University of Illinois, Urbana

SANDRA S.BATIE,

Michigan State University, East Lansing

MAY R.BERENBAUM,

University of Illinois, Urbana

ANTHONY S.EARL,

Quarles & Brady Law Firm, Madison, Wisconsin

ESSEX E.FINNEY, Jr.,

Mitchellville, Maryland, US Department of Agriculture, Retired

CORNELIA FLORA,

Iowa State University, Ames

ROBERT T.FRALEY,

Monsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri

GEORGE R.HALLBERG,

The Cadmus Group, Waltham, Massachusetts

RICHARD R.HARWOOD,

Michigan State University, East Lansing

GILBERT A.LEVEILLE,

McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania

HARLEY W.MOON,

Iowa State University, Ames

WILLIAM L.OGREN,

Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, US Department of Agriculture, Retired

G.EDWARD SCHUH,

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

JOHN W.SUTTIE,

University of Wisconsin, Madison

THOMAS N.URBAN,

Des Moines, Iowa, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Retired

ROBERT T.WILSON,

Mississippi State University, Mississippi State

JAMES J.ZUICHES,

Washington State University, Pullman

Staff

MYRON F.UMAN, Acting Executive Director (through May 1999)

WARREN R.MUIR, Executive Director

DAVID L.MEEKER, Director (since March 2000)

CHARLOTTE KIRK BAER, Associate Director

SHIRLEY B.THATCHER, Administrative Assistant

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

Foreword

In 1989 the Board on Agriculture of the National Research Council recommended that an expanded public investment be made through competitive research grants in agriculture, food, and the environment. The rationale for this recommended program, to be administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), was a perceived need “to revitalize and reinvigorate one of [America’s] leading industries, the agricultural, food, and environmental system.” The objective was to increase the generation of new knowledge in key issue areas, which could best be accomplished by selecting the highest quality research proposals through the use of peer review. In Fiscal Year 1991, Congress created the National Research Initiative (NRI), the expanded competitive grants program at USDA. Without accounting for inflation, this program is currently funded at a level slightly less than one fourth of that recommended by the 1989 Research Council report.

In 1995 Frank Press, my predecessor as President of the National Academy of Sciences, chaired a National Academies committee that examined the allocation of federal funds for science and technology. Among the central recommendations of this committee were that: (1) federal agencies should make allocation decisions based on clearly articulated criteria congruent with those of the President and the Congress, (2) the allocated funds should ensure that the U.S. achieves preeminence in select fields and is world class in all other major

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

fields of science and technology, and (3) competitive merit review, especially involving external reviewers, should be the preferred way to make awards. The NRI is a program aimed at meeting these three important criteria.

The National Research Council is releasing this report, focused on improving and strengthening the NRI, following a study carried out by an expert and knowledgeable committee. Many of its members have been successful, as described in Appendix 4, in competing for peer review grants at NSF, NIH, and NRI. This committee has conducted a retrospective assessment of the quality and value of the NRI program, examined its science and technology priorities, and suggested changes for the future. Among the key findings and recommendations are: (1) a major emphasis of the program should continue to be the support of high risk research that has potential long-term payoffs, as well as benefits in training and education, (2) the proposals and awarded grants are generally of high quality, but scientists outside the traditional “food, fiber, and natural resources” disciplines need to be attracted to the program, (3) a more effective performance tracking system needs to be established to improve research accountability, (4) the priority setting process needs significant revision with creation of six standing scientific research review committees to identify critical issues and with special consideration given to important problems perceived by the public, and (5) a new NRI advisory board with representatives of NRI stakeholders should be established. The committee has also reemphasized the original NRI budgetary recommendation (adjusted for inflation) of the 1989 Board on Agriculture report.

As emphasized in the 1995 report of the Press committee, the federal government has played a pivotal role in developing the world’s most successful system of research and development. Maintaining the vigor of this science and technology enterprise, of which the NRI is an important component, is essential to the nation’s future. By making changes in the NRI program of the type recommended here, the US can attract many more outstanding young scientists to careers in these critical areas.

I thank the chair and members of the committee that produced this important report. We hope that it will help to make the NRI even more effective.

Bruce Alberts

Chair

National Research Council

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

Preface

Our nation faces daunting challenges to its food and fiber system and to the condition of our natural resources in the coming decades. Rapid increases in world population and the pressure on resources generated by increasing per capita consumption as a result of increasing per capita income challenge the very basis of our standard of living—our food, fiber, and natural-resource base. As the nation faces the challenges, new technologies and new information systems are changing the face of biologic research.

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has traditionally been the nation’s primary public research engine in food, fiber, and natural resources. The National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program (NRI) is a small part of that USDA research effort, but it accounts for a substantial portion of the nation’s merit-based peer-reviewed fundamental research efforts in food, fiber, and natural resources.

USDA asked the National Research Council to review the NRI from four perspectives:

  1. To perform a retrospective assessment of the quality and value of research funded by the program.

  2. To determine whether the science and technology priorities in the major NRI programs are defined appropriately.

  3. To assess how NRI activities complement other USDA programs, programs of other federal agencies, and state programs in the private sector.

  4. To recommend the nature and content of changes for the future.

To respond to the request, the Research Council established the Committee on Evaluating the USDA National Research Initiative (NRI) Competitive Grants Program. The charge is broad. To assess the quality and value of research, the committee gathered data from the literature and solicited informed opinions

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

from a broad spectrum of researchers and administrators who have long experience with the NRI and other federal institutions involved in merit-based peer-reviewed research. The committee did not have the time or expertise to review each funded activity and assess its specific quality and value. Assessing quality and value of fundamental research is difficult in any program without many years of hindsight. Had we discovered important concerns about the quality or value of research funded by the NRI during our deliberations, we would have had to revisit our approach to the charge. We did not have to do that.

It is a daunting prospect to undertake the evaluation of priorities for any research endeavor that covers as wide an array of topics as that in the NRI portfolio. We addressed the question of whether grant-setting priorities met congressional mandates. We studied the priority-setting process itself in much detail and have made recommendations for change. We chose not to define priorities per se although we have suggested a wide range of research concerns that, in our judgment, the NRI needs to address for the nation’s food, fiber, and natural-resources agenda. Our recommendations on structure and process should, however, allow the NRI to put a detailed priority-setting process into place, and that should result in a comprehensive agenda for NRI research.

Addressing the question of complementarity required defining how the NRI food, fiber, and natural-resources activities fit into the nation’s other public and private research activities. We endeavored to do that.

Finally, we chose to give item 4—recommending the nature and content of changes for the future—the broadest of interpretations. Information garnered during this study required that we address the funding and structure of the NRI to respond fully to the charge. A Research Council committee recommended dramatic increases in funding of the NRI in the 1989 report Investing in Agriculture, and the interim Research Council review in 1994 reiterated that position. We revisited the subject and responded with recommendations on both structure and funding. Our recommendations reaffirm and extend the earlier Research Council vision for fundamental merit-based peer-reviewed research in food, fiber, and natural resources.

Substantial recommendations are made to strengthen the NRI itself and, by strengthening the NRI, to enhance the nation’s peer-reviewed research efforts in food, fiber, and natural resources, which, if successful, will prepare us for the coming decades.

We are, indeed, unprepared for many of tomorrow’s food, fiber, and natural-resources challenges. There is much to be done to avert catastrophe if the projected increases in world population are realized. I am convinced that the adoption of the committee’s recommendations by Congress and the executive branch will dramatically improve the nation’s preparedness to address the challenges.

Thomas N.Urban

Chair

Committee on An Evaluation of the National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

Acknowledgments

The committee is extremely grateful to numerous people who gave of their time and expertise to provide data and other input during the study process and the development of this report. It is difficult to provide an exhaustive list of those who contributed to this effort, but the committee wishes to thank the following, who provided input during public meetings: Kenneth Barton, Monsanto Life Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri; Robert Bremel, Gala Design, Sauk City, Wisconsin; Anthony Cavalieri, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Johnston, Iowa; Harold Coble, Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jack Eberspacher, National Association of Wheat Growers, Washington, DC; Noah Engelberg, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC; David Ervin, Wallace Institute, Greenbelt, Maryland; Kellye Eversole, National Corn Growers Association, Chevy Chase, Maryland; Kirk Ferrell, Animal Agriculture Coalition, Washington, DC; Cliff Gabriel, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Washington, DC; Karl Glasener, Tri-Societies, Washington, DC; Richard Herrett, Agricultural Research Institute, Washington, DC; Tracy Irwin Hewitt, C-FARE, Arlington, VA; Charles Jamison, National Corn Growers Association, Beltsville, Maryland; Andrew Jordan, National Cotton Council, Mamphis, Tennessee; Eileen Kennedy, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC; Victor Lechtenberg, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; David McKenzie,

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

State Agricultural Experiment Station, College Park, Maryland; Terri Nintemann, US Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, Washington, DC; Terry Nipp, AESOP Enterprises, Washington, DC; Kenneth Olson, American Farm Bureau Federation, Park Ridge, Illinois; Lyle Roberts, Illinois Soybean Association, Bloomington, Illinois; John Suttie, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; and Robert Zimbelman, Federation of Animal Science Societies, Bethesda, Maryland.

In addition, we would like to thank those who took time to meet with the committee throughout the study process: Colien Hefferan, US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC; Ted Hullar, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York; Ron Phillips, US Department of Agriculture, Little Rock, Arkansas; Michael Roberts, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC; and Sally Rockey, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

Two hundred eighty-eight persons took the time to fill out the survey that provided much useful information to the committee. We are grateful for the responses and for the many additional comments and ideas provided.

This report has been reviewed by people chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council Report Review Committee. The purposes of this independent review are to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the authors and the Research Council in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards of objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The content of the review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process, but we wish to thank the following for their participation in the review: Roger Beachy, Danforth Plant Center, St. Louis, Missouri; John Burris, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massassachusetts; Susan Cozzens, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia; Rodney Croteau, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington; Jackie DuPont, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida; Ronald Estabrook, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Jack Gorski, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Edward Hackett, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; George Hallberg, The Cadmus Group, Waltham, Massachusetts; Theodore Hullar, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York; John Shadduck, Shadduck Consulting LLC, Fort Collins, Colorado; Philip Smith, McGeary and Smith, Washington, DC; and Patrick Windham, R. Wayne Sayer and Associates, Washington, DC Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, responsibility for the final content of this report rests solely with the committee and with Research Council.

The committee wishes to thank Study Director Michael J.Phillips (through July, 1999), Research Associate Lucyna Kurtyka, and Administrative Assistant Shirley Thatcher for their assistance during our deliberations and in preparing this report. Their organizational skills contributed enormously to the study process. We gratefully acknowledge the editorial work of Anne H.(Kate) Kelly

Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

on early versions of the report. We also thank Laura Boschini for her efforts in preparing the final report for publication.

Finally, the committee and the members of the Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources wish to extend special thanks to Gregory H.Symmes, study director since August 1999. It was our great fortune that Greg agreed to assist us in the completion of the report and that the Research Council’s Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources was willing to share Greg’s expertise. Greg provided invaluable advice and direction during the final phase of the study. His experience, knowledge, energy, and persistence helped the committee through a long, and sometimes difficult, process. We deeply appreciate Greg’s untiring and extraordinary efforts in seeing this study to a successful conclusion.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R12
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R13
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9844.
×
Page R14
Next: Table of Contents »
National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $50.00 Buy Ebook | $40.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Our nation faces daunting challenges to its food and fiber system and to the condition of our natural resources in the coming decades. Rapid increases in world population and the pressure on resources generated by increasing per capita consumption as a result of increasing per capita income challenge the very basis of our standard of living—our food, fiber, and natural-resource base. As the nation faces the challenges, new technologies and new information systems are changing the face of biologic research.

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has traditionally been the nation's primary public research engine in food, fiber, and natural resources. The National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program (NRI) is a small part of that USDA research effort, but it accounts for a substantial portion of the nation's merit-based peer-reviewed fundamental research efforts in food, fiber, and natural resources.

In 1997, USDA asked the National Research Council Board on Agriculture (now the Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources) to conduct an independent assessment of the NRI program. Specifically, USDA asked the Research Council to: perform a retrospective assessment of the quality and value of research funded by the program; determine whether the science and technology priorities in the major NRI programs are defined appropriately; assess how NRI activities complement other USDA programs, those of other federal agencies, and state programs in the private sector; and recommend the nature and content of changes for the future.

This report summarizes the results of the committee's analysis. Chapter 2 summarizes the value of food, fiber, and natural resources-research to the United States, focusing on economic contributions and rates of return of food and fiber research. The committee's analysis of the quality, value, fairness, relevance, and responsiveness of the NRI competitive grants program is presented in chapter 3. Chapter 4 presents the committee's analysis of the role and scope of the NRI, including its scientific objectives, its value in training and education, and its complementarity with other research activities. The committee's analysis of NRI's priority-setting process and its research priorities is given in chapter 5. The committee's analysis of organizational and funding issues is given in chapter 6. Chapter 7 presents the committee's recommendations to improve the effectiveness of the NRI program. Additional supporting materials are found in appendixes A through I.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!