B

Request from NASA's Office of Space Science



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 39
Assessment of Technology Development in NASA's Office of Space Science B Request from NASA's Office of Space Science

OCR for page 39
Assessment of Technology Development in NASA's Office of Space Science National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters Washington, DC 20546-0001 reply to Attn of: S Dr. Bruce Alberts Chair National Research Council 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418 Dear Dr. Alberts: In 1995, the Space Studies Board released a report, entitled Managing the Space Sciences, that analyzed several important issues in the management of NASA 's space science programs. Since then, the structure and organization of the Office of Space Science (OSS) have been totally overhauled, and a number of the recommendations of the 1995 report have been implemented while others have been superseded by intervening events. As a result, I would like to request that the National Research Council carry out an updated assessment of OSS management processes in the context of the original recommendations and the new organizational environment. The reassessment should focus particularly on structure and management of technology development. OSS has acquired management responsibility and budget for spacecraft and related technology development from the former Office of Space Access and Technology. During the past year, these technology tasks have been assimilated with other technology tasks formerly OSS funded into a restructured program that must support both generic agency technology needs and OSS-specific requirements in alignment with the new OSS strategic plan. Specific issues that should be addressed are: How well does the current management approach meet the objectives of those technology recommendations provided in Managing the Space Sciences (section 6) that remain relevant in the new organization? How well does OSS's new management approach for Advanced Technology Development tasks meet related congressional concerns articulated in the FY 1998 space science appropriations legislative report?

OCR for page 39
Assessment of Technology Development in NASA's Office of Space Science The study should take account of scientific, technological, and management considerations. The results will be most useful if they can be made available to us by November 1, 1998. Sincerely, Wesley T. Huntress, Jr. Associate Administrator for Space Science