National Academies Press: OpenBook

Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Final Report (2000)

Chapter: Appendix C Meeting Summary, September 19-21, 1999

« Previous: Appendix B Meeting Summary, July 21-22, 1999
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C Meeting Summary, September 19-21, 1999." National Research Council. 2000. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9883.
×

APPENDIX C
Meeting Summary

Meeting of the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment

J. Erik Jonsson Woods Hole Center of the National Academies

September 19-21, 1999

SEPTEMBER 19, 1999—AGENDA

2:00 p.m.

Closed Session—Preliminary Discussion of Meeting Goals

2:30 p.m.

Open Session—Update on Argonne National Laboratory’s Electrometallurgical Demonstration Project—Robert Benedict, Argonne National Laboratory

4:00 p.m.

Closed Session—Discussion of Final ANL Results and Preliminary Discussion of the Committee’s Final Report

5:00 p.m.

Adjourn

SEPTEMBER 20, 1999—AGENDA

7:45 a.m.

Closed Session—Discussion of the Final Report Draft

8:00 a.m.

Chapter 1—Introduction

8:30 a.m.

Chapter 2—Historical Development

9:00 a.m.

Chapter 3—The Electrometallurgical Technique at ANL

9:45 a.m.

Product Streams Produced by the Electrometallurgical Process

10:15 a.m.

Break

10:30 a.m.

Post-demonstration Activities

11:00 a.m.

Previous Committee Recommendations

11:30 a.m.

Discussion of the Draft

12:00 p.m.

Lunch

1:00 p.m.

Open Session—Questions for ANL Personnel

2:00 p.m.

Closed Session—Writing Breakout Session

4:00 p.m.

Discussion of the Updated Report Draft

Suggested Citation:"Appendix C Meeting Summary, September 19-21, 1999." National Research Council. 2000. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9883.
×

4:30 p.m.

Preliminary Discussion of Findings and Recommendations

5:00 p.m.

Adjourn

SEPTEMBER 21, 1999—AGENDA

7:45 a.m.

Closed Session—Findings and Recommendations for the Final Report

10:00 a.m.

Break

10:15 a.m.

Final Agreement on Findings and Recommendations

11:00 a.m.

Outstanding Issues—Post Meeting Requirements, Planning Schedule for Completion and

Release of the Committee’s Final Report

12:00 p.m.

Adjourn

SUMMARY OF PRESENTATIONS

Robert W. Benedict, ANL, spoke to the committee about the spent fuel demonstration project status. He gave the following summary of the repeatability results for driver electrorefining. The specific success criterion goal was to freeze process modifications and operating parameters while demonstrating a continuous throughput of 16 kg of driver uranium per month over a 3-month period. The repeatability demonstration began on November 14, 1998, and ended on January 22, 1999 (61 working days). The average treatment rate was approximately 24 kg per month.

For the blanket throughput, demonstration results were as follows. The specific success criterion goal was to treat 150 kg of blanket uranium in 1 month. The 1-month demonstration began on July 17, 1999, and ran through August 15, 1999 (30 days). The unit throughput for the blanket chopper was 164 kg; for the Mark-V electrorefiner, it was 205 kg; for the cathode processor it was 206 kg; and for the casting furnace it was 177 kg.

Mark-V electrorefiner process improvements since the completion of the throughput demonstration include the following. Stall recovery software has been implemented. The software automatically restarts the anode rotation after a stall. Using the demonstration operating conditions, the average production rate increased from 212 g of uranium per hour to 260 g of uranium per hour. Anode agitation software has been implemented along with stall recovery software. The software rotates that anode 90 to 180 degrees forward, then 45 to 90 degrees backward continuously. This greatly reduces the tendency to stall (0-4 stalls per product collector versus 16-20 stalls in the demo mode). The average production rate was increased to 350-400 g of uranium per hour.

Significant achievements for the Mark-V electrorefiner include the following. The latest run allows 400 g of uranium per hour per ACM as the average production rate, with 60 percent equipment utilization per ACM. The four ports are operational. Operation of the four ports is simultaneous, with routine operation of two ports possible. More than 13 blanket assemblies have been treated. Control software allows unattended operation. Two product collector harvesting methods have been developed: a bake-out oven with a gravity-assisted product dump at 500 °C, and a product collector harvesting tool that has a rotating multibladed tool used for grinding out product at room temperature.

The cathode processor treated 40 driver batches, 14 blanket batches, and 8 cladding hull batches. The casting furnace treated 40 driver batches, 14 blanket batches, and 7 metal waste batches.

For the driver fuel, the cathode processor/casting operating conditions were as follows. The cathode processor has a maximum crucible temperature of 1200 °C. The operating pressure was 0.1 torr, with isolation for cadmium. The salt distillation step took place over 1 hour at 1100 °C. Casting took place with a maximum crucible temperature of 1300 °C. The operating pressure was 900 torr until cast, and there was one stir cycle.

Significant accomplishments in the treatment process include the following. Driver treatment has processed 100 driver assemblies in 3 years. Eight assemblies were treated in 1 month. One thousand one hundred and ten kilograms of low-enriched uranium were cast. The cathode processor batch size increased from 12 to 19 kg. The casting furnace batch size increased from 36 to 54 kg. Blanket treatment has processed 13 of 25 blanket assemblies. The Mark-V electrorefiner has run 21 batches of irradiated blankets. Three hundred fifty five kilograms of blanket product have been cast. The blanket element chopper is operational.

Results for metal waste casting include the following. Three MWF ingots in the FCF that each accommodate

Suggested Citation:"Appendix C Meeting Summary, September 19-21, 1999." National Research Council. 2000. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9883.
×

an amount of cladding hulls corresponding to two driver fuel assemblies have been cast. The third MWF ingot with blanket cladding hulls substituted for driver hulls has been cast and characterized. The conclusion was that the appropriate casting conditions and waste characteristics have been determined and implemented for both driver and blanket hulls.

For the CWF, production of demonstration-scale irradiated samples involved the following. Irradiated salt was removed from the electrorefiner and transferred to the HFEF. Mill/classifier tests were performed to confirm the behavior of electrorefiner salt. A batch was successfully processed through the V-mixer. Ten radioactive samples and witness tubes have been processed through the HIP.

Significant accomplishments in waste activities include the following. A stainless steel-zirconium alloy continues as the MWF. The test matrix for qualification testing has been established. Three of three full batches of irradiated cladding hulls have been cast. Spiked and cold sample castings are complete. Waste qualification testing had started by the time of the meeting (July 21, 1999). Glass-bonded sodalite is the ceramic waste form. Initial uranium and plutonium behavior studies are available. Nonradioactive demonstration-scale equipment testing is complete. Equipment has been installed in the HFEF. Laboratory-scale samples containing plutonium for accelerated alpha decay tests have been fabricated. All 10 demonstration scale-cans were processed.

For the Environmental Impact Statement for the treatment and management of sodium-bonded spent nuclear fuel, the following schedule was presented. The notice of intent was published in February 1999. Scoping meetings were held in March 1999. The draft document was available in July 1999. Public hearings took place in August 1999. The final document was scheduled to be ready in January 2000, with the record of decision to be issued in February 2000.

A number of specific reports for the demonstration evaluation were issued. Overall demonstration reports include the following:

  • Spent Fuel Treatment Demonstration Final Report,1

  • Production Operations for the Electrometallurgical Treatment of Sodium-bonded Spent Nuclear Fuel,2

  • Analysis of Spent Fuel Treatment Demonstration Operations,3 and

  • Uranium Disposition Options.4

Treatment operation reports include the overall treatment report:

  • Development of Cathode Processor and Casting Furnace Operating Conditions.5

Driver treatment reports include:

  • Process Description for Driver Fuel Treatment Operation,6 and

  • Development of the Electrorefining Process for Driver Fuel.7

1  

R.W. Benedict, H.F. McFarlane, S.P. Henslee, M.J. Lineberry, D.P. Abraham, J.P. Ackerman, R.K. Ahluwalia, H.E. Garcia, E.C. Gay, K.M. Goff, S.G. Johnsm, R.D. Mariani, S. McDeavitt, C. Pereira, P.D. Roach, S.R. Sherman, B.R. Westphal, R.A. Wigeland, and J.L. Willit, Spent Fuel Treatment Demonstration Final Report, NT Technical Memorandum No. 106, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

2  

K.M. Goff, L.L. Briggs, R.W. Benedict, J.R. Liaw, M.F. Simpson, E.E. Feldman, R.A. Uras, H.E. Bliss, A.M. Yacout, D.D. Keiser, K.C. Marsden, and C. Nielsen, Production Operations for the Electrometallurgical Treatment of Sodium-Bonded Spent Nuclear Fuel, NT Technical Memorandum No. 107, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

3  

H.E. Garcia, C.H. Adams, D.B. Barber, R.G. Bucher, I. Charak, R.J. Forrester, S.J. Grammel, R.P. Grant, R.J. Page, D.Y. Pan, A.M. Yacout, L.L. Burke, and K.M. Goff, Analysis of Spent Fuel Treatment Demonstration Operations, NT Technical Memorandum No. 108, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

4  

H.F. McFarlane, K.M. Goff, T.J. Battisti, B.R. Westphal, and R.D. Mariani, Options for the Disposition of Uranium Recovered from Electrometallurgical Treatment of Sodium-Bonded Spent Nuclear Fuel, NT Technical Memorandum No. 109, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

5  

B.R. Westphal, A.R. Brunsvold, P.D. Roach, K.C. Marsden, B.A. Jensen, and D.V. Laug, Development of Cathode Processor and Casting Furnace Operating Conditions, NT Technical Memorandum No. 110, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

6  

D. Vaden, B.R. Westphal, D.V. Laug, S.S. Cunningham, S.X. Li, T. A. Johnson, J.R. Krsul, and M.J. Lambregts, Process Description for Driver Fuel Treatment Operations, NT Technical Memorandum No. 111, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

7  

E.C. Gay, S.X. Li, R.K. Ahluwalia, D. Vaden, S.R. Sherman, and M.A. Power, Development of the Electrorefining Process for Driver Fuel, NT Technical Memorandum No. 112, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix C Meeting Summary, September 19-21, 1999." National Research Council. 2000. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9883.
×

Blanket treatment reports include:

  • Process Description for Blanket Treatment Operations,8 and

  • Development of the Electrorefining Process for Blanket Fuel.9

For waste operations and qualification, the following reports have been issued. Overall waste reports include:

  • Waste Form Qualification Strategy,10

  • Waste Acceptance Product Specifications,11

  • Waste Compliance Plan,12

  • Waste Form Degradation,13 and

  • Waste Form Degradation and Repository Performance Modeling.14

Ceramic waste reports include:

  • Ceramic Waste Form Process Qualification Plan,15 and

  • Ceramic Waste Form Handbook.16

Metal waste reports include

  • Metal Waste Form Process Qualification Plan,17 and

  • Metal Waste Form Handbook.18

In summary, 100 drivers were treated by June 1999. Blanket treatment of 150 kg of uranium per month was successfully completed in August 1999. Thirteen blankets had been treated by the time of the meeting (September 19, 1999). Ten radioactive demonstration ceramic waste cans were produced in the summer of 1999. The Environmental Impact Statement was in the public comment period at the time of the meeting.

8  

S.R. Sherman, D. Vaden, R.D. Mariani, B.R. Westphal, T.S. Bakes, S.S. Cunningham, B.A. Jensen, T.A. Johnson, D.V. Laug, and J.R. Krsul, Process Description for Blanket Fuel Treatment Operations, NT Technical Memorandum No. 113, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

9  

E.C. Gay, S.R. Sherman, J.L. Willit, and R.K. Ahluwalia, Development of the Electrorefining Process for Blanket Fuel, NT Technical Memorandum No. 114, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

10  

T.P. O’Holleran, R.W. Benedict, and S.G. Johnson, Waste Form Qualification Strategy for the Metal and Ceramic Waste Forms from Electrometallurgical Treatment of Spent Nuclear Fuel, NT Technical Memorandum No. 115, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

11  

T.P. O’Holleran, D.P. Abraham, J.P. Ackerman, K.M. Goff, S.G. Johnson, and D.D. Keiser, Waste Acceptance Product Specifications for the Waste Forms from Electrometallurgical Treatment of Spent Nuclear Fuel, NT Technical Memorandum No. 116, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

12  

Argonne National Laboratory-West, Waste Form Compliance Plan for the Waste Forms from Electrometallurgical Treatment of Spent Nuclear Fuel, W0000-0062-ES, Rev. 00, Argonne National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, 1999.

13  

R.A. Wigeland, L.L. Briggs. T.H. Fanning, E.E. Feldman, E.E. Morris, and M.C. Petri Waste Form Degradation and Repository Performance Modeling, NT Technical Memorandum No. 117, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

14  

R.A. Wigeland, L.L. Briggs, T.H. Fanning, E.E. Feldman, E.E. Morris, and M.C. Petri, Waste Form Degradation and Repository Performance Modeling, NT Technical Memorandum No. 117, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

15  

K.M. Goff, J.P. Ackerman, M.F. Simpson, M.C. Hash, K.J. Bateman, T.J. Battisti, and K.L. Hirsche, Ceramic Waste Form Process Qualification Plan, NT Technical Memorandum No. 118, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

16  

W.L. Ebert, D.W. Esh, S.M. Frank, K.M. Goff, M.C. Hash, S.G. Johnson, M.A. Lewis, L.R. Morss, T.L. Moschetti, T.P. O’Holleran, M.K. Richman, W.P. Riley, Jr., L.J. Simpson, W. Sinkler, M.L. Stanley, C.D. Tatko, D.J. Wronkiewicz, J.P. Ackerman, K.A. Arbesman, K.J. Bateman, T.J. Battisti, D.G. Cummings, T. DiSanto, M.L. Gougar, K.L. Hirsche, S.E. Kaps, L. Leibowitz, J.S. Luo, M. Noy, H. Retzer, M.F. Simpson, D. Sun, A.R. Warren, and V.N. Zyryznov, Ceramic Waste Form Handbook, NT Technical Memorandum No. 119, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

17  

B.R. Westphal, K.C. Marsden, S.M. McDeavitt, D.D. Keiser, Jr., D.P. Abraham, R.H. Rigg, B.A. Jensen, and D.V. Laug, Metal Waste Form Process Qualification Plan, NT Technical Memorandum No. 120, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

18  

D.P. Abraham, S.M. McDeavitt, D.D. Keiser, S.G. Johnson, M.L. Adamic, S.A. Barker, T.D. DiSanto, S.M. Frank, J.R. Krsul, M. Noy, J.W. Richardson, Jr., and B.R. Westphal, Metal Waste Form Handbook, NT Technical Memorandum No. 121, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1999.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix C Meeting Summary, September 19-21, 1999." National Research Council. 2000. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9883.
×
Page 103
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C Meeting Summary, September 19-21, 1999." National Research Council. 2000. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9883.
×
Page 104
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C Meeting Summary, September 19-21, 1999." National Research Council. 2000. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9883.
×
Page 105
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C Meeting Summary, September 19-21, 1999." National Research Council. 2000. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9883.
×
Page 106
Next: Appendix D Recommendations and Selected Findings and Conclusions from Previous Reports of the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment »
Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Final Report Get This Book
×
 Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Final Report
Buy Paperback | $44.00 Buy Ebook | $35.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment was formed in September 1994 in response to a request made to the National Research Council (NRC) by the U.S. Department of Energy DOE. DOE requested an evaluation of electrometallurgical processing technology proposed by Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) for the treatment of DOE spent nuclear fuel. Electrometallurgical treatment of spent reactor fuel involves a set of operations designed to remove the remaining uranium metal and to incorporate the radioactive nuclides into well defined and reproducible waste streams. Over the course of the committee's operating life, this charge has remained constant. Within the framework of this overall charge, the scope of the committee's work—as defined by its statement of task—has evolved in response to further requests from DOE, as well as technical accomplishments and regulatory and legal considerations. As part of its task, the committee has provided periodic assessments of ANL's R&D program on the electrometallurgical technology.

Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment assesses the viability of electrometallurgical technology for treating DOE spent nuclear fuel and monitors the scientific and technical progress of the ANL program on electrometallurgical technology, specifically within the context of ANL's demonstration project on electrometallurgical treatment of EBR-II SNF. This report evaluates ANL's performance relative to the success criteria for the demonstration project, which have served as the basis for judging the efficacy of using electrometallurgical technology for the treatment of EBR-II spent nuclear fuel. It also addresses post-demonstration activities related to ANL's electrometallurgical demonstration project, and makes related recommendations in this area.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!