National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Executive Summary
Suggested Citation:"Prologue 1." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×

Prologue 1

Mount Rainier Explodes!

Massive Eruption Devastates Seattle Area;

Officials Looking for Answers

Seattle, May 19, 2010 (AP)

Three months after rumbling back to life and exactly thirty years after the last major eruption in the lower 48 states, Mount Rainier exploded yesterday in a terrifying shower of ash, mud, and lava that took tens of thousands of lives and caused property damage initially estimated at more than 100 billion dollars. The unexpected magnitude of the eruption, which caught civil officials totally unaware, appears to have devastated the economy of a major Pacific gateway, setting the stage for a global financial crisis on a scale similar to that caused by the great Los Angeles earthquakes of 2003.

Yesterday’s destruction was concentrated in three areas. The most immediate and deadly impact was felt in the southeastern suburbs of Seattle, where a searing blast of fine ash and gas flattened houses, factories, and bridges, and killed an estimated 13,000 people. Within an hour, mudflows surged down the volcano’s western valleys, burying towns, highways, and railroads, and clogging the southern third of Puget Sound with logs and other debris. Throughout the day, the hills east of Kent were blanketed with up to 10 inches of rain-soaked ash, halting nearly all transportation and collapsing the roofs of thousands of homes and other buildings.

The devastation was not confined to the Puget Sound area. A 797 aircraft, en route from New York to Portland, crashed near Yakima when its engines shut down after passing through the ash cloud. All 650 people on board are presumed dead. The eruption’s most concentrated economic effects appeared to be at aviation facilities in Renton, where wet ash caved in the roof of the main aircraft assembly plant, destroying 12 nearly completed supersonic transports valued at more than $3 billion each.

Also hard hit was the country’s largest database server farm near Enumclaw, run by an industry-wide information technology consortium. A spokesperson said that backup systems should minimize the impact on

Suggested Citation:"Prologue 1." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×

global commerce, but investors’ skepticism caused the stock price of several participating companies in the consortium to drop 40 percent overnight. Ironically, it was the inability of several Silcon Valley companies to respond quickly to the San Jose earthquake in 2007 that led to the relocation of these facilities to the Pacific Northwest in 2008.

Civil officials throughout the region were scrambling this morning to find scientists who could make sense of the disaster. Thirty years ago, the Volcano Hazards Program (VHP) of the U.S. Geological Survey provided official warnings that minimized loss of life from a similar eruption at Mount St. Helens. In 1991 the VHP and the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology forecast a massive eruption of Mount Pinatubo, saving tens of thousands of Filipino lives and hundreds of millions of dollars of military hardware at two nearby U.S. military bases. However, as part of the continued downsizing of the federal government in the early 2000s, the VHP changed from a scientific organization focused on research and prediction to a technical organization whose main tasks were printing maps and enforcing federal regulations. The Los Angeles disaster further shifted public attention and resources toward earthquake mitigation, leading to the complete shutdown of the VHP in 2007.

Contacted this morning at his home in Hilo, Hawaii, the retired former head of the USGS’s Hawaiian and Cascades Volcano Observatories, sounded both angry and frustrated. “This is a human disaster that should have been avoided. Twenty years ago we had monitoring systems in place that could have tracked the movement of magma into the volcano, the weakening of the edifice’s north side, the advance of mudflows toward Tacoma, and the paths of ash clouds. New techniques and sensors developed at universities in the United States, Japan, and Europe over the past decade could have further improved our predictive abilities, if we had people in place that knew how to use them. Instead we were lulled into a deadly complacency by leaders looking to save money and by Cascade volcanoes that typically awaken only once every century or two. Without a well-funded agency charged with coordinating volcano research and monitoring, this disaster is bound to be repeated.”

Suggested Citation:"Prologue 1." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×

Figure P.1 Location map showing area affected by yesterday’s eruption.

Suggested Citation:"Prologue 1." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Prologue 1." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×
Page 9
Suggested Citation:"Prologue 1." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×
Page 10
Suggested Citation:"Prologue 1." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×
Page 11
Suggested Citation:"Prologue 1." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×
Page 12
Next: Prologue 2 »
Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program Get This Book
×
 Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program
Buy Paperback | $50.00 Buy Ebook | $39.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The United States has more than 65 active or potentially active volcanoes, more than those of all other countries except Indonesia and Japan. During the twentieth century, volcanic eruptions in Alaska, California, Hawaii, and Washington devastated thousands of square kilometers of land, caused substantial economic and societal disruption and, in some instances, loss of life. More than 50 U.S. volcanoes have erupted one or more times in the past 200 years. Recently, there have been major advances in our understanding of how volcanoes work. This is partly because of detailed studies of eruptions and partly because of advances in global communications, remote sensing, and interdisciplinary cooperation.

The mission of the Volcano Hazards Program (VHP) is to "lessen the harmful impacts of volcanic activity by monitoring active and potentially active volcanoes, assessing their hazards, responding to volcanic crises, and conducting research on how volcanoes work." To provide a fresh perspective and guidance to the VHP about the future of the program, the Geologic and Water Resources Divisions of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) requested that the National Research Council conduct an independent and comprehensive review.

Review of the U. S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program is organized around the three components of hazards mitigation. Chapter 2 deals with research and hazard assessment. Chapter 3 covers monitoring and Chapter 4 discusses crisis response and other forms of outreach conducted by the VHP. Chapter 5 describes various cross-cutting programmatic issues such as staffing levels, data formats, and partnerships. Chapter 6 offers a vision for the future of the Volcano Hazards Program, and Chapter 7 summarizes the conclusions and recommendations of the preceding chapters. Throughout the report, major conclusions are printed in italics and recommendations in bold type.

The committee has written this report for several different audiences. The main audience is upper management within the USGS and the VHP. However, the committee believes that scientists within the VHP will also find the report valuable. The report is written in such a manner as to be useful to congressional staff as well.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!