National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Prologue 1
Suggested Citation:"Prologue 2." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×

Prologue 2

Mount Rainier Erupts

Government Predictions Confirmed;

Major Disaster Averted

Seattle, May 19, 2010 (AP)

Mount Rainier exploded yesterday in a major volcanic eruption that caused serious property damage across the southern part of the Seattle-Tacoma metropolitan area. The relatively low initial death toll of 45 was credited to one of the most extensive disaster preparations in U.S. history, carried out over the past four years by state and municipal governments in conjunction with members of the United States Geological Survey’s Volcano Hazards Program (VHP). Most of the casualties were thrill-seekers and photographers who ignored posted warnings and sneaked into the evacuation zone north and west of the volcano.

The eruption had three main parts, each affecting a different part of the region. At 8:31 a.m., the north flank of the volcano collapsed in a landslide, releasing a searing explosive blast that flattened trees, houses, and bridges across the southeastern suburbs of Seattle. Within an hour, mudflows surged down the volcano’s western valleys where they were mostly contained and diverted by massive levees into huge, human-made basins. Throughout the day, the hills east of Kent were blanketed with up to 10 inches of rain-soaked ash that made roads impassable and collapsed the roofs of numerous buildings.

Although sobered by these property losses, public officials rejoiced that the unprecedented evacuations over the previous three days had been largely successful in preventing more deaths. The eruption was seen as a validation of the VHP, whose staff size increases, high-tech focus, and longstanding university and international partnerships allowed for near-pinpoint prediction of most of yesterday’s events.

Early warnings from instrument networks and computer models let civil defense planners stage targeted evacuations, similar to those used since the 1980s to remove people from the paths of hurricanes. What was earlier feared to be a nearly impossible task—rapidly moving more than a million residents out of the potentially affected area in an orderly way—went remarkably smoothly,

Suggested Citation:"Prologue 2." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×

thanks in large part to a five-year public education campaign. Engineers were especially pleased that the widespread reinforcement and retrofit campaign for roofs, dams, bridges, and factories, carried out under the Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2004, appeared to have saved most of the structures.

Contacted at his home in Hilo, Hawaii, the retired former head of the USGS’s Hawaiian and Cascades Volcano Observatories sounded both relieved and proud.

“Although the number of victims claimed by Mount Rainier was still too high, scientists and citizens alike should feel satisfied that their investments of time and money were rewarded in such spectacular fashion. The relatively small amount of destruction is a testament to the central role that federally coordinated scientific research can play in reducing the dangers of natural hazards.”

For more details see Chapter 6.

Suggested Citation:"Prologue 2." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×
Page 13
Suggested Citation:"Prologue 2." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9884.
×
Page 14
Next: 1 Introduction »
Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program Get This Book
×
 Review of the U.S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program
Buy Paperback | $50.00 Buy Ebook | $39.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The United States has more than 65 active or potentially active volcanoes, more than those of all other countries except Indonesia and Japan. During the twentieth century, volcanic eruptions in Alaska, California, Hawaii, and Washington devastated thousands of square kilometers of land, caused substantial economic and societal disruption and, in some instances, loss of life. More than 50 U.S. volcanoes have erupted one or more times in the past 200 years. Recently, there have been major advances in our understanding of how volcanoes work. This is partly because of detailed studies of eruptions and partly because of advances in global communications, remote sensing, and interdisciplinary cooperation.

The mission of the Volcano Hazards Program (VHP) is to "lessen the harmful impacts of volcanic activity by monitoring active and potentially active volcanoes, assessing their hazards, responding to volcanic crises, and conducting research on how volcanoes work." To provide a fresh perspective and guidance to the VHP about the future of the program, the Geologic and Water Resources Divisions of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) requested that the National Research Council conduct an independent and comprehensive review.

Review of the U. S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program is organized around the three components of hazards mitigation. Chapter 2 deals with research and hazard assessment. Chapter 3 covers monitoring and Chapter 4 discusses crisis response and other forms of outreach conducted by the VHP. Chapter 5 describes various cross-cutting programmatic issues such as staffing levels, data formats, and partnerships. Chapter 6 offers a vision for the future of the Volcano Hazards Program, and Chapter 7 summarizes the conclusions and recommendations of the preceding chapters. Throughout the report, major conclusions are printed in italics and recommendations in bold type.

The committee has written this report for several different audiences. The main audience is upper management within the USGS and the VHP. However, the committee believes that scientists within the VHP will also find the report valuable. The report is written in such a manner as to be useful to congressional staff as well.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!