Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$57.00
Web:$51.30
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $44.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury (2000)
Commission on Life Sciences (CLS)

Page
285
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury

FIGURE 7-3 Benchmark dose (o) and lower 95% confidence limit on the benchmark dose (+): P0 = BMR = 0.05, K-power model. Abbreviations: WJ, Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement; CPT, Continuous Performance Test; CVLT, California Verbal Learning Test; TOLD, Test of Language Development; WISC-R:PIQ, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised Performance IQ; WISC-R:FSIQ, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised Full-Scale IQ.

appropriate to choose the lowest BMDL as the point of departure because that could easily result in choosing an unreliable end point (i.e., one with great uncertainty). One suitable option might be to choose the BMDL corresponding to the end point with the lowest BMD, selected from among those end points that show a statistically significant effect of exposure. That would lead to choosing the BMD or BMDL based on McCarthy Perceptual Performance from the New Zealand study. The BMD for this end point estimated from the K-power model is 8 ppm; the corresponding BMDL is 4.

The committee had some reservations about choosing the New Zealand study as the basis for risk assessment. First, it is a relatively small study, with only 237 children in contrast to over 700 studied in both the

Page
285