Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK + PDF
your price: $55.00
add to cart

PAPERBACK
list:$47.00
Web:$42.30
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $36.00
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $2.80
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Long-Term Institutional Management of U.S. Department of Energy Legacy Waste Sites (2000)
Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER)

Page
107
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Long-Term Institutional Management of U.S. Department of Energy Legacy Waste Sites

APPENDIXES

Page
107

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 107
Long-Term Institutional Management of U.S. Department of Energy Legacy Waste Sites APPENDIXES

OCR for page 108
Long-Term Institutional Management of U.S. Department of Energy Legacy Waste Sites This page in the original is blank.

OCR for page 109
Long-Term Institutional Management of U.S. Department of Energy Legacy Waste Sites APPENDIX A Committee's Statement of Task The purpose of this project is to assess approaches for developing criteria for transition from active to passive remediation and subsequent long-term disposition, including institutional control with monitoring and surveillance, of U.S. Department of Energy waste sites and facilities such as Hanford, Washington; Savannah River, South Carolina; Idaho National Engineering Laboratory; and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee. Such criteria will include technical feasibility, future land use, performance assessment of remediation activities, and risks to health, safety, and the environment associated with long-term site disposition. Relevant federal and state regulatory requirements and agreements will be included. Appropriate approaches will be applicable to facilities such as high-level radioactive waste tanks (including related facilities and contaminated environments), buried radioactive waste (such as the Hanford low-level waste disposal sites), and on environments contaminated by nuclear testing (such as the Nevada Test Site weapons test event location). April 1997

Representative terms from entire chapter:

radioactive waste