National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$34.95
add to cart

HARDBACK
price:$54.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment (2000)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "9 Research Recommended to Improve the Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes." Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
164
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


DRI DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES: Applications in Dietary Assessment

were discussed in Chapter 8. Some of these topics are revisited now and specific areas in which research is still needed are identified.

Perhaps one of the most important advances to improve application of human nutrient requirement estimates has been the further development and refinement of statistical procedures to reduce if not eliminate the distorting effect of random error in dietary data. What has become apparent in dealing with the random error is that the remaining issue of paramount importance in dietary data collection and analysis is the presence and true extent of bias (such as under- or over-reporting of food intake). The same amount of effort that went into determining statistical approaches for estimation and reduction of the effect of random error should be directed toward the estimation and amelioration of bias. This is a relatively unexplored field. Methods for directly estimating bias regarding energy intake have been developed and used to demonstrate that the problem is serious. Efforts have begun in the management of bias during data analysis but these are far from satisfactory at present. The handling of bias is seen as a very high-priority area awaiting new initiatives and innovative approaches.

Another area of need is behavioral research to determine why people under-report food intake. Advances in this area would allow development of improved dietary data collection tools that would not trigger this behavior. Such information would also help in the derivation of statistical tools to correct the bias associated with this phenomenon.

Better ways to quantify the intake of supplements are needed. Methods for collecting accurate supplement intake data have not been widely investigated. For the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, different instruments were used to collect food intake data and supplement intake data, and the correct methodology for combining these data is uncertain. Furthermore, the intake distribution from supplements usually cannot be adjusted because the current data do not permit the estimation of the day-to-day variability in supplement intake. Despite the difficulties in maintaining a supplement composition database for the rapidly changing market, investigation of better methods of quantifying supplement intakes is a high-priority research area.

Food composition databases need to be updated to include the forms and units that are specified by Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs). Chemical methodology to facilitate analysis of various forms of certain nutrients (e.g., α-vs. γ-tocopherol) may be required. The DRI recommendations also imply that databases need to separate nutrients inherent in foods from those provided by fortification,

Page
164
Front Matter (R1-R14)
Contents (R15-R18)
Summary (1-18)
I. Historical Perspective and Background (19-20)
1 Introduction and Background (21-28)
2 Current Uses of Dietary Reference Standards (29-42)
II. Application of DRIs for Individual Diet Assessment (43-44)
3 Using Dietary Reference Intakes for Nutrient Assessment of Individuals (45-70)
III. Application of DRIs for Group Diet Assessment (71-72)
4 Using the Estimated Average Requirement for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (73-105)
5 Using the Adequate Intake for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (106-112)
6 Using the Tolerable Upper Intake Level for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (113-126)
7 Specific Applications: Assessing Nutrient Intakes of Groups Using the Dietary Reference Intakes (127-144)
IV. Fine-Tuning Dietary Assessment Using the DRIs (145-146)
8 Minimizing Potential Errors in Assessing Group and Individual Intakes (147-161)
9 Research Recommended to Improve the Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes (162-167)
10 References (168-178)
Appendix A: Origin and Framework of the Development of Dietary Reference Intakes (179-184)
Appendix B: Nutrient Assessment of Individuals: Statistical Foundations (185-202)
Appendix C: Assessing Prevalence of Inadequate Intakes for Groups: Statistical Foundations (203-210)
Appendix D: Assessing the Performance of the EAR Cut-Point Method for Estimating Prevalence (211-231)
Appendix E: Units of Observation: Assessing Nutrient Adequacy Using Household and Population Data (232-238)
Appendix F: Rationale for Setting Adequate Intakes (239-253)
Appendix G: Glossary and Abbreviations (254-261)
Appendix H: Biographical Sketches of Subcommittee Members (262-266)
Index (267-281)
Summary Table: Estimated Average Requirements (282-283)
Summary Table: Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (284-286)
Summary Table: Recommended Intakes for Individuals (287-289)