National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$34.95
add to cart

HARDBACK
price:$54.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment (2000)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix B: Nutrient Assessment of Individuals: Statistical Foundations." Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
190
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


DRI DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES: Applications in Dietary Assessment

TABLE B-1 Values for the Ratio D/SDD and Corresponding Probability of Correctly Concluding that Usual Intake Is Adequate or Inadequate

Criterion

Conclusion

Probability of Correct Conclusion

D/SDD > 2.00

Usual intake is adequate

0.98

D/SDD > 1.65

Usual intake is adequate

0.95

D/SDD > 1.50

Usual intake is adequate

0.93

D/SDD > 1.00

Usual intake is adequate

0.85

D/SDD > 0.50

Usual intake is adequate

0.70

D/SDD > 0.00

Usual intake is adequate (inadequate)

0.50

D/SDD < −0.50

Usual intake is inadequate

0.70

D/SDD < −1.00

Usual intake is inadequate

0.85

D/SDD < −1.50

Usual intake is inadequate

0.93

D/SDD < −1.65

Usual intake is inadequate

0.95

D/SDD < −2.00

Usual intake is inadequate

0.98

SOURCE: Adapted from Snedecor and Cochran (1980).

and is only approximate. The assumptions that are implicit in the criterion include:

  1. The distribution of daily intakes Y around the mean intake is approximately normal, or at least symmetrical, for the individual. Any nutrient with a skewed distribution of daily intakes would not satisfy this assumption, such as those nutrients in Table B-2, Table B-3, Table B-4 through Table B-5 with a CV larger than about 60 to 70 percent.

  2. The distribution of requirements in the group is approximately normal.

  3. The daily intake Y accurately reflects the individual's true intake of the nutrient for the day.

  4. A reliable estimate of the day-to-day variability in intake for the individual is available.

  5. Intakes are independent of requirements.

In probabilistic terms, the value of 1 for the ratio D/SDD corresponds to an approximate 0.15 p-value for the test of the hypothesis that y > ρ. That is, when it is concluded that intake is adequate, there is approximately an 85 percent chance of reaching the correct conclusion and approximately a 15 percent chance of making a mistake (erroneously concluding that intake is adequate). Because the criterion is formulated on this probabilistic basis, the level of

Page
190
Front Matter (R1-R14)
Contents (R15-R18)
Summary (1-18)
I. Historical Perspective and Background (19-20)
1 Introduction and Background (21-28)
2 Current Uses of Dietary Reference Standards (29-42)
II. Application of DRIs for Individual Diet Assessment (43-44)
3 Using Dietary Reference Intakes for Nutrient Assessment of Individuals (45-70)
III. Application of DRIs for Group Diet Assessment (71-72)
4 Using the Estimated Average Requirement for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (73-105)
5 Using the Adequate Intake for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (106-112)
6 Using the Tolerable Upper Intake Level for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (113-126)
7 Specific Applications: Assessing Nutrient Intakes of Groups Using the Dietary Reference Intakes (127-144)
IV. Fine-Tuning Dietary Assessment Using the DRIs (145-146)
8 Minimizing Potential Errors in Assessing Group and Individual Intakes (147-161)
9 Research Recommended to Improve the Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes (162-167)
10 References (168-178)
Appendix A: Origin and Framework of the Development of Dietary Reference Intakes (179-184)
Appendix B: Nutrient Assessment of Individuals: Statistical Foundations (185-202)
Appendix C: Assessing Prevalence of Inadequate Intakes for Groups: Statistical Foundations (203-210)
Appendix D: Assessing the Performance of the EAR Cut-Point Method for Estimating Prevalence (211-231)
Appendix E: Units of Observation: Assessing Nutrient Adequacy Using Household and Population Data (232-238)
Appendix F: Rationale for Setting Adequate Intakes (239-253)
Appendix G: Glossary and Abbreviations (254-261)
Appendix H: Biographical Sketches of Subcommittee Members (262-266)
Index (267-281)
Summary Table: Estimated Average Requirements (282-283)
Summary Table: Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (284-286)
Summary Table: Recommended Intakes for Individuals (287-289)