National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$34.95
add to cart

HARDBACK
price:$54.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment (2000)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix F: Rationale for Setting Adequate Intakes." Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
241
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


DRI DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES: Applications in Dietary Assessment

Study Populationa

Balance studies:

n=60 girls and 39 boys; aged 2–8 y; normal and healthy (Matkovic, 1991; Matkovic and Heaney, 1992)

Retention studies:

  1. n=115 girls and 113 boys; aged 9–19 y (Martin et al., 1997)

  2. n=80; aged 12–15 y; Caucasians (Greger et al., 1978; Jackman et al., 1997; Matkovic et al., 1990)

  3. n=111 girls and 22 boys; aged 9–17 y; normal and healthy (Matkovic and Heaney, 1992)

BMC studies:

  1. n=94 Caucasian girls; mean age 12 y (Lloyd et al., 1993)

  2. n=48 Caucasian girls; mean age 11 y (Chan et al., 1995)

  3. n=70 pairs of identical twins; aged 6–14 y; 45 pairs completed the 3-y study (Johnston et al., 1992)

n=26 men and 137 women; aged 18–30 y; normal and healthy (Matkovic and Heaney, 1992)

Balance studies:

  1. n=130 premenopausal women (white Roman Catholic nuns); aged 35–50 y (Heaney et al., 1977)

  2. n=25 healthy women; aged 30–39 y (Ohlson et al., 1952)

  3. n=34 healthy women; aged 40–49 y (Ohlson et al., 1952)

BMD studies:

  1. n=37 premenopausal women; aged 30–42 y (Baran et al., 1990)

  2. n=49 premenopausal, healthy women; aged 46–55 y; Netherlands (Elders et al., 1994)

Page
241
Front Matter (R1-R14)
Contents (R15-R18)
Summary (1-18)
I. Historical Perspective and Background (19-20)
1 Introduction and Background (21-28)
2 Current Uses of Dietary Reference Standards (29-42)
II. Application of DRIs for Individual Diet Assessment (43-44)
3 Using Dietary Reference Intakes for Nutrient Assessment of Individuals (45-70)
III. Application of DRIs for Group Diet Assessment (71-72)
4 Using the Estimated Average Requirement for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (73-105)
5 Using the Adequate Intake for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (106-112)
6 Using the Tolerable Upper Intake Level for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (113-126)
7 Specific Applications: Assessing Nutrient Intakes of Groups Using the Dietary Reference Intakes (127-144)
IV. Fine-Tuning Dietary Assessment Using the DRIs (145-146)
8 Minimizing Potential Errors in Assessing Group and Individual Intakes (147-161)
9 Research Recommended to Improve the Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes (162-167)
10 References (168-178)
Appendix A: Origin and Framework of the Development of Dietary Reference Intakes (179-184)
Appendix B: Nutrient Assessment of Individuals: Statistical Foundations (185-202)
Appendix C: Assessing Prevalence of Inadequate Intakes for Groups: Statistical Foundations (203-210)
Appendix D: Assessing the Performance of the EAR Cut-Point Method for Estimating Prevalence (211-231)
Appendix E: Units of Observation: Assessing Nutrient Adequacy Using Household and Population Data (232-238)
Appendix F: Rationale for Setting Adequate Intakes (239-253)
Appendix G: Glossary and Abbreviations (254-261)
Appendix H: Biographical Sketches of Subcommittee Members (262-266)
Index (267-281)
Summary Table: Estimated Average Requirements (282-283)
Summary Table: Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (284-286)
Summary Table: Recommended Intakes for Individuals (287-289)