National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$34.95
add to cart

HARDBACK
price:$54.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment (2000)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "3 Using Dietary Reference Intakes for Nutrient Assessment of Individuals." Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
55
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


DRI DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES: Applications in Dietary Assessment

TABLE 3-1 Illustration of Observed Mean Intakes of Magnesium That Would Be Necessary to Have 85 Percent or 97.5 Percent Confidence That Usual Intake Is Greater Than the Requirement for a Woman 40 Years of Age

 

Using SD of Intake from CSFIIa

Assuming the SD is 25 Percent Larger

Assuming the SD is 50 Percent Larger

 

mg

% RDAb

mg

% RDA

mg

% RDA

Magnesium EARc

265

 

265

 

265

 

SD of requirement

26.5

 

26.5

 

26.5

 

Magnesium RDA

320

 

320

 

320

 

Assumed SD of intaked

86

 

107

 

129

 

Observed mean intake with 85 % confidence of adequacy of usual intake

1 d of intake

355

111

376

117

397

124

3 d of intake

321

100

332

104

344

107

7 d of intake

307

96

313

98

320

100

Observed mean intake with 97.5 % confidence of adequacy of usual intake

1 d of intake

445

139

486

152

528

165

3 d of intake

377

118

400

125

423

132

7 d of intake

349

109

362

113

376

117

NOTE: Observed mean intake with xx percent confidence of adequacy = observed mean intake necessary to have approximately xx percent confidence that the woman's intake is greater than her requirement.

a SD = standard deviation; CSFII = Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals.

b RDA = Recommended Dietary Allowance for women 31 through 50 years of age

c EAR = Estimated Average Requirement for women 31 through 50 years of age.

d SD of magnesium intake for women 19 through 50 years of age taken from CSFII (Appendix Table B-2).

is not the best estimate of the individual's SD of daily intake, the Subcommittee still recommends its use in individual assessment.

Table 3-1 expands this example to further illustrate the effect of day-to-day variation on the evaluation of magnesium intake for a woman in the 31–50 years age group.

  • For a given confidence level, the number of days of intake data affects the level of nutrient intake judged to be adequate. Based on the SD in intake of 85.9 mg/day for an individual (again using the information in Appendix Table B-2), observed intake would need

Page
55
Front Matter (R1-R14)
Contents (R15-R18)
Summary (1-18)
I. Historical Perspective and Background (19-20)
1 Introduction and Background (21-28)
2 Current Uses of Dietary Reference Standards (29-42)
II. Application of DRIs for Individual Diet Assessment (43-44)
3 Using Dietary Reference Intakes for Nutrient Assessment of Individuals (45-70)
III. Application of DRIs for Group Diet Assessment (71-72)
4 Using the Estimated Average Requirement for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (73-105)
5 Using the Adequate Intake for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (106-112)
6 Using the Tolerable Upper Intake Level for Nutrient Assessment of Groups (113-126)
7 Specific Applications: Assessing Nutrient Intakes of Groups Using the Dietary Reference Intakes (127-144)
IV. Fine-Tuning Dietary Assessment Using the DRIs (145-146)
8 Minimizing Potential Errors in Assessing Group and Individual Intakes (147-161)
9 Research Recommended to Improve the Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes (162-167)
10 References (168-178)
Appendix A: Origin and Framework of the Development of Dietary Reference Intakes (179-184)
Appendix B: Nutrient Assessment of Individuals: Statistical Foundations (185-202)
Appendix C: Assessing Prevalence of Inadequate Intakes for Groups: Statistical Foundations (203-210)
Appendix D: Assessing the Performance of the EAR Cut-Point Method for Estimating Prevalence (211-231)
Appendix E: Units of Observation: Assessing Nutrient Adequacy Using Household and Population Data (232-238)
Appendix F: Rationale for Setting Adequate Intakes (239-253)
Appendix G: Glossary and Abbreviations (254-261)
Appendix H: Biographical Sketches of Subcommittee Members (262-266)
Index (267-281)
Summary Table: Estimated Average Requirements (282-283)
Summary Table: Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (284-286)
Summary Table: Recommended Intakes for Individuals (287-289)