. "Calibration and Validation." Issues in the Integration of Research and Operational Satellite Systems for Climate Research: Part II. Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Issues in the Integration of Research and Operational Satellite Systems for Climate Research: II. Implementation
The establishment of traceability by national measurement institutions in addition to NIST should be considered to determine if improved accuracy, reduced uncertainty in the measurement chain, and/or better documentation might be achieved, perhaps even at a lower cost.
The results of sensitivity studies on the parameters in data product algorithms should be summarized in a requirements document that specifies the characterization measurements for each channel in a sensor. Blanket specifications covering all channels should be avoided unless justified by the sensitivity studies.
Quality assessment should be an intrinsic part of operational data production. It involves providing metadata on product quality along with the data product so as to give the user an indication of deviations from expected instrument and algorithm performance and the long-term stability of the data product.
Validation should be undertaken for each data product or data record to provide a quantitative estimate of the accuracy of the product over the range of environmental conditions for which the product is provided. It should involve independent correlative measurement of the geophysical variable derived from the satellite data. The guidelines and protocols that are being developed for validation will lead to more standardized measurements and will make comparing the accuracy of similar products from different instruments possible. Undertaking validation both once the instrument calibration is established and following significant changes to the algorithm will contribute to establishing product continuity.
Wavelengths and bandwidths of channels in the solar spectral region should be selected to avoid absorption features of the atmosphere, if possible.
The calibration of thermal sensing instruments such as CERES and the thermal bands of MODIS should continue to be traceable to the SI unit of temperature via Planckian radiator, blackbody technology. The accumulated uncertainty of calibrations traceable to the fundamental unit of electricity via a cryogenic electrical substitution radiometer is at present much larger than that of calibrations traceable to temperature.
Barnes, R.A., R.E. Eplee, F.S. Patt, and C.R. McClain. 1999. “Changes in the radiometric sensitivity of SeaWiFS determined from lunar and solar-based measurements,” Appl. Opt. 38:4649-4664.
Dowman, I., J. Morisette, C. Justice, and A. Belward. 1999. “CEOS working group on calibration and validation meeting on digital elevation models and terrain parameters,” Earth Observer 11(4):19-20.
Fox, N.P., P.R. Haycock, J.E. Martin, and I. Ul-Haq. 1996. “A mechanically cooled portable cryogenic radiometer,” Metrologia 32:581-584.
Gellman, D.I., S.F. Biggar, M.C. Dinguirard, P.J. Henry, M.S. Moran, K. Thome, and P.N. Slater. 1993. “Review of SPOT-1 and -2 calibrations at White Sands from launch to present,” Proc. SPIE 1938:118-125.
Justice, C., D. Starr, D. Wickland, J. Privette, and T. Suttles. 1998. “EOS land validation coordination: An update,” Earth Observer 10(3):55-60.
Kieffer, H.H., and R.L. Wildey. 1996. “Establishing the moon as a spectral radiance standard,” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 13:360-375.
Lyu, C-H., W.L. Barnes, and R.A. Barnes. 2000. “First results from the on-orbit calibrations of the Visible and Infrared Scanner for the tropical rainfall measurement mission,” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. (February).
McClain, C., and G.S. Fargion. 1999. SIMBIOS Project 1999 Annual Report. NASA Tech. Memo. 1999-209486, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Rice, J.P., S.R. Lorentz, R.U. Datla, L.R. Vale, D.A. Rudman, M. Lam Chok Sing, and D. Robbes. 1998. “Active cavity absolute radiometer based on high-Tc superconductors,” Metrologia 35:289-293.
Scott, K.P., K.J. Thome, and M.R. Brownlee. 1996. “Evaluation of the Railroad Valley playa for use in vicarious calibration,” SPIE Proc., paper no. 2818-30, Denver, Colo.
Slater, P.N., S.F. Biggar, R.G. Holm, R.D. Jackson, Y. Mao, M.S. Moran, J.M Palmer, and B. Yuan. 1987. “Reflectance- and radiance-based methods for the in-flight absolute calibration of multi-spectral sensors,” Remote Sensing Environ. 22:11-37.
Vermote, E., and Y.J. Kaufman. 1995. “Absolute calibration of AVHRR visible nad near infrared channels using ocean and cloud views,” Int. J. Remote Sensing 16:2317-2340.
Wan, Z., Y. Zhang, X. Ma, M.D. King, J.S. Myer, and X. Li. 1999. “Vicarious calibration of the Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer Airborne Simulator thermal infrared channels,” Appl. Opt. 38:6294-6306.
Wrigley, R.C., et al. 1984. “Thematic Mapper image quality: Registration, noise, and resolution,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing GE22 (May).