References

Adams-Cameron M, Gilliland FD, Hunt WC, et al. 1999. Trends in incidence and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ in Hispanic, American Indian, and non-Hispanic white women in New Mexico, 1973–1994. Cancer 85(5):1084–1090.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2000. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2000. Evidence-Based Practice Centers (EPCs). http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/epc/.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 1999. Expanding and Improving Quality of Care Measures (Q-SPAN). http://www.ahcpr.gov/qual/qspanovr.htm.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 1997. Theory and Reality of Value-Based Purchasing: Lessons from the Pioneers (AHCPR Pub. No.98-0004). http://www.ahcpr.gov/qual/meyerrpt.htm.

Aldrich TE, Vann D, Moorman PG, et al. 1995. Rapid reporting of cancer incidence in a population-based study of breast cancer: One constructive use of a central cancer registry . Breast Cancer Res Treat 35:61–64.

Allison J, Kiefe CI, Weissman NW. 1999. Can data-driven benchmarks be used to set the goals for Healthy People 2010? Am J Pub Health 89:61–65.

American Cancer Society. 1998. Cancer Facts and Figures—1998. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.

American Medical Association (AMA). “AMA Study Finds that Physician Web Use Has Doubled.” Press release: December 6, 1999. http://www.ama-assn.org/ad-com/releases/1999/991203b.htm.

AMA, American Medical Accreditation Program (AMAP). 1999. http://www.ama-assn.org/med-sci/amapsite.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 95
Enhancing DATA SYSTEMS to Improve the Quality of CANCER Care References Adams-Cameron M, Gilliland FD, Hunt WC, et al. 1999. Trends in incidence and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ in Hispanic, American Indian, and non-Hispanic white women in New Mexico, 1973–1994. Cancer 85(5):1084–1090. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2000. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2000. Evidence-Based Practice Centers (EPCs). http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/epc/. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 1999. Expanding and Improving Quality of Care Measures (Q-SPAN). http://www.ahcpr.gov/qual/qspanovr.htm. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 1997. Theory and Reality of Value-Based Purchasing: Lessons from the Pioneers (AHCPR Pub. No.98-0004). http://www.ahcpr.gov/qual/meyerrpt.htm. Aldrich TE, Vann D, Moorman PG, et al. 1995. Rapid reporting of cancer incidence in a population-based study of breast cancer: One constructive use of a central cancer registry . Breast Cancer Res Treat 35:61–64. Allison J, Kiefe CI, Weissman NW. 1999. Can data-driven benchmarks be used to set the goals for Healthy People 2010? Am J Pub Health 89:61–65. American Cancer Society. 1998. Cancer Facts and Figures—1998. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society. American Medical Association (AMA). “AMA Study Finds that Physician Web Use Has Doubled.” Press release: December 6, 1999. http://www.ama-assn.org/ad-com/releases/1999/991203b.htm. AMA, American Medical Accreditation Program (AMAP). 1999. http://www.ama-assn.org/med-sci/amapsite.

OCR for page 95
Enhancing DATA SYSTEMS to Improve the Quality of CANCER Care AMA, AMAP. 1999. AMAP Criteria for AMAP-Compatible Physician Performance Measurement Systems. May 25. American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO). “First Large-Scale Study on Quality Cancer Care Launched.” Press release: January 20, 2000. http://www.asco.org/people/nr/html/genpr/m_0100qualitypr.htm. Austin DF. 1994. Types of Registries: Goals and Objectives. In Menck H and Smart CR, eds. Central Cancer Registries: Design, Management, and Use. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers. Ayanian JZ. 1999. Using Cancer Registries to Assess Quality of Cancer Care. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 4. Ayanian JZ, Kohler BA, Abe T, et al. 1993. The relation between health insurance coverge and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 329(5):326–331. Baker F. 1999. Data for Health Services Research: American Cancer Society, Cancer Survivorship Surveys. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 5. Ballard DJ. 1999. A call to action: Improving oncologic care information in the United States. Med Care 37(5):431–433. Bergmann MV, Calle EE, Mervis CA, et al. 1998. Validity of self-reported cancers in a prospective cohort study in comparison with data from state cancer registries. Am J Epidemiol 147:556–562. Bickell NA and Chassin MR. 2000. Determining the quality of breast cancer care: Do tumor registries measure up? Ann Int Med 132:705–710. Bland KI, Menck HR, Scott-Conner CE, et al. 1998. The National Cancer Data Base 10-Year survey of breast carcinoma treatment at hospitals in the United States. Cancer 83(6):1262–1273. Bodenheimer T. 1999. The American health care system: The movement for improved quality in health care. N Engl J Med 340(6):488–492. Brown M. 1999. Data for Health Services Research: NCI's HMO Cancer Research Network. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 4. Castles AG, Milstein A, Damberg CL. 1999. Using employer purchasing power to improve the quality of perinatal care. Pediatrics 103(1 Suppl E):248–254. Chambers LW, Spitzer WO, Hill GB, et al. 1976. Underreporting of cancer in medical surveys: A source of systematic error in cancer research. Am J Epidemiol 104(2):141–145. Chen VW and Rainey JM. 1996. Louisiana Tumor Registry: New developments and services provided. J La State Med Soc 148:186–188. Chen VW, Wu XC, Andrews PA, eds. 1999. Cancer in North America: 1991–1995. Volume 1: Incidence. Sacramento, CA: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Cherney BJ. 1999. President/CEO, Central Florida Health Care Coalition. Personal communication to M. Hewitt, November 23. Classen DC. 1998. Clinical decision support systems to improve clinical practice and quality of care. JAMA 280(15):1360–1361. Clive RE, Ocwieja KM, Kamell L, et al. 1995. A national quality improvement effort: Cancer registry data. J Surg Oncol 58:155–161.

OCR for page 95
Enhancing DATA SYSTEMS to Improve the Quality of CANCER Care Coia LR, Owen JB, Hanks GE. 1997. Introduction. Sem Radiat Oncol 7(2)3:95–96. Coleman MP, Muir CS, Menogoz F. 1992. Confidentiality in the cancer registry. Br J Cancer 66:1138–1149. Crane, 1999. Accreditation Programs for Physicians, AMA's AMAP Program. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 4. Darby M. 1998. Health care quality: From data to accountability. Acad Med 73(8):843–853. Deleyiannis FW, Weymuller EA, Garcia I, et al. 1997. Geographic variation in the utilization of esophagoscopy and bronchoscopy in health and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:1203–1210. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. 1999. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs. DHHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2000. The National Program of Cancer Registries. Cancer Registries: The Foundation for Comprehensive Cancer Control, at a Glance 2000 . http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/ncpr/register.htm. DHHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1999. National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS): Rationale and Approach. DHHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. 1999. Research Data Center. http://www/cdc.gov.nchs.r&d.rdc.htm. DHHS, Office of Public Health and Science, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. 1996. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, Second Edition, Report of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Washington, DC: DHHS. DHHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1998. Cancer Objectives (Number 15): Statewide Population-Based Cancer Registries. Healthy People 2010 Objectives: Draft for Public Comment. Atlanta, GA: CDC. Desch CE, Penberthy L, Newschaffer CJ, et al. 1996. Factors that determine the treatment for local and regional prostate cancer. Med Care 34(2):152–162. Du X, Freeman JL, Goodwin JS. 1999. Information on radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer: the advantages of the linked Medicare and SEER data. J Clin Epidemiol 52(5):463–470. Eddy DM. 1997. Performance measurement: Problems and solutions. Health Affairs (Millwood) 17(4):7–25. Edge SB, Fritz A, Clutter GG, et al. 1999. A unified cancer stage data collection system: Preliminary report from the Collaborative Stage Task Force/American Joint Committee on Cancer. J Registry Manage 26(2):57–61. Edwards BK. 1997. Associate director, Cancer Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute. National Cancer Institute Cancer Surveillance Research. Presentation to the National Cancer Policy Board, July 17. Fleming St, Kohrs FP. 1998. Linking claims and cancer registry data: Is it worth the effort? Clin Perform Qual Health Care 6(2):88–96. Foundation for Accountability (FACCT). 1998. FACCT Quality Measures—Breast Cancer. http://www.facct.org. Frey CM, McMillen MM, Cowan CD, et al. 1992. Representativeness of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data: Recent trends in cancer mortality rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 84(11):872–877.

OCR for page 95
Enhancing DATA SYSTEMS to Improve the Quality of CANCER Care Goldsmith J. 2000. How will the internet change our health system? Health Affairs 19(1):148–156. Greenfield S, Aronow HU, Elashoff RM, et al. 1988. Flaws in mortality data: The hazards of ignoring comorbid disease . JAMA 260(15):2253–2255. Hand R, Sener S, Imperato J, et al. 1991. Hospital variables associated with quality of care for breast cancer patients. JAMA 226 (24):3429–3432. Hanks GE, Coia LR, Curry J. 1997. Patterns of Care studies: Past, present, and future. Sem Radiat Oncol 7(2):97–100. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). 1999. 10th Annual HIMSS Leadership Survey Sponsored by IBM: Trends in Healthcare Information and Technology—Final Report. http://www.himss.org/survey. The Henry J.Kaiser Family Foundation. 1999. Medicare State Profiles: State and Regional Data on Medicare and the Population It Serves. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J.Kaiser Family Foundation. Hillner B, Penberthy L, Desch CE, et al. 1996. Variation in staging and treatment of local and regional breast cancer in the elderly. Breast Cancer Res Treat 40:75–86. Hillner BE, McDonald MK, Penberthy L, et al. 1997. Measuring standards of care for early breast cancer in an insured population. J Clin Oncol 15(4):1401–1408. Hodge JG. 1999. Privacy Issues Related to Using Registry Data to Monitor Quality of Care. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 4. Hodge JG, Gostin LO, Jacobson PD. 1999. Legal issues concerning electronic health information: Privacy, quality, and liability. JAMA 282(15):1466–1471. Howe HL, Population-Based Cancer Registries in the United States. Undated manuscript. Howe HL, Katterhagen JG, Yates J, et al. 1992. Urban-rural differences in the management of breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 3:533–539. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, et al. 1998. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA 280(15):1339–1346. IMSystem. 1997. Oncology Indicators: Indicator Information Forms, Code Tables, Report Prototype. Oakbrok Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Institute of Medicine (IOM). 1997. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care (revised edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Institute of Medicine. 1999a. Ensuring the Quality of Cancer Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Institute of Medicine. 1999b. Measuring the Quality of Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Institute of Medicine. 1999c. Using Information Technology to Improve Quality in Health Care: Workshop Summary. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine. Jencks S. 1999. HCFA's Use of Cancer Care Qualty Data. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 4. Jessup JM, Menck HR, Winchester DP, et al. 1996. The National Cancer Data Base report on patterns of hospital reporting . Cancer 78(8):1829–1837. Johantgen ME, Coffey RM, Harris DR, et al. 1995. Treating early-stage breast cancer: Hospital characteristics associated with breast-conserving surgery. Am J Public Health 85(10):1432–1434.

OCR for page 95
Enhancing DATA SYSTEMS to Improve the Quality of CANCER Care Johnson CH, ed. 1999. Standards for Cancer Registries, Volume II. (Data Standards and Data Dictionary (4th ed). Sacramento, CA: North American Association of Centralized Cancer Registries. Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Health Care Organizations . 1999. http://www.jcaho.org Karagas MR, Thomas DB, and Roth GJ. 1991. The effects of changes in health care delivery on the reported incidence of cutaneous melanoma in western Washington State. Am J Epidemiol 133:58–62. Katterhagen G. 1999. Implementing successful internal quality monitoring: Sutter Breast Health Project. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care.” Washington, DC, October 5. Katz SJ, Hislop G, Thomas DB, et al. 1993. Delay from symptom to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in Washington State and British Columbia. Med Care 31(3):264–268. Kiefe CI, Weissman NW, Allison JJ, et al. 1998. Identifying achievable benchmarks of care: Concepts and methodology . Int J Qual Health Care 10(5):443–447. KnowMed. 1999. http://www.knowmed.com. Koh HK, Clapp RW, and Barnett JM. 1991. Systemic underreporting of cutaneous malignant melanoma in Massachusetts . J Am Acad Dermatol 24:545–550. Kurowski B. 1996. Cancer carve outs and outcomes measurement programs: An emerging paradigm. Med Interface 9(11):81–84. Lazar GS and Desch CE. 1998. Performance measurement in cancer care: Uses and challenges. Cancer 82(Suppl 10):2016–2021. Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, et al. 1995. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg 222(5):638–645. Lu-Yao GL, Greenberg ER. 1994. Changes in prostate cancer incidence and treatment in USA. Lancet 343:251–254. Lu-Yao GL, Potosky AL, Albertsen, et al. 1996. Follow-up prostate cancer treatments after radical prostatectomy: A population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 88(3/4):166–173. Malin JL, Asch SM, Kerr EA, and McGlynn EA. 2000. Evaluating the quality of cancer care: Development of cancer quality indicators for a global quality assessment tool. Cancer 88(3)701–707. Mandelblatt JS, Ganz PA, Kahn KL. 1999. Proposed agenda for the measurement of quality of care outcomes in oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 17(8):2614–2622. Mann BA, Samet JM, Hunt WC, et al. 1988. Changing treatment of breast cancer in New Mexico from 1969 through 1985. JAMA 259(23):3413–3417. McDonald C J, Overhage JM, Dexter PR, et al. 1998. Canopy computing: Using the Web in clinical practice. JAMA 280(15):325–1329. McGlynn E. 1998. Choosing and evaluating clinical performance measures. Joint Comm J Qual Improve 24:470–479. Menck HR, Bland KI, Conner CEH, et al. 1998. Regional diversity and breadth of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 83(12):2649–2658. Menck HR, Cunningham MP, Jessup JM, et al. 1997. The growth and maturation of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 80(12):2296–2306.

OCR for page 95
Enhancing DATA SYSTEMS to Improve the Quality of CANCER Care Mighion K, Gesme, DH, Rifkin RM, et al. 1999. Growth of oncology physician management companies. Cancer Invest 17(5):362–370. Miller A. 1999. Involving physicians in cancer disease management: Ten concepts. Managed Care Cancer 1(6):26–30. Modern Healthcare's “By the Numbers.” 1999. HMO Market Penetration by State: Interstudy. July 19. Morris D. Data for Health Services Research: AHCPR, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 5. Morrow M. 1999. Using hospital-based data to monitor physicians and hospitals: The National Cancer Data Base. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 4. Moulton G. 1998. Database provides window on applications of treatments. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(24):1865–1866. Munoz KA, Harlan LC, Trimble EL. 1997. Patterns of care for women with ovarian cancer in the United States . J Clin Oncol 15(11):3408–3415. National Cancer Institute (NCI). 2000. NCI and CDC Collaborate on a Comprehensive Cancer Surveillance and Control System. Press release: March 17. http://rex.nci.nih.gov/massmedia/pressreleases.nci_cdc.html. NCI. 1999a. Confidentiality, Data Security, and Cancer Research: Perspectives from the NCI. www.nci.nih.gov/confidentiality.html. NCI. 1999b. Response to Ensuring Quality Care, a Report of the National Cancer Policy Board. Unpublished. NCI, Surveillance Implementation Group (SIG). 1999. Cancer Surveillance Research Implementation Plan. Bethesda, MD: NCI. National Committee for Quality Assurance. 1999. http://www.ncqa.org. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 1999. Member Institutions. http://www.nccn.org/network_content.htm. National Quality Forum. 2000. Mission Statement. http://www.qualityforum.org/mission/. National Research Council. 1997. For the Record: Protecting Electronic Health Information. Washington, DC: National Academy Press . Nattinger AB, Hoffmann RG, Shapiro R, et al. 1996. Effect of legislative requirements on the use of breast-conserving surgery. N Engl J Med 335(14):1035–1040. Nattinger AB, McAuliffe TL, Schapira MM. 1997. Generalizability of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry population: Factors relevant to epidemiologic and health care research. J Clin Epidemiol 50(8):939–945. Newcombe HB. 1995. When “privacy” threatens public health. Can J Public Health 86(3):188–192. Newcomer LN. 1997. Keynote address: Deodorants, value and performance. NCCN Proc 11:21–24. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. 1999. Mission, goals, and objectives 1996–2000. http://www.naaccr.org. O'Kane ME. 2000. President, National Committee for Quality Assurance. Presentation to the Committee on the National Quality Report on Health Care Delivery, Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC, February 14. Office of Management and Budget. 2000. Statistical programs of the United States government: Fiscal Year 2000. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.

OCR for page 95
Enhancing DATA SYSTEMS to Improve the Quality of CANCER Care OnCare. 1998. http://www.oncare.com. Oncology News. 1999. NCQA to add more measures of the quality of cancer care to its HEDIS performance dataset. Oncol News 8(4):2, 20. Partridge EE. 1998. The National Cancer Data Base: Ten years of growth and commitment . CA Cancer J Clin 48(3):131–145. Penman AD, Brackin BT, and Moulder JT. 1996. Case report: Mississippi's new central cancer registry design and implementation. J Miss State Med Assoc 37(4):537–539. Piccirillo JF. 1999. Data Elements Needed for Quality Assessment. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 4. Piccirillo JF, Creech C, Zequeira R, et al. 1999. Inclusion of comorbidity into oncology data registries. J Registry Manage 26(2):66–70. Polednak AP. 1997. Predictors of breast-conserving surgery in Connecticut, 1990–1992. Ann Surg Oncol 4(3):259–263. Polednak AP, Shevchenko IP, Flannery JT, et al. 1996. Estimating breast cancer treatment charges in Connecticut. Conn Med 60(5)263–267. Polednak AP and Flannery JT. 1992. Black versus white racial differences in clinical stage at diagnosis and treatment of prostatic cancer in Connecticut. Cancer 70(8):2152–2158. Pollock AM, Rice DP. 1997. Monitoring health care in the United States: A challenging task. Public Health Rep 112:109–115. Potosky AL. 1999. Using SEER to Answer Quality-Related Health Services Research. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 4. Potosky AL, Harlan LC, Stanford JL, et al. 1999. Prostate cancer practice patterns and quality of life: The Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(20):1719–1724. Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lubitz J, et al. 1993. Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database. Med Care 31(8):732–748. Potosky AL, Merrill RM, Riley GF, et al. 1997. Breast cancer survival and treatment in health maintenance organization and fee-for-service settings. J Natl Cancer Inst 89(22):1683–1691. Potosky AL, Merrill RM, Riley GF, et al. 1999. Prostate cancer treatment and 10-year survival among group/staff HMO and fee-for-service Medicare patients. Health Serv Res 34(2):525-546. President's Advisory Commission. 1999. Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry, Final Report. http://www.hcqualitycommission.gov/final/. Public Law 102-515. Cancer Registries Amendment Act. October 24, 1992. Public Law 105-277. FY1999 Omnibus Appropriations Act. October 21, 1999. Public Law 106-113. DHHS Appropriation Act for FY2000. November 1999. Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force. 2000. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Fact Sheet. http://www.ahcpr.gov/qual/quicfact.htm. Quality Oncology, Inc. 1999. Brochure and Fact Sheet. McLean, VA: Quality Oncology, Inc. Riley GF, Feuer EJ, et al. 1996. Disenrollment of Medicare cancer patients from health maintenance organizations. Med Care 34(8):826-836. Riley GF, Potosky AL, Klabunde CN, et al. 1999. Stage at diagnosis and treatment patterns among older women with breast cancer. JAMA 281(8):720–726.

OCR for page 95
Enhancing DATA SYSTEMS to Improve the Quality of CANCER Care Roohan PJ, Bickell NA, Baptiste MS, et al. 1998. Hospital volume difference and five-year survival from breast cancer . Am J Public Health 88(3):454–457. Salick Health Care, Inc. 1999. www.salick.com. Schuster MA, Reifel JL, McGuigan K. 1998a. Assessment of the Quality of Cancer Care. Paper prepared for the National Cancer Policy Board, Washington, DC. Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. 1998b. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q 76(4):517–563. Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, et al. 1999. Pancreatic cancer: A report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985–1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surgeons 89(1):1–7. Sennett C. 1999. A glimpse at the National Committee for Quality Assurance. Managed Care Cancer May/June:40–41. Smith TJ, Hillner NE. 1998. Ensuring Quality Cancer Care: Clinical Practice Guidelines, Critical Pathways, and Care Maps. Paper prepared for the National Cancer Policy Board, Washington, DC. Smith TJ, Penberthy L, Desch CE, et al. 1995. Differences in initial treatment patterns and outcomes of lung cancer in the elderly. Lung Cancer 13:235–252. Swan J, Wingo P, Clive R, et al. 1998. Cancer surveillance in the U.S.: Can we have a national system? Cancer 83(7):1282–1291. Tucker TC, Howe HL, and Weir HK. 1999. Certification for population-based registries. J Registry Manage Feb:24–27. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1994. Identifying Health Technologies that Work: Searching for Evidence . Washington, DC: U.S. GPO. Wagner G. 1991. History of Cancer Registration. In Jensen OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, et al., eds. Cancer Registration: Principles and Methods. Lyons, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Wanebo HJ, Cole B, Chung M, et al. 1997. Is surgical management compromised in elderly patients with breast cancer? Ann Surg 225(5):579–589. Warren J, Potosky A, and Riley J. 1999. Use of linked SEER-Medicare Data: Assessing Quality of Care. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington DC, October 4. Watkins S, MacKinnon J, W Price. 1994. Legislation, Affiliation and Governance. In Menck H and Smart C, eds. Central Cancer Registries: Design, Management, and Use. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers. Weeks JC. 1997. Outcomes assessment in the NCCN. NCCN Proc 11:137–140. Weeks JC. 1999. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 4. Weeks JC and Niland JC. 1999. NCCN oncology outcomes database: An update. Managed Care Cancer May/June:32–35. Weissman NW, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI et al. 1999. Achievable benchmarks of care: The ABCs of benchmarking. J Eval Clin Pract 5(3):269–281. Wingo P. 1999. Data for health services research: National Center for Health Statistics, National Hospital Discharge Survey. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 5.

OCR for page 95
Enhancing DATA SYSTEMS to Improve the Quality of CANCER Care Winn R. 1999. Accreditation programs for health plans: National Committee for Quality Assurance. Presentation at National Cancer Policy Board Workshop, “Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care,” Washington, DC, October 4. Ziegler J. 1999. Inching toward an info technology revolution. In “The State of Healthcare in America.” Business and Health 15(5, Suppl A):50–55.

OCR for page 95
Enhancing DATA SYSTEMS to Improve the Quality of CANCER Care This page in the original is blank.