National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$51.75
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Microbial Status and Genetic Evaluation of Mice and Rats: Proceedings of the 1999 US/Japan Conference (2000)
Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR)

Citation Manager

. "International Harmonization of Laboratory Animals." Microbial Status and Genetic Evaluation of Mice and Rats: Proceedings of the 1999 US/Japan Conference. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
86
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Microbial Status and Genetic Evaluation of Mice and Rats: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1999 US/JAPAN CONFERENCE
Hybrid Animals

In laboratory animal science, hybrid animals are usually obtained by mating among different inbred strains. They include the following four types: F1 hybrid, F2 hybrid, three-way cross, and four-way cross.

As explained subsequently in Genetic Test Method for Genetic Composition, genetic control of hybrids is easy, and it is possible to produce hybrid colonies with a high degree of reproducibility. Hybrids are considered appropriate for animal experiments because they generally show excellent reproductivity and good health, which compensate for the defects of their inbred parent strains such as low productivity due to inbreeding degeneration and various physiologic and biochemical defects caused by mutant genes. Historically, however, there have been few examples of the widespread use of hybrids in animal experimentation.

Closed Colonies

Closed colonies of rats and mice have long been used as representative species in experiments such as toxicity tests. Gene polymorphism is maintained in closed colonies, and the genotypes of individual animals are known to differ based on genetic testing (Katoh and others 1998). In this respect, closed colonies correspond to human populations; however, it is evident from an understanding of the origins of closed colonies that they cannot always be considered representative of species such as mice and rats. The main reason is that a single population (colony) does not possess all of the genes or gene polymorphisms of the species. There is also a strong possibility that closed colonies will lose their genetic stability because of artificial (human) control. Extreme phenomena (the bottleneck effect) concerning the number of members of colonies associated with microbiologic cleaning, in particular, are likely to occur during cesarean section, and we have experienced several actual examples of this.

SAFETY STUDIES AND LABORATORY ANIMALS

Studies in Which Animal Species Present a Problem

Mice and rats are widely used in new drug development, especially in toxicity (acute, subacute, and chronic) tests. In these studies, the responses are strong as long as the genetic differences in the same species are negligible. The doses are high, and individual differences or strain differences are not likely to appear. Although they are not performed at this time, studies formerly used the LD50 (50% lethal dose; the amount or concentration that causes death of 50% of the animals when a drug is administered) as the parameter. Therefore, primarily closed colonies, rather than inbred animals, have been used historically in this

Page
86
Front Matter (R1-R16)
Opening Remarks, Judith Vaitukaitis (1-3)
Opening Remarks, Shin-Ichi Ota (4-5)
Introductory Comments on Microbiologic Testing of Laboratory Mice and Rats: Uniformity of Results (6-6)
Development of a Performance Assessment Program for Research Animal Diagnostic Laboratories and Defining Microbiologic Testing Standards (7-10)
Standardization of Rodent Health Surveillance: Regulation Versus Competition (11-15)
Factors Causing Difficulties in Uniformity of Results Among Testing Facilities in Microbiologic Monitoring of Laboratory Animals (16-20)
Necessity of Reexamining the Pathogenicity and Elimination of Parasites in Rats and Mice (21-26)
Emerging (and Reemerging) Viruses of Laboratory Mice and Rats (27-34)
Emerging Infections as a Cause of Concern (35-39)
Emerging Diseases in Mice and Rats (40-43)
Survey of Heliobacter Species in Laboratory Mice and Gerbils in Japan (44-46)
Genetic Evaluation of Outbred Rats (47-50)
Genetic Evaluation of Outbred Rats from the Breeder's Perspective (51-64)
Concept for Establishment of Rat Outbred Global Standard Strains (65-76)
Necessity of Genetic and Microbiologic Quality Network from the Pharmaceutical Industry's Perspective (77-84)
International Harmonization of Laboratory Animals (85-96)
Rat Genetics and Toxicology (97-104)
A Phenotype-driven Approach to the Molecular and Functional Analysis of the Mouse Genome (105-115)
Evaluation of Targeted Mutations (116-118)
Defining Behavioral Phenotypes in Transgenic and Knockout Mice (119-129)
Defining Phenotype in Genetically Engineered Mice (130-131)
Development of the Mouse Model Dramatype for Human Clinical Benefit (132-136)
Concluding Remarks (137-137)
Implication of Wild-derived Genes, Mitochondria, and Chromosomes in the Genetic Background of Mouse Models for Diseases and Biologic Functions (138-141)
Concluding Comments, John Strandberg (142-143)
Concluding Remarks, John Vandenbergh (144-146)
Appendix A (147-148)
Appendix B (149-150)