National Academies Press: OpenBook

Evaluation of Alternative Technologies for Disposal of Liquid Wastes from the Explosive Destruction System (2001)

Chapter: Appendix D: Comparison of MMD and EDS Neutralent Toxicities

« Previous: Appendix C: Composition of Liquid Waste Streams from Destruction of Sarin in the EDS
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Comparison of MMD and EDS Neutralent Toxicities." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Alternative Technologies for Disposal of Liquid Wastes from the Explosive Destruction System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10646.
×

Appendix D
Comparison of MMD and EDS Neutralent Toxicities

The neutralents produced by the EDS have not been tested in animals for toxicity, so it can only be approximated from their chemical composition, which has a much lower degree of certainty than animal testing. Because the neutralizing reagents are present in considerable excess, it can be anticipated that they will make major contributions to the toxicity of the neutralents. Thus, neutralents generated by destruction of HD, GB, and VX will probably have toxicity characteristics of MEA, which include moderate to severe irritation of the skin, eyes, and respiratory tract. This inference is supported by findings that the dermal toxicity of neutralents generated by destruction of HD, GB, and VX in the MMD could not be distinguished from that of the MEA oxidant/ solvent system (NRC, 2001a).

As discussed in Chapter 2, the chemical composition of the EDS neutralents may be more complex and variable than that of the neutralents from the MMD owing to the presence of energetics, their decomposition products, metals extracted from the munitions hardware and shaped charge residues, and miscellaneous compounds that may have been present in the munitions. Some of the metals identified in EDS neutralents generated at RMA and Porton Down are quite toxic to humans and/or the environment (e.g., Pb, Hg, Cd, As, and Ag) and, depending on their concentrations, could well contribute to the toxicity of the neutralents. In general, the energetics tend to be relatively toxic (see Table D-1). The lack of information concerning the identity and concentrations of all of the decomposition products formed by reaction of energetic compounds with MEA may make it difficult to estimate the potential contribution of energetics to the overall toxicity of the neutralent. Even if all chemical components of the neutralents were identified, the toxicity of the neutralents could not be predicted with certainty because (1) toxicity data may not be available for all of the components and (2) chemicals may behave differently in mixtures. Because of this, the toxicity of a neutralent can best be determined by mammalian toxicity studies.

However, since the chemical composition of the neutralents produced by the destruction of different types of munitions could vary substantially, a number of representative neutralents would have to be subjected to toxicity tests in order to accurately predict hazards to humans and the environment. Because the time and cost of such an endeavor would be prohibitive and would strongly reduce the likelihood of meeting the CWC’s 2007 deadline, toxicity tests on the neutralents generated by EDS would not be practical, and toxicity estimates should instead be based on the most complete chemical analyses possible using standard EPA risk assessment methodologies.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Comparison of MMD and EDS Neutralent Toxicities." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Alternative Technologies for Disposal of Liquid Wastes from the Explosive Destruction System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10646.
×

TABLE D-1 Toxicity Characteristics of Energetic Compounds

 

Effects of Exposure

 

Compound

Short-Term Exposure

Long-Term Exposure

Oral RfD (mg/kg)a

HMXb

Convulsions and other CNS effects; liver injury

Liver and kidney damage; changes in red blood cells; no cancer or reproductive studies available

5E-02

RDXb

Irritation of eyes, skin, and lungs; CNS effects (hyperirritability, convulsions)

Damage to liver, kidneys; inflammation of the prostate; testicular degeneration; toxic to fetus. Possible human carcinogen (EPA Group C)

3E-03

Tetrylb

Allergic contact dermatitis

Fatigue, headache, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, upper respiratory tract irritation with sore throat, nose bleeds, coughing; liver damage

Insufficient data

Trinitrotolueneb

Inhalation causes irritation of respiratory passages; skin contact can cause dermatitis; TNT readily absorbed through the skin and all routes of exposure can cause gastrointestinal disorders (e.g., nausea, anorexia, constipation) and cyanosis

Liver damage, anemia, cataracts, neurological disorders. Possible human carcinogen (EPA Group C)

5E-04

aThe oral RfD is an estimate (with uncertainty spanning as much as an order of magnitude) of a daily exposure (by ingestion) to humans (including sensitive subgroups) that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime (EPA, 2001b). For comparative purposes, the Army has proposed RfDs for HD and VX of 7E-06 and 6E-07 mg/kg/day, respectively (NRC, 1999c). The EPA RfDs for some of the chemicals identified in the neutralents produced at Porton Down and RMA are as follows:

 

mg/kg/day

 

mg/kg/day

Benzenec,e

3E-03

Bariumd

7E-02

Chlorobenzened

2E-02

Cadmium (in food)d,e

1E-03

1,4-Dichlorobenzenec,d

3E-02

Cadmium (in water)d,e

5E-04

1,4-Dithianed

1E-02

Trivalent chromiumd

1.5E+0

 

Hexavalent chromiumd,e

3E-03

bEPA (2000a).

cEPA (2000b).

dEPA (2001a).

eBenzene and hexavalent chromium are recognized as human carcinogens, and cadmium is considered to be a probable human carcinogen by the EPA (EPA, 2001a).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Comparison of MMD and EDS Neutralent Toxicities." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Alternative Technologies for Disposal of Liquid Wastes from the Explosive Destruction System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10646.
×
Page 52
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Comparison of MMD and EDS Neutralent Toxicities." National Research Council. 2001. Evaluation of Alternative Technologies for Disposal of Liquid Wastes from the Explosive Destruction System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10646.
×
Page 53
Next: Appendix E: Criteria for Evaluating Technologies »
Evaluation of Alternative Technologies for Disposal of Liquid Wastes from the Explosive Destruction System Get This Book
×
 Evaluation of Alternative Technologies for Disposal of Liquid Wastes from the Explosive Destruction System
Buy Paperback | $29.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Chemical warfare materiel (CWM) encompasses diverse items that were used during 60 years of efforts by the United States to develop a capability for conducting chemical warfare. Non-Stockpile CWM (NSCWM) is materiel not included in the current U.S. inventory of chemical munitions and includes buried materiel, recovered materiel, components of binary chemical weapons, former production facilities, and miscellaneous materiel. Because NSCWM is stored or buried at many locations, the Army is developing transportable treatment systems that can be moved from site to site as needed. Originally, the Army planned to develop three transportable treatment systems for nonstockpile chemical materiel: the rapid response system (RRS), the munitions management device (MMD), and the explosive destruction system (EDS).

This report supplements an earlier report that evaluated eight alternative technologies for destruction of the liquid waste streams from two of the U.S. Army's transportable treatment systems for nonstockpile chemical materiel: the RRS and the MMD. This report evaluates the same technologies for the destruction of liquid waste streams produced by the EDS and discusses the regulatory approval issues and obstacles for the combined use of the EDS and the alternative technologies that treat the EDS secondary waste streams. Although it focuses on the destruction of EDS neutralent, it also takes into consideration the ability of posttreatment technologies to process the more dilute water rinses that are used in the EDS following treatment with a reagent.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!