National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 6 - Conclusions
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13899.
×
Page 70
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13899.
×
Page 71
Page 72
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13899.
×
Page 72
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13899.
×
Page 73

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

70 1. Krammes, R. A. and C. Hayden. Making Two-Lane Roads Safer. Public Roads Magazine, Vol. 66, No. 4, January/February 2003, pp. 38–40. 2. SafetyAnalyst Homepage. Federal Highway Administration. www.safetyanalyst.org. Accessed August 10, 2007. 3. Highway Safety Manual Home Page. Transportation Research Board. Hosted by Washington State DOT. www.highwaysafety- manual.org. Accessed August 10, 2007. 4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offi- cials. AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan—A Comprehensive Plan to Substantially Reduce Vehicle-Related Fatalities and Injuries on the Nation’s Highways. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2005. 5. Harkey, D. L., R. Srinivasan, C. Zegeer, B. Persaud, C. Lyon, K. Eccles, F. Council, and H. McGee. NCHRP Research Results Digest 299: Crash Reduction Factors for Traffic Engineering and Intelligent Transportation System (IFS) Improvements: State-Of-Knowledge Report. Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., November 2005. 6. Various authors. NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Volumes 1–17 and 19. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2003–2007. 7. Hauer, E. Observational Before—After Studies in Road Safety: Esti- mating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety. Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science, Ltd., Oxford, UK, 1997. 8. Rodegerdts, L., M. Blogg, E. Wemple, E. Myers, M. Kyte, M. Dixon, G. List, A. Flannery, R. Troutbeck, W. Brilon, N. Wu, B. Persaud, C. Lyon, D. Harkey, and D. Carter. NCHRP Report 572: Round- abouts in the United States. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. 9. Harwood, D. W., F. M. Council, E. Hauer, W. E. Hughes, and A. Vogt. Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two- Lane Highways. Publication FHWA-RD-99-207. FHWA, U.S. DOT, December 2000. 10. Preston, H. and T. Schoenecker. Bypass Lane Safety, Operations, and Study Design. Publication MN/RC-2000-22, Minnesota DOT, July 1999. 11. Sebastian, O. L. and R. S. Pusey. Paved-Shoulder Left-Turn Bypass Lanes: A Report on the Delaware Experience. Delaware DOT, Octo- ber 1982. 12. Harwood, D. W., K. M. Bauer, I. B. Potts, D. J. Torbic, K. R. Richard, E. R. Kohlman Rabbani, E. Hauer, and L. Elefteriadou. Safety Effectiveness of Intersection Left- and Right-Turn Lanes. Pub- lication FHWA-RD-02-089, FHWA, U.S. DOT, July 2002. 13. Khattak, A. J., B. Naik, and V. Kannan. Safety Evaluation of Left- Turn Lane Line Width at Intersections with Opposing Left-Turn Lanes. Final Report, Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln, NE, December 2004. 14. Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements, Phase II/Phase III. FHWA, U.S. DOT. Expected completion date unknown. 15. Hughes R. (Principal Investigator). NCHRP Project 3-78, “Cross- ing Solutions at Roundabouts and Channelized Turn Lanes for Pedestrians with Vision Disabilities.” Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Expected completion—November 2008. 16. NCHRP Project 3-89, “Design Guidance for Channelized Right- Turn Lanes.” Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- emies, Washington, D.C., Expected completion date unknown. 17. Bowman, B. L. and R. L. Vecellio. Effects of Urban and Suburban Median Types on Both Vehicular and Pedestrian Safety. In Trans- portation Research Record 1445, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 169–179. 18. McGee, H., S. Taori, and B. Persaud. NCHRP Report 491: Crash Experience Warrant for Traffic Signals. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 19. Persaud, B., E. Hauer, R. A. Retting, R. Vallurupalli, and K. Mucsi. Crash Reductions Related to Traffic Signal Removal in Philadel- phia. In Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 29, No. 6, Pergamon Press, Oxford, NY, 1997, pp. 803–810. 20. Hauer, E. Left-Turn Protection, Safety, Delay and Guidelines: A Literature Review. Prepared for FHWA, U.S. DOT, October 2004. www.roadsafetyresearch.com. Accessed August 11, 2005. 21. Lyon, C., A. Haq, B. Persaud, and S. Kodama. Safety Performance Functions for Signalized Intersections in Large Urban Areas: Development and Application to Evaluation of Left-Turn Priority Treatment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. 1908, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 165–171. 22. Retting, R. A., J. F. Chapline, and A. F. Williams. Changes in Crash Risk Following Re-timing of Traffic Signal Change Intervals. In Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 2, Pergamon Press, Oxford, NY, 2002, pp. 215–220. 23. Hamilton Associates. The Safety Benefits of Additional Primary Signal Heads. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 1998. 24. Sayed, T., W. Abdelwahab, and J. Nepomuceno. Safety Evaluation of Alternative Signal Head Design. In Transportation Research References

Record 1635, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 140–146. 25. Persaud, B., F. Council, C. Lyon, K. Eccles, and M. Griffith. A Multi-Jurisdictional Safety Evaluation of Red Light Cameras. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1922, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 29–37. 26. Council, F. M., B. Persaud, C. Lyon, K. Eccles, M. Griffith, E. Zaloshnja, and T. Miller. Implementing Red Light Camera Pro- grams: Guidance for Economic Analysis of Safety Benefits. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1922, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 38–43. 27. Evaluation of Yellow-Light Hold System to Reduce Rear-End Collisions. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, VA. Expected completion is unknown. 28. Sayed, T., H. Vahidi, and F. Rodriguez. Advance Warning Flashers: Do They Improve Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Jour- nal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1692, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 30–38. 29. Srinivasan, R., D. Carter, B. Persaud, K. Eccles, N. Lefler, C. Lyon, and R. Amjadi. Safety Evaluation of Flashing Beacons at Stop- Controlled Intersections. Publication FHWA-HRT-08-048. FHWA, U.S. DOT, August 2007. 30. Lovell, J. and E. Hauer. The Safety Effect of Conversion to All-Way Stop Control. In Transportation Research Record 1068, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 103–107. 31. McGee, H. W. and M. R. Blankenship. NCHRP Report 320: Guide- lines for Converting Stop to Yield Control at Intersections. Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989. 32. Ray, B. (Principal Investigator, Kittelson & Associates). NCHRP Project 3-74, “Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treat- ments at High-Speed Intersections.” Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Expected publication of final report—June 2008. 33. Transverse Rumble Strips at Stop-Controlled Intersections in Iowa. Highway Safety Information System, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Expected completion date—2008. 34. Walker, F. W. and S. E. Roberts. Influence of Lighting on Accident Frequency at Highway Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 562, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976, pp. 73–78. 35. Lipinski, M. E., and R. H. Wortman. Effect of Illumination on Rural At-Grade Intersection Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 611, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976, pp. 25–27. 36. Preston, H. and T. Schoenecker. Safety Impacts of Street Lighting at Isolated Rural Intersections. Publication MN/RC-1999-17. Minnesota DOT, April 1999. 37. Rea, M. S. (Principal Investigator at Rensselaer Polytechnic Insti- tute). NCHRP Project 5-19, “Guidelines for Roadway Lighting Based on Safety Benefits and Costs.” Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Expected completion—July 2008. 38. Zegeer, C. V., J. R. Stewart, H. Huang, and P. Lagerway. Safety Effects of Marked Versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Analysis of Pedestrian Crashes in 30 Cities (with Dis- cussion and Closure). In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1773, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 56–68. 39. Zaidel, D. M. and I. Hocherman. Safety of Pedestrian Crossings at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1141, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 1–6. 40. Zegeer, C. V., K. S. Opiela, and M. J. Cynecki. Effect of Pedestrian Signals and Signal Timing on Pedestrian Accidents. In Transporta- tion Research Record 847, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 62–72. 41. Andreassen, D. The Treatment/Crash Reduction Matrix. www. dotars.gov.au/transprog/downloads/road_bs_matrix.pdf. Accessed August 11, 2005. 42. Council, F. M. and J. R. Stewart. Safety Effects of the Conversion of Rural Two-Lane to Four-Lane Roadways Based on Cross-Sectional Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. 1665, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 35–43. 43. Huang, H. F., J. R. Stewart, and C. V. Zegeer. Evaluation of Lane Reduction “Road Diet” Measures on Crashes and Injuries. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 80–90. 44. Pawlovich, M., L. Wen, A. Carriquiry, and T. Welch. Iowa’s Expe- rience with Road Diet Measures: Use of Bayesian Approach to Assess Impacts on Crash Frequencies and Crash Rates. In Trans- portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1953, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 163–171. 45. Bauer, K. M., D. W. Harwood, W. E. Hughes, and K. R. Richard. Safety Effects of Using Narrow Lanes and Shoulder-Use Lanes to Increase the Capacity of Urban Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1897, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 71–80. 46. Persaud, B., C. Lyon, K. Eccles, N. Lefler, D. Carter, and R. Amjadi. Safety Evaluation of Installing Center Two-Way Left-Turn Lanes on Two-Lane Roads. Publication FHWA-HRT-08-042. FHWA, U.S. DOT, March 2008. 47. Harwood, D. W., D. K. Gilmore, K. R. Richard, and J. M. Dunn. NCHRP Report 605: Passing Sight Distance Criteria. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. 48. Hadi, M. A., J. Aruldhas, L. Chow, and J. Wattleworth. Estimating Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Various Highway Types Using Negative Binomial Regression. In Transportation Research Record 1500, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 169–177. 49. Knuiman, M. W., F. M. Council, and D.W. Reinfurt. Association of Median Width and Highway Accident Rates. In Transportation Research Record 1401, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 70–82. 50. Maze, T. (Principal Investigator at Iowa State University). NCHRP Project 15-30, “Median Intersection Design for Rural High-Speed Divided Highways.” 51. Harwood, D. W., E. R. K. Rabbani, K. R. Richard, H. W. McGee, and G. L. Gittings. NCHRP Report 486: Systemwide Impact of Safety and Traffic Operations Design Decisions for 3R Projects. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 52. Hauer E. Safety of Horizontal Curves: Review of Literature for the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model. March 2000. www. roadsafetyresearch.com. Accessed August 11, 2005. 71

53. Griffith, M. S. Safety Evaluation of Rolled-in Continuous Shoulder Rumble Strips Installed on Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1665, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 28–34. 54. Torbic, D.J. (Principal Investigator, Midwest Research Institute). NCHRP Project 17-32, “Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips.” Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Expected completion—August 2008. 55. Patel, R. B., F. M. Council, and M. S. Griffith. Estimating Safety Benefits of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Two-Lane Rural Highways in Minnesota: Empirical Bayes Observational Before-and-After Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. 2019, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 205–211. 56. Lindly, J. K. and R. K. Wijesundera. Evaluation of Profiled Pavement Markings. Publication UTCA 01465. University Transportation Center for Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, November 2003. 57. Persaud, B. N., R. A. Retting, and C. Lyon. Crash Reduction Following Installation of Centerline Rumble Strips on Rural Two- Lane Roads. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, VA, September 2003. 58. Dixon, K. (Principal Investigator, Georgia Tech Research Corpo- ration). NCHRP Project 16-04, “Design Guidelines for Safe and Aesthetic Roadside Treatments in Urban Areas.” Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003–2007. 59. Zegeer, C. V., J. Hummer, D. Reinfurt, L. Herf, and W. Hunter. Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Two-Lane Roads—Volumes I and II. Publication FHWA-RD-87-008, FHWA, U.S. DOT, 1987. 60. Elvik, R. and T. Vaa. The Handbook of Road Safety Measures, Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK, 2004. 61. Miaou, S., R. P. Bligh and D. Lord. Developing Guidelines for Median Barrier Installation: Benefit-Cost Analysis with Texas Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1904, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, D.C., 2005, pp. 3–19. 62. Zegeer, C. V. and M. J. Cynecki. Determination of Cost-Effective Roadway Treatments for Utility Pole Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 970, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 52–64. 63. Elvik, R. Meta-Analysis of Evaluations of Public Lighting as Acci- dent Countermeasure. In Transportation Research Record 1485, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 112–123. 64. Weiss, A. (Principal Investigator, Northwestern University). NCHRP Project 3-59, “Assessment of Variable Speed Limit Imple- mentation Issues.” Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2000–2005. 65. Results of Field Tests on Impacts of Setting and Enforcing Rational Speed Limits. Cooperative Agreement Projects. FHWA, U.S. DOT. Expected completion date is unknown. 66. Kockelman, K. NCHRP Research Results Digest 303: Safety Impacts and Other Implications of Raised Speed Limits on High-Speed Roads. Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington, D.C., April 2006. 67. Rakha, H., A. Medina, F. Sin, M. Dion, M. Van Aerde, and J Jenq. Traffic Signal Coordination Across Jurisdictional Boundaries: Field Evaluation of Efficiency, Energy, Environmental, and Safety Impacts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1727, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. 68. Bray, J. S. Skid Accident Reduction Program (SKARP): Targeted Crash Reductions. In 2003 ITE Technical Conference and Exhibit. CD-ROM. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., March 2003. 69. Bowman, B. L., and R. L. Vecellio. Effects of Urban and Suburban Median Types on Both Vehicular and Pedestrian Safety. In Trans- portation Research Record 1445, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 169–179. 70. Gårder, P. Pedestrian Safety at Traffic Signals. In Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 21, No.5, 1989, pp. 435–444. 71. Miller, T., T. Schlax, D. Lestina, M. Galbraith, P. Mabery, R. Deering, K. L. Campbell, and D. L. Massie. Understanding the Harm from U.S. Motor Vehicle Crashes. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Asso- ciation for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Barrington, IL, 1995, pp. 327–342. 72. Council, F., E. Zaloshnja, T. Miller, and B. Persaud. Crash Cost Estimates by Maximum Police-Reported Injury Severity within Selected Crash Geometries. Publication FHWA-HRT-05-051, FHWA, U.S. DOT, October 2005. 73. Nilsson, G. Traffic Safety Dimensions and the Power Model to Describe the Effect of Speed on Safety. Lund Institute of Technology, Department of Technology and Society, Traffic Engineering, Lund, Sweden, 2004. www.lub.lu.se/luft/diss/tec_733/tec_733.pdf. 74. Elvik, R., P. Christensen, and A. Amundsen. Speed and Road Acci- dents: An Evaluation of the Power Model. TOI Report 740, Institute of Transport Economics (TOI), Oslo, Norway, 2004. 75. Lee, J. and F. Mannering. Analysis of Roadside Accident Frequency and Severity and Roadside Safety Management, Final Research Report. Publication No. WA-RD 475.1, Washington State DOT, 1999. 76. Donnell, E. T., D. W. Harwood, K. M. Bauer, J. M. Mason, and M. T. Pietrucha. Cross-Median Collisions on Pennsylvania Inter- states and Expressways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 91–99. 77. Bligh, R., S. Miaou, D. Lord, and S. Cooner. Median Barrier Guide- lines for Texas. Publication No. FHWA/TX-06/0-4254-1. Texas Department of Transportation, August 2006. 78. Ulf, B. and L. Jörgen. Traffic Safety of Roundabouts for Cyclists and Pedestrians. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Insti- tute (VTI), Linköping, Sweden, 1999. 79. Clark, J. E., S. Maghsoodloo, and D. Brown. Public Good Relative to Right-Turn-On-Red in South Carolina and Alabama. In Trans- portation Research Record 926, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 24–31. 80. Bray, J. S. Memo on Skid Accident Reduction Program (SKARP). 2001 81. Harwood, D. W. and A. D. St. John. Passing Lanes and Other Operational Improvements on Two-Lane Highways. Publication FHWA/RD-85/028. FHWA, U.S. DOT, July 1984. 82. Nettelbad, P. Traffic Safety Effects of Passing (Climbing) Lanes: An Accident Analysis Based on Data for 1972–1977. Meddelande TU 1979-5. Swedish National Road Administration, 1979. 83. Hauer E. The Median and Safety: Review of Literature for the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model. March 2000. www.roadsafetyresearch. com. Accessed August 11, 2005. 84. Zegeer, C. V., D. W. Reinfurt, J. Hummer, L. Herf, and W. Hunter. Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Two-Lane Roads. In 72

Transportation Research Record 1195, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 20–32. 85. Griffin, L. I. and K. K. Mak. The Benefits to Be Achieved from Widen- ing Rural, Two-Lane Farm-to-Market Roads in Texas. Publication IAC (86-87)-1039. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX, April 1987. 86. Hauer E. Lane Width and Safety: Review of Literature for the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model. March 2000. www.roadsafetyresearch. com. Accessed August 11, 2005. 87. Zegeer, C. V., R. C. Dean and J. G. Mayes. Effect of Lane and Shoul- der Widths on Accident Reduction on Rural, Two-Lane Roads. In Transportation Research Record 806, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 33–43. 88. Miaou, S. Measuring the Goodness-of-Fit of Accident Prediction Models. Publication FHWA-RD-96-040. FHWA, U.S. DOT, December 1996. 89. Hauer E. Shoulder Width, Shoulder Paving and Safety: Review of Literature for the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model. March 2000. www.roadsafetyresearch.com. Accessed August 11, 2005. 90. Zegeer, C. V., J. R. Stewart, F. M. Council, D. W. Reinfurt, and E. Hamilton. Safety Effects of Geometric Improvements on Hori- zontal Curves. In Transportation Research Record 1356, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 11–19. 91. Bonneson, J. A., K. Zimmerman, and K. Fitzpatrick. Roadway Safety Design Synthesis. Publication No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4703-P1. Texas DOT, November 2005. 92. Bonneson, J. A. and P. T. McCoy. NCHRP Report 395: Capacity and Operational Effects of Midblock Left-Turn Lanes. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997. 93. McCoy, P. T., M. Ramanujam, M. Moussavi, and J. L. Ballard. Safety Comparison of Types of Parking on Urban Streets in Nebraska. In Transportation Research Record 1270, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 28–41. 94. Box, P. C. Angle Parking Issues Revisited. ITE Journal, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., March 2002, pp. 36–47. 95. Institute for Transportation Engineers. Determining Vehicle Change Intervals: A Proposed Recommended Practice. ITE Journal, Vol. 59, No. 7, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 27–32. 73

Next: Appendices »
Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements Get This Book
×
 Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 617: Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements explores the development of accident modification factors (AMFs) for traffic engineering and intelligent transportation system improvements. AMFs, also known as crash reduction factors, are designed to provide a simple and quick way of estimating the safety impacts of various types of engineering improvements, encompassing the areas of signing, alignment, channelization, and other traffic engineering solutions.

The following appendices to NCHRP Report 617 are available online:

* Appendix A: Methodology for Determining Crash-Harm Rating for Treatments

* Appendix B: Effects of Converting Rural Intersections from Stop to Signal Control

* Appendix C: Safety Effects of Four-Lane to Three-Lane Conversions

* Appendix D: Safety Effects of Improving Pavement Skid Resistance

* Appendix E: Evaluation of the Safety Effectiveness of Urban Signal Treatments

* Appendix F: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Speed and Road Accidents

* Appendix G: Accident Modification Factors for Median Width

Two AMF treatment summaries that appear in the printed version of NCHRP Report 617 contain incorrect information. These treatments are "Add Intersection Lighting" and "Add Roadway Segment Lighting." The information in these two AMF treatment summaries has been corrected in the online version of the report.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!