National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7 RECOMMENDATIONS
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

8

Selected Bibliography

The following bibliography is a condensed version of more than 1,400 reference items in the panel's project files. This version omits references to news articles, book reviews, draft papers, and early government reports that have been replaced by revised policies.

Abelson, J., R. C. Atkinson, R. L. Davidson, R. Dulbecco, M. E. Friedkin, G. E. Palade, J. E. Seegmiller, M. I. Simon, and D. Steinberg. 1990. “PNAS paper: rules and standard practice.” Science 249(September 21):1358.

Abelson, P. 1990. “Mechanisms for evaluating scientific information and the role of peer review.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(3):216-22.

Agricultural Research Service (ARS). 1990. Procedures for Reporting and Dealing with Possible Misconduct in Science. Draft report. ARS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Md.

Allison, P. D. and J. S. Long. 1987. “Interuniversity mobility of academic scientists.” American Sociological Review 52(October):643-52.

Altman, L. and L. Melcher. 1983. “Fraud in science.” British Medical Journal 286(June 25):2003-06.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1990. AAAS Resolution on Federal Legislation Providing Immunity for Investigations and Reporting of Scientific Fraud and Misconduct, approved by the Board of Directors, April 27. AAAS, Washington, D.C.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1991a. AAAS Report XVI: Research and Development FY1992. AAAS, Washington, D.C.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1991b. “Misconduct in science: Recurring issues, fresh perspectives.” Executive summary of conference, November 15-16, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

American Association for the Advancement of Science-American Bar Association (AAAS-ABA) National Conference of Lawyers and Scientists. 1989. Project on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct. Reports on workshops one (September 18-20, 1987), two (September 23-25, 1988), and three (February 17-18, 1989). Three volumes. AAAS, Washington, D.C.

American Association of University Professors (AAUP). 1989. “Statement on plagiarism.” Academe (September/October):47-48.

American Bar Association (ABA). n.d. A Survey on the Teaching of Professional Responsibility. Center for Professional Responsibility, ABA, Chicago, Ill.

American Chemical Society (ACS). 1986. “Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.” Pp. 217-22 in The ACS Style Guide, Dodd, J. S. (ed.). ACS, Washington, D.C.

American Chemical Society (ACS). 1989. ACS Academic Professional Guidelines. ACS, Washington, D.C.

American Federation for Clinical Research (AFCR). 1989. “AFCR guidelines for the responsible conduct of research.” Clinical Research 37(September):510-11.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 1988. Society Policy: Ethics. P-15.7. ASME, New York.

American Sociological Association (ASA). 1989. Code of Ethics. ASA, Washington, D.C.

American Statistical Association (ASA), Ad Hoc Committee on Professional Ethics. 1983. “Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice.” The American Statistician 37(February):5-6. [With comments.]

American Statistical Association (ASA). 1989. Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice, Committee on Professional Ethics. ASA, Washington, D.C.

Amundson, N. R. 1987. “American university graduate work.” Chemical Engineering Education 21(4):160-63.

Andersen, Robert. 1988. “The federal government's role in regulating misconduct in scientific and technological research. ” Journal of Law and Technology 3:121-148.

Angell, M. 1983. “Editors and fraud.” CBE Views 6(2):3-8.

Angell, M. 1986. “Publish or perish: a proposal.” Annals of Internal Medicine 104(2):261-62.

Angell, M. and A. S. Relman. 1988. “Fraud in biomedical research: a time for congressional restraint. ” New England Journal of Medicine 318(June 2):1462-63.

Annals of Internal Medicine. 1982. “Authorship from the reader's side.” Annals of Internal Medicine 97(October):613-14.

Appelbaum, P. S., L. H. Roth, C. W. Lidz, P. Benson, and W. Winslade. 1987. “False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.” Hastings Center Report (April):20-24.

Arkin, H. R. 1985a. “Academic dismissals: due process, part 1.” Journal of the American Medical Association 254(November 1):2463-66.

Arkin, H. R. 1985b. “Academic dismissals: due process, part 2.” Journal of the American Medical Association 254(November 8):2653-56.

Association of Academic Health Centers (AAHC). 1990. Conflicts of Interest in Academic Health Centers, AAHC Task Force on Science Policy. Policy paper 1. AAHC, Washington, D.C.

Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). 1982. The Maintenance of High Ethical Standards in Conduct of Research, Ad Hoc Committee on the Maintenance of High Ethical Standards in the Conduct of Research. AAMC, Washington, D.C.

Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). 1990. Guidelines for Dealing with Faculty Conflicts of Commitment and Conflicts of Interest in Research . AAMC, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Association of American Universities (AAU). 1983. Report of the Association of American Universities Committee on the Integrity of Research, Association of American Universities, American Council on Education, and National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. AAU, Washington, D.C.

Association of American Universities (AAU). 1988. Indirect Costs Associated with Federal Support of Research on University Campuses: Some Suggestions for Change, AAU Ad Hoc Committee on Indirect Costs. AAU, Washington, D.C.

Babbage, C. 1989. “The decline of science in England.” Nature 340(August 17):499-502.

Bailar, J. C., III. 1985. “When research results are in conflict.” New England Journal Medicine 313(October 24):1080-81.

Bailar, J. C., III. 1986. “Science, statistics, and deception.” Annals of Internal Medicine 104(February):259-60.

Bailar, J. C., III and K. Patterson. 1985. “Journal peer review: the need for a research agenda.” New England Journal of Medicine 312(March 7):654-57.

Bailar, J. C., III, M. Angell, S. Boots, E. S. Myers, N. Palmer, M. Shipley, and P. Woolf (eds.). 1990. Ethics and Policy in Scientific Publication. Council of Biology Editors, Bethesda, Md.

Baird, L. L. “The melancholy of anatomy: the personal and professional development of graduate and professional school students.” Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Agathon Press, New York, in press.

Baltimore, D. 1989. “Baltimore's travels.” Issues in Science and Technology 5(Summer):48-54.

Barber, A. A. 1989. “Misconduct in science: an administrator's view.” Council of Graduate Schools meeting, Banff, Alberta, March 5.

Barber, B. 1978. “Control and responsibility in the powerful professions.” Political Science Quarterly 93(4):599-615.

Barber, B. and W. Hirsch (eds.). 1962. The Sociology of Science. The Free Press of Glencoe, New York.

Barzun, J. 1978. “The professions under seige: private practice versus public need. ” Harper's (October):61-67.

Batshaw, M. L., L. P. Plotnick, B. G. Petty, P. K. Woolf, and E. D. Mellits. 1988. “Academic promotion at a medical school.” New England Journal of Medicine 318(March 24):741-46.

Bayles, M. D. 1981. Professional Ethics. Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif.

Beaty, H. N., D. Babbott, E. J. Higgins, P. Jolly, and G. S. Levey. 1986. “Research activities of faculty in academic departments of medicine. ” Annals of Internal Medicine 104(January):90-97.

Bechtel, H. K., Jr. and W. Pearson, Jr. 1985. “Deviant scientists and scientific deviance.” Deviant Behavior 6:237-252.

Berardo, F. M. 1989. “Scientific norms and research publication issues and professional ethics.” Sociological Inquiry 59(3):249-66.

Bernstein, F. C., T. F. Koetzle, J. B. Williams, E. F. Meyer, Jr., M. D. Brice, J. R. Rodgers, O. Kennard, T. Shimanouchi, and M. Tasumi. 1977. “The protein data bank.” European Journal of Biochemistry 80:319-24.

Beveridge, W. I. B. 1957. The Art of Scientific Investigation. Third edition. Vintage Books, New York.

Biven, L. W. 1989. “Scientific integrity programs of the Public Health Service.” Assistance Management Journal 5(Fall):21-28.

Blair, C. and W. Schaffer. 1991. “Promotion of the responsible conduct of research.” NIH Peer Review Notes (June):4-6.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Blisset, M. 1972. Politics in Science. Basic Studies in Politics. Little, Brown and Company, Boston.

Bloch, E. 1989. “Changes in NSF proposal format.” IMS Bulletin 18(6):577.

Bloch, E. 1991. “Academic research funding: is there a crisis? Optimists, pessimists and realists.” AAAS Colloquium on Science and Technology Policy, Washington, D.C., April 11.

Bloom, F. 1989. “Who should police scientific misconduct? Most misconduct is already resolved within the system.” Journal of NIH Research 1(May/June):14.

Bok, D. 1988. “Ethics, the university, and society.” Harvard Magazine (May/June):39-50.

Bok, D. 1990. Universities and the Future of America. Duke University Press, Durham, N.C.

Bosk, C. L. 1979. Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Bowen, W. G. and Sosa, J. A. 1989. Prospects for Faculty in the Arts and Sciences: A Study of Factors Affecting Demand and Supply, 1987 to 2012. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

Bowen, W. G., G. Lord, and J. A. Sosa. 1991. “Measuring time to doctorate: reinterpretation of the evidence.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 88(February 1):713-17.

Boyer, E. L. 1990. The Condition of the Professoriate: Attitudes and Trends, 1989, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

Bradshaw, R. A., A. J. Adler, F. Chytil, N. D. Goldberg, and B. J. Litman. 1990. “Bridges committee procedures.” Science 250(November 2):611.

Braunwald, E. 1987. “On analysing scientific fraud.” Nature 325(January 15):215-16.

Braxton, J. M. 1992. “The influence of graduate department quality on the sanctioning of scientific misconduct.” Journal of Higher Education , forthcoming.

Brett, J. M., S. B. Goldberg, and W. L. Ury. 1990. “Designing systems for resolving disputes in organizations.” American Psychologist 45(February):162-70.

Bridgstock, M. 1982. “A sociological approach to fraud in science.” Australia-New Zealand Journal of Science 18(3):364-83.

Brigham and Women's Hospital. 1989. Policies on Hospital-Industry Relationships. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston.

Broad, W. J. 1981. “Fraud and the structure of science.” Science 212(April. 10):137-41.

Broad, W. and Wade, N. 1982. Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science. Simon and Schuster, New York.

Brooks, H. 1989. “Lessons of history: Successive challenges to science policy.” In The Research System in Transition, Cozzens, S. E., P. Healey, A. Rip, and J. Ziman, (eds.). NATO Advanced Studies Institute Series, Series D, Volume 57. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

Browning, G. 1991. “Testing the hypothesis.” National Journal (May 4):1078.

Bulger, R. E. 1988. “The need for an ethical code for teachers of the basic biomedical sciences.” Journal of Medical Education 63(February):131-33.

Burks, C. and L. Tomlinson. 1989. “Submission of data to GenBank.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 86(January):408.

Burman, K. D. 1982. “‘Hanging from the masthead': reflections on authorship.” Annals of Internal Medicine 97(4):602-05.

Burton, R. V. 1981. “Landmarks in the literature: Can ethics be taught?” New York University Education Quarterly 12(3):29-32.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Busch, J. W. 1985. “Mentoring in graduate schools of education: mentors' perceptions.” American Educational Research Journal 22(2):257-65.

Bush, V. 1945. Science, the Endless Frontier: A Report to the President. Office of Scientific Research and Development. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Calabrese, R. L. and J. T. Cochran. 1990. “The relationship of alienation to cheating among a sample of American adolescents.” Journal of Research and Development in Education 23(Winter):65-72.

Calkins, E. V., L. M. Arnold, and T. L. Willoughby. 1987. “Perceptions of the role of a faculty supervisor or ‘mentor' at two medical schools.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 12(3):202-08.

Calkins, E. V., L. M. Arnold, T. L. Willoughby, and S. C. Hamburger. 1986. “Docents' and students' perceptions of the ideal and actual role of the docent.” Journal of Medical Education 61(September) :743-48.

Callahan, D. and S. Bok. 1980. Ethics Teaching in Higher Education. Plenum Press, New York.

Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government. 1991. Science and Technology and the President. Carnegie Commission, New York.

Casper, G. 1990. “University policy documents.” The University of Chicago Chronicle (October 25):2.

Cassidy, M. M. and A. E. Shamoo. 1989. “First international conference on scientific data audit, policies and quality assurance.” Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 1(1):1-3.

Ceci, S. J. 1988. “Scientists' attitudes toward data sharing.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 13(1/2):45-52.

Ceci, S. J. and E. Walker. 1983. “Private archives and public needs.” American Psychologist 38(4):414-23.

Cesa, I. L. and S. C. Fraser. 1989. “A method for encouraging the development of good mentor-protege relationships. ” Teaching of Psychology 16(3):125-28.

Chalk, R. 1978. “Scientific society involvement in whistleblowing.” Science, Technology, and Human Values (January):47-51.

Chalk, R. and P. Woolf. 1989. “Regulating a ‘knowledge business'.” Issues in Science and Technology 5(Winter):33-35.

Chalk, R., M. Frankel, and S. Chafer. 1981. Professional Ethics Activities in Science and Engineering Societies. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.

Charrow, R. 1989. “Who should police scientific misconduct? Each new scandal increases the chance for federal regulation.” Journal of NIH Research 1(May/June):15.

Charrow, R. P. 1990. “Scientific misconduct revisited: OSI on trial.” Journal of NIH Research 2(October):83-85.

Charrow, R. P. 1991. “Message to NIH's Office of Scientific Integrity: here comes the judge.” Journal of NIH Research 3(February):97-99.

Chubin, D. E. 1985. “Misconduct in research: an issue of science policy and practice.” Minerva 23(Summer):175-202.

Chubin, D. E. 1988. “Allocating credit and blame in science.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 13(1/2):53-63.

Chubin, D. E. 1990. “Scientific malpractice and the contemporary politics of knowledge. ” Pp. 144-63 in Theories of Science in Society, Cozzens, S. E. and T. F. Gieryn (eds.). Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Chubin, D. E. and E. J. Hackett. 1990. Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. SUNY Series in Science, Technology, and Society. SUNY Press, Albany, N.Y.

Cinkosky, M. J., J. W. Fickett, P. Gilna, and C. Burks. 1991. “Electronic data publishing and GenBank.” Science 252(May 31):1273-77.

Cohen, D. L., L. B. McCullough, R. W. I. Kessel, A. Apostolides, K. Heiderich, and E.R. Alden. 1988. “A national survey concerning the ethical aspects of informed consent and role of medical students.” Journal of Medical Education 63(November):821-29.

Cole, J. F. and J. A. Lipton. 1977. “The reputations of American medical schools.” Social Forces 55:662-84.

Cole, S., L. Rubin, and J. R. Cole. 1977. “Peer review and the support of science.” Scientific American 237(4):34-41.

Cordes, C. 1990. “U.S. enters lawsuit accusing scientist, institutions of fraud.” Chronicle of Higher Education (September 5):A1.

Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE). 1988. Special Advisory for College and University Presidents, National Task Force on Higher Education and the Public Interest. CASE, Washington, D.C.

Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). 1990a. Research Student and Supervisor: An Approach to Good Supervisory Practice. CGS, Washington, D.C.

Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). 1990b. Summary of Oral and Written Reports Presented at the Meeting on the Role and Nature of the Doctoral Dissertation, January 26. CGS, Washington, D.C.

Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). 1990c. The Doctor of Philosophy Degree: A Policy Statement, Task Force on the Doctor of Philosophy Degree. CGS, Washington, D.C.

Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). 1991. The Role and Nature of the Doctoral Dissertation: A Policy Statement . CGS, Washington, D.C.

Cournand, A. 1977. “The code of the scientist and its relationship to ethics.” Science 198(November 18):699-705.

Cournand, A. and M. Meyer. 1976. “The scientist's code.” Minerva (Spring):79-96.

Cozzens, S. E. 1989. Social Control and Multiple Discovery in Science: The Opiate Receptor Case. SUNY Press, Albany, New York.

Cozzens, S. E., P. Healey, A. Rip, and J. Ziman (eds.). 1990. The Research System in Transition. NATO Advanced Studies Institute Series, Series D, Volume 57. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

Cram, D. 1989. “Commentary: Tribe and leader.” CGS Communicator 22(April):1.

Crawford, S. and L. Stucki. 1990. “Peer review and the changing research record.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(April):223-28.

Cronan-Hillix, T., L. K. Gensheimer, W. A. Cronan-Hillix, and W. S. Davidson. 1986. “Students' views of mentors in psychology graduate training.” Teaching of Psychology 13(3):123-27.

Crutcher, K. A. 1991. “How to succeed in science.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 34(Winter):213-18.

Culliton, B. J. 1990. “NIH misconduct probes draw legal complaints.” Science 249(July 20):240-43.

Culver, C. M., K. D. Clouser, B. Gert, H. Brody, J. Fletcher, A. Jonsen, L. Kopelman, J. Lynn, M. Siegler, and D. Wikler. 1985. “Special report: basic curricular goals in medical ethics.” New England Journal of Medicine 312(January 24):253-56.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Dakins, D. R. 1989. “Copyright lawsuit illuminates debate over academic standards.” Diagnostic Imaging (May):54-60.

Dana–Farber Cancer Institute. 1987. “Policy for recording and preserving scientific data.” October. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass.

Daniels, G. H. 1967. “The pure-science ideal and democratic culture.” Science 156(June 30):1699-1706.

David, R. J. and J. A. Kovach. 1979. “Attitudes towards unethical behavior as a function of educational commercialization.” College Student Journal (Winter):338-44.

Davis, B. D. 1989. “Government and quality in science.” Science 246(November10):736.

Davis, M. S. 1989. The Perceived Seriousness and Incidence of Ethical Misconduct in Academic Science. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Ohio State University, Columbus.

Davis, R. D. 1988. “New censors in the academy: two approaches to curb their influence. ” Science, Technology, and Human Values 13(1&2):64-74.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1985. ALERT System for Institutions, Organizations and Individuals Under Investigation for Possible Misconduct in Science or Subject to Sanctions for Such Misconduct. October 15 draft. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1986. “Policies and procedures for dealing with possible misconduct in science. ” NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts 15(July 18):1-37.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1989a. “Responsibilities of PHS awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science: final rule.” Federal Register 54(August 8):32446-32451.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1989b. “Statement of organization, functions and delegations of authority. ” Public Health Service (PHS) Federal Register 54(March 16):11080-81.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1989c. Draft Standards for the Responsible Conduct of Science in PHS Intramural Research Programs . Office of Scientific Integrity Review, Washington, D.C.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1989d. Misconduct in Scientific Research, Office of Inspector General OAI-88-07-00420. Washington, D.C.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1990a. Policies and Procedures for Dealing with Possible Misconduct in Extramural Research. August 30. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1990b. PHS Workshop: Education and Training of Scientists in the Responsible Conduct of Research . March 8-9. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1990c. Workshop on Data Management in Biomedical Research: Background Papers . April 25-26. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1991a. “Proposed policies and procedures for dealing with possible scientific misconduct in extramural research.” Federal Register 56(June 13):27384-94.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1991b. First Annual Report: Scientific Misconduct Investigations Reviewed by Office of Scientific Integrity Review, March 1989 - December 1990. Office of Scientific Integrity Review, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1991c. Data Management in Biomedical Research: Report of a Workshop, Office of Scientific Integrity Review, Public Health Service, Washington, D.C.

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 1991d. Minutes, Meetings of the OSIR Advisory Committee. Office of Scientific Integrity Review. July 15 and November 17. OSIR, Washington, D.C.

Dewald, W. G., J. G. Thursby, and R. G. Anderson. 1986. “Replication in empirical economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking project.” American Economic Review 76(4):587-603.

Diamond, A. L. and D. R. Laurance. 1985. “Product liability in respect of drugs.” British Medical Journal 290(February 2):365-68.

Dickinson, J. P. 1984. Science and Scientific Researchers in Modern Society. UNESCO, Paris.

Djerassi, C. 1986. “Castor's dilemma.” The Hudson Review 39(3):405-18.

Djerassi, C. 1989. Cantor's Dilemma. Doubleday. New York.

Donaldson, V. H. 1984. “When things are not as they seem.” The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 103(April):491-96.

Dong, E. 1991. “Confronting scientific fraud.” The Chronicle of Higher Education (October 9):A52.

Duke University. 1988. Code of Policy and Procedures for Dealing with Allegations of Scientific Fraud or Misconduct. Duke University, Durham, N.C.

Dworkin, G. 1983. “Fraud and science.” Pp. 65-74 in Research Ethics. Alan R. Liss Inc., New York. [Reprinted from Progress in Clinical Biological Research, Volume 128, 1983.]

Edsall, J. T. 1975. Scientific Freedom and Responsibility, Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.

Edsall, J. T. 1981. “Two aspects of scientific responsibility.” Science 212(April 3):11-14.

Eisenberg, R. S. 1989. “Patents and the progress of science: exclusive rights and experimental use.” University of Chicago Law Review 56(Summer):1017-86.

Eisenhut, L. P. 1990. “Universität prüft Anschuldigungen gegen Professorin.” Kolner Stadtanzeiger (October 24).

Ellenberg, J. H. 1983. “Ethical guidelines for statistical practice: a historical perspective. ” The American Statistician 37(February):1-4.

Emory University. 1991. Draft Proposal for a University-wide Policy for Research Conduct: Guidelines for the Conduct of Research and Scholarship, March 20 draft. Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.

Engler, R. L., J. W. Covell, P. J. Friedman, P. S. Kitcher, and R. M. Peters. 1987. “Misrepresentation and responsibility in medical research.” New England Journal of Medicine 317(November 26):1383-89.

Epstein, R. 1986. “On drafting rules and procedures for academic fraud.” Minerva 24(Summer-Autumn):344-46.

Erkut, S. and J. R. Mokros. 1984. “Professors as models and mentors for college students.” American Educational Research Journal 21(2):399-417.

Eser, A. 1987. “Researcher as “offender” and “victim”—comparative observations as to freedom and responsibility of science and technology.” Brigham Young University Law Review 1987(2):571-85.

Etnier, C. 1986. “Secrecy and the young researcher.” Technology in Society 8:267-71.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Evanoski, P. O. 1988. “The role of mentoring in higher education.” Community Review 8(2):22-27.

Fass, R. A. 1990. “Cheating and plagiarism.” Pp. 170-84 in Ethics and Higher Education, May, W. M. (ed.). American Council on Education. Macmillan, New York.

Feinstein, R.J. 1985. “The ethics of professional regulation.” New England Journal of Medicine 312(March 21):801-04.

Feynman, Richard. 1985. Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman. W. W. Norton, New York.

Fletcher, R. 1987. “The doubtful case of Cyril Burt.” Social Policy & Administration 21(1): 40-57.

Florman, S.C. 1978. “Moral blueprints: on regulating the ethics of engineers.” Harper's (October):30-33.

Foelsing, A. 1984. Der Mogelfaktor. Hamburg, pp. 20-21.

Fox, R. 1985. “Reflections and opportunities in the sociology of medicine.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 26(March):6-14.

Francis, J. R. 1990. “The credibility and legitimation of science: a loss of faith in the scientific narrative.” Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 1(1):5-22.

Frankel, M. 1988. “In the news.” Professional Ethics Report (Fall):1.

Frankel, M. S. 1989. “Professional codes: why, how, and with what impact?” Journal of Business Ethics 8:109-15.

Frazer, M. J. and A. Kornhauser (eds.). 1986. Ethics and Social Responsibility of Science Education. ICSU Press, New York.

Freedman, D. X. 1988. “The meaning of full disclosure.” Archives of General Psychiatry 45(July):689-91.

Freidson, E. 1970. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge . Dodd, Mead, and Company, New York.

Friedman, P. J. 1988. “Research ethics, due process, and common sense.” Journal of the American Medical Association 260(October 7):1937-38.

Friedman, R. S. and R. C. Friedman. 1982. Role of University Organized Research Units in Academic Science. NSF/PRM 82-004. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

Fruton, J. S. 1990. Contrasts in Scientific Style: Research Groups in the Chemical and Biochemical Sciences. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia.

Galtung, J. 1983. “Researchers, elites, and people in a rapidly changing world.” Pp. 95-108 in Research Ethics. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York.

Gaston, J. 1978. “Disputes and deviant views about the ethos of science.” In The Reward System in British and American Science. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Geiger, R. L. 1990. “The American University and Research.” Pp. 15-35 in The Academic Research Enterprise within the Industrialized Nations: Comparative Perspectives, Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Geis, G. and R. F. Meier (eds.). 1977. White-collar Crime: Offenses in Business, Politics, and the Professions. The Free Press, New York.

Gert, B., W. A. Nelson, and C. M. Culver. 1989. “Moral theory and neurology.” Neurologic Clinics 7(November):681-96.

Gjerde, C. L. and S. E. Colombo. 1982. “Promotion criteria: perceptions of faculty members and departmental chairmen.” Journal of Medical Education 57(March):157-62.

Glazer, M. P. and Glazer, P. M. 1990. The Whistleblowers: Exposing Corruption in Government and Industry. Basic Books, New York.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Glazer, S. 1988. “Combating science fraud.” CQ Editorial Research Reports 2(August 5):390.

Glick, J. L. 1990. “On the potential cost effectiveness of scientific audits.” Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 1(1):77-83.

Gluck, M. E., D. Blumenthal, and M. A. Stoto. 1987. “University-industry relationships in the life sciences: implications for students and post-doctoral fellows.” Research Policy 16:327-36.

Golberg, L. 1982. “A code of ethics for scientists reporting and reviewing information on chemicals.” Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 2(11-12):289-92.

Goldschmidt, R. B. 1956. Portraits from Memory: Recollections of a Zoologist. University of Washington Press, Seattle.

Goodstein, D. 1991. “Scientific fraud.” American Scholar 60(4):505-15.

Government–University–Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR). 1989. Science and Technology in the Academic Enterprise: Status, Trends, and Issues. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Green, H. P. 1987. “Scientific responsibility and the law.” Journal of Law Reform.

Greene, P. J., J. S. Durch, W. Horwitz, and V. Hooper. 1985. “Policies for responding to allegations of fraud in research.” Minerva 23(Summer):203-215.

Grinnel, F. 1987. The Scientific Attitude. Westview, Boulder, Colo.

Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry (GAP). 1990. A Casebook in Psychiatric Ethics, GAP Committee on Medical Education. Brunner/Mazel, New York.

Grouse, L. D. 1982. “Dealing with alleged fraud in medical research.” Journal of the American Medical Association 248(October 1):1637-38.

Haas, W. 1991. “An overview of optical disk imaging.” Unpublished paper.

Hackett, E. J. 1990. “Science as a vocation in the 1990s: the changing organizational culture of academic science.” Journal of Higher Education 61(3):241-79.

Hackett, E. J. and D. E. Chubin. 1990. “Scientific malpractice and the politics of knowledge.” Annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Minneapolis, October.

Hagstrom, W. O. 1965. The Scientific Community. Basic Books, New York.

Hall, E. C., C. M. Huguley, Jr., P. N. Symbas, and N. C. Moran. 1985. “Research of Dr. John R. Darsee at Emory University.” Minerva 23(Summer):276-304.

Hallum, J. V. and S. W. Hadley. 1990. “OSI: why, what, and how.” ASM News (12):647-51.

Hallum, J. V. and S. W. Hadley. 1991. “Editorial: rights to due process in instances of possible scientific misconduct.” Endocrinology 128(2):643-44.

Hamilton, D. P. 1990. “PNAS bars papers from UC geneticist.” Science 249(August 10):622.

Hamilton, D. P. 1991a. “Can OSI withstand a scientific backlash?” Science 253:1084-1086.

Hamilton, D. P. 1991b. “NIH finds fraud in Cell paper.” Science 251(March 29):1552-54.

Hanna, K. E. 1989. “Collaborative research in biomedicine: resolving conflicts.” Background paper, Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee on Government-Industry Collaboration in Biomedical Research and Education, Washington, D.C.

Hansen, B. C. and K. D. Hansen. 1991a. “The proper role of the Office of Scientific Integrity: institutional vs. federal responsibilities.” FASEB Journal 5(11):2507-2508.

Hansen, B. C. and K. D. Hansen. 1991b. “Scientific fraud and the Public Health Service Act: a critical analysis. ” FASEB Journal 5(11):2512-2515.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Hardy, R. J. and D. Burch. 1981. “What political science professors should know in dealing with academic misconduct.” Teaching Political Science 9(Fall):5-14.

Harvard University Faculty of Medicine. 1988. Guidelines for Investigators in Scientific Research, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. [Also published in Clinical Research 37(April 1989):192-93.]

Harvard University Faculty of Medicine. 1990. Policy on Conflicts of Interest and Commitment. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., March 22.

Healy, B., L. Campeau, R. Gray, J. A. Herd, B. Hoogwerf, D. Hunninghake, G. Knatterud, W. Stewart, and C. White, et al. 1989. “Conflict-of-interest guidelines for a multicenter clinical trial of treatment after coronary-artery bypass-graft surgery.” New England Journal of Medicine 320(April 6):949-51.

Heinz, L. and D. Chubin. 1988. “Congress investigates scientific fraud.” BioScience (September):559-61.

Hendrickson, R. M. 1988. “Removing tenured faculty for cause.” Educational Law Reporter 44(April 14):483-94.

Hill, S., E. Kogler, M. H. Bahniuk, and J. Dobos. 1989. “The impact of mentoring and collegial support on faculty success: an analysis of support behavior, information adequacy, and communication apprehension.” Communication Education 38(January):15-33.

Hinder, S. and P. Halfpenny. 1990. “Potential for sharing research equipment.” Science and Public Policy 17(2):105-10.

Hollis, B. W. 1987. “I turned in my mentor.” The Scientist 1(December 14):11-12.

Holton, G. 1975. “On the role of themata in scientific thought.” Science 188(April 25):328-34.

Holton, G. 1978. The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Holton, G. 1988. Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein. Revised edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Holton, G. 1990. “The drive to unity in physics, and the drive to delegitimate science. ” April 17. Andrew Gemant Award Lecture at the American Physical Society Washington, D.C.

Hoshiko, Tom. 1991. “Facing ethical dilemmas: Scientists must lead the charge.” The Scientist (October 28):11 13-14.

Hull, David. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Hunter, H. O. 1985. “Academic self-government in the United States.” Minerva 23(Spring):1-28.

Huth, E. 1986a. “Irresponsible authorship and wasteful publication.” Annals of Internal Medicine 104(2):258-65.

Huth, E. J. 1986b. “Abuses and uses of authorship.” Annals of Internal Medicine 104(February):266-67.

Huth, E. J. 1986c. “Guidelines on authorship of medical papers.” Annals of Internal Medicine 104(February):269-74.

Huth, E. J. 1988. Scientific Authorship and Publication: Process, Standards, Problems Suggestions. Background paper, Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research, Washington, D.C.

Industrial Chemist. 1987a. “Do you ever fake a research result?” February.

Industrial Chemist. 1987b. “Error and fraud in the lab.” May, p. 84.

Institute of Medicine (IOM). 1989a. The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences, Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research, Division of Health Sciences Policy. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Institute of Medicine (IOM). 1989b. Report of a Workshop, Committee on Government-Industry Collaboration in Biomedical Research and Education. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 1985. “Style matters: guidelines on authorship.” British Medical Journal 291(September 14):722.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 1988. “Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. ” Annals of Internal Medicine 108(February):258-66.

International Statistical Institute. 1986. “ISI declaration on professional ethics.” International Statistical Review 54(2):227-42.

Jackson, C. I. and J. W. Prados. 1983. “Honor in science.” American Scientist 71(Sept-Oct.):462-64.

Jacobstein, J. 1987. “I am not optimistic.” The Scientist 1(December 14):11-12.

Jasanoff, S. 1988. Good Laboratory Practices: Regulating Responsibility in Science. Background paper, Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research, Washington, D.C.

Jayaraman, K. S. 1991. “Gupta faces suspension.” Nature 349(February 21):645.

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. 1989. Policy on Conflict of Commitment and Conflict of Interest. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. 1990. Rules and Guidelines for Responsible Conduct of Research. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.

Jonsen, A. R. 1984. “Public policy and human research.” Pp. 3-20 in Biomedical Ethics Reviews, Humber, J. M. and R. T. Almeder (eds.). Humana, Clifton, N.J.

Joynson, R. B. 1989. The Burt Affair. Routledge, London.

Kaplin, W. A. 1986. The Law and Higher Education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

Karlins, M., C. Michaels, and S. Podlogar. 1988. “An empirical investigation of actual cheating in a large sample of undergraduates.” Research in Higher Education 29(4):359-364.

Kass, L. R. 1983. “Professing ethically.” Journal of the American Medical Association 249(March 11):1305-10.

Keenan, C. E., G. C. Brown, H. N. Pontell, and G. Geis. 1985. “Medical students' attitudes on physician fraud and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.” Journal of Medical Education 60(March):167-73.

Kennedy, D. 1989. “Statement on academic authorship.” Stanford University Research Policy Handbook. Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.

Kennedy, D. 1991. The Improvement of Teaching. Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.

Kleppner, D. 1991. “The mismeasure of science.” The Sciences (May/June):18-21.

Klotz, I. M. 1985. Diamond Dealers and Feather Merchants: Tales from the Sciences. Birkhauser, Boston.

Knight, E. J. 1990. Scientific Misconduct and Self-Deception. Senior honors thesis. University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.

Knight, J. 1991. “Scientific misconduct: the rights of the accused.” Issues in Science and Technology 8(1):28-29.

Knight, J. A. 1984. “Exploring the compromise of ethical principles in science.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 27(3):432-42.

Knorr-Cetina, K. D. and M. Mulkay (eds.). 1983. Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

Knox, P. L. and T. V. McGovern. 1988. “Mentoring women in academia.” Teaching of Psychology 15(1):39-41.

Knox, R. A. 1983a. “The Harvard fraud case: where does the problem lie?” Journal of the American Medical Association 249(April 8):1797-1806.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Knox, R. A. 1983b. “Deeper problems for Darsee: Emory probe.” Journal of the American Medical Association 249(June 3):2867-76.

Kohn, A. 1986. False Prophets: Fraud and Error in Science and Medicine. Basil Blackwell, New York.

Koj, A. 1990. “Complex responsibilities of scientists in the contemporary world. ” Science and Public Policy 17(2):78-81.

Koshland, D. E. 1987. “Fraud in science.” Science 235(January 9):141.

Koshland, D. E. 1988a. “Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing.” Science 240(April 29):585.

Koshland, D. E. 1988b. “The price of progress.” Science 241(August 5):637.

Koshland, D. E. 1990. “Conflict of interest.” Science 249(July 13):109.

Kreytbosch, C. E. and S. L. Messinger. 1968. “Unequal peers: the situation of researchers at Berkeley.” American Behavioral Scientist 11(5):33-43.

Kubie, L. S. 1953. “Some unsolved problems of the scientific career, part II.” American Scientist (November):101-12.

Kuyper, B. J. 1991. “Bringing up scientists in the art of critiquing research.” Bioscience (April):248-50.

Lane, J., R. Ray, and D. Glennon. 1990. “Work profiles of research statisticians.” American Statistician 44(February):9-13.

Langmuir, I. “Pathological science: scientific studies based on non-existent phenomena. ” Speculations in Science and Technology 8(2):77-94.

Lanza-Kaduce, L. 1980. “Deviance among professionals: the case of unnecessary surgery.” Deviant Behavior 1:333-59.

Laor, N. 1985. “Prometheus the impostor.” British Medical Journal 290(March 2):681-84.

LaPidus, J. B. and B. Mishkin. 1990. “Values and ethics in the graduate education of scientists.” Pp. 283-298 in Ethics and Higher Education, May, W. W. (ed.). American Council on Education. Macmillan, New York.

Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Latour, B. and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Library of Social Research, 80. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

Lauscher, S. 1987. “Scientific misconduct: a case study.” Grants Magazine 10(3):143-49.

Lawson, A. J. 1989. “The organic chemist and the personal computer.” Impact of Science on Society 39(4):291-302.

Lederman, L. M. 1990. Science: The End of the Frontier? Report to the Board of Directors of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, AAAS, Washington, D.C.

Lee, B. G. 1978. “Fraud and abuse in medicare and medicaid.” Administrative Law Review 30:301-43.

Levy, C. S. 1979. “Professional ethics: dilemmas of code construction.” National Conference of Social Welfare, Philadelphia, May 15.

Lewin, B. 1987. “Fraud in science: the burden of proof.” Cell 48(January 16):1-2.

Lewin, B. 1989. “Fraud and the fabric of science.” Cell 57(June 2):699-700.

Lind, S. E. 1986. “Fee-for-service research.” New England Journal of Medicine 314(January 30):312-15.

Lipschutz, S. B. 1990. “Toward independent scholarship: collaborative research relationships in doctoral education.” CGS Communicator (April):1-2.

List, C. J. 1985. “Scientific fraud: social deviance or the failure of virtue?” Science, Technology, and Human Values 10(4):27-36.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Littlejohn, M. J. and C. M. Matthews. 1989. Scientific Misconduct in Academia: Efforts to Address the Issue. 89-392 SPR. Congressional Research Service, Washington, D.C., June 30.

Lo, B. 1987. “Behind closed doors: promises and pitfalls of ethics committees.” New England Journal of Medicine 317(July 2):46-50.

Lock, S. 1985. A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine. ISI Press, Philadelphia.

Lock, S. 1988a. “Fraud in medicine.” British Medical Journal 296(February 6):376-77.

Lock, S. 1988b. “Scientific misconduct.” British Medical Journal 297(September 24):1531-1535.

Lock, S. 1990. “Medical misconduct: A survey in Britain.” In Ethics and Policy in Scientific Publication, Bailar et al. (eds.). Council of Biology Editors, Bethesda, Md.

Lock, S. 1991. “Where do we go from here?” Nature 350(April 11):530.

Long, J. S. and R. McGinnis. 1981. “Organizational context and scientific productivity.” American Sociological Review 46(August):422-42.

Long, J. S. and R. McGinnis. 1985. “The effects of the mentor on the academic career.” Scientometrics 7(3-6):255-280.

Long, J. S., P. D. Allison, and R. McGinnis. 1979. “Entrance into the academic career.” American Sociological Review 44(5):816-30.

Lovain, T. B. 1983-1984. “Grounds for dismissing tenured postsecondary faculty for cause.” Journal of College and University Law 10(3):419-33.

Lundberg, G. D. and A. Flanagin. 1989. “New requirements for authors: signed statements of authorship responsibility and financial disclosure.” Journal of the American Medical Association 262(October 13):2003-05.

Maddox, J. 1988a. “Why the pressure to publish?” Nature 333(June 9):493.

Maddox, J. 1988b. “Can a Greek tragedy be avoided?” Nature 333(June 30):795-97.

Maddox, J. 1989a. “Making good databanks better.” Nature 341(September 28):277.

Maddox, J. 1989b. “Is the salami sliced too thin?” Nature 342(December 14):733.

Maddox, J. 1989c. “Making authors toe the line.” Nature 342(December 21/28):855.

Maddox, J. 1990a. “What to do with extraneous data.” Nature 346(July 19):215.

Maddox, J. 1990b. “Should camp-followers be policemen?” Nature 348(November 8):107.

Maddox, J. 1991. “Secret Service as ultimate referee.” Nature 350(April 18):553.

Majerus, P. W. 1982. “Fraud in medical research.” Journal of Clinical Investigation 70(July):213-17.

Manwell, C. and C. M. Ann Baker. 1981. “Honesty in science: a partial test of a sociobiological model of the social structure of science.” Search 12(6):151-59.

Martin, B. 1986. “Bias in awarding research grants.” British Medical Journal 293(August 30):550-52.

Martin, H. C., R. M. Ohmann, and J. Wheatly. 1969. The Logic and Rhetoric of Exposition. Third edition. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

Martin, R. G. 1990. “Scientific hype.” New Biologist 2(9):747-49.

May, W. F. 1980. “Professional ethics: setting, terrain, and teacher.” Pp. 205-41 in Ethics Teaching in Higher Education, Callahan, D. and S. Bok (eds.). Plenum Press, New York.

May, W. W. (ed.). 1990. Ethics and Higher Education. American Council on Education. Macmillan, New York.

Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Mayr, Ernst. 1988. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Mazlish, B. 1982. “The quality of ‘The Quality in Science': An evaluation.” Pp. 48-67 in Quality in Science, La Follette, M. C. (ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Mazur, Allan. 1989. “Allegations of dishonesty in research and their treatment by American universities.” Minerva 27:177-194.

McBride, G. 1974. “The Sloan-Kettering affair: could it have happened anywhere?” Journal of the American Medical Association 229(September 9):1391-1410.

McCain, K. W. 1991. “Communication, competition and secrecy.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 16(4):491-516.

McGarity, T. O. 1990. “Public participation in data audits.” Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 1(1):47-52.

McGinnis, R. and J. S. Long. 1988. “Entry into academia: effects of stratification, geography, and ecology. ” Pp. 28-51 in Academic Labor Markets and Academic Careers in American Higher Education Breneman, D. W. and T. I. K. Youn (eds.). Falmer, New York.

McGinnis, R., P. D. Allison, and J. S. Long. 1982. “Postdoctoral training in bioscience: allocation and outcome.” Social Forces 60(3):701-22.

Meadow, C. T. 1990. “Perspectives on Evaluation of scientific information: peer review and the impact of new information technology, introduction and overview.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(April):214-15.

Medawar, P. 1964. “Is the scientific paper fraudulent? yes; it misrepresents scientific thought.” Saturday Review (August 1):42-43.

Medawar, P. 1984. The Limits of Science. Harper and Row, New York.

Medawar, P. B. 1979. Advice to a Young Scientist. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Series. Harper and Row, New York.

Menninger, D. C. 1990. “Scientific misconduct and the federal response.” Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, September 2.

Merriam, S. B., T. K. Thomas, and C. P. Zeph. 1987. “Mentoring in higher education: what we know.” The Review of Higher Education 11(2):199-210.

Merton, R. K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations Storer, N. W. (ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Miceli, M. P., J. B. Dozier, and J. P. Near. 1991. “Blowing the whistle on data fudging: a controlled field experiment. ” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21(4):271-95.

Miers, M. L. 1985. “Current NIH perspectives on misconduct in science.” American Psychologist 40(7):831-35.

Mishkin, B. 1988. “Responding to scientific misconduct: due process and prevention.” Journal of the American Medical Association 260(October 7):1932-36.

Mishkin, B. 1991a. “First annual report of scientific misconduct investigations reviewed by OSIR—a review and analysis.” Professional Ethics Report (Spring):305.

Mishkin, B. 1991b. “Cooperation between academia and industry: opportunities and challenges. ” Fidia Research Foundation Ethical Issues in Research, Washington, D.C., March 29-30.

Mitroff, I. I. 1974. The Subjective Side of Science: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Psychology of the Apollo Moon Scientists. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Mulkay, M. J. 1975. “Norms and ideology in science.” Social Science Information 15(4/5):637-56.

Mulkay, M. and G. N. Gilbert. 1982. “Accounting for error: how scientists construct their social world when they account for correct and incorrect belief.” Sociology 16:165-72.

National Academy of Sciences (NAS). 1989. On Being A Scientist, Committee on the Conduct of Science. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council (NAS-NRC) 1984. Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences . National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 1990. Faculty in Higher Education Institutions, 1988. NCES 90-365. Office of Education Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1978. Report and Recommendations: Institutional Review Boards. DHEW (OS) 78-0008. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

National Institutes of Health (NIH). 1987. “NIH policy relating to reporting and distribution of unique biological materials produced with NIH funding.” NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts 16(October 23):1-3.

National Institutes of Health (NIH). 1988a. “Misconduct in science assurance.” NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts 17(January 15):1-2.

National Institutes of Health (NIH). 1988b. “PHS policy relating to distribution of unique research resources produced with PHS funding.” NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts 17(September 16):1-2.

National Institutes of Health. 1988c. Retreat Summary Report: Retreat on Conflict of Interest in Collaborations with Industry. December 19-20. Office of Invention Development, Bethesda, Md.

National Institutes of Health (NIH). 1990. Guidelines for the Conduct of Research at the National Institutes of Health. NIH, Bethesda, Md.

National Institutes of Health (NIH). 1991. NIH 91-126. September. Bethesda, Md.

National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration (ADAMHA). 1989. “Requirement for programs on the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training programs. ” NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts 18(December 22):1.

National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration (ADAMHA). 1990. “Reminder and update: requirement for programs on the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training programs.” NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts 19(August 17):1.

National Research Council (NRC). 1981. Postdoctoral Appointments and Disappointments, Committee on a Study of Postdoctorals in Science and Engineering in the United States. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (NRC). 1985. Sharing Research Data, Fienberg, S. E., M. E. Martin, and M. L. Straf (eds.). National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Research Council (NRC). Summary Report. 1989. Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities , Office of Science and Engineering Policy. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

National Science Board (NSB). 1988. Report of the NSB Committee on Openness of Scientific Communication. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

National Science Board (NSB). 1989. Science and Engineering Indicators. NSB 89-1. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1987. “Misconduct in science and engineering research: final regulations. ” Federal Register 52(July 1):24466-24470.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1989a. Report of NSF Staff Committee on Sharing. Office of the General Counsel, NSF, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1989b. “Important Notice to Presidents of Colleges and Universities and Heads of Other National Science Foundation Grantees Organizations.” Notice No. 106. April 17. NSF, Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1989c. Semiannual Report to the Congress. Number 1. Office of Inspector General, NSF, Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1990a. Semiannual Report to the Congress. Number 2. Office of Inspector General, NSF, Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1990b. Semiannual Report to the Congress. Number 3. Office of Inspector General, NSF, Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1990c. The State of Academic Science and Engineering. NSF, Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1990d. Survey Data on the Extent of Misconduct in Science and Engineering. OIG-90-3214. Office of Inspector General, NSF, Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1991a. Semiannual Report to the Congress. Number 4. Office of Inspector General, NSF, Washington, D.C.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1991b. “Misconduct in science and engineering: final rule.” Federal Register 56(May 14):22286-90.

National Science Foundation (NSF). 1991c. Semiannual Report to the Congress. Number 5. Office of Inspector General, NSF, Washington, D.C.

Neidle, E. A. 1985. “The mentor apprentice program: a modest proposal for alleviating the scarcity of clinical research in dentistry.” Journal of Dental Education 49(5):272-74.

Nelkin, D. 1983. “Whistle blowing and social responsibility in science.” Pp. 351-57 in Research Ethics. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. [Reprinted from Progress in Clinical Biological Research, Volume 128, 1983.]

Nelkin, D. 1984. Science as Intellectual Property. Macmillan, New York.

New England Journal of Medicine. 1992. “Information for authors.” April 2.

Newhouse, R. C. 1982. “Alienation and cheating behavior in the school environment.” Psychology in the Schools 19(April):234-37.

Nobel, J. J. 1990. “Comparison of research quality guidelines in academic and nonacademic environments.” Journal of the American Medical Association 263(March 9):1435-37.

Novack, J. M. and A. C. Bennett. 1983. “Informally inviting moral development: teacher perception and behaviour regarding the handling of moral transgressions.” Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.

Nowack, J. A. 1989. The University-Policy Environment for University-Industry Interactions Background paper, Committee on Government-Industry Collaboration in Biomedical Research and Education, Institute of Medicine, Washington, D.C.

Nowak, T., R. Rotunda, and J. Young. 1983. Constitutional Law. Second edition. West Publishing, St. Paul, Minn.

Nuss, E. M. “Academic integrity: comparing faculty and student attitudes.” Improving College and University Teaching 32(3):140-44.

Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU). 1990. Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct. ORAU 90/J-125. Department of Energy, ORAU, Oak Ridge, Tenn.

Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1986a. The Regulatory Environment.for Science. Technical Memorandum. OTA, Washington, D.C.

Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1986b. Research Funding as an Investment: Can We Measure the Returns? OTA-TM-SET-36. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1990. “Proposal pressure in the 1980s: An indicator of stress on the federal research system.” Staff paper. OTA, Washington, D.C., April.

Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1991. Federally Funded Research: Decisions for a Decade. OTA-SET-490. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C..

O'Reilly, J. T. 1990. “More gold and more fleece: improving the legal sanctions against medical research fraud.” Administrative Law Review 42(Summer):393-422.

Osmond, D. H. 1983. “Malice's wonderland: research funding and peer review.” Journal of Neurobiology 14(2):95-112.

O'Toole, M. 1991. “Margot O'Toole's record of events.” Nature 351(May 16):180-82.

Parmley, W. W. 1990. “21st Bethesda conference: ethics in cardiovascular medicine.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 16(July)(1):1-36.

Petersdorf, R. G. 1982. “Preventing and investigating fraud in research.” Journal of Medical Education 57:880-81.

Petersdorf, R. G. 1986. “The pathogenesis of fraud in medical science.” Annals of Internal Medicine 104(February):252-54.

Petersdorf, R. G. 1989. “A matter of integrity.” Academic Medicine (March):119-23.

Phillip, Kathryn. 1991. “Making the transition from bench scientist to lab leader.” The Scientist (April 1):18-19.

Pigman, Ward and Emmett B. Carmichael. 1950. “An ethical code for scientists.” Science (June 16):643-647.

Pinch, T. 1990. “The role of scientific communities in the development of science. ” Impact of Science on Society (159):219-25.

Pincus, K. V. 1990. “Financial auditing and fraud detection: implications for scientific data audit.” Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 1(1):53-70.

Polanyi, M. 1951. The Logic of Liberty. International Library of Sociology and Social Reconstruction. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Polanyi, M. 1962a. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Polanyi, M. 1962b. “The republic of science: its political and economic theory.” Minerva 1(Autumn):54-73.

Pontell, H. N., P. D. Jesilow, and G. Geis. 1982. “Policing physicians: practitioner fraud and abuse in a government medical program.” Social Problems 30(1):117-25.

Pratt, C. B. and G. W. McLaughlin. 1989. “An analysis of predictors of college students' ethical inclinations.” Research in Higher Education 30(2):195-219.

Price, D. K. 1979. “The ethical principles of scientific institutions.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 4(1):46-60. [Originally presented at Nobel Symposium No. 44, Stockholm, 1978.]

Price, D. K. 1985. America's Unwritten Constitution: Science, Religion, and Political Responsibility. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Princeton Conference on Honor Systems. 1988. Codes and Regulations. Princeton University, Princeton, N.J., February.

Rall, J. E. 1990. “Conflict of interest as it relates to intramural scientists at the National Institutes of Health.” Presented to the Endocrine Society, Atlanta, June 20.

Raub, W. F. 1990. “Statement of the Acting Director, NIH.” U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Washington, D.C., April 30.

Raub, W. F. 1991. “Testimony.” U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Washington, D.C., March 6.

Ravetz, J. 1971. Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Rawles, B. A. 1980. The Influence of a Mentor on the Level of Self-Actualization of American Scientists. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus.

Relman, A. S. 1983. “Lessons from the Darsee affair.” New England Journal of Medicine 308(June 9):1415-17.

Relman, A. S. 1984. “Responsibilities of authorship: where does the buck stop?” New England Journal of Medicine 310(April 19):1048-49.

Relman, A. S. 1985. “Professional regulation and the state medical boards.” New England Journal of Medicine 312(March 21):784-85.

Relman, A. S. 1989. “Economic incentives in clinical investigation.” New England Journal of Medicine 320(April 6):933-34.

Relman, A. S. 1990. “New ‘information for authors'—and readers.” New England Journal of Medicine 323(July 5):56, 72.

Remington, J. A. 1988. “Beyond big science in America: the binding of inquiry.” Social Studies of Science 18:45-72.

Rennie, D. 1986. “Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review.” Journal of the American Medical Association 256(November 7):2391-92.

Rennie, D. 1989. “Editors and auditors.” Journal of the American Medical Association 261(May 5):2543-45. [With letters.]

Rest, J. R. 1988. “Can ethics be taught in professional schools? The psychological research. ” Easier Said Than Done (Winter):22-26.

Rider, R. E. 1991. “Saving the records of big science.” American Libraries (February):166-68.

Rip, A. 1988. “Contextual transformations in contemporary science.” Pp. 59-85 in Keeping Science Straight: A Critical Look at the Assessment of Science and Technology, Jamison, A. (ed.). Department of Theory of Science and Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Rodman, H. 1970. “The moral responsibility of journal editors and referees.” The American Sociologist 5(November):351-57.

Rodwin, M. A. 1989. “Physicians' conflicts of interest.” New England Journal of Medicine 321(November 16):1405-08.

Roe, R. 1990. A Bill: To Promote the Integrity of Scientific Research, and for Other Purposes. U.S. Congress, House of Representatives. 101st Cong., 2nd sess., April 20. [Discussion draft; not introduced.]

Rosner, J. L. 1990. “Reflections of science as a product.” Nature 345(May 10):108.

Ross, M., I. J. Winograd, and J. L. Cook. 1989. “Report to the Director [of the U.S. Geological Survey].” January 25. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.

Rostand, J. 1960. Error and Deception in Science: Essays on Biological Aspects of Life Translated from the French by A. J. Pomerans. Basic Books, New York.

Roth, J. A. 1966. “Hired hand research.” The American Sociologist (August):190-96.

Rothschild, L. 1972. “Forty-five varieties of research (and development).” Nature 239(October 13):373-78.

Royal College of Physicians. 1991. Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research: Causes, Investigation and Prevention. Royal College of Physicians of London, London.

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). 1988. Guidance on Professional Conduct. Burlington House, Royal Society of Chemistry, London.

Ruegg, W. 1986. “The academic ethos.” Minerva 24(Winter):393-412.

Rutherford, D. G. and S. G. Olswang. 1981. “Academic misconduct: the due process rights of students.” National Association of Student Personnel Administrators 19(Fall):12-16.

Sapp, J. 1990. Where the Truth Lies: Franz Moewus and the Origins of Molecular Biology Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Scheers, N. J. and C. M. Dayton. 1987. “Improved estimation of academic cheating behavior using the randomized response technique.” Research in Higher Education 26(1):61-69.

Schein, E. H. 1990. “Organizational culture.” American Psychologist 45(February):109-119.

Schmaus, W. 1983a. “Fraud and negligence in science.” Connecticut Medicine 47(March):155-58.

Schmaus, W. 1983b. “Fraud and the norms of science.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 8(4):12-22.

Shader, R. I. and D. J. Greenblatt. 1987. “Authorship and coauthorship—working out the meaning.” Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 7(5):293.

Shapiro, M. F. and R. P. Charrow. 1985. “Scientific misconduct in investigational drug trials.” New England Journal of Medicine 312(March 14):731-36.

Shapiro, M. F. and R. P. Charrow. 1989. “The role of data audits in detecting scientific misconduct.” Journal of the American Medical Association 261(17):2505-11.

Shils, E. 1990a. “The university world turned upside down: does confidentiality of assessment by peers guarantee the quality of academic appointment? ” Minerva 28(3):324-34.

Shils, E. 1990b. “The university world turned upside down: does confidentiality of assessment by peers guarantee the quality of academic appointment? part II.” Minerva 28(4):469-85.

Sigma Xi. 1986. Honor in Science. Second edition. Sigma Xi, New Haven, Conn.

Sigma Xi. 1987. A New Agenda for Science. Sigma Xi, New Haven, Conn.

Sigma Xi. 1989. Sketches of the American Scientist. Sigma Xi, New Haven, Conn.

Sindermann, C. J. 1985. The Joy of Science: Excellence and its Rewards. Plenum Press, New York.

Sindermann, C. J. 1987. Survival Strategies for New Scientists. Plenum Press, New York.

Smith, B. L. R. 1990. American Science Policy Since World War II. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.

Smith, J. M., P. N. Chase, and J. J. Byrd. 1986. “A formalized mentor system in an educational setting.” Engineering Education 76(4):216-18.

Snyder, R. G. 1988. The Federal Research Assistantship: Indicators of Utilization in Graduate Research Training in Science and Engineering. Council of Graduate Schools, Washington, D.C.

Soskolne, C. L. 1989. “Epidemiology: questions of science, ethics, morality, and law.” American Journal of Epidemiology 129(January):1-18.

Sprague, R. L. 1987. “I trusted the research system.” The Scientist 1(December 14):11-12.

Steelman, J. R. 1947. Science and Public Policy: Administration of Research, a Report to the President, President's Scientific Research Board. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Sterling, T. D. and J. J. Weinkam. 1990. “Sharing scientific data.” Communications of the ACM 33(8):112-19.

Stewart, W. and N. Feder. 1987. “The integrity of the scientific literature.” Nature 325(January 15):207-214.

St. James-Roberts, I. 1976a. “Are researchers trustworthy?” New Scientist 72(September 2):481-83.

St. James-Roberts, I. 1976b. “Cheating in science.” New Scientist 72(November 25):466-69.

Storer, N. 1966. The Social System of Science. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Stossel, T. P. 1985. “Reviewer status and review quality: experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation.” New England Journal of Medicine 312(March 7):658-59.

Stromholm, S. 1990. “Hero or villain? Prometheus reconsidered.” Science and Public Policy 17(April):69-72.

Summerlin Peer Review Committee. 1974. Report. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, May 17.

Sun, M. 1989. “Peer review comes under peer review.” Science 244(May 26):910-12.

Sundstrom, E., K. P. De Meuse, and D. Futrell. 1990. “Work teams: applications and effectiveness.” American Psychologist 45(2):120-33.

Sutton, J. R. 1984. “Organizational autonomy and professional norms in science: a case study of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory.” Social Studies of Science 14:197-224.

Swan, N. 1989. “Preventing and dealing with scientific fraud in Australia.” Medical Journal of Australia 150(February 20):169-70.

Swazey, J. P. and S. R. Scher (eds.). 1981. Whistleblowing in Biomedical Research: Policies and Procedures for Responding to Reports of Misconduct. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Swazey, J. P., K. S. Louis, and M. S. Anderson. 1989. “University policies and ethical issues in research and graduate education: highlights of the CGS deans' survey.” CGS Communicator 22(March):1-3 7-8.

Szilagyi, D. E. 1984. “The elusive target: truth in scientific reporting.” Journal of Vascular Surgery (March):243-53.

Tangney, J. P. 1987. “Fraud will out—or will it?” New Scientist (August 6):62-63.

Thompson, J. J., B. S. Dreben, E. Holtzman, and R. B. Kreiser. 1983. “Corporate funding of academic research.” Academe (November-December):18a-23a.

Tranoy, K. E. 1983. “Is there a universal research ethic?” Pp. 3-12 in Research Ethics. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York.

Traweek, S. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Tribe, L. H. 1988. American Constitutional Law. Second edition. Foundation Press, Mineola, N.Y.

Tuckman, H., S. Coyle, and Y. Bae. 1990. On Time to the Doctorate: A Study of the Lengthening Time to Completion for Doctorates in Science and Engineering Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Turner, S. P. 1990. “Forms of patronage.” Pp. 185-211 in Theories of Science in Society, Cozzens, S.E. and T. F. Gieryn (eds.). Indiana University, Bloomington, Ind.

University of Chicago. 1986. “Report of the Committee on Academic Fraud.” Minerva 24(Summer-Autumn):347-358.

University of Maryland at Baltimore. 1989. Policies and Procedures Related to Allegations or Other Evidence of Academic Misconduct. University of Maryland, Baltimore, December 22.

University of Michigan Medical School. 1989. Guidelines for the Responsible Conduct of Research, Medical School Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Responsible Conduct of Research. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

U.S. Congress. 1981a. Fraud in Biomedical Research. House of Representatives, Committee on Science and Technology, Subcommittee on Investigation and Oversight. 97th Cong., 1st sess., March 31 and April 1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Congress. 1981b. National Cancer Institute Contracting and Procurement Procedures, 1981. Senate, Committee on Labor and Human Resources. 97th Cong., 1st sess., June 2. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

U.S. Congress. 1986. Science and the Regulatory Environment. House of Representatives, Committee on Science and Technology, Task Force on Science Policy. 99th Cong., 2nd sess., February 26 and March 5-6. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Congress. 1988a. Scientific Fraud and Misconduct and the Federal Response. House of Representatives, Committee on Governmental Operations, Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations. 100th Cong., 2nd sess., April 11. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Congress. 1988b. Scientific Fraud and Misconduct in the National Institutes of Health Biomedical Grant Programs. Hearings. House of Representatives, Committee on Energy and Commerce. April 12.

U.S. Congress. 1988c. Federal Response to Misconduct in Science: Are Conflicts of Interest Hazardous to Our Health? House of Representatives, Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations. 100th Cong., 2nd sess., September 29. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Congress. 1989a. Fraud in NIH Grant Programs. House of Representatives, Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. 100th Cong., 2nd sess., April 12. Serial No. 100-189. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Congress. 1989b. Scientific Fraud. House of Representatives, Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. 101st Cong., 1st sess., May 4, 9. Serial No. 101-64. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Congress. 1989c. Is Science for Sale? Conflicts of Interest vs. the Public Interest House of Representatives, Committee on Governmental Operations, Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations. 101st Cong., 1st sess., June 13. Serial No. 20-969. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Congress. 1990a. Are Scientific Misconduct and Conflicts of Interest Hazardous to Our Health? H. Rpt. 101-688. House of Representatives, Committee on Government Operations. 101st Cong., 2nd sess. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Congress. 1990b. Maintaining the Integrity of Scientific Research. House of Representatives, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight. 101st Cong., 1st sess., June 28. No. 73. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Congress. 1990c. Scientific Fraud, Part 2. House of Representatives, Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. 101st Cong., 1st sess., April 30 and May 14. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Van Alstyne, W. 1970. “The constitutional rights of teachers and professors.” Duke Law Journal (5):841-79.

Vanderpool, H. Y. and G. B. Weiss. 1987. “False data and the therapeutic misconception: two urgent problems in reseach ethics.” Hastings Center Report (April):16-19.

Warwick, D. P. and T. F. Pettigrew. 1983. “Toward ethical guidelines for policy research.” Hastings Center Report (February):9-16.

Washington University Senate Council. 1990. Research Integrity Policy for Washington University. Washington University, St. Louis, April 17.

Weber, M. 1946 [1918]. “Science as a vocation.” Pp. 129-56 in From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, Gerth, H. and C. W. Mills (eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Weil, V. 1988. “Policy incentives and constraints on scientific and technical information. ” Science, Technology, and Human Values 13(1&2):17-26.

Weil, V. and J. W. Snapper. 1989. Owning Scientific and Technical Information. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J.

Weinstein, D. 1979. “Fraud in science.” Social Science Quarterly 59(4):639-52.

Weinstein, D. 1981. “Scientific fraud and scientific ethics.” Connecticut Medicine 45(October):655-58.

Weiss, T. 1991a. “NIH grants research integrity amendments of 1991.” Congressional Record (April 17):E1288-89.

Weiss, T. 1991b. “Too many scientists who ‘blow the whistle' end up losing their jobs and careers.” Chronicle of Higher Education (June 26):A36.

Westin, A. F. 1981. Whistle-blowing! McGraw-Hill, New York.

Wheeler, D. 1991. “U.S. has barred grants to 6 scientists in past 2 years.” Chronicle of Higher Education (July 3).

Williams, J. S. Forthcoming. “The importance of preserving scientific data.” In Archival Management of Research Resources in the Health Field, McCall, N. and L. A. Mix (eds.). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.

Wilshire, B. 1990. “Professionalism as purification ritual.” Journal of Higher Education 61(May/June 1990):280-93.

Wilson, E. Bright. 1952. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Wilson, J. T. 1983. Academic Science, Higher Education, and the Federal Government, 1950-1983 University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Wolins, L. 1962. “Responsibility for raw data.” American Psychologist 17:657-58.

Woolf, P. K. 1981. “Fraud in science: how much, how serious?” Hastings Center Report 11(October):9-14

Woolf, P. K. 1986. “Pressure to publish and fraud in science.” Annals of Internal Medicine 104(2):254-56.

Woolf, P. K. 1988a. “Deception in scientific research.” Jurimetrics Journal 29(Fall):67-95.

Woolf, P. K. 1988b. “Science needs vigilance not vigilantes.” Journal of the American Medical Association 260(October 7):1939-40.

Yamamoto, K. R. 1982. “Faculty members as corporate officers: does cost outweigh benefit? ” Pp. 195-201 in From Genetic Engineering to Biotechnology—The Critical Transition, Whelan, W. J. and S. Black (eds.). John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Yankauer, A. 1989. “Editor's annual report—manuscript requirements.” American Journal of Public Health 79(April):413-14.

Yolles, B. J., J. C. Connors, and S. Grufferman. 1986. “Sounding Board: Obtaining access to data from government-sponsored medical research.” New England Journal of Medicine 315(December 25):1669-72.

Zastrow, C. H. 1970. “Cheating among college graduate students.” Journal of Educational Research 64(December):157-60.

Zen, E-an. 1988. “Abuse of coauthorship: its implications for young scientists and the role of journals.” Geology 16:292.

Ziman, J. 1978. Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science Cambridge University Press, New York.

Ziman, J. 1990. “Research as a career.” Pp. 345-59 in The Research System in Transition, Cozzens, S. E., P. Healey, A. Rip, and J. Ziman (eds.). NATO Advanced Studies Institute Series, Series D, Volume 57. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

Zuckerman, H. 1968. “Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: a study of social symbolism and its ambiguity.” American Journal of Sociology 74(November 3):276-291.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×

Zuckerman, Harriet. 1977. “Deviant behavior and social control in science.” Pp. 87-138 in Deviance and Social Change. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

Zuckerman, H. 1984. “Norms and deviant behavior in science.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 9(1):7-13.

Zuckerman, H. 1988a. “The sociology of science.” Pp. 511-73 in Handbook of Sociology , Smelser, N. J. (ed.). Sage, Newbury Park, Calif.

Zuckerman, H. A. 1988b. “Introduction: Intellectual property and diverse rights of ownership in science.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 13(1&2):7-16.

Zuckerman,. H. and R. K. Merton. 1971. “Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalism, structure and functions of the referee system.” Minerva 9(1):66-100.

Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 156
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 157
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 158
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 159
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 160
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 161
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 162
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 163
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 164
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 165
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 166
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 167
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 168
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 169
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 170
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 171
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 172
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 173
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 174
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 175
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 176
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 177
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 178
Suggested Citation:"8 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.
×
Page 179
Next: MINORITY STATEMENT »
Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $50.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Responsible Science is a comprehensive review of factors that influence the integrity of the research process. Volume I examines reports on the incidence of misconduct in science and reviews institutional and governmental efforts to handle cases of misconduct.

The result of a two-year study by a panel of experts convened by the National Academy of Sciences, this book critically analyzes the impact of today's research environment on the traditional checks and balances that foster integrity in science.

Responsible Science is a provocative examination of the role of educational efforts; research guidelines; and the contributions of individual scientists, mentors, and institutional officials in encouraging responsible research practices.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!