NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
2101 Constitution Avenue, NW • Washington, DC 20418
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance.
This report and the committee were supported by a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Electric Power Research Institute. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Clean coastal waters : understanding and reducing the effects of nutrient pollution / Ocean Studies Board and Water Science and Technology Board, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, National Research Council.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-309-06948-3 (casebound)
1. Nutrient pollution of water—United States. 2. Marine eutrophication—United States. 3. Coastal zone management—Government policy—United States. 4. Water quality management—Government policy—United States. 5. Watershed management—Government policy—United States. I. National Research Council (U.S.). Ocean Studies Board. II. National Research Council (U.S.). Water Science and Technology Board.
TD427.N87 C58 2000
363.739'4--dc21
00-009621
Clean Coastal Waters: Understanding and Reducing the Effects of Nutrient Pollution is available from the
National Academy Press,
2101 Constitution Avenue, NW, Box 285, Washington, DC 20055 (1-800-624-6242 or 202-334-3313 in the Washington metropolitan area; Internet: http://www.nap.edu).
Copyright 2000 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
National Academy of Science
National Academy of Engineering
Institute of Medicine
National Research Council
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.
COMMITTEE ON THE CAUSES AND MANAGEMENT OF COASTAL EUTROPHICATION
ROBERT W. HOWARTH (Chair),
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
DONALD M. ANDERSON,
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Massachusetts
THOMAS M. CHURCH,
University of Delaware, Newark
HOLLY GREENING,
Tampa Bay Estuary Program, St. Petersburg, Florida
CHARLES S. HOPKINSON,
Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts
WAYNE C. HUBER,
Oregon State University, Corvallis
NANCY MARCUS,
Florida State University, Tallahassee
ROBERT J. NAIMAN,
University of Washington, Seattle
KATHLEEN SEGERSON,
University of Connecticut, Storrs
ANDREW N. SHARPLEY,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, University Park, Pennsylvania
WILLIAM J. WISEMAN,
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
Staff
DAN WALKER, Study Director, OSB
CHRIS ELFRING, Senior Program Officer, WSTB
JODI BACHIM, Project Assistant, OSB
OCEAN STUDIES BOARD
KENNETH BRINK (Chair),
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Massachusetts
ARTHUR BAGGEROER,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
DAN BROMLEY,
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTIS BROWN,
University of Miami, Florida
JAMES COLEMAN,
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
CORT COOPER,
Chevron Petroleum Technology, San Ramon, California
G. BRENT DALRYMPLE,
Oregon State University, Corvallis
EARL DOYLE,
Shell Oil (Retired), Sugar Land, Texas
D. JAY GRIMES,
University of Southern Mississippi, Ocean Springs
RAY HILBORN,
University of Washington, Seattle
EDWARD HOUDE,
University of Maryland, Solomons
CINDY LEE,
State University of New York, Stony Brook
ROGER LUKAS,
University of Hawaii, Manoa
NANCY MARCUS,
Florida State University, Tallahassee
BONNIE MCCAY,
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
RAM MOHAN,
Gahagan & Bryant Associates, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland
SCOTT NIXON,
University of Rhode Island, Narragansett
NANCY RABALAIS,
Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium, Chauvin
WALTER SCHMIDT,
Florida Geological Survey, Tallahassee
PAUL TOBIN,
Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association, Fairfax, Virginia
KARL TUREKIAN,
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
Staff
MORGAN GOPNIK, Director
EDWARD R. URBAN, JR., Senior Program Officer
DAN WALKER, Senior Program Officer
ALEXANDRA ISERN, Program Officer
SUSAN ROBERTS, Program Officer
ROBIN MORRIS, Financial Associate
SHIREL SMITH, Office Manager
SHARI MAGUIRE, Research Assistant
ANN CARLISLE, Senior Project Assistant
JODI BACHIM, Project Assistant
MEGAN KELLY, Project Assistant
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD
HENRY J. VAUX, JR. (Chair),
Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland
CAROL A. JOHNSTON (Vice-Chair),
University of Minnesota, Duluth
RICHELLE ALLEN-KING,
Washington State University, Pullman
GREGORY BAECHER,
University of Maryland, College Park
JOHN S. BOYER,
University of Delaware, Lewes
JOHN BRISCOE,
The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
DENISE FORT,
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
STEVEN GLOSS,
University of Wyoming, Laramie
WILLIAM A. JURY,
University of California, Riverside
GARY S. LOGSDON,
Black & Veatch, Cincinnati, Ohio
RICHARD G. LUTHY,
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
JOHN W. MORRIS,
J.W. Morris Ltd., Arlington, Virginia
PHILIP A. PALMER,
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Delaware
REBECCA T. PARKIN,
George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
JOAN B. ROSE,
University of South Florida, St. Petersburg
R. RHODES TRUSSELL,
Montgomery Watson, Pasadena, California
ERIC F. WOOD,
Princeton University, New Jersey
Staff
STEPHEN D. PARKER, Director
LAURA EHLERS, Senior Program Officer
CHRIS ELFRING, Senior Program Officer
JEFFREY JACOBS, Senior Program Officer
WILLIAM LOGAN, Program Officer
MARK GIBSON, Research Associate
JEANNE AQUILINO, Administrative Associate
PATRICIA JONES, Study/Research Associate
ANITA A. HALL, Administrative Assistant
ELLEN DE GUZMAN, Senior Project Assistant
ANIKE JOHNSON, Project Assistant
COMMISSION ON GEOSCIENCES, ENVIRONMENT, AND RESOURCES
GEORGE M. HORNBERGER (Chair),
University of Virginia, Charlottesville
RICHARD A. CONWAY,
Union Carbide Corporation (Retired), S. Charleston, West Virginia
LYNN GOLDMAN,
Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
THOMAS E. GRAEDEL,
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
THOMAS J. GRAFF,
Environmental Defense Fund, Oakland, California
EUGENIA KALNAY,
University of Maryland, College Park
DEBRA KNOPMAN,
Progressive Policy Institute, Washington, D.C.
BRAD MOONEY,
J. Brad Mooney Associates, Ltd., Arlington, Virginia
HUGH C. MORRIS,
El Dorado Gold Corporation, Vancouver, British Columbia
H. RONALD PULLIAM,
University of Georgia, Athens
MILTON RUSSELL,
Joint Institute for Energy and Environment and University of Tennessee (Emeritus), Knoxville
ROBERT J. SERAFIN,
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
ANDREW R. SOLOW,
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Massachusetts
E-AN ZEN,
University of Maryland, College Park
MARY LOU ZOBACK,
U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California
Staff
ROBERT M. HAMILTON, Executive Director
GREGORY H. SYMMES, Associate Executive Director
JEANETTE SPOON, Administrative and Financial Officer
DAVID FEARY, Scientific Reports Officer
SANDI FITZPATRICK, Administrative Associate
MARQUITA SMITH, Administrative Assistant/Technology Analyst
Preface
The National Research Council exists to provide independent scientific advice to the nation, and in particular to help federal agencies with guidance on how best to address significant or controversial problems and make wise use of science in their programs and activities. Sometimes, the topics of study are narrow and the advice is targeted at a specific program. But more often, and perhaps more importantly, a study will focus on a complex issue and the committee will need to synthesize significant (and at times contradictory) information, and then provide clear, practical conclusions and recommendations—recommendations that will make a real difference in solving the problem at hand.
The NRC’s Committee on Causes and Management of Coastal Eutrophication conducted exactly this type of nationally important study. Accelerated eutrophication is a real threat to the nation’s coastal waters: for instance, eutrophication-caused oxygen-poor waters on the inner continental shelf of the northern Gulf of Mexico can extend over an area as great as 20,000 km2. It has major impacts, from economic losses associated with reduced fisheries to potential human health impacts, and is likely to increase in severity as nutrient loading from upstream sources increases as a result of continuing urbanization, deforestation, agriculture, and atmospheric deposition. Given that the population in U.S. coastal communities now exceeds 141 million (over half of the U.S. population) and that 17 of the 20 fastest growing counties are located along the coast, nutrient pollution is certainly a national priority requiring attention.
But it is the kind of diffuse, complex problem that prohibits easy answers. It can be addressed best by coordinated actions at many levels—local, state, regional, and national. And success depends on having a solid scientific understanding of the causes of the problem and the full range of possible management alternatives.
To provide advice to federal, state, and local government agencies charged with addressing the growing problems associated with nutrient pollution and eutrophication, the National Research Council (NRC) charged the Committee on the Causes and Management of Coastal Eutrophication to review current knowledge of watershed, estuarine, and coastal processes and their roles in eutrophication; assess past and ongoing efforts to monitor and assess water quality on a variety of scales; and address barriers to implementation of effective management practices and regulatory strategies for preventing and reducing nutrient enrichment and its effects. In essence, the committee was asked to recommend actions that could provide a basis for improving strategies for watershed management to reduce coastal eutrophication in the future. The committee was composed of 11 members with expertise in estuarine biology, aquatic and freshwater ecology, watershed management, environmental engineering, chemistry, agricultural science, economics, and other related fields. The study was funded with contributions from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Geological Survey, and Electric Power Research Institute.
To conduct this study, the committee met six times to gather information, talk at length with other experts in the fields, deliberate, and write its report. Special effort was made to get input from regional scientific experts and managers in eutrophication-related programs to gain a practical view of the problems faced. In an effort to better understand the challenges facing local managers, the committee conducted a series of detailed interviews with local, state, and federal managers and scientists responsible for addressing nutrient over-enrichment in 18 estuaries around the country.
Given the technical complexity of the problem and the myriad players who have a role in addressing it, considerable thought was given to who the potential audiences of the report may be and how best to convey the findings and recommendations to this diverse group. We identified four main audiences: 1) coastal and watershed managers—these individuals directly or indirectly influence coastal ecosystems, whether by formulating strategies to deal with local or regional problems or through the various permitting responsibilities they often have. Thus their decisions affect significant sectors of local and state economies, and these decisions cannot be put off until greater information or scientific understanding can be obtained. 2) Scientists—these individuals conduct
research that may provide greater understanding and possible solutions to many of the problems facing resource managers. 3) Federal agencies—these organizations are often placed in support or oversight roles as the federal government attempts to enable or ensure that local and state entities are able to address environmental problems effectively and for the national good. And 4) Congress and the Executive Branch—these entities directly influence the legal and administrative powers given to federal agencies as well as the fiscal and human resources needed to implement recommendations.
These four audiences vary greatly in their level of technical acumen. Thus the report has been essentially divided into three parts. The first section, which includes Chapters 1 and 2, provides an introduction to the topic and a summary of the committee’s findings and recommendations, and is intended for a non-technical audience. The second section, which includes Chapters 3, 4, 5, and 6, provides detailed technical information on the nature of nutrient over-enrichment and its sources, effects, and the relative susceptibility of different types of systems. The third section, which includes Chapter 7, 8, and 9, addresses abatement strategies.
This report is the result of the committee’s extensive efforts, and I would like to thank the committee’s members for their hard work, patience, and cooperation. I would also like to offer thanks to the large number of people—local managers, state agency personnel, federal agency personnel, and others—who provided information and insights to the committee. The committee could not have done its job without this assistance. In particular, the committee would like to thank Suzanne Bricker, David Brock, Jim Cloern, David Davis, Scott Dawson, David Flemer, Jonathan Garber, Robert Goldstein, Jack Kelly, Brian Lapointe, Peggy Lehman, Tom Malone, Karen McGlathery, Paul Orlando, Glenn Patterson, Donald Scavia, and John Sowles. For the committee, I would also like to thank the NRC staff who supported our efforts, Jodi Bachim, Chris Elfring, Kirstin Rohrer, Kate Schafer, Dan Walker, and Jennifer Wright.
In accordance with NRC report review policies, this report has been reviewed by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. This independent review provided candid and critical comments that assisted the authors and the NRC in making the published report as sound as possible and ensured that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The content of the review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their participation in the review of the report: Larry P. Atkinson (Old Dominion University), James Baker (Iowa State University), Donald F. Boesch (University of Maryland), John
Boland (Johns Hopkins University), Scott Dawson (California Regional Water Quality Control Board), Thomas J. Graff (Environmental Defense Fund), Alan Krupnick (Resources for the Future), Pamela A. Matson (Stanford University), Hans Paerl (University of North Carolina), Nancy Rabalais (Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium), and Larry Roesner (Colorado State University). While these people provided many constructive comments and suggestions, responsibility for the final content rests solely with the authoring committee and the NRC.
Bob Howarth,
Chair, Committee on the Causes and
Management of Coastal Eutrophication