|
Research-Doctorate Programs Tables
Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
TABLES
- ES-1 Percentage of Programs Whose "Scholarly Quality of Program Faculty" Rated
on Average as "Distinguished," "Strong," or "Good" /3
- ES-2 Relative Distribution of Research-Doctorate Programs Appearing in Both the
1982 and 1993 Studies by Mean Rating of "Scholarly Quality of Program Faculty"
in Quality Grouping /4
- ES-3 Percentage of Research-Doctorate Programs Remaining in the "Top Quarter"
Between 1982 and 1993 When Mean Rating of "Scholarly Quality of Program
Faculty" Is Considered by Broad Field and Quality Grouping /4
- ES-4 Relative Distribution of Graduates from Participating HBCU/HSI
Institutions by Quality Grouping (for All Fields) /6
- 1-1 Scores on Graduate Record Examination (GRE) and Subject Matter Tests:
1980-1992 /12
- 1-2 Number of Ph.D.s Awarded by U.S. Universities (1920-1992) by Reporting
Period and Year in Which the Doctorate Records File Recorded the First Ph.D.
Awarded by that Institution /13
- 2-1 Ph.D. Production in Selected Fields in the Biological Sciences by Field,
Institution, and Program Within Institution, 1986-1990 /18
- 2-2 Estimated Range of Institutional Coverage by 1993 Study of
Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States by Field /20
- 2-3 Distribution of Participating Institutions by Carnegie Classification and
Broad Field /21
- 2-4 Selected Characteristics of Research-Doctorate Programs in the 1993 Study
/25
- 3-1 Distribution of Program Ratings on the Variable "Scholarly Quality of
Program Faculty" /32
- 3-2 Distribution of Program Ratings on the Variable "Effectiveness of Program
in Educating Research Scholars/Scientists" /33
- 3-3 Average Number of Program Faculty by Field and Quality Grouping /36
- 3-4 Average Number of Students Enrolled in Doctoral Studies in Fall 1992 and
(in parentheses) the Percentage of Female Students, by Field and Quality
Grouping /38
- 3-5 Average Percentage of Faculty in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Having
Had Federal Grants (1986-1992) by Quality Grouping /40
- 3-6 Publication and Citation Information for Selected Fields by Quality
Grouping /40
- 3-7 Average Number of Awards and Honors Among Faculty in the Arts and
Humanities by Field and Quality Grouping /41
- 3-8 Relative Distribution of Research-Doctorate Programs Appearing in Both the
1982 and 1993 Studies by Mean Rating of "Scholarly Quality of Program Faculty"
in Quality Grouping /42
- 3-9 Percentage of Research-Doctorate Programs Remaining in the "Top Quarter"
Between 1982 and 1993 When Mean Rating of "Scholarly Quality of Program
Faculty" Is Considered by Broad Field and Quality Grouping /43
- 3-10 Change in the Average Number of Faculty in the Arts and Humanities by
Field and 1982 Quality Grouping, Fall 1980 and Fall 1992 /44
- 3-11 Average Number Faculty in Selected Fields of Engineering Based on 1982
Quality Grouping /46
- 3-12 Average Percentage of Doctoral Recipients With Research or Teaching
Assistantships as a Primary Source of Support by Field and Quality Grouping
/52
- 3-13 Summary Information on Patterns of Doctoral Degrees Earned by Women from
Programs Participating in the 1993 Study by Broad Field and Quality Grouping
/53
- 3-14 Summary Information on Patterns of Doctoral Degrees Earned by Minorities
from Programs Participating in the 1993 Study by Broad Field and Quality
Grouping /53
- 3-15 Relative Distribution of Programs from Participating HBCU/HSI Institutions
by Quality Grouping (for All Fields) /55
- 3-16 Relative Distribution of Graduates from Participating HBCU/HSI
Institutions by Quality Grouping (for All Fields) /55
FIGURES
- ES-1 Relative Distribution of Research-Doctorate Programs Appearing in the 1993
Study for the First Time in Fields Included in Both the 1982 and 1993 Study, by
Broad Field and 1993 Quality Grouping
/5
- ES-2 Relative Distribution of Minority Ph.D. Recipients by Broad Field and by
Quality Grouping (1986-1992) /6
- 1-1 Doctorate Recipients, Total and by Gender, 1963-1993 /9
- 2-1 Excerpt from the 1993 NRC National Survey of Graduate Faculty /21
- 3-1 Distribution of Program Ratings Across All Programs by "Scholarly Quality
of Program Faculty"
/31
- 3-2 Average Number of Program Faculty by Quality Grouping and Broad Field /35
- 3-3 Average Number of Students Enrolled by Broad Field and Quality Grouping
37
- 3-4 Average Percentage of Faculty in Programs Rated in the "Top Quarter" Having
Had Federal Grant Support Between 1986 and 1992, by Field /39
- 3-5 Relative Distribution of Research-Doctorate Programs Appearing in the 1993
Study for the First Time in Fields Included in Both the 1982 and 1993 Study, by
Broad Field and 1993 Quality Grouping
/43
- 3-6 Change in the Average Number of Program Graduates in the Arts and
Humanities by Field and Quality Grouping: 1975-1980 and 1986-1992 /45
- 3-7 Average Number of Program Graduates in Engineering by Quality Grouping:
1975-1980 and 1987-1992 /47
- 3-8 Average Number of Program Graduates in the Physical Sciences and
Mathematics by Field and Quality Grouping: 1975-1980 and 1986-1992 /48
- 3-9 Average Number of Program Graduates in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
by Field and 1982 Quality Grouping: 1975-1980 and 1986-1992 /50
- 3-10 Median Time to Degree by Broad Field and by Quality Grouping: 1986-1992
/51
- 3-11 Percentage of Female Doctorates Who Come From Programs Rated in the "Top
Quarter" on the "Scholarly Quality of Program Faculty" Variable /54
- 3-12 Relative Distribution of Minority Ph.D. Recipients by Broad Field and by
Quality Grouping (1986-1992) /55
Previous Section |
HTML Home Page |
NAS Home Page |
NAP Home Page |
Reading Room |
Report Home Page
|