In 2001, the National Research Council (NRC) completed a congressionally mandated assessment of the benefits and costs of DOE’s fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs, Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? The Congress followed this retrospective study by directing DOE to request the NRC to develop a methodology for assessing prospective benefits. The first phase of this project—development of the methodology—began in December 2003. Phase two will make the methodology more robust and explore related issues, and subsequent phases will apply the methodology to review the prospective benefits of different DOE fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs. In developing this project, three considerations were particularly important. First, the study should adapt the work of the retrospective study. Second, the project should develop a methodology that provides a rigorous calculation of benefits and risks, and a practical and consistent process for its application. Third, the methodology should be transparent, should not require extensive resources for implementation, and should produce easily understood results. This report presents the results of phase one. It focuses on adaptation of the retrospective methodology to a prospective context.
Table of Contents
|2 From Retrospective to Prospective Evaluation||9-12|
|3 Methodology for Prospective Evaluation of Department of Energy Programs||13-31|
|4 Expert Panel Process||32-37|
|5 Results of Applying the Methodology||38-47|
|6 Conclusions and Recommendations||48-51|
|Appendix A: Committee Biographical Information||53-58|
|Appendix B: Statement of Task||59-59|
|Appendix C: Presentations and Committee Meetings||60-61|
|Appendix D: Letter Report||62-69|
|Appendix E: Prospective Evaluation of DOE Programs: A Preliminary Methodology||70-74|
|Appendix F: Report of the Panel on Benefits of Lighting R&D||75-88|
|Appendix G: Report of the Panel of Sequestration R&D||89-101|
|Appendix H: Report of the Panel of Benefits of Fuel Cell R&D||102-119|
|Appendix I: The Lighting Cse Study Recast as a Decision Tree||120-120|
|Appendix J: Expected Benefits Results and Report Guidance||121-123|
|Appendix K: Information Request to the Department of Energy||124-126|
The National Academies Press and the Transportation Research Board have partnered with Copyright Clearance Center to offer a variety of options for reusing our content. You may request permission to:
For most Academic and Educational uses no royalties will be charged although you are required to obtain a license and comply with the license terms and conditions.
For information on how to request permission to translate our work and for any other rights related query please click here.
For questions about using the Copyright.com service, please contact:
Copyright Clearance Center
22 Rosewood Drive
Danvers, MA 01923
Tel (toll free): 855/239-3415 (select option 1)
Loading stats for Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase One): A First Look Forward...