The San Francisco Bay Delta Estuary is a large, complex estuarine ecosystem in California. It has been substantially altered by dikes, levees, channelization, pumps, human development, introduced species, dams on its tributary streams and contaminants. The Delta supplies water from the state's wetter northern regions to the drier southern regions and also serves as habitat for many species, some of which are threatened and endangered. The restoration of water exacerbated tensions over water allocation in recent years, and have led to various attempts to develop comprehensive plans to provide reliable water supplies and to protect the ecosystem. One of these plans is the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP).
The report, A Review of the Use of Science and Adaptive Management in California's Draft Bay Delta Conservation Plan, determines that the plan is incomplete in a number of important areas and takes this opportunity to identify key scientific and structural gaps that, if addressed, could lead to a more successful and comprehensive final BDCP. The plan is missing the type of structure usually associated with current planning methods in which the goals and objectives are specified, alternative measure for achieving the objectives are introduced and analyzed, and a course of action in identified based on analytical optimization of economic, social, and environmental factors. Yet the panel underscores the importance of a credible and a robust BDCP in addressing the various water management problems that beset the Delta. A stronger, more complete, and more scientifically credible BDCP that effectively integrates and utilizes science could indeed pave the way toward the next generation of solutions to California's chronic water problems.
Table of Contents
|3 Critical Gaps in the Scope of the Draft BDCP||20-28|
|4 Use of Science in the BDCP||29-37|
|5 Adaptive Management in the BDCP||38-44|
|6 Management Fragmentation and a Lack of Coherence||45-49|
|7 In Conclusion||50-51|
|Appendix A: Statement of Task||63-63|
|Appendix B: BDCP Steering Committee Members and Planning Agreement Signature Dates||64-64|
|Appendix C: BDCP Proposed Covered Species and Associated Habitats||65-71|
|Appendix D: Possible Causal Connections in Suppression of Populations of Endangered Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake||72-72|
|Appendix E: BDCP Adaptive Management Process Framework||73-73|
|Appendix F: Water Science and Technology Board||74-74|
|Appendix G: Ocean Studies Board||75-75|
|Appendix H: Panel Biographical Information||76-82|
The National Academies Press and the Transportation Research Board have partnered with Copyright Clearance Center to offer a variety of options for reusing our content. You may request permission to:
For most Academic and Educational uses no royalties will be charged although you are required to obtain a license and comply with the license terms and conditions.
For information on how to request permission to translate our work and for any other rights related query please click here.
For questions about using the Copyright.com service, please contact:
Copyright Clearance Center
22 Rosewood Drive
Danvers, MA 01923
Tel (toll free): 855/239-3415 (select option 1)
Loading stats for A Review of the Use of Science and Adaptive Management in California's Draft Bay Delta Conservation Plan...