Research and development (R&D) organizations are operated by government, business, academe, and independent institutes. The success of their parent organizations is closely tied to the success of these R&D organizations. In this report, organizations refers to an organization that performs research and/or development activities (often a laboratory), and parent refers to the superordinate organization of which the R&D organization is a part. When the organization under discussion is formally labeled a laboratory, it is referred to as such. The question arises: How does one know whether an organization and its programs are achieving excellence in the best interests of its parent? Does the organization have an appropriate research staff, facilities, and equipment? Is it doing the right things at high levels of quality, relevance, and timeliness? Does it lead to successful new concepts, products, or processes that support the interests of its parent?
This report offers assessment guidelines for senior management of organizations and of their parents. The report lists the major principles of assessment, noting that details will vary from one organization to another. It provides sufficient information to inform the design of assessments, but it does not prescribe precisely how to perform them, because different techniques are needed for different types of organizations.
Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations covers three key factors that underpin the success of an R&D organization: (1) the mission of the organization and its alignment with that of the parents; (2) the relevance and impact of the organization's work; and (3) the resources provided to the organization, beginning with a high-quality staff and management.
Table of Contents
|2 Framework for Examination of Assessment Processes||15-22|
|3 Assessing Management||23-28|
|4 Assessing Technical Quality||29-37|
|5 Assessing Impact||38-41|
|6 Guidelines for Consideration During Assessment||42-46|
|Appendix A Biographical Sketches of the Panel for Review of Best Practices In Research and Development Organizations||47-51|
|Appendix B Importance of Alignment Between an Organization's Vision and Its People||52-53|
|Appendix C Validating the Assessment||54-55|
|Appendix D Example of Peer Advice During the Planning Phase of R&D||56-56|
|Appendix E Relevant Statutes and Requirements Documents for U.S. Government Laboratories and U.S. Government Research||57-57|
|Appendix F The Army Research Laboratory's Process for Assuring Relevance||58-60|
|Appendix G Examples of Stakeholders||61-63|
|Appendix H Questions Pertaining to Assessment of Leadership and Management||64-66|
|Appendix I Sample Crosscutting Assessments||67-68|
|Appendix J Assessment at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Army Research Laboratory, and Sandia National Laboratories||69-72|
|Appendix K Examples of Peer Review Conducted at Federal R&D Organizations||73-77|
|Appendix L Metrics Applied by National Research Council Panels to Assessment of the Army Research Laboratories||78-80|
The National Academies Press and the Transportation Research Board have partnered with Copyright Clearance Center to offer a variety of options for reusing our content. You may request permission to:
For most Academic and Educational uses no royalties will be charged although you are required to obtain a license and comply with the license terms and conditions.
For information on how to request permission to translate our work and for any other rights related query please click here.
For questions about using the Copyright.com service, please contact:
Copyright Clearance Center
22 Rosewood Drive
Danvers, MA 01923
Tel (toll free): 855/239-3415 (select option 1)
Loading stats for Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations...