TRB Special Report 315: Funding and Managing the U.S. Inland Waterways System: What Policy Makers Need to Know explores the role and importance of the federally funded inland waterways system, priorities for future investment, its beneficiaries, and sources of funding.
In recent years, the inland waterways system has transported six to seven percent of all domestic ton-miles of cargo. The system is a small but important component of the national freight system, particularly for bulk commodities. The study committee finds that, in order to ensure efficient use of limited navigation resources, the most critical need for the inland waterways system is a sustainable and well-executed plan for maintaining system reliability and performance. Reliability and performance will depend on placing higher priority on investments in operations and maintenance (O&M). Without a funding strategy that prioritizes system preservation, maintenance may continue to be deferred, which would result in further deterioration and in a less cost effective and less reliable system.
The committee finds that more reliance on a “user-pays” funding strategy for the commercial navigation system is feasible, would generate new revenues for maintenance, and would promote economic efficiency.
The committee suggests that an asset management program focused on economic efficiency, fully implemented and linked to the budgeting process, would help prioritize maintenance spending and ascertain the funding levels required for reliable freight service.
View the TRB Special Report 315 webcast.
View the press release.
Table of Contents
|2 Role of the Inland Waterways System in National Freight Transportation||14-65|
|3 Federal Role in the Inland Waterways System||66-102|
|4 Prioritizing Maintenance for the Inland Waterways Freight System||103-130|
|5 Options for a User-Based Approach to Funding Operations, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation for Commercial Navigation||131-157|
|Appendix A Fuel-Taxed Inland Waterways||169-174|
|Appendix B Major Commodity Corridors||175-177|
|Appendix C Documentation of Original Construction and Major Rehabilitation Dates for Mainstem Inland Waterways System Locks||178-183|
|Appendix D Age Detail for Infrastructure on Each Major River System||184-184|
|Appendix E Illustrations of Delay and Possible Metrics by Major River System||185-193|
|Appendix F Summary of Correlations Between Lock Performance and Lock Age (in 2014) Calculated from the Date of Known Major Rehabilitation Construction||194-195|
|Appendix G Energy Intensity Comparisons for Water, Rail, and Highway||196-200|
|Appendix H USACE Description of the Status of Implementation of Its Asset Management Program||201-205|
|Study Committee Biographical Information||206-214|
The National Academies Press and the Transportation Research Board have partnered with Copyright Clearance Center to offer a variety of options for reusing our content. You may request permission to:
For most Academic and Educational uses no royalties will be charged although you are required to obtain a license and comply with the license terms and conditions.
For information on how to request permission to translate our work and for any other rights related query please click here.
For questions about using the Copyright.com service, please contact:
Copyright Clearance Center
22 Rosewood Drive
Danvers, MA 01923
Tel (toll free): 855/239-3415 (select option 1)
Loading stats for Funding and Managing the U.S. Inland Waterways System: What Policy Makers Need to Know: What Policy Makers Need to Know...