National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: DoD Facilities Sustainment Model
Suggested Citation:"Table of Responsibilities." National Research Council. 2001. Deferred Maintenance Reporting for Federal Facilities: Meeting the Requirements of Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Standard Number 6, as Amended. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10095.
×
Page 31

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

DEFINITIONAL ISSUES AND POTENTIAL REVISIONS 31 DoD excludes activities that are sometimes considered “maintenance” (such as grass cutting) as well as some repair activities that go beyond sustainment (such as restoration of a facility destroyed by fire or repairs done solely to implement a new standard). To use FSM the following are needed: a standard classification of facilities into categories with common units of measure; a standard per-unit sustainment cost for each category of facility; a real property inventory with accurate unit quantities, locations, and projections; and an area cost factor and inflation table. For per-unit sustainment cost factors, DoD obtained standard, off-the-shelf, commercial cost factors wherever possible.3 Computation of a sustainment requirement is as follows: Requirement = Facility Quantity × Unit Cost Factor × Area Cost Factor × Inflation Factor The sustainment requirement formula is run for each category of facility at each location, and the results are summed to the desired level (or view) of the data. For DoD, FSM can provide a sustainment cost by installation, major command, state or country, military service, or for the department as a whole. To determine whether sustainment requirements are being met, two additional tools are necessary: (1) a “table of responsibilities” that allocates responsibility for sustainment to a suborganization and funding source and (2) a budget category that matches the sustainment definition for each responsible organization and funding source combination. Table of Responsibilities Facility quantities (and hence sustainment requirements) must be allocated to the subcomponent organization and funding source that has sustainment responsibility. This process produces a matrix like the one below, where the columns represent funding sources, the rows represent responsible organizations, and the cells are filled in with facility sustainment requirements generated by FSM: Funding Sources Responsible Organization 1 2 3 4 n A B C n 3 DoD Facilities Cost Factor Handbook, April 2000, Office of the Deputy Under Secretary (Installations).

Next: NASA Backlog of Maintenance and Repair Model »
Deferred Maintenance Reporting for Federal Facilities: Meeting the Requirements of Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Standard Number 6, as Amended Get This Book
×
 Deferred Maintenance Reporting for Federal Facilities: Meeting the Requirements of Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Standard Number 6, as Amended
Buy Paperback | $47.00 Buy Ebook | $37.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In 1996 the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) 1 enacted Standard Number 6, Accounting for Property, Plant, and Equipment (PP&E), the first government-wide initiative requiring federal agencies to report dollar amounts of deferred maintenance annually. The FASAB has identified four overall objectives in federal financial reporting: budgetary integrity, operating performance, stewardship, and systems and control. FASAB Standard Number 6, as amended, focuses on operating performance and stewardship. The FFC Standing Committee on Operations and Maintenance has prepared this report to identify potential issues that should be considered in any future amendments to the standard and to suggest approaches for resolving them. The committee's intent is to assist the CFO Council, federal agencies, the FASAB, and others as they consider how best to meet the objectives of federal financial reporting for facilities.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!