National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 1. Introduction
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

CHAPTER 2
PATTERNS OF CHILDHOOD DEATH IN AMERICA

A simple child, that lightly draws its breath, And feels its life in every limb, What should it know of death?

William Wordsworth, 1798

In 1999, children aged 0 to 19 accounted for 29 percent, or 77.8 million, of the U.S. population of 272.7 million (U.S. Census, 2001). Reflecting their generally good health, children accounted for only 2 percent of all deaths—about 55,000 compared to more than a half million deaths for adults aged 20 to 64 and 1.8 million for those age 65 and over (NCHS, 2001a).1 Wordsworth’s implicit hope is far more a reality today than during the time 200 years past when the poet’s two youngest children died.

This chapter summarizes information about the death rates and leading causes of death for children of different ages. It also reviews information about where children die. The discussion begins, however, by briefly putting life-threatening illness and death during childhood in the broader context of child health and illness in the United States. The chapter ends with a short discussion of conclusions and implications for health care providers and policymakers.

CHILDHOOD DEATH IN THE CONTEXT OF IMPROVED CHILD HEALTH

Any discussion of death in childhood and the experience of children

1  

Unless otherwise indicated, data are from the National Center for Health Statistics report Deaths: Final Data 1999 (NCHS, 2001a).

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

and families living with life-threatening medical problems has to be put in the context of child health as it has improved during the last century. First, in the United States, death in childhood is now rare rather than commonplace. Second, causes of death in childhood have changed. Third, children have different patterns of mortality than adults. Fourth, although most children are now healthy, a significant fraction lives with serious health problems.

Death in Childhood Is No Longer Expected

In 1900, 30 percent of all deaths in the United States occurred in children less than 5 years of age compared to just 1.4 percent in 1999 (CDC, 1999a; NCHS, 2001a). Infant mortality dropped from approximately 100 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1915 (the first year for which data to calculate an infant mortality rate were available) to 29.2 deaths per 1,000 births in 1950 and 7.1 per 1,000 in 1999 (CDC, 1999b; NCHS, 2001a).2

This decrease in mortality reflects a century’s worth of advances in public health, living standards, medical science and technology, and clinical practice. Many infants who once would have died from prematurity, complications of childbirth, and congenital anomalies (birth defects) now survive. Children who previously would have perished from an array of childhood infections today live healthy and long lives thanks to sanitation improvements, vaccines, and antibiotics. In the United States, the average life expectancy at birth rose from less than 50 years in 1900 to more than 76 years in 1999, due in considerable measure to continuing reductions in infant and child mortality (NCHS, 2001c).

Nonetheless, each year in this country, thousands of parents lose their children to conditions such as prematurity, congenital anomalies, injuries, and diseases such as cancer and heart disease. Thousands more siblings, grandparents, other family members, friends, neighbors, schoolmates, and professional caregivers are touched by these deaths. Instead of being a sad but common family experience, death in childhood now stands out as a particular tragedy, at least in developed nations such as the United States.

2  

Despite such progress, the United States ranked twenty-seventh in infant mortality among 38 countries in 1997, lower than such nations as the Czech Republic and Portugal and tied with Cuba (NCHS, 2001c). The relatively high infant mortality rate in the United States has been attributed in part to this country’s large number of low birth weight infants, which in turn, reflects underlying social and economic problems and disparities (see, e.g., Guyer et al., 2000; Hoyert et al., 2001).

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

Leading Causes of Death in Childhood Have Changed

In 1900, pneumonia and influenza, tuberculosis, and enteritis with diarrhea were the three leading causes of death in the United States, and children under 5 accounted for 40 percent of all deaths from these infections (CDC, 1999a). Today, only pneumonia (in combination with influenza) is among the top 10 causes of death overall or for children. Substantial declines in mortality have continued in recent decades. During the past 40 years, infant deaths due to pneumonia and influenza fell from 314 per 100,000 live births in 1960 to 8 per 100,000 in 1999 (Singh and Yu, 1995; NCHS, 2001b). As infectious disease mortality has declined in significance, unintentional and intentional injuries have emerged as leading causes of death, especially for children past infancy.

In 1960, infant deaths from short gestation/low birth weight and congenital anomalies (described in federal reports as “congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities”) occurred at rates of 457 and 361 per 100,000 live births, respectively (Singh and Yu, 1995). By 1999, these rates had dropped to 111 and 138 per 100,000, respectively (NCHS, 2001b).

More recently, mortality from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), which was first reported as a separate cause of death in 1973, has dropped substantially—by more than a third between 1992 and 1996, with continuing decreases since then (Willinger et al., 1998; NCHS, 2000b). SIDS is still, however, the third leading cause of infant death in this country.

Children Have Different Patterns of Mortality Than Adults

As shown in Table 2.1 (which uses broader age categories than those used later in this chapter) the leading causes of death differ considerably for children compared to adults, especially elderly adults. For infants, the leading causes of death include congenital anomalies (a highly diverse group of malformations and other conditions), disorders related to short gestation and low birth weight, and sudden infant death syndrome. For older children and teenagers, mortality from unintentional and intentional injuries grows in importance. Among adults, as age increases, the relative contribution of injuries decreases, and death rates related to chronic conditions such as heart disease increase sharply. Beginning in adolescence, increasing age also brings increases in causes of death linked to individual behaviors involving diet, exercise, smoking, alcohol use, and similar factors.

Figure 2.1 shows the percentages of all deaths in childhood accounted for by leading causes of child mortality. Table 2.2 shows the proportion of all deaths for given age groups accounted for by the top five leading causes of death. For most age groups, a few causes of death account for two-thirds

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

TABLE 2.1 Top Ten Causes of Death, Numbers of Deaths by Cause and Total, and Total Death Rates, by Age Group (1999)

 

Age Group (years)

Rank

Infant (<1)

1–4

5–14

1

Congenital anomaliesa 5,473

Accidentsb 1,898

Accidents 3,091

2

Short gestation and LBWc 4,392

Congenital anomalies 549

Malignant neoplasms 1,012

3

SIDS 2,648

Malignant neoplasms 418

Homicide 432

4

Complications of pregnancy 1,399

Homicide 376

Congenital anomalies 428

5

Respiratory distress syndrome 1,110

Diseases of the heart 183 4

Diseases of the heart 277

6

Placental cord membranes 1,025

Pneumonia and influenza 130

Suicide 242

7

Accidents 845

Perinatal periode 92

Chronic lower respiratory diseases 139

8

Newborn Sepsis 691

Septicemia 63

Benign neoplasms 101

9

Diseases of the circulatory system 667

Benign neoplasms 63

Pneumonia and influenza 93

10

Atelectasisf 647

Chronic lower respiratory diseases 54

Septicemia 77

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

 

15–24

25–44

45–64

>65

Accidents 13,656

Accidents 27,121

Malignant neoplasms 135,748

Diseases of the heart 607,265

Homicide 4,998

Malignant neoplasms 20,737

Diseases of the heart 99,161

Malignant neoplasms 390,122

Suicide 3,901

Diseases of the heart 16,666

Accidents 18,924

Stroke 148,599

Malignant neoplasms 1,724

Suicide 11,572

Stroke 15,215

Chronic lower respiratory disease 108,112

Disease of the heart 1,069

HIV infection 8,961

Chronic lower respiratory diseases 14,407

Pneumonia and influenza 57,282

Congenital anomalies 434

Homicide 7,437

Diabetes mellitus 13,832

Diabetes mellitus 51,843

Chronic lower respiratory diseases 209

Diseases of the liver 3,709

Diseases of the liver 12,005

Alzheimer's Disease 44,020

HIV 198

Stroke 3,154

Suicide 7,977

Accidents 32,219

Stroke 182

Diabetes mellitus 2,524

HIV 5,056

Nephritis 29,938

Pneumonia and influenza 179

Pneumonia and influenza 1,402

Septicemia 4,399

Septicemia 24,626

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

 

Age Group (years)

Rank

Infant (<1)

1–4

5–14

Total deaths (all causes)

27,937

5,249

7,595

Death rate per 100,000 (all causes)

705.6g

34.7

19.2

NOTE: The rank order of leading causes of death changed somewhat between 1998 and 1999, reflecting in part changes in the coding rules for selecting underlying cause of death between the ninth and tenth editions of the International Classification of Diseases.

aCongenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities.

bMost vital statistics reports now use the term “unintentional injury” rather than accidents.

cLBW = low birth weight.

FIGURE 2.1 Percentage of total childhood by major causes (1999).

SOURCE: NCHS, 2001a.

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

 

15–24

25–44

45–64

>65

30,656

130,322

391,953

1,797,331

81.2

157.5

662.2

5,203.6

dDeaths related to congenital malformations of the heart are included with congenital anomalies.

e Certain conditions originating in the perinatal period.

f Pulmonary collapse or, more generally, absence of gas from part or all of the lung.

g Death rate calculated per 100,000 population (under 1 year) rather than per 1,000 live births, which is the infant mortality rate (see Table 2.4)

SOURCE: NCHS, 2001a, b.

to three-quarters of all deaths. The major exception involves infants who die from a broader array of medical problems, as discussed in more detail below.

Most Children Are Healthy, but Many Live with Serious Health Problems

Although experts worry about the long-term health consequences of common problems such as juvenile obesity and lack of exercise, most children are healthy. Nonetheless, many children live with special health care needs, in part because medical and clinical advances make it possible to save and prolong the lives of children who in earlier times would have died from prematurity, congenital anomalies, injuries, and other problems.

As defined by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, children with special health care needs “have or are at increased risk for a chronic physical, developmental, behavioral or emotional condition and . . . also require health and related services of a type or amount beyond that required by children generally” (McPherson et al., 1998, p. 138).3 These conditions include cerebral palsy,

3  

The definition is not yet consistently used, even by the government. For example, one federal government web site (www.childstats.gov) uses the term to describe children who are “limited in their activities because of one or more chronic health conditions.”

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

TABLE 2.2 Percentage of All Deaths Due to Top Five Leading Causes, by Age (1999)

Age (years)

Percentage of Total

<1

53

1–4

65

5–9

71

10–14

69

15–19

84

20–24

81

25–44

66

45–64

74

>65

73

 

SOURCE: NCHS, 2001a,b.

vision loss, sickle cell anemia, asthma, mental retardation, autism, and serious learning disorders (NRC, 1996; Newacheck et al., 1998).

Newacheck (2000) has estimated that some 18 percent of children (more than 12 million) have special health care needs, which range from modest to extraordinary. Most have conditions that are not expected to lead to death in childhood. Of the estimated 12.8 million individuals with needs for long-term care at home or elsewhere, approximately 384,000 were children (National Academy on Aging, 1997).

A study by Feudtner and colleagues (2001) found that complex chronic conditions such as cancer and cardiovascular problems accounted for nearly 15,200 deaths among individuals 0 to 24 years of age in 1997. (Note that this estimate spans an additional five years beyond the 0 to 19 age range discussed in this chapter.) The researchers estimated that on any given day, about 5,000 of these individuals were in their last six months of life and potentially could have benefited from hospice care based on restrictive Medicaid eligibility criteria.

A working group on pediatric palliative care has estimated that about 8,600 children would benefit on any given day from palliative care services because of their limited life expectancy and serious needs (ChIPPS, 2001). This estimate did not link the potential for benefit to an assumed life expectancy of six months or less, a criterion for Medicare or Medicaid hospice benefits.

Some children who die from critical acute problems might need intensive palliative or hospice services for a few days or even hours, whereas children with complex chronic problems might need mostly intermittent services over a period of months or years. A substantial percentage of

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

children would not benefit from palliative or hospice services because they die suddenly and unexpectedly, leaving caregivers to tend to the bereaved family.

The next three sections of this chapter review death rates and major causes of death for children by broad age groups. Later sections consider socioeconomic and other disparities in death rates and causes of death.

INFANT, FETAL, AND PERINATAL DEATHS

Because so many deaths occur during pregnancy and in the first year after birth and because understanding the causes of such deaths is of particular interest, a number of terms have been developed to describe and differentiate these deaths. Table 2.3 lists the most widely used terms and their definitions and also includes other common terms and definitions relating to this period.

Death Rates and Numbers

Table 2.4, which shows trends in infant, fetal, and perinatal mortality rates since 1950, reveals continuing mortality decreases in the last half-century. In 1999, the infant mortality rate in the United States reached a low of 7.1 infant deaths per 1,000 live births, or 28,371 total infant deaths. After infancy, the mortality rate drops significantly and does not rise again to similar rates until people reach their mid-50s.

More children die in the first year of life than in all other years of childhood combined (27,937 infants compared to 26,622 children aged 1 to 19 years in 1999) (see Figure 2.2). Two-thirds of infant deaths occur in the neonatal period (18,728 of 27,937 deaths).

Of some 6.2 million pregnancies each year, about 63 percent result in a live birth, 20 percent in an induced abortion, and 15 percent in a fetal death (Martin and Hoyert, 2001). Ninety percent of spontaneous fetal losses occur within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. A large percentage of these end so early that the pregnancy is unrecognized. Most of the decline in fetal death rates in recent decades has occurred in the late fetal period.

Leading Causes of Infant Death

Understanding the common causes of infant death is important in understanding the potential role of supportive care for these children and their families. Table 2.5 reports the five leading causes of infant, neonatal, and postneonatal death. These causes account for approximately 54 percent of all infant deaths. In contrast, the next five causes (complications of placenta, cord, and membranes; infections; unintentional injuries; intrauterine

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

TABLE 2.3 Terminology Relating to Infants and Fetuses

Term

Definition

Infant

Child less than 1 year of age

Full-term infant

Infant born between 37 and 42 weeks’ gestation

Premature

infant Infant born before 37 weeks of gestation

Neonatal

period First 27 days of lifea

Early neonatal period

First 6 days of lifea

Postneonatal period

Days 28–365 of lifea

Low birth weight

Birth weight less than 2,500 grams (5.5 pounds) at birth

Very low birth weight

Birth weight less than 1,500 grams (3.3 pounds) at birth

Extremely low birth weight

Birth weight less than 1,000 grams (2.2 pounds) at birth

Miscarriage or spontaneous abortion

Naturally occurring, spontaneous expulsion of a human fetus, especially between the twelfth and twenty-seventh weeks of gestation

Antepartum fetal death

Death of a fetus before labor begins

Intrapartum fetal death

Death of a fetus during labor

Fetal death

Death of fetus prior to complete expulsion or extraction from the mother of a product of human conception (irrespective of duration of pregnancy) that is not an induced termination of pregnancy.b Some states use the term “stillbirth” for such fetal deaths

Late fetal deaths

Fetal deaths of 28 weeks’ or more gestationb

Perinatal mortality

Late fetal deaths plus infant deaths within 7 days of birth. (definitions of perinatal mortality vary and sometimes include fetal and infant deaths from the twentieth or the twenty-eighth week of gestation through the seventh or twenty-seventh day of life)

Infant mortality rate

Number of infant deaths per 1,000 live births

aNCHS, 2001c, Table 23.

bNCHS, 1997. The federal government recommends that state governments, for vital statistics reporting purposes, report fetal deaths of 350 grams or more or, if the weight is unknown, 20 weeks’ or more gestation; 13 U.S. jurisdictions follow this recommendation, but the majority (25) use only the 20 weeks’ gestation criterion. Fetal mortality rates are based on deaths of 20 or more weeks’ gestation.

hypoxia and birth asphyxia; and pneumonia and influenza) account for approximately 14 percent of deaths.

Congenital anomalies and disorders relating to short gestation and unspecified low birth weight dominate as causes of neonatal deaths. During the postneonatal period, SIDS and unintentional injuries and intentional

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

TABLE 2.4 Infant, Fetal, and Perinatal Mortality Rates, Selected Years 1950–1999

 

Neonatal

Year

Infant(All)

<28 Days

< 7 Days

Post-neonatal

Fetal

Late Fetal

Perinatal

1950

29.2

20.5

17.8

8.7

18.4

14.9

32.5

1970

20.0

15.1

13.6

4.9

14.0

9.5

23.0

1990

9.2

5.8

4.8

3.4

7.5

4.3

9.1

1999

7.1

4.8

3.8

2.4

6.7

3.4

7.2

NOTES: Infant, neonatal, and postneonatal rates are based on deaths per 1,000 live births.

Fetal mortality rate = number of fetal deaths of 20 weeks or more gestation per 1,000 live births plus fetal deaths (at 20 weeks or more).

Fetal deaths are sometimes called stillbirths, but terms and criteria (e.g., gestation period, weight) vary among jurisdictions (NCHS, 1997).

Late fetal mortality rate = number of fetal deaths of 28 weeks’ or more gestation per 1,000 live births plus late fetal deaths. Perinatal mortality rate = number of late fetal deaths plus infant deaths within 7 days of birth per 1,000 live births.

SOURCE: NCHS, 2001c.

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

FIGURE 2.2 Percentage of total childhood deaths by age group (1999).

SOURCE: NCHS, 2001b.

injuries increase in relative importance, although the mortality rate overall is substantially lower. Congenital anomalies also cause deaths among children past infancy, but they do so to a lesser extent because most children with problems likely to prove fatal have already died.

Feudtner and colleagues (2001) reported that about one-quarter of all infant deaths in Washington state during 1980 to 1998 were linked to complex chronic conditions such as cardiac, brain, and spinal malformations, with the rest relatively evenly divided between injuries and other acute events (e.g., extreme prematurity, SIDS, respiratory distress syndrome). For the entire group of children, approximately one-fifth of all deaths were linked to chronic complex conditions.

Congenital Anomalies

Congenital anomalies, whether detected before or after birth, can involve any part of an infant. (Federal mortality reports refer to “congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities” [NCHS, 2001b, p. 71].) Definitions vary. For example, one source defines them as “structural defects present at birth” (Merck Manual, 2001, Chapter 261). Another definition is “existing at birth, referring to certain mental or physical traits, anomalies, malformations, diseases, etc. which may be either

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

TABLE 2.5 Top Five Causes of Infant, Neonatal, and Postneonatal Mortality and Total Deaths (1999)

Rank

Infant Mortality

No.

Neonatal Mortality

No.

Postneonatal Mortality

No.

1

Congenital anomalies

5,473

Short gestation and LBW

4,320

SIDS

2,440

2

Short gestation and LBW

4,392

Congenital anomalies

3,892

Congenital anomalies

1,581

3

SIDS

2,648

Complications of pregnancy

1,391

Accidents and adverse effects

743

4

Complications of pregnancy

1,399

Respiratory distress syndrome

1,050

Pneumonia and influenza

399

5

Respiratory distress syndrome

1,110

Complications of placenta, cord, membrane

1,010

Homicide

288

Total (all causes)

27,937

 

18,728

 

9,209

 

SOURCE: NCHS, 2001b.

hereditary or due to an influence occurring during gestation up to the moment of birth” (Stedman’s Medical Dictionary, 1995). Congenital anomalies may be inherited or sporadic (for example, arising de novo during embryonic development). Some are readily evident during physical examination at birth, whereas others are detectable only by radiologic, genetic, or other testing. Many defects may be detected before birth by ultrasound examination or examination of fluid or tissue samples.

Congenital anomalies can arise from fetal environmental causes (e.g., drug exposure, infection, maternal nutritional deficiencies, injury) or from chromosomal or genetic abnormalities (which may be inherited or spontaneous). About one newborn in 100 has a hereditary malformation, and about 1 in 200 has an inherited metabolic disorder or an abnormality of the sex chromosomes (Shapiro, 2000). Most anomalies are not lethal, and most (for example, an extra finger, toe, or nipple) have little effect on infant

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

health. The most serious structural anomalies affect the formation of the heart, brain, or other vital organs, and many fatal inherited disorders involve neuromuscular or metabolic functions.

Congenital heart disease is the major cause of death in children with congenital anomalies, but it still occurs in only 0.5 to 0.8 percent of live births. The incidence of cardiac anomalies is higher in fetal deaths (10 to 25 percent) and premature infants (about 2 percent, excluding patent ductus arteriosis, a common heart problem that results from the persistence of a fetal circulatory pattern, not from a malformation) (Bernstein, 2000). Advances in surgical procedures, in particular, have significantly improved outcomes for infants with congenital heart problems, but survival is still limited for infants with uncorrectable malformations or coexisting defects in other vital organs.

Congenital disorders of the nervous system that are often or always fatal include anencephaly (absence of all or a major part of the brain) and severe spina bifida (especially rachischisis, a completely open spine) among others. Anencephaly and spina bifida (all degrees of severity) each occur in approximately 1 in 1,000 live births. Virtually all children with anencephaly die within days after birth. The overall risk of mortality for children with spina bifida is 10 to 15 percent, and death usually occurs within the first 4 years of life. Children with severe spinal cord defects who survive often have major chronic care needs (e.g., assistance in eating, bathing, toileting, and dressing). Even with surgical repair of the spinal opening, the spinal cord injury is permanent. The extent of paralysis or mental retardation depends on the location and extent of the defect (Haslam, 2000). Congenital anomalies can also affect the gastrointestinal tract, skeletal system, genitourinary system, circulatory system, and pulmonary system, with varying prognoses depending on the severity of the anomaly and its susceptibility to surgical correction.

Genetic abnormalities may be inherited or arise sporadically. For example, trisomy 13 (Pateau syndrome), trisomy 18 (Edward’s syndrome), and trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), conditions in which an extra chromosome is present, are typically not inherited in the usual sense but tend to arise from age-linked errors in the division of ova. Trisomy 13 and 18 are almost always fatal, with less than 10 percent of children surviving more than one year (Merck Manual, 2001, Chapter 261). In contrast, trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) rarely leads to death in childhood, but associated problems (e.g., cardiac and skeletal anomalies and a propensity to leukemia) generally cause death by middle age. Duchenne muscular dystrophy and Tay-Sachs disease are among a number of nonchromosomal genetic disorders that are inherited and usually or always lead to death in childhood.

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Low Birth Weight and Prematurity

Short gestation and low birth weight are the leading causes of neonatal mortality and handicaps in infants (Stoll and Kliegman, 2000b; see also Sowards, 1999). Most very low birth weight infants are premature, rather than simply small for their gestational age. Only 20 percent of infants weighing 500 to 600 grams at birth survive, compared to 85 to 90 percent of those weighing between 1,250 and 1,500 grams. Similarly, very few infants born at 22 weeks’ gestation survive, but more than 95 percent of those born at 30 weeks do.

Most extremely low birth weight (<1,000 grams at birth) infants who die do so within a few days of birth, although some survive for weeks or months before dying (see, e.g., Meadow et al., 1996; Lemons et al., 2001; Tommiska et al., 2001). A study by Meadow and colleagues (1996) reported that the survival rate at birth for these infants was 47 percent but rose to 81 percent by the fourth day of life. After the fourth day of life, an infant’s overall severity of illness was a more important factor in survival than the original birth weight. Mortality for premature infants results primarily from conditions associated with immature organs (e.g., respiratory distress related to immature lungs and intraventricular hemorrhage, bleeding into the brain related to underdeveloped cerebral blood vessels) or infection (e.g., sepsis [infection of the blood], necrotizing enterocolitis [an inflammation that causes injury to the bowel], pneumonia) that are complicated by an insufficiently developed immune system.

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

SIDS is the most common cause of death in infants after 1 month of age. It is a diagnosis of exclusion when a postmortem examination, death scene investigation, and review of case records fail to reveal a specific cause of death. Deaths typically occur between 2 and 4 months of age, and 90 percent of SIDS deaths occur before the child is 6 months old (AAP, 2001c). Environmental factors such as the baby’s sleeping position, soft bedding, and cigarette smoke have been implicated as risk factors. An immaturity of the infant’s innate ability to control his or her breathing, heartbeat, blood pressure, or arousal level may also contribute to these deaths (AAP, 2001c). Educational programs encouraging parents to put infants to sleep on their backs (the “Back to Sleep” campaign) have been credited as an important factor in the reduction of SIDS rates (Willinger et al., 1998; AAP, 2000b).

The vast majority of unexpected and unexplained infant deaths are caused by SIDS. Experts estimate, however, that between 1 and 5 percent of deaths that are diagnosed as SIDS may actually result from intentional suffocation or other abuse (AAP, 2001c). For this reason and, more generally, to learn more about sudden unexplained infant deaths, death scene

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

investigations of all such deaths are recommended (AAP, 1999c), although no uniformly accepted standards for such investigations now exist (NMRP, 1999). Autopsies are performed in approximately 90 percent of sudden infant deaths that occur without evident explanation (Iverson, 1999). In addition, although the details vary, an increasing number of jurisdictions routinely require an assessment of child deaths by multidisciplinary child fatality review teams that attempt to determine the circumstances surrounding child deaths and identify preventable causes of death, including child abuse and neglect. As discussed later, police investigations, although necessary when the cause of a child’s death is unexplained, add extra stress for parents and warrant extra sensitivity by investigators who meet parents.

MORTALITY FOR CHILDREN AGED 1 TO 4 AND 5 TO 9

Death Rates and Numbers

Children in these age groups are much less likely to die than infants. The death rate for infants is more than 751 per 100,000 population (and 7.2 per 1,000 live births) whereas the death rate for children aged 1 to 4 is 34.6 per 100,000 and for children aged 5 to 9 is 17.7 per 100,000 (Tables2.2 and 2.6). Of the age groups reviewed in this chapter, children aged 5 to 9 have the lowest death rate, with lower rates of death from most leading causes including unintentional and intentional injuries.

TABLE 2.6 Top Five Causes of Death in Children Aged 1–4 and 5–9 Years, Death Rates, and Total Deaths (1999)

Rank

Mortality Ages 1–4

No.

Ratea

Mortality Ages 5–9

No.

Ratea

1

Unintentional injury

1,898

12.6

Unintentional injury

1,459

7.3

2

Congenital anomalies

549

3.6

Malignant neoplasms

509

2.6

3

Malignant neoplasms

418

2.8

Congenital anomalies

207

1.0

4

Homicide

376

2.5

Homicide

186

0.9

5

Diseases of the heart

183

1.2

Diseases of the heart

116

0.6

Total (all causes)

5,249

34.7

 

3,474

17.4

aPer 100,000 population in age group.

SOURCE: NCHS, 2001a.

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

Leading Causes of Death for Children 1 to 4 and 5 to 9

Not only death rates but also causes of death differ significantly for children who survive their first year. In particular, unintentional and intentional injuries become more important. The diseases that kill so many older adults—heart disease and cancer—kill relatively few children in these age groups. As shown in Table 2.6, more children aged 1 to 4 were murdered in 1999 than died of heart disease.

Unintentional Injuries

Unintentional injuries are the leading cause of death in children ages 1 to 9. In 1999, they accounted for 36 percent of deaths in the 1 to 4 age group and 42 percent of deaths in the 5 to 9 age group.

Among children aged 1 to 4, motor vehicle occupant injury is the leading cause of unintentional injury-related death, followed by drowning, fire and burns, airway obstruction injuries (choking and suffocation), and motor vehicle pedestrian injuries. Among children aged 5 to 9, motor vehicle occupant injury is again the leading cause of unintentional injury-related death, followed by drowning, fire and burns, airway obstruction injuries, and other transportation fatalities (NCHS, 2001b). Failure to wear seat belts is an important factor in motor vehicle deaths. Nearly 6 out of 10 children under the age of 15 killed in a motor vehicle crash in 2000 were not restrained by a seat belt or child safety seat (NHTSA, 2000).

Congenital Anomalies

Congenital anomalies continue to be a leading cause of death for children in the 1 to 4 age group and, to a lesser extent, the 5 to 9 age group. The total deaths from this cause were, however, slightly more than 800 in 1999 for both age groups combined compared to more than 5,000 for the infant group.

Malignant Neoplasms

Cancer is the leading disease-related cause of death for children more than 1 year of age.4 In 1999, 2,244 children aged 0 to 19 died of malignant neoplasms (NCHS, 2001a). Analyses by the National Cancer Institute show

4  

Cancer is not a leading cause of infant death (see Table 2.1). Nonetheless, although it causes only 0.2 percent of infant deaths, the peak incidence of childhood cancer occurs in the first year of life. Infants fare worse than older children for some diagnoses (e.g., acute lymphoblastic leukemia) but better for others (e.g., neuroblastoma) (Ries et al., 1999, 2001).

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

FIGURE 2.3 Percentage distribution of childhood cancer mortality by type and age group, age <20 (1995).

NOTE: ONS = other nervous system.

SOURCE: Ries et al., 1999.

that leukemias and cancers of the brain and central nervous system are the most frequent causes of cancer-related deaths in those under age 20 (Figure 2.3) (Ries et al., 1999, 2001). For adults, lung cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer dominate as cancer-related causes of death (Reis et al., 2001).

Survival rates for most childhood cancers have improved dramatically over the past three decades. Age-adjusted mortality dropped by nearly 44 percent from 1975 to 1998 (Ries, 2001). For leukemias in childhood, the decrease was more than 55 percent, but for brain and other nervous system tumors, it was considerably smaller, 24 percent.

According to the National Cancer Institute, the death rate between 1994 and 1998 from all cancers was 2.7 per 100,000 for children aged 0 to 4 and 5 to 9 years (Ries, 2001). Leukemias and brain and other nervous system cancers were the most common types of cancer in these two age groups (as well as in the 10- to 14-year group). They also accounted for more than half the cancer mortality for these age groups. Five-year relative survival rates for children in all age groups for these cancers were fairly similar—between 76 and 79 percent—for the period 1992 to 1997.

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Intentional Injuries

In 1990 to 1995, the homicide rate for children aged 1 to 14 in the United States was five times the rate in other industrialized countries (CDC, 1997). The rate of suicide was twice as high for the United States. Although the overall death rate for children decreased substantially during 1950 to 1993, homicide rates tripled and suicide rates quadrupled. More recently, child deaths due to homicide have been declining (NCHS, 2001c). Firearms are the major cause of homicide deaths among children in the United States. Gunshot wounds account for 5 percent of pediatric injuries seen in emergency departments and produce the highest death rate due to injury (NPTR, 2001).5

In 1999, homicide was the fourth leading cause of death for children aged 1 to 4 years and was also the fourth leading cause for 5- to 9-year-olds, who had the lowest rate among children. Homicide mortality was nearly threefold higher (2.5 deaths per 100,000, or 376 deaths) for children aged 1 to 4 years than for the 5 to 9 age group (0.9 per 100,000, or 186 deaths). As discussed below, homicide mortality rates vary not only by age but by sex and other characteristics.

Although young children are less likely to be victims of violence than are adolescents, when they are victims, parents and other caretakers are more likely than acquaintances and strangers to have inflicted the abuse, especially for children aged 1 to 4. Within the category of parents and other caretakers, analyses of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation indicate that parents accounted for 60 percent of the abuse reported to the police, and stepparents and boyfriends or girlfriends of parents accounted for 19 percent (Finkelhor and Ormrod, 2001). As discussed in Chapter 8, such abusive situations present ethical and legal problems related to normal parental responsibilities for decisions about children’s medical care.

MORTALITY FOR CHILDREN AGED 10 TO 14 AND 15 TO 19

Death Rates and Numbers

The age groups 10 to 14 and 15 to 19 include the adolescent years. Adolescents can, however, be categorized differently based on social, biological, or developmental criteria. For example, those age 18 and older are legally adults. In most states, they can obtain a driver’s license at age 16. Still, pediatricians may continue to care for patients with complex chronic conditions even after they have entered early adulthood.

5  

The National Pediatric Trauma Registry is a multicenter nationwide registry established in 1985 to study the etiology of pediatric trauma and its consequences.

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

TABLE 2.7 Top Five Causes of Death for Adolescents (1999)

Rank

Mortality Ages 10–14

No.

Ratea

Mortality Ages 15–19

No.

Ratea

1

Unintentional injury

1,632

8.3

Unintentional injury

6,688

33.9

2

Malignant neoplasms

503

2.6

Homicide

2,093

10.6

3

Homicide

246

1.3

Suicide

1,615

8.2

4

Suicide

242

1.2

Malignant neoplasms

745

3.8

5

Congenital anomalies

221

1.1

Heart Disease

463

2.3

Total (all causes)

4,121

21.1

Total (all causes)

13,778

69.8

aPer 100,000 population in the age group.

SOURCE: NCHS, 2001b.

Leading Causes of Death for Children 10 to 14 and 15 to 19

Table 2.7 reports the leading causes of death for children aged 10 to 14 and 15 to 19. Overall, 10- to 14-year-olds have death rates similar those of 5- to 9-year-olds. For older teenagers, however, death rates rise sharply— more than tripling compared to the 10 to 14 age group. This increased mortality reflects developmental changes, including increased risk-taking behaviors as adolescents accelerate their independence from their parents.

Unintentional Injuries

Unintentional injuries are the leading cause of death for both younger and older adolescents, but the rate for older adolescents is almost four times that of the younger group. Not surprisingly, given that younger children are not legally allowed to drive, the rate of unintentional deaths involving motor vehicles increases dramatically with age, from 5.0 deaths per 100,000 children aged 10 to 14 to 26.3 deaths per 100,000 in those aged 15 to 19 in 1999 (NCHS, 2001e). Almost three-quarters of all unintentional traumatic deaths in the older adolescent group involved motor vehicle crashes, including collisions between vehicles, single-car crashes, collisions with fixed objects (e.g., telephone poles, trees), pedestrians, and trains. Older teens also have higher death rates for other kinds of injuries (7.3 per 100,000 for those aged 15 to 19 compared to 3.5 per 100,000 for those aged 10 to 14 in 1998) (NCHS, 2001e).

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

The teens who die in motor vehicle crashes are passengers 86 percent of the time, but in 68 percent of those crashes, the driver is also a teenager. Alcohol is a significant factor when teens are killed in motor vehicle crashes, with more than half of the teenaged victims found to have blood alcohol levels 0.1 mg/dL or greater (Jones et al. 1992).

Intentional Injuries

Homicide and suicide mortality rates increase as children move through adolescence, with greater than an eight-fold difference between the younger and older adolescent groups for homicide and about seven-fold difference for suicide. Among 10- to 14-year-olds, homicide was the third leading cause of death in 1999, and suicide ranked fourth. For those aged 15 to 19, homicide was the second leading cause of death with suicide ranking third. The majority of suicide and homicide deaths in both age groups were linked to firearms (NCHS, 2001e).

Malignant Neoplasms

Adolescents tend to suffer from different types of cancers than younger children (Ries et al., 1999). Embryonal cancers (e.g., neuroblastoma, Wilms’ tumor) are uncommon cancer diagnoses in this age group; germ cell cancers (e.g., testicular cancer) are more common. In 1995, the top four causes of cancer mortality in 10- to 14-year-olds were leukemia, brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors, bone and joint tumors, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (Ries et al., 1999). In 15- to 19-year-olds, the top causes of mortality due to malignant neoplasm were brain and CNS tumors, leukemia, bone and joint tumors, sarcomas, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Overall, malignant neoplasms are the second leading cause of death in 10- to 14-year-olds and the fourth leading cause of death in 15- to 19-year-olds. The cancer death rate is, however, slightly higher in the older teens than in the younger group (3.8 per 100,000 versus 2.6 per 100,000 in 1999) (NCHS, 2001b). Between 1973 and 1992, the incidence of cancer rose the most and the death rate decreased the least in the 15- to 19-year age category compared to any other child or adult age group (Bleyer et al. 1997).

GENDER, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND OTHER DIFFERENCES AND DISPARITIES IN CHILD MORTALITY

Whether the objective is preventing deaths or planning programs to improve palliative and end-of-life care for children and their families, one useful step is examining demographic and other data for risk factors or

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

variables associated with different rates or causes of child death. Variables typically examined include geographic location, age, sex, socioeconomic and ethnocultural characteristics, and community characteristics such as density, average income or income inequality, and rates of violence.6

Differences and Disparities by Region

Reflecting social, economic, physical, and other differences, states and regions show considerable variation in child mortality by cause. One stark contrast involves infant mortality. In 1999, the District of Colombia had the highest infant mortality rate (15.0 per 1,000 live births), followed by South Carolina (10.2 per 1,000 live births). Maine and Utah had the lowest rate in 1999 at 4.8 deaths per 1,000 live births (NCHS, 2001e).

In 1999, for those aged 0 to 19, Wyoming led the nation in motor vehicle fatality rates (23.5 per 100,000), followed by Mississippi (20.9 per 100,000). The lowest fatality rates were for Hawaii (3.6 per 100,000) and Rhode Island (3.8 per 100,000) (NCHS, 2001e). For motor vehicle fatalities involving all ages, factors contributing to differences in rates appear to include population density, proportions of light and heavy trucks in use, alcohol use, and delayed medical care (see, e.g., Muelleman and Mueller, 1996). Two single-state studies, one in Colorado (Hwang et al., 1997) and one in Alabama (King et al. 1994), reported higher death rates from motor vehicle crashes and unintentional injuries for children in rural areas. Another study reported that rural children ages 1 to 19 had a 44 percent higher death rate from injuries than their urban counterparts in 1992, with the greatest differences found in the 15 to 19 age group (Ricketts, 2000). (Reported differences in urban and rural death rates may vary depending on how rural and urban are defined [Farmer et al., 1993]).

Juvenile homicide rates also differ substantially among states. Maryland led the nation in 1999 with a homicide rate of 7.8 per 100,000, followed by Illinois at 7.25 per 100,000. Hawaii and Utah had the lowest

6  

Reporting categories for published information from various data sets that include mortality are not completely standardized. For example, the federal government’s primary mortality report provides information by Hispanic origin and by race (white and black non-Hispanics (NCHS, 2001a). In contrast, published information from the NCHS linked data set of births and infant deaths subdivides infants by Hispanic origin (black and white) and by race (white, black, American Indian, and Asian or Pacific Islander (NCHS, 2000b). Because death information is linked to information collected at birth, the latter data set also includes more detailed individual data such as the mother’s age, educational attainment, marital status, place of birth (U.S. or foreign), and smoking during pregnancy. Information about the infant includes birth order, birth weight, period of gestation, and trimester when prenatal care began.

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

TABLE 2.8 Death Rates for Selected Causes by Geographic Region (1999)

Region

Infant Mortality

Motor Vehicle (ages 15–19)

Suicide (ages 15–19)

Homicide (ages 15–19)

Northeast

13.6

19.0

5.9

8.0

South

32.8

33.3

8.5

11.8

Midwest

30.8

26.3

8.7

10.7

West

23.5

30.0

8.8

11.0

NOTE: Infant mortality rate is per 1,000 live births. Other death rates are per 100,000 children aged 15 to 19. Homicide deaths include deaths from homicides and legal interventions.

Regions: Northeast (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont); South (Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia); Midwest (Illinois,Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin); and West (Alaska,Arizona,California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho,Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming).

SOURCE: NCHS, 2001e.

rates at 0.6 and 0.75 per 100,000, respectively7 (NCHS, 2001e). For homicide rates across all age groups, factors contributing to variations appear to include level of urbanization and socioeconomic conditions (see, e.g., Cubbin et al., 2000).

On a regional basis (Table 2.8), the South led the nation in infant mortality, homicides, and motor vehicle-related mortality rates for ages 15 to 19. The West Coast led in suicide rates for this age group. The Northeast region had the lowest death rates for all categories reported here.

Gender Differences

Across all age ranges and for most causes of death, boys have a higher death rate than girls. The disparity increases with age and ranges from a 20 percent higher death rate for male children less than 5 to a 130 percent greater death rate for older adolescent boys compared to girls (NCHS, 2001a).

Male gender is a major risk factor for all injury-related deaths (NPTR, 2001; Hussey, 1997). The most dramatic gender difference is seen in the homicide rate for older adolescents. Boys are more than five times as likely

7  

Rates are based on fewer than 20 deaths throughout the year.

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

to be victims of homicide than girls (1,748 boys aged 15 to 19 were killed compared to 345 teen girls in 1999 aged 15 to 19). Thus, homicide prevention efforts typically focus on young males. For those concerned about support for survivors, special attention to the psychological impact on young male siblings and friends of teen homicide victims may serve dual goals of support for the grieving and preventing further violence.

Socioeconomic and Ethnocultural Differences

A number of studies have examined the association between socioeconomic variables—including income, education, and social status—and variations in mortality among geographic areas and population subgroups (see, e.g., IOM, 2002). Nonetheless, the validity of racial categories and their relevance in clinical and health care research and decisionmaking are sometimes controversial.8 Concerns about the appropriate use of such categories without adequate attention to underlying differences in access to health care, poverty, and other factors are reasonable. Nonetheless, racial and ethnic disparities in health outcomes and health care access are troubling and cannot be ignored in health care research, planning, and delivery. For example, in addition to considering underlying sources of disparities and developing programs to counter them, advocates of palliative care must consider disparities in the help available to and desired by families for themselves and their children.

8  

For example, a recent editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine argues that race is a social not a scientific construct and that “attributing differences in a biological end point to race is not only imprecise but also of no proven value in treating an individual patient,” although it may be important in the formulation of “just and impartial public policies” (Schwartz, 2001, p. 1392). A second editorial argues that “racial differences . . . have practical importance for the choice and dose of drugs” but emphasizes the clinical importance of identifying and understanding “the genetic determinants of the reported racial differences” rather than relying on self or other reports (Wood, 2001, p. 1395). In the same issue, authors of an article reporting outcomes by racial categories note that such categories may be “only a surrogate marker for genetic or other factors” (Exner et al., 2001, p. 1355). Brosco (1999) suggests that the American habit of separating statistics based on race, especially infant mortality statistics, has led to a policy in children’s health that focuses on welfare and reducing poverty rather than on improving all children’s health. He argues that such policy allows for bias against certain races, or moral character judgments against socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, and may contribute to resistance to policies that would benefit all children, such as universal health care coverage for children. Others argue that the collection of information on race, ethnicity, and primary language is necessary to guide social policy to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health status (Perot and Youdelman, 2001). The AAP (2000h) has concluded that it “is no longer sufficient to use [racial, gender, and socioeconomic] categories as explanatory. If data relevant to the underlying social mechanisms have not been collected and are otherwise unavailable, researchers should discuss this as a limitation of the possible conclusions of the presented research.”

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

At all ages, the death rate for black children is higher than for white or Hispanic children. Even before birth, black fetuses have higher mortality rates than white fetuses. In 1998, the fetal mortality rate was more than twice as high for blacks as for whites (12.3 versus 5.7 per 1,000)9 (NCHS, 2001, Table 23).

In the United States, disparities in infant mortality rate are related to maternal variables such as the mother’s age, level of education, amount of prenatal care, marital status, or smoking habits and also differ depending on the infant’s age at death, sex, birth weight, or period of gestation. Nonetheless, even when adjusted for these risk factors, racial disparities in mortality remain (Guyer, 2000).

Black infants have a 150 percent higher mortality rate than white infants (1,456 compared to 577 deaths per 100,000 live births, respectively) (NCHS, 2001b). Puerto Rican, Hawaiian, and American Indian infants also experienced higher mortality rates than white infants (26, 33, and 55 percent higher, respectively) (Singh, 1995). In contrast, Chinese, Japanese, and Filipino infants had 30 percent, 23 percent, and 16 percent lower infant mortality rates, respectively, than white infants. Cuban, Central and South American, and Mexican infants had mortality rates that were 12 percent, 10 percent, and 6 percent lower, respectively, than those of whites (Singh, 1995).

Low birth weight is the primary cause of infant mortality in black infants and occurs at a rate of 280.9 per 100,000 live births compared to 72 per 100,000 for white infants.10 Infants born to black American women are more likely to have low birth weights than those born to either white American women or African-born black women in the United States, which suggests the role that social and cultural factors may play in this difference (Stoll and Kliegman, 2000a,b).

Over the past 50 years, infant mortality has declined at a relatively lower rate for black than for white infants (2.9 percent per year for the former compared to 3.2 percent per year for the latter [Singh and Yu, 1995]). The result is lower rates for both but a greater relative difference. Between 1964 and 1987, racial disparity in infant mortality generally increased across all levels of education and was wider at the highest levels of education (Singh, 1995).

9  

Race determined by using the race of the mother.

10  

The number of low birth weight infants, however, increased in white, American Indian, and Asian or Pacific Islander women between 1990 and 1999. Guyer suggests that this increase, for white women in particular, is likely due to the increased use of in vitro fertilization leading to more multiple births, which have a higher likelihood of premature delivery and low birth weights (Martin and Parks, 1999; Guyer et al., 2000).

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

A study of injury-related mortality attempted to identify socioeconomic factors linked to racial differences in injury rates (Hussey, 1997). When compared to white children, black children were twice as likely to live with a head of household who had not completed high school, more than four times as likely to live in a household in the lowest income bracket, almost four times as likely to live in a female-headed household, and almost three times as likely to live in an inner city. Of these socioeconomic factors, however, the educational attainment of the head of household was the single independent factor related to mortality of children related to injuries. When the head of household had less than a high school diploma, the injury-related death rate of children in the family was 3.5 times greater than for children living with a college-educated head of household. Income and other disparities interact to account statistically for almost two-thirds of the overall difference in injury-related death rates.

Older black children have higher death rates than whites for both injury-related and other causes of death (Table 2.9). For other causes of death, in 1999, HIV/AIDS was not among the top 10 among white children, but it ranked tenth among causes of death for black children 1 to 4 years old, seventh for those aged 5 to 14, and sixth for ages 15 to 24 (NCHS, 2001e).

The greatest disparity in death rates between races is seen in the adolescent homicide rate. Black adolescents between the ages of 15 and 19 years are killed at six times the rate for white adolescents (37.5 per 100,000 versus 5.7 per 100,000). In contrast, suicide and motor vehicle death rates are almost half again as high among white adolescents, ages 15 to 19, compared to black adolescents in this age group (8.6 per 100,000 versus 5.9 per 100,000 for suicide and 28.4 versus 18.2 per 100,000 for motor vehicle deaths) (NCHS, 2001e).

A number of factors appear to underlie racial differences in homicide rates including socioeconomic disparities and age structure of racial subgroups. For example, in a study of domestic homicides in black and white neighborhoods in New Orleans and Atlanta, Centerwall (1995) reported that differences in relative risk of homicide essentially disappeared when controlled for socioeconomic variables such as household crowding. As noted earlier, the United States has substantially higher homicide mortality for children than other developed countries, and explanations for this difference (and similar differences across all age groups) generally focus on handgun availability (CDC, 1997).

WHERE CHILDREN DIE

Based on analysis of 1997 national mortality data, more than 56 percent of child deaths (under age 19) occurred in inpatient hospital settings

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

TABLE 2.9 Deaths Due to Injury Compared to Other Conditions, by Age and Race (1999)

 

Injury Rate (number)a

Other Conditions Rate (number)b

Age (years)

Black

White

Black/White Ratio

Black

White

Black/White Ratio

1–4

27.4 (609)

13.4 (1,605)

2.0

30.6 (693)

16.1 (1,936)

1.9

5–9

14.8 (465)

7.2 (1,129)

2.1

13.2 (418)

8.2 (1,278)

1.6

10–14

13.8 (426)

10.7 (1,650)

1.3

13.9 (416)

9.1 (1,385)

1.5

15–19

69.6 (2,119)

51.2 (8,009)

1.4

22.9 (692)

13.9 (2,156)

1.6

aUnintentional and intentiona injuries.

bAll noninjury causes.

SOURCE: NCHS, 2001e.

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

and another 16 percent in outpatient hospital sites (primarily the emergency department).11 Approximately 5 percent of children were declared dead on arrival at a hospital. Almost 11 percent of children died in home, and the site of death was unknown for a similar percentage. Only a tiny fraction of children (0.36 percent) died in nursing homes. For the population overall, an estimated 52 percent of deaths occurred in hospitals, 22 percent at home, and 21 percent in nursing homes. The percentage of those dying in nursing homes rises steeply with age, increasing from 11 percent among those aged 65 to 74 to 43 percent among those aged 85 or older.

For children who died of cancer in 1997, about 58 percent of deaths occurred in hospital inpatient units, about 36 percent occurred at home, and 2.8 percent occurred in hospital outpatient settings (see footnote 11). In contrast to these national data, a study at Boston Children’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Center found that of 103 child patients who died of cancer during the period September 1997 to August 1998, about half (49 percent) died in the hospital and about half died at home (Wolfe et. al., 2000b). Of those who died in the hospital, nearly half died in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and an additional third in the oncology ward. Regional variations in medical practice, health care resources, urban or rural place of residence, and other factors could account for the different pattern in the national data.

A recent analysis of deaths of individuals less than 25 years old in Washington state from 1980 to 1998 found that 52 percent occurred in the hospital, 17 percent at home, 8 percent in the emergency department or during transport, and 22 percent at other sites (Feudtner et al., 2002). When only deaths from complex chronic conditions and only individuals between ages 1 and 24 were considered, the picture changes. Between 1980 and 1998, the proportion of these deaths occurring at home rose from 21 to 43 percent. Although those who resided in more affluent areas and those with congenital, genetic, neuromuscular, and metabolic conditions were more likely to die at home, considerable regional variation in site of death remained unexplained.

Nearly all SIDS deaths occur in the home. In contrast, most babies who die during the neonatal period never leave the hospital. Some die in the delivery suite shortly after birth; others die within hours to months after being transferred to the neonatal or pediatric intensive care unit. A few

11  

This information was provided by Joan Teno, M.D., and Sherry Weitzen, M.H.A., Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, based on an analysis of a database of all deaths in 1997 reported to the National Center for Health Statistics. For more detailed information on site of death data, see http://www.chcr.brown.edu/dying/siteofdeath.htm.

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

hospitals and hospices have worked together so that families, if they wish and the infant survives long enough after birth, can take infants with fatal conditions home, if only for a day or two before the child’s expected death (Sumner, 2001).

According to the National Pediatric Trauma Registry, the most common sites for injuries to children are the road (41 percent) and the home (31 percent). One study of children who died of injuries in an urban county during 1995 and 1996 found that most were pronounced dead at hospitals (although some of these deaths actually occurred outside the hospital) (Bowen and Marshall, 1998), but 10 percent of the children were pronounced dead at home and 4 percent on roads.

Although data are limited, children who die of complex chronic conditions such as AIDS, cystic fibrosis, and muscular dystrophy usually die in the hospital, typically following several earlier hospitalizations for crises that they survived. One multicenter study of children with AIDS who died reported that nearly 65 percent died in the hospital and almost one-quarter died at home (Langston et al., 2001). Another study of children with AIDS reported that nearly three-quarters died in the hospital, either in the pediatric ward (38 percent), the PICU (29 percent), or the emergency department (7 percent) (Oleske and Czarniecki, 1999). Forty percent of these children were orphans living in foster care, adoptive care, or with extended families prior to their deaths.

Clinicians from cystic fibrosis centers in Canada and the United States have reported that the majority of their patients with cystic fibrosis died in the hospital. Of the 45 patients who were reported to have died of the disease in Canada in 1995, 82 percent died in the hospital (Mitchell et al., 2000). A U.S. study, which examined 44 deaths over a 10-year period (1984–1993) in a children’s hospital, found that 43 of the children died in the hospital (5 in intensive care) and 1 died at home under hospice care (Robinson et al., 1997). The typical length of stay in the hospital prior to death was two to three weeks, with a range of several hours to several months.

Very few studies describe the deaths of children who suffer from other congenital or genetic conditions. Records of patients admitted to Helen House, the first pediatric hospice in England, between 1982 and 1993 indicate that the largest group of child patients (127 children, 41 percent) had a neurodegenerative disease. By the end of the study period, 77 (58 percent) of the children had died: 49 percent at home, 23 percent at Helen House, and 20 percent in the hospital (8 percent died in “other situations”) (Hunt and Burne, 1995). A very small Australian study indicated that six of the nine patients who died from muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy died in the hospital, some in the emergency department (Parker et al., 1999). The majority of children with congenital heart disorders die in

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

an intensive care setting, often after or while awaiting a heart transplant (Rees in Goldman, 1999).

Regardless of the specific cause of death, many patients who die in the hospital die in the PICU after a short hospitalization for an acute problem. In a study of a diverse set of 16 pediatric intensive care units, Levetown and colleagues (1994) found that of 5,415 consecutive admissions to the PICUs, 265 (5 percent) of the patients died. Of the group that died, 248 (94 percent) died in the PICU. The average length of stay in the PICU before death was 3 days (range 0 to 82 days), and the average total length of stay in the hospital prior to death was only 4 days (range 0 to 305 days). The majority (61 percent) of children who died in the PICU suffered from an acute condition such as brain damage due to lack of oxygen (for instance, in drowning), infection, and trauma. Thirty-five percent of the children who died in the PICU had chronic conditions such as congenital malformations, acquired neurologic problems, cancer, metabolic disease, immune deficiency, and respiratory disease. A recent Canadian study, which examined end-of-life care for children who died anticipated deaths (77 of 236 deaths) following admission to one hospital, reported that more than 80 percent died in intensive care (McCallum et al., 2000).

IMPLICATIONS

The profile of childhood death presented in this chapter has a number of implications for those providing or supporting care for children who die and their families. First, children who die and their families are clearly a diverse group. Many children die suddenly and unexpectedly from injuries. Many others die in infancy from complications of prematurity or congenital defects. Some children need care for a few days, whereas others, particularly those with severe neurological deficits, require care for years before death. Further, some children have conditions that are inevitably fatal, whereas other children die from conditions that may be survivable. These differences suggest that palliative and end-of-life care must be flexible if it is to meet child and family needs. Chapter 3 further illustrates the differences in the paths that lead to death in childhood and the different challenges presented by these varied pathways.

Second, unintentional and intentional injuries are important contributors to death in childhood. Emergency medical services dominate in these situations, but many children die before care arrives or without awareness of care. They leave shocked and bereft parents, siblings, grandparents, and others needing support in their bereavement.

Third, particularly for infants and very young children, a varied array of rare, fatal disorders generates a relatively small number of deaths individually, although collectively their impact is more significant. The combi-

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×

nation of diversity and small numbers adds to the complexity of determining prognosis, recognizing the end stage of illness, assessing the appropriateness of shifts in the emphasis and goals of care, and helping children and their families prepare for death. Small numbers and diversity can also complicate the development of successful programs to provide and fund palliative and end-of-life care for children and their families. Further, the combination of these characteristics with children’s changing developmental needs suggests that palliative care and hospice programs designed for adults will require significant modifications to help children and their families.

Fourth, many important causes of death in childhood—including those due to injuries, low birth weight, and SIDS—are linked to socioeconomic disparities. In addition to encouraging preventive health services and other policies and programs to counter or reduce socioeconomic inequalities, advocates of pediatric palliative care need to consider how their programs can best serve disadvantaged and troubled families and how they can best identify the kinds of support desired by these families for themselves and their children.

Fifth, hospitals, especially their neonatal and pediatric intensive care units, play a particularly important role in care for children who die of complex chronic problems. Discussions of end-of-life care for older adults tend to emphasize practices and policies intended to allow more people to die at home without unwanted “rescue” efforts. Although similar efforts adapted to children and their families may be desirable, more flexible attitudes about the role of hospital care including intensive care at the end of life may be appropriate for this young population.

Sixth, no single protocol for palliative and end-of-life care will fit the varied needs of children who die and their families, and no single focus of research will build the knowledge base to guide such care. The diversity of circumstances and the relatively small numbers of child deaths will challenge researchers and policymakers as well as clinicians.

Chapter 3 builds on this chapter’s epidemiologic and quantitative focus by adding a more qualitative perspective on the pathways to death in childhood. It reinforces the conclusion that care for children who die and their families must be adjusted to their specific circumstances and needs, although the fundamental principles outlined in Chapter 1 will broadly apply.

Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 42
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 43
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 44
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 45
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 50
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 51
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 52
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 53
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 54
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 55
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 56
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 58
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 59
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 60
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 64
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 65
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 66
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 67
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 68
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"2. Patterns of Childhood Death in America." Institute of Medicine. 2003. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10390.
×
Page 71
Next: 3. Pathways to a Child »
When Children Die: Improving Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Children and Their Families Get This Book
×
Buy Hardback | $55.95 Buy Ebook | $44.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The death of a child is a special sorrow. No matter the circumstances, a child’s death is a life-altering experience. Except for the child who dies suddenly and without forewarning, physicians, nurses, and other medical personnel usually play a central role in the lives of children who die and their families. At best, these professionals will exemplify “medicine with a heart.” At worst, families’ encounters with the health care system will leave them with enduring painful memories, anger, and regrets.

When Children Die examines what we know about the needs of these children and their families, the extent to which such needs are—and are not—being met, and what can be done to provide more competent, compassionate, and consistent care. The book offers recommendations for involving child patients in treatment decisions, communicating with parents, strengthening the organization and delivery of services, developing support programs for bereaved families, improving public and private insurance, training health professionals, and more. It argues that taking these steps will improve the care of children who survive as well as those who do not—and will likewise help all families who suffer with their seriously ill or injured child.

Featuring illustrative case histories, the book discusses patterns of childhood death and explores the basic elements of physical, emotional, spiritual, and practical care for children and families experiencing a child’s life-threatening illness or injury.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!