National Academies Press: OpenBook

Air Quality Management in the United States (2004)

Chapter: Executive Summary

« Previous: Front Matter
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×



AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×

Executive Summary1

The Clean Air Act (CAA) provides a legal framework for promoting public health and public welfare2 by pursuing five major air quality goals (see Box 1). For the first goal, the CAA authorizes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set maximum allowable atmospheric concentrations of six major “criteria” pollutants by establishing National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Individual states then develop state implementation plans (SIPs) that show how, with the assistance of national control programs, they will meet these standards. Such efforts, as well as those in pursuit of the other CAA goals, seek to regulate emissions from a variety of stationary and mobile sources through the nation’s air quality management (AQM) system (see Figure ES-1). Since passage of the CAA Amendments of 1970, the nation has devoted significant efforts and resources to AQM, and substantial progress has been made.

The Committee on Air Quality Management was formed by the National Research Council to examine the role of science and technology in the implementation of the CAA and to recommend ways in which the scientific and technical foundations for AQM in the United States can be enhanced. Over a 2-year period, the committee heard briefings from experts

1  

This Executive Summary provides a brief overview of the committee’s findings and recommendations. The detailed Summary is presented after the Executive Summary.

2  

Within the framework of the CAA, “welfare” refers to the viability of agriculture and ecosystems (such as forests and wildlands), the protection of materials (such as monuments and buildings), and the maintenance of visibility.

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×

BOX 1
Goals of the Clean Air Act

  • Mitigate potentially harmful ambient concentrations of six “criteria” pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), particulate matter (PM), and lead (Pb).

  • Limit sources of exposure to hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).

  • Protect and improve visibility in wilderness areas and national parks.

  • Reduce emissions of substances that cause acid deposition, specifically sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides (NOx).

  • Curb use of chemicals that have the potential to deplete the stratospheric ozone layer.

FIGURE ES-1 Idealized schematic showing the iterative nature of air quality management. Bullets under each heading provide examples.

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×

and stakeholders and examined the operation, successes, and limitations of the many components of the nation’s AQM system.

PROGRESS

The committee concluded that implementation of the CAA has contributed to substantial decreases in emissions of several pollutants. Regulations for light-duty vehicles, light-duty trucks, and fuel properties have greatly reduced emissions per mile traveled. Programs for stationary sources, such as power plants and large factories, have also achieved substantial reductions of pollutant emissions. However, most of the reductions have been accomplished through regulations on new facilities, while many older, often higher-emitting facilities can be a substantial source of emissions. Emission “cap and trade” has also provided a mechanism for achieving emission reductions at reduced costs. Air quality monitoring networks have confirmed that ambient pollutant concentrations, especially in urban areas, have decreased over the past three decades, and monitoring has documented a reduction in sulfate deposition in the eastern United States. Economic assessments of the overall costs and benefits of AQM in the United States indicate, despite uncertainties, that implementation of the CAA has had and will probably continue to have substantial net economic benefits.

CHALLENGES AHEAD

Despite the progress, the committee identified scientific and technical limitations in the current AQM system that will hinder future progress, especially as the nation attempts to meet the following key challenges in the coming decade:

  • Meeting new standards for ozone, particulate matter, and regional haze.

  • Understanding and addressing the human health risks from exposure to air toxics.

  • Responding to the evidence that, for some pollutants, there may be no identifiable threshold exposure below which harmful effects cease to occur.

  • Mitigating pollution effects that might disproportionately occur in minority and low-income communities in densely populated urban areas.

  • Enhancing understanding and protection of ecosystems affected by air pollution.

  • Understanding and addressing multistate and international transport of pollutants.

  • Adapting the AQM system to a changing (and most likely warmer) climate.

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×

MEETING THE CHALLENGES: THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

To meet these challenges and remedy current limitations, the committee identified a set of overarching long-term objectives that should guide future improvement of the AQM system. In the committee’s view, AQM should

  • Strive to identify and assess more clearly the most significant exposures, risks, and uncertainties.

  • Strive to take an integrated multipollutant approach to controlling emissions of pollutants posing the most significant risks.

  • Strive to take an airshed3-based approach by assessing and controlling emissions of important pollutants arising from local, multistate, national, and international sources.

  • Strive to emphasize results over process, create accountability for the results, and dynamically adjust and correct the system as data on progress are assessed.

Immediate attainment of these objectives is unrealistic. It would require a level of scientific understanding that has yet to be developed, a commitment of new resources that would be difficult to obtain in the short term, and a rapid transformation of the AQM system that is undesirable in light of the system’s past successes. The committee proposes, therefore, that the AQM system be enhanced so that it steadily evolves toward meeting these objectives. In that spirit, the committee makes five interrelated recommendations to be implemented through specific actions:

  1. Strengthen the scientific and technical capacity of the AQM system to assess risk and track progress. Recommended actions include enhancing assessments of air quality and health, ecosystem monitoring, emissions tracking, exposure assessment (both outdoors and indoors), and other components of the scientific and technical foundation of AQM.

  2. Expand national and multistate performance-oriented control strategies to support local, state, and tribal efforts. Recommended actions include controlling currently unregulated and underregulated sources; expanding use of performance-oriented, market-based (where appropriate) multipollutant control strategies; and enhancing authority to identify and address multistate and international air pollutant transport.

  3. Transform the SIP process into a more dynamic and collaborative performance-oriented, multipollutant air quality management plan (AQMP)

3  

Airshed is used here to denote the broader geographic extent of the emissions that contribute to the deleterious effects of a pollutant in a given location.

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×

process. Recommended actions include enhancing the effectiveness and innovation of state and local air quality planning, while maintaining federal oversight and retaining requirements for conformity with regional transportation planning.

  1. Develop an integrated program for criteria pollutants and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). Recommended actions include establishing a more unified assessment of criteria and hazardous air pollutants, setting priorities for those pollutants, establishing a more dynamic process for considering new pollutants, and considering multiple pollutants in forming the scientific basis for NAAQS.

  2. Enhance protection of ecosystems and other aspects of public welfare. Recommended actions include better tracking of ecosystem effects and building an improved basis for implementing secondary or alternative standards to protect ecosystems.

Implementation of these recommendations will still require substantial resources, but they should not be overwhelming, especially when compared with current expenditures for CAA compliance and costs resulting from harmful effects of air pollution on human health and welfare. Implementing these recommendations will also require a commitment by all parties to adjust and change; it may also require new legislation from Congress. As the transition occurs, however, it is imperative that ongoing programs to reduce emissions continue so that progress toward cleaner air is maintained.

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×
Page 1
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×
Page 2
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×
Page 3
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×
Page 4
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×
Page 5
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×
Page 6
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10728.
×
Page 7
Next: Summary »
Air Quality Management in the United States Get This Book
×
Buy Hardback | $68.00 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The implementation of air quality regulations should be less bureaucratic -- with more emphasis on results than process -- and should be designed to protect ecosystems as well as people. The report recommends that The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) use an approach to target groups of pollutants instead of individual ones and that revised or new regulations also should consider how air pollution travels from state to state and across international borders. In addition, improved tracking of emissions is needed to accurately assess what populations are at the highest risk of health problems from pollution and to better measure the progress of pollution-control strategies.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!