National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: REFERENCES
Suggested Citation:"General Comments." National Research Council. 2003. Assessment of Scientific Information for the Radiation Exposure Screening and Education Program: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10766.
Page 23

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

APPENDIX A 23 APPENDIX A Comments on Methods Proposed by HRSA and its Grantees COMMENTS ON BPHC POLICY INFORMATION NOTICE 2002–17 General Comments These comments were developed during this review and are not intended to be exclusive. 1. This is an effort to be responsive to the RECA legislation that would be more appropriately couched in terms of a good and cost-effective health-care program (rather than in terms of a screening program, which would have the potential to do more harm than good) that offers an initial comprehensive medical evaluation to establish baseline data for individuals, many of whom now are likely to be in the older age groups and who live in medically underserved communities. 2. Cancer of the female breast is the only one of the conditions identified as “radiogenic” for which there is a proven effective screening mode, and even that is useful only for defined “at-risk” population groups. 3. Given that none of the conditions identified (in the BPHC Policy Information Notice) is causally associated exclusively with radiation, the categorization of “For Non-Malignant Radiogenic Diseases” (2a) and “For Malignant Radiogenic Diseases” (2b) for the purposes of the Notice is inappropriate, is unnecessary, and could be misconstrued as implying that all such conditions that may be detected in the proposed “screening” program unquestionably would be attributable to exposure to radiation during one of the RECA events or activities specified. “Non-malignat compensable disease” and “malignant compensable diseases” would be a more appropriate categorization. 4. Clinical tests and procedures should be based on findings in the individual consistent with good medical practice, and follow-up should be scheduled in accordance with good medical practice, irrespective of exposure history. 5. Presumably, RECA covers the cost of “screening” for the specified diseases and for any indicated medical follow-up, treatment, and care for compensable diseases or conditions. But what happens if a participant has a coincidental diagnosis (as the result of the screening process) of a noncovered disease or condition and is uninsured or otherwise unable to pay for further recommended testing, treatment, and so on. What is the responsibility (including ethical) of the program to manage or treat the person in such a situation? Is the possibility of such a coincidental diagnosis and its potential consequences explained to the person?

Next: Specific Comments »
Assessment of Scientific Information for the Radiation Exposure Screening and Education Program: Interim Report Get This Book
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook,'s online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!