National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Enabling Ocean Research in the 21st Century: Implementation of a Network of Ocean Observatories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10775.
×
Page 185
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Enabling Ocean Research in the 21st Century: Implementation of a Network of Ocean Observatories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10775.
×
Page 186
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Enabling Ocean Research in the 21st Century: Implementation of a Network of Ocean Observatories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10775.
×
Page 187
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Enabling Ocean Research in the 21st Century: Implementation of a Network of Ocean Observatories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10775.
×
Page 188

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

References Argo Data Management Committee. 2002. Argo Data Management Handbook, Version 1.0. Institut franc5ais de recherche pour ['exploitation de la mer (IFREMER), Brest, France, and Marine Environmental Data Service (MEDS), Ottawa, Canada. Baker, P., and M. McNutt, eds. 1996. The Future of Marine Geology and Geophysics (FUMAGES). Report of a Workshop, Ashland Hills, OR, December 5-7, 1996. Consor- tium for Oceanographic Research & Education, Washington, DC, 264pp. Chave, A.D., R. Butler, and T. Pyle, eds. 1990. Workshop on the Scientific Uses of Undersea Cables, January 30-February 1, 1990, Honolulu, HI. Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS)/Joint Oceanographic Institutions, Inc. JOI), Washington, DC. DEOS Global Working Group. 1999. Moored Buoy Ocean Observatories. The Scripps Institu- tion of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego. DEOS Moored Buoy Observatory Working Group. 2000. DEOS Moored Buoy Observatory Design Study. [Online] Available: http://obslab.whoi.edu/buoy.html [March 26, 2003]. DEOS Moored Buoy Observatory Working Group. 2003. Implementation Plan for the DEOS Global Network of Moored Buoy Observatories. The Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego. Dickey, T., and S. Glenn. 2003. Scientific Cabled Observatories for Time Series (SCOTS) Report. National Science Foundation, Draft, Arlington, VA, 92pp. Duennebier, F.K., D. Harris, J. Jolly, J. Caplan-Auerbach, R. Jordan, D. Copson, K. Stiffel, J. Babinec, and J. Bosel. 2002. HUGO: The Hawaii Undersea Geo-Observatory. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Journal of Oceanic Engineering 27~2~:218-227. Eriksen, C.C., T.J. Osse, R.D. Light, T. Wen, T.W. Lehman, P.L. Sabin, J.W. Ballard, and A.M. Chiodi. 2001. Seaglider: A long range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Journal of Oceanic Engineering 26~4~:424436. Federal Oceanographic Facilities Committee. 2001. Charting the Future of the National Aca- demic Research Fleet: A Long-Range Plan for Renewal. National Oceanographic Partner- ship Program, Washington, DC. 185

186 ENABLING OCEAN RESEARCH IN THE 2 lST CENTURY Freitag, L., M. Johnson, and D. Frye. 2000. High-rate acoustic communications for ocean observatories: Performance testing over a 3000 m vertical path. Pp.1443-1448 in Pro- ceedings of Oceans 2000 M.T.S./I.E.E.E. Where Science and Technology Meet, Volume 2. Marine Technology Society, Columbia, MD and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Piscataway, NJ. Friederich, G.E., P.M. Walz, M.G. Burczynski, and F.P. Chavez. 2002. Inorganic carbon in the central California upwelling system during the 1997-1999 E1 Nino-La Nina event. Progress in Oceanography 54~1-4~:185-203. Goodstein, D. 2003. "Scientific elites and scientific illiterates." In: Resources for Scientists in Education and Public Outreach. Space Science Institute, Boulder, CO. [Online] Available: http://www.spacescience.org Duly 12, 2003]. Hallegraeff, G.M. 1993. A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global in- crease. Phycologia 32:79-99. Hughes, D., D. Freeborn, D. Crichton, C. Atkinson, and J. Hyon. 2001. GESS Ground Data System Proposal. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA. Isern, A. 2002. Presentation to the NRC Committee on the Implementation of a Seafloor Observatory Network for Oceanographic Research, October, 2002. Washington, DC. Jahnke, R., L. Atkinson, J. Barth, F. Chavez, K. Daly, J. Edson, P. Franks, J. O'Donnell, and O. Schofeld. 2002. Coastal Ocean Processes and Observatories: Advancing Coastal Research. Skidaway Institute of Oceanography TR-02-01. Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, Savannah, GA. Johnson, K.S., and L.J. Coletti. 2002. In situ ultraviolet spectrophotometry for high resolu- tion and long-term monitoring of nitrate, bromide and bisulfide in the ocean. Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 49~7~:1291-1305. Joint Oceanographic Institutions, Inc. 1994. Dual Use of IUSS: Telescopes in the Ocean. Joint Oceanographic Institutions, Inc., Washington, DC. J0rgensen, B.B., and K. Richardson, eds. 1996. "Eutrophication in coastal marine ecosys- tems." In: Coastal and Estuarine Studies, Volume 52. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC. Jumars, P., and M. Hay, comps. 1999. OEUVRE, Ocean Ecology: Understanding and Vision for Research. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Joint Office for Science Support, Boulder, CO. Mayer, L., and E. Druffel, eds. 1999. The Future of Ocean Chemistry in the U.S. Report of the FOCUS Workshop. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Joint Office for Science Support, Boulder, CO. National Research Council.1995. Beach Nourishment and Protection. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. National Research Council. 2000. Illuminating the Hidden Planet: the Future of Seafloor Obser- vatory Science. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. National Science Foundation. 2001. Ocean Sciences at the New Millennium. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA. National Science Foundation. 2002. Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction FY 2004 Budget Request. National Science Foundation, Division of Ocean Sciences, Arling- ton, VA. National Science Foundation. 2003. Guidelines for Planning and Managing the Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction Account. National Science Foundation, Division of Ocean Sciences, Arlington, VA. [Online] Available: http://www.nsf.govibfa/lfp/document/ mrefc.pdf Uuly 12, 2003].

REFERENCES 187 NEPTUNE Canada. 2000. Feasibility of Canadian Participation in the NEPTUNE Undersea Ob- servatory Network. Canadian NEPTUNE Management Board, Victoria, British Colum- bia. [Online] Available: http://www.neptunecanada.com/neptune-canada/Canadianfeas.pdf Duly 12, 2003]. NEPTUNE Data Communications Team. 2002. NEPTUNE Data Communications System De- sign Requirements and Conceptual Design. Draft Report. Version 0.9. Woods Hole Oceano- graphic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Available: http://sea.whoi.edu/nept comm/documents Duly 12, 2003]. NEPTUNE Phase 1 Partners: University of Washington, Woods Hole Oceanographic Insti- tution, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory.2000. Real-time, Long-term Ocean and Earth Studies at the Scale of a Tectonic Plate. [Online] Available: http://www.neptune.washington.edu/pub/documents/documents.html#Anchor- NEPTUNE-33869 [March 26, 2003]. Ocean.US. 2002a. An Integrated and Sustained Ocean Observing System (IOOS) for the United States: Design and Implementation. Ocean.US, Arlington, VA. [Online] Available: http:// www.ocean.us/documents/docs/FINAL-ImpPlan-NORLC. pdf Duly 12, 2003]. Ocean.US. 2002b. Building Consensus: Toward an Integrated and Sustained Ocean Observ- ing System. Ocean.US Workshop Proceedings. Ocean.US, Arlington, VA. [Online] Avail- able: http://www.ocean.us/documents/docs/Core_lores.pdf Duly 12, 2003]. Petitt, R.A, Jr., D.W. Harris, B. Wooding, J. Bailey, J. Jolly, E. Hobart, A. D. Chave, F. Duennebier, R. Butler, A. Bowen, and D. Yoerger. 2002. The Hawaii-2 Observatory. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Journal of Oceanic Engineering 27~2~:245- 253. Purdy, G. M., and J.A. Orcutt, eds. 1995. Broadband Seismology in the Oceans Towards a Five- Year Plan. Ocean Seismic Network/Joint Oceanographic Institutions, Inc., Washing- ton, DC. Rabalais, N.N., and R.E. Turner, eds. 2001. "Coastal hypoxia: consequences for living re- sources and ecosystems". In: Coastal and Estuarine Studies, Volume 58. American Geo- physical Union, Washington, DC, 460pp. REVEL Project.2003. Mission Statement. [Online] Available: http://www.ocean.washington.edu/ ocean_web/education/outreach/outreach.html Duly 12, 2003]. RIDGE. 2000. In-Situ Sensors: Their Development and Application for the Study of Chemical, Physical and Biological Systems at Mid-Ocean Ridges. [Online] Available: http://ridge. oce.orst.edu/meetings3SSworkshopbSS_Report.pdf Duly 12, 2003]. Royer, T., and W. Young, comps. 1998. The Future of Physical Oceanography. Report of the Advances and Primary Research Opportunities in Physical Oceanography Studies (APRO- POS) Workshop. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Joint Office for Sci- ence Support, Boulder, CO, 255pp. Scholin, C., G. Massion, E. Mellinger, M. Brown, D. Wright, and D. Cline. 1998. The Devel- opment and Application of Molecular Probes and Novel Instrumentation for Detec- tion of Harmful Algae. Pp. 367-370 in MTS/Ocean Community Conference '98 Proceed- ings Celebrating 1998 International Year of the Ocean, Volume 1. Marine Technology Society, Columbia, MD. Summerhayes, C. 2002. GOOS project update: implementation progress. Sea Technology 43(10):4649. Thornton, E., T. Dalrymple, T. Drake, E. Gallagher, R.Guza, A. Hay, R. Holman, J. Kaihatu, T. Lippmann, and T. Ozkan-Haller. 2000. State of Nearshore Processes Research: II. NPS- OC-00-001. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA. [Online] Available: http://www. coastal.udel.edu/coastal/nearshorereport/nrwreport/html Duly 12, 2003].

188 ENABLING OCEAN RESEARCH IN THE 2 lST CENTURY University of Hawaii, Department of Oceanography. 2002. Aloha Observatory. [Online] Avail- able: http://lcela.soest.hawaii.edu/ALOHA/ [11 April 2003]. U.S. House, Committee on Science. 1999. K-12 Math and Science Education: What is Being Done to Improve it? Hearing before the Committee on Science, 28 April 1999, 106th Congress, 1st Session. Serial No.106-34. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

Next: Appendix A: Committee and Staff Biographies »
Enabling Ocean Research in the 21st Century: Implementation of a Network of Ocean Observatories Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $60.00 Buy Ebook | $47.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

As the importance of the oceans to society grows, so does the need to understand their variation on many temporal and spatial scales. This need to understand ocean change is compelling scientists to move beyond traditional expeditionary modes of investigation. Observing systems will enable the study of processes in the ocean basins over varying timescales and spatial scales, providing the scientific basis for addressing important societal concerns such as climate change, natural hazards, and the health and viability of living and non-living resources along our coasts and in the open ocean.

The book evaluates the scientific and technical readiness to move ahead with the establishment of a research-driven ocean observatory network, and highlights outstanding issues. These issues include the status of planning and development, factors that affect the timing of construction and installation, the cost and requirements for maintenance and operations, needs for sensor development and data management, the impact on availability of ships and deep submergence facilities, and the role of research-based observatories within national and international operational ocean observing systems being developed and implemented.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!