National Academies Press: OpenBook

Bridging the Bed-Bench Gap: Contributions of the Markey Trust (2004)

Chapter: The Biomedical Research Environment in the 1980s

« Previous: Assessing the Markey General Organizational Grants Program
Suggested Citation:"The Biomedical Research Environment in the 1980s." National Research Council. 2004. Bridging the Bed-Bench Gap: Contributions of the Markey Trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10920.
×
Page 22
Suggested Citation:"The Biomedical Research Environment in the 1980s." National Research Council. 2004. Bridging the Bed-Bench Gap: Contributions of the Markey Trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10920.
×
Page 23

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

The Biomedical Research Environment in the ~ 980s Throughout the 1980s and 1990s many investigators continued sounding the alarm about the state of translational research. Like Wyngaarden, Gill (1984), Arias (1989), Hartwell (1992), Bunn and Casey (1995), Goldstein and Brown (1997), Shine (1998), and Nathan (1998), among others, expressed marked concern that a shortage of clini- cal researchers was endangering our nation's leading role in today's bio- medical revolution. A shortage of clinical researchers was clearly contrib- uting to a widening gap between those discoveries made in He basic science laboratories and the application of discoveries to conquer human diseases. Physician-scientists are key to bridging the gap since they relate to both human patients and laboratory research (Rosenberg and Ley, 2003~. In 1988 the National Institutes of Health (NIH) commissioned the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to assess the availability of resources for per- forming clinical research. That study committee found that the number of highly talented young medical school graduates pursuing careers as clinical investigators was declining. As many as 20 percent of clinical traineeships and fellowships were filled by individuals with the Ph.D. degree rather than the M.D. degree (Institute of Medicine, 1988~. Follow- ing the release of the committee's report, Resources for Clinical Investiga- tion (Institute of Medicine, 1988), the IOM convened a planning meeting to develop a strategy for exploring problems associated with clinical re- search training. 22

THE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT IN THE 1980s 23 In the second half of the twentieth century the production of Ph.D.s in the life sciences increased substantially. In 1960 there were 1,160 doctor- ates awarded in the biological sciences (National Research Council, 1969~; by 1999 that number had increased to 5,600 (Sanderson et al., 2000~. In the past 20 years the advance of Ph.D.s into disease-oriented research has increased dramatically. In 1997 "the majority of principal investigators for clinical research projects supported by the NIH and me Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality held Ph.D.s (1,449) rather than M.D.s or M.D.-Ph.D.s (1,061~" (National Research Council, 2000, p. 42~. Despite the impressive numbers of Ph.D. scientists available to per- form clinical research, the development of training programs that specifi- cally prepare basic scientists for clinical research has been sporadic. Be- fore 1980 there was practically no systematic instruction of basic scientists in disease-oriented research. In 1980 Harvard Medical School began offer- ing a one-semester course in organismal physiology and disease mecha- nism to basic science students (Arias, 2003~. During the 15 years between 1984 and 1998, 214 predoctoral students, and postdoctoral fellows, and faculty participated in the one-semester course. In 1984 Irwin Arias began training basic scientists at Tufts University in pathobiology as part of an effort to bridge the gap between basic science and its application to medi- cine (Arias, 1989~.

Next: Closing the Bed-Bench Gap »
Bridging the Bed-Bench Gap: Contributions of the Markey Trust Get This Book
×
 Bridging the Bed-Bench Gap: Contributions of the Markey Trust
Buy Paperback | $46.00 Buy Ebook | $36.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Since the 1970s there has been a serious gap between fundamental biological research and its clinical application. In response to this gap the Lucille P. Markey Charitable Trust instituted the General Organizational Grants program, which funded two types of awards to provide training that would bridge the bed-bench gap. These training awards fell into two categories: (1) those that provided significant opportunities for M.D.s to engage in basic research during and immediately following medical school and residency, and (2) those that provided significant clinical exposure for Ph.D.s while they were predoctoral or postdoctoral students. These grants were intended to close the widening gap between rapid advances in our understanding of the biological process and the translation of that knowledge into techniques for preventing diseases. This report examines the General Organizational Grant programs, identifies best practices, and provides observations for future philanthropic funders.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!