1. “Advanced Photon Source Home page.” Web page, [accessed 6 May 2004]. Available at http://epics.aps.anl.gov/aps.php.
2. “Association for Integrative Studies (AIS).” Web page, [accessed 8 August 2003]. Available at http://www.units.muohio.edu/aisorg/intro.html.
3. “Budgeting with the UB Model at the University of Michigan.” Web page, [accessed 24 July 2003]. Available at http://www.umich.edu/~provost/budgeting/ubmodel.html.
4. “Department of Defense Strategic Plan.” Web page, [accessed 22 July 2003]. Available at http://www.conginst.org/resultsact/PLANS/plans_dod.html.
5. “Department of Energy Strategic Plan.” Web page, [accessed 15 July 2003]. Available at http://www.cfo.doe.gov/stratmgt/plan/DOEsplan.htm.
6. “Environmental Protection Agency/OCFO—Strategic Plan.” Web page, [accessed 15 July 2003]. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ocfo/plan/plan.htm.
7. “Fund for the Advancement of the Discipline.” Web page, [accessed 23 February 2004]. Available at http://www.asanet.org/members/fad.html.
8. “Good Work Project.” Web page, [accessed 18 July 2003]. Available at http://www.goodworkproject.org.
9. “History of X-ray Crystallography and Associated Topics.” Web page, [accessed 8 March 2004]. Available at http://www.d1.ac.uk/SRS/PX/history/history.html.
10. “Human Frontier Science Program.” Web page, [accessed 30 July 2003]. Available at http://www.hfsp.org/home.php.
11. “Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS).” Web page, [accessed 8 August 2003]. Available at http://www.informs.org/.
12. “Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT).” Web page, [accessed 10 March 2004]. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04550/nsf04550.pdf.
13. “Keck Futures Conferences.” Web page, [accessed 3 March 2004]. Available at http://www7.nationalacademies.org/keck/Keck_Futures_Conferences.html.
14. “Marine Biological Laboratory Home page.” Web page, [accessed 6 May 2004]. Available at http://www.mbl.edu/research/summer/index.html.
15. “Mathematical Sciences Research Institute.” Web page, [accessed 6 May 2004]. Available at http://www.msri.org/.
16. “Microsoft Research Home page.” Web page, [accessed 6 May 2004]. Available at http://research.microsoft.com/aboutmsr/jobs/internships/.
17. “National Academies Keck Futures Initiative.” Web page, [accessed 3 March 2004]. Available at http://www7.nationalacademies.org/keck/index.html.
18. “National Institute of Standards and Technology 2010 Strategic Plan.” Web page, [accessed 16 July 2003]. Available at http://www.nist.gov/director/.
19. “National Science Foundation GPRA Strategic Plan FY 2001—2006.” Web page, [accessed 15 July 2003]. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2001/nsf0104/start.htm.
20. “The Shingobee Headwaters Aquatic Ecosystems Project (SHAEP) Home page.” Web page, [accessed 6 May 2004]. Available at http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/SHAEP/index.html
21. “Society for Social Studies of Science (4S).” Web page, [accessed 8 August 2003]. Available at http://www.lsu.edu/ssss/.
22. “Training for a New Interdisciplinary Research Workforce.” Web page, [accessed 1 June 2004]. Available at http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-04-015.html.
23. “University of Minnesota Budget and Interdisciplinary Initiatives.” Web page, [accessed 5 August 2003]. Available at http://www.evpp.umn.edu/evpp/init.htm.
24. “USGS Home page; Cottonwood Lake Study Area.” Web page, [accessed 6 May 2004]. Available at http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/clsa/index.htm.
25. “Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology.” Web page, [accessed 20 January 2004]. Available at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/vicb/home.html.
26. “What is Biogeochemistry?” Web page, [accessed 20 January 2004]. Available at http://calspace.ucsd.edu/virtualmuseum/climatechange1/05_1.shtml.
27. Advisory Council for Science and Technology Policy. 2003. 1 + 1 > 2 Promoting Interdisciplinary Research, Report 54 of Series Advisory Reports. http://www.awt.nl/en/index.html.
28. Balsiger, P. W. 2004. Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale. Futures 36, no. 4:407-21.
29. Barth, R. T. and R. Steck. 1979. Interdisciplinary Research Groups: Their Management and Organization. Vancouver: International Group on Interdisciplinary Programs.
30. Baumann, H. 2003. Publish and Perish? The impact of citation indexing on the development of new fields of environmental research. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6, no. 3-4:13-26.
31. Bayer, P. S. and B. Steinheider. 2004. Working in interdisciplinary research teams: Why heterogeneity matters. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
32. Bechtel, W. 1986. Integrating Scientific Disciplines: The Nature of Scientific Integration. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoof.
33. Bell, N. 2003. Mapping Academic Disciplines to a Multi-Disciplinary World. Proceedings of an NSF/CPST/Professional Societies Workshop Washington, D.C.: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.
34. Birnbaum-More, P. H., F. Rossini, and D. Baldwin. 1990. International Research Management. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Birnbaum, P. H. 1983. Predictors of Long-Term Research Performance. Managing Interdisciplinary Research. S. R. Epton, R. L. Payne, and A. W. Pearson, 47-59. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
36. Birnbaum, P.H. 1979. A Theory of Academic Interdisciplinary Research Performance: A Contingency and Path Analysis Approach. Management Science 25, no. 3:231-42.
37. Bourke, P. and L. Butler. 1998. Institutions and the map of science: Matching university departments and fields of research. Research Policy 26:711-18.
38. Bozeman, B. and E. Corley. 2004. Scientists’ Collaboration Strategies: Implications for Scientific and Technical Human Capital. Research Policy 33, no. 4:599-616.
39. Brainard, Jeffrey. 2002. U.S. Agencies Look to Interdisciplinary Science. The Chronicle of Higher Education: A20.
40. Brandt, E.N. 1997. Research Administration in a Time of Change. SRA Journal 29, no. 1,2:233-36.
41. Bruce, A., C. Lyall, J. Tait, and R. Williams. 2004. Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures 36, no. 4:457-70.
42. Bruhn, J.G. 2000. Interdisciplinary Research: A Philosophy, Art Form, Artifact or Anti-dote? Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 35, no. 1:58-66.
43. Butler, D. 1998. Interdisciplinary research ‘being stifled’. Nature 396, no. 6708:202.
44. Butler, D. 2000. Pasteur Institute to Abandon Departmental Structure? Nature 405, no. 6790:990.
45. Cairns, R. B., E. J. Costello, and Elder, G. H. 1996. The Making of Developmental Science. Developmental Science. R.B. Cairns, G.H. Elder, and E.J. Costello, 223-34. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Campbell, W. H., W. K. Anderson, and G. J. Burckart. 2003. “Institutional and faculty roles and responsibilities in the emerging environment of university-wide interdisciplinary research structures.” Report of the 2001-2002 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.
47. Caruso, D. and D. Rhoten. 2001. Lead, follow, get out of the way: sidestepping the barriers to effective practice on interdisciplinarity. The Hybrid Vigor Institute http://www.hybridvigor.net/interdis/pubs/hv_pub_interdis-2001.04.30.pdf.
48. Chase, A., J. Giancola, L. Horst, R. Jacob, A. Martinez, M. A. Millsap, W. C. Smith, S. Goldsmith, D. Haviland, and N. Tushnet. 2003. IGERT Annual Cross-Site Report: 1998 and 1999 Cohorts, Abt Associates Inc., Washington D.C.
49. Chase, A., J. Giancola, L. Litin, A. Martinez, and C. Weiland. 2003. IGERT Implementation and Early Outcomes: 2002, Abt Associates Inc., Washington D.C.
50. Chubin, D. E. 1986. “Interdisciplinary Analysis and Research: Theory and Practice of Problem-Focused Research and Development.” Interdisciplinary Analysis and Research: Theory and Practice of Problem-Focused Research and Development. Mt. Airy: Lomond Publications.
51. Chubin, D. E., A. L. Porter, and F. A. Rossini. 1984. “Citation Classics” Analysis: An Approach to Characterizing Interdisciplinary Research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 35, no. 6:360-368.
52. Chubin, D. E., A. L. Porter, F. A. Rossini, and T. Connolly. 1986. Interdisciplinary Analysis and Research: Theory and Practice of Problem-Focused Research and Development. Mt. Airy: Lomond Publications.
53. Cohen, L., M. J. Aboelata, T. Gantz, and J. Van Wert. 2003. “Collaboration Math: Enhancing the Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Collaboration: Applying Collaboration Math to the U.C. Berkeley Traffic Safety Center.” Prevention Institute, www.preventioninstitute.org.
54. Collins, J. P. 2002. May You Live in Interesting Times: Using Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Programs To Cope with Change in the Life Sciences. Bioscience 52, no. 1:75-83.
55. Colwell, R. 2001. From Microscope to Kaleidoscope: Merging Fields of Vision. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Probelm Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. J. Thompson-Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Haberli, A. Bill, R.W. Scholz, and M. Welti, 59-66. Basel, Boston, Berlin: Birhauser-Verlag.
56. Committee on Building Bridges in Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences. 2000. “Bridging Disciplines in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences.” National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
57. Committee on Human Factors. 2003. “Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers.” National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
58. Committee on Large-Scale Science and Cancer Research. 2003. Large-Scale Biomedical Science: Exploring Strategies for Future Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
59. Committee on Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology. 1987. Interdisciplinary research in mathematics, science, and technology education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
60. Committee on Undergraduate Biology Education to Prepare Research Scientists for the 21st Century. 2003. “BIO 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists.” Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
61. Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs, Policy and Global Affairs Division. 2003. “Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs: A Methodology Study.” Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
62. Couzin, J. 2003. Congress Wants the Twain to Meet. Science 301:444.
63. Cummings, J. and S. Kiesler. 2003. KDI Initiative: Multidisciplinary Scientific Collaborations, NSF Award No. IIS-9872996. National Science Foundation.
64. Cutler, R. S. 1979. A Policy Perspective on Interdisciplinary Research in U.S. Universities. Interdisciplinary Research Groups: Their Management and Organization. R. T Barth, and R. Steck, 295-314. IGRIP.
65. Davis, J. R. 1995. Interdisciplinary Courses and Team Teaching: New Arrangements for Learning. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
66. de Paula, J. C. 2003. Integrating the Sciences at Haverford College. Research Corporation Report http://www.rescorp.org/report/rc_report.htm:3.
67. Defila, R., and A. DiGiulio. 1999. Evaluating Transdisciplinary Research. Panorama 1.
68. Derry, S. J. C. D. Schunn, and M. A. Gernsbacher. 2004. Problems and Promises of Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Despres, C., N. Brais, and S. Avellan. 2004. Collaborative planning for retrofitting suburbs: transdisciplinarity and intersubjectivity in action. Futures 36, no. 4:471-86.
70. DeWachter, M. 1982. Interdisciplinary Bioethics: But Where Do We Start? A Reflection on Epoche as Method. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7, no. 3:275-87.
71. Dill, K. A. 1999. Strengthening biomedicine’s roots. Nature 400:309-10.
72. Dressel, P. 1970. The Confidence Crisis: An Analysis of University Departments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
73. Edwards, A. Jr. 1996. Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Programs: A Directory. Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group.
74. Elder, G. H., J. Modell, and R. D. Parke. 1993. Epilogue: An emerging framework for dialogue between history and developmental psychology. Children in time and place: Developmental and historical insights . G. H. Elder, J. Modell, and R. D. Parke, 241-49. New York: Cambridge University Press.
75. Elgass, J. R. 1994. Clarke co-directs project at Argonne photon facility. The University Record March 28.
76. Epton, S. R., R. L. Payne, and A. W. Pearson. 1983. Contextual Issues in Managing Cross-Disciplinary Research. Managing High Technology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 209-29. New York: Elsevier.
77. Epton, S. R., R. L. Payne, and A. W. Pearson. 1984. Cross-Disciplinarity and Organizational Forms. Managing Interdisciplinary Research. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
78. Epton, S. R., R. L. Payne, and A. W. Pearson. 1983. Managing Interdisciplinary Research. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
79. European Commission. 2003. “CORDIS FP6: Guidelines on proposal evaluation and selection procedures [FP6].” Web page. Available at http://dbs.cordis.lu/.
80. European Commission. 2003. “CORDIS FP6: Provisions for implementing integrated projects: Background document. “ Web page. Available at http://dbs.cordis.lu/.
81. Feder, T. 2000. Strasbourg Interdisciplinary Institute Gets Off the Ground. Physics Today April: 58.
82. Feist, G. J. and M. E. Gorman. 1998. The Psychology of Science: Review and Integration of a Nascent Discipline. Review of General Psychology 2, no. 1:3-47.
83. Feller, I. 2002. New Organizations, old cultures: stategy and implementation of interdisciplinary programs. Research Evaluation 11:109-16.
84. Feller, I. 2002. Performance Measurement Redux. American Journal of Evaluation 23:435-52.
85. Feller, I. 2004. Whither Interdisciplinarity (In an Era of Strategic Planning)? Proceedings of 2004 Annual AAAS Meeting Washington D.C.: AAAS.
86. Fiscella, J. and S. Kimmel. 1999. “Interdisciplinary Education: A Guide to Resources.” Interdisciplinary Education: A Guide to Resources, The College Board, New York.
87. Flexner, H. 1979. The Curriculum, the Disciplines, and Interdisciplinarity in Higher Education: Historical Perspective. Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education. J. Kockelmans, 93-122. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
88. Fouke, J. and K. Brodie. 2003. Symposium on catalyzing team science. Bioengineering Consortium (BECON), National Institutes of Health.
89. Friedman, R. S., and R. C. Friedman. 1985. Organized Research Units of Academe Revisited. Managing High Technology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. B. W. Mar, W. T. Newell, and B. O. Saxberg, 75-91.
90. Frost, Susan H. 2001. “Intellectual Initiatives: Working Across Disciplines, Schools and Institutions.” Emory: Provost Initiatives, Emory University, Atlanta.
91. Garrett Russell, M. 1990. The Impact of Interdisciplinary Activities on Departmental Disciplines. International Research Management. P. H. Birnbaum-More, Frederick A. Rossini, and Donald R. Baldwin, 81-96. New York: Oxford University Press.
92. Gaughan, M., and S. Robin. 2004. National Science Training Policy and Early Scientific Careers in France and the United States. Research Policy 33:569-81.
93. Geneuth, J., I. Chompalov, and W. Shrum. 2000. How Experiments Begin: The Formation of Scientific Collaborations. Minerva 38, no. 3:311-48.
94. Gershon, D. 2000. Changing the Face of Training for Science at the Interface. Nature 404, no. 6775:315-6.
95. Gershon, D. 2000. Crossing the Divide Between Theory and Practice. Nature 404, no. 6775:316.
96. Gershon, D. 2000. Laying a Firm Foundation for Interdisciplinary Research Endeavours. Nature 406, no. 6791:107-8.
97. Gershon, D. 2000. Pushing the Frontiers of Interdisciplinary Research: an Idea Whose Time Has Come. Nature 404, no. 6775:313-5.
98. Goebel, G. “Microwave Radar and The MIT Rad Lab.” Web page, [accessed 10 March 2004]. Available at http://www.vectorsite.net/ttwiz3.html.
99. Golde, C. M. and H. A. Gallagher. 1999. The Challenges of Conducting Interdisciplinary Research and Traditional Doctoral Programs. Ecosystems 2:281-85.
100. Gonzalez, C. 2003. The role of the graduate school in interdisciplinary programs: The University of California, Davis, Budget Model. Communicator: Council of Graduate Schools 26, no. 5:1-12.
101. Goulet, R. R. 1985. The National Science Foundation and High Tech Interdisciplinary Research. Managing High Technology: An Interdisciplinary Approach. W. T. Newell and B. O. Saxberg B.W. Mar, 179-83. New York: Elsevier.
102. Grace, D. J. and F. A. Rossini. 1990. Georgia Tech Research Institute: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. International Research Management. P. H. Birnbaum-More, Frederick A. Rossini, and Donald R. Baldwin, 105-13. New York: Oxford University Press.
103. Gregorian, V. 2004. Colleges Must Retain the Unity of Knowledge. The Chronicle of Higher Education 50, no. 39:1-5.
104. Guetzkow, J., and M. Lamont. 2002. Evaluating Creative Minds: The Assessment of Originality in Peer Review. Creativity July.
105. Gusdorf, G. 1977. Past, Present and Future in Interdisciplinary Research. International Social Science Journal. 29, no. 4:580-600.
106. Haberli, R., W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, J. Thompson-Klein, A. Bill, R. Scholz, and M. Welti. 2001. Summary and Synthesis. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. J. Thompson-Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Haberli, A. Bill, R.W. Scholz, and M. Welti, 3-23. Boston: Birkhauser Verlag.
107. Haggin, J. 1995. Illinois’ Beckman Institute Targets Disciplinary Barriers to Collaboration. Chemical and Engineering News 73, no. 10:32-39.
108. Hagoel, L. 2002. Crossing Borders: Toward a Trans-Disciplinary Scientific Identity. Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 3:297-308.
109. Hansson, B. 1999. Interdisciplinarity: For what purpose? Policy Sciences 32:339-43.
110. Hattery, L. H. 1979. Interdisciplinary Research Management: Research Needs and Opportunities. Interdisciplinary Research Groups: Their Management and Organization. R. T Barth, and R. Steck, 9-25. IGRIP.
111. Hoag, H. 2003. Building Bridges. Nature 425:882-83.
112. Hollaender, K. 2001. Reflections on the Interactive Sessions: From Scepticism to Good Practices. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. J. Thompson-Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Haberli, A. Bill, R.W. Scholz, and M. Welti Boston: Birkhauser-Verlag.
113. Hollingsworth, R., and E. J. Hollingsworth. 2000. Major Discoveries and Biomedical Research Organizations: Perspectives on Interdisciplinarity, Nurturing Leadership, and Integrated Structure and Cultures. Practising Interdisciplinarity. P. Weingart, and N. Stehr, 215-44. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
114. Holton, G. 1998. The Scientific Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
115. Holton, G., and H. Jurkowitz E. Chang. 1996. How a Scientific Discovery is Made: A Case History. American Scientist 84, no. 4:364-75.
116. Hooper, J. W., and F. A. Rossini. 1990. The Development of an Interdisciplinary University-Based Microelectronics Research Center. International Research Management. Eds. P. H. Birnbaum, Frederick A. Rossini, and Donald R. Baldwin, 114-21. New York: Oxford University Press.
117. Horlick-Jones, T., and J. Sime. 2004. Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures 36, no. 4:441-56.
118. Hursh, B., P. Haas, and M. Moore. 1983. An Interdisciplinary Model to Implement General Education. Journal of Higher Education 54:42-59.
119. Jeffrey, P. 2003. Smoothing the Waters: Observations on the Process of Cross-Disciplinary Research Collaboration. Social Studies of Science 33, no. 4:539-62.
120. Jewitt, G. P. W., and A. H. M. Görgens. 2000. Facilitation of interdisciplinary collaboration in research: lessons from a Kruger National Park Rivers Research Programme project. South African Journal of Science 96:411-14.
121. Kafatos, F. C., and T. Eisner. 2004. Unification in the Century of Biology. Science 303:1257.
122. Karlqvist, A. 1999. Going beyond disciplines: The meanings of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences 32:379-83.
123. Kates, R. W. 1989. The great questions of science and society do not fit neatly into single disciplines. The Chronicle of Higher Education 35:B2-B3.
124. Kessel, F., P. Rosenfield, and N. Anderson. 2003. “Expanding the Boundaries of Health and Social Science: Case Studies in Interdisciplinary Innovation.” Oxford University Press, Oxford.
125. Klein, J. T. 1996. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
126. Klein, J. T. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, & Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
127. Klein, J. T. 2004. Prospects for Transdisciplinarity. Futures 36:515-26.
128. Klein, J. T., and W. H. Newell. 1997. Handbook of the Undergraduate Curriculum: A Comprehensive Guide to Purposes, Structures, Practices, and Change. Advancing Interdisciplinary Studies., 393-415. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
129. Klein, J. T. Porter A. L. 1990. Preconditions for Interdisciplinary Research. International Research Management: Studies in Interdisciplinary Methods from Business, Government, and Academia. P. H. Birnbaum-More, F. A. Rossini, and D. R. Baldwin, 11-19. New York: Oxford University Press.
130. Kostoff, R. N. 2002. Overcoming Specialization. BioScience 52, no. 10:937-41.
131. Kostoff, R. N. 1997. Peer review: The appropriate GPRA metric for research. Science 277:651-52.
132. Kreeger, K. 2003. The Learning Curve. Nature 424:234-35.
133. Kusmierek, K. N. and M. Piontek. 2002. Content, Consciousness, and Colleagues: Emerging Themes from a Program Evaluation of Graduate Student Progress Toward Multidisciplinary Science. 42nd Annual Association for Institutional Research Forum.
134. Landa, J. T. and M. T. Ghiselin. 1999. The emerging disciplines of bioeconomics: aims and scope of the Journal of Bioeconomics. Journal of Bioeconomics 1, no. 1:5-12.
135. Lattuca, L. R. 2001. Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching among College and University Faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
136. Lawrence, R. J. 2004. Housing and health: from interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary research and practice. Futures 36, no. 4:487-502.
137. Lawrence, R. J. and C. Despres. 2004. Futures of Transdisciplinarity. Futures 36, no. 4:397-405.
138. Lind, I. 1999. Organizing for interdisciplinarity in Sweden: The case of tema at Linköping University. Policy Sciences 32:415-20.
139. Lindas, N. 1979. Conclusions from the American Society for Public Administration’s Assessment of Four Interdisciplinary Research Management Projects. Interdisciplinary Research Groups: Their Management and Organization. R. T. Barth, and R. Steck, 278-94. IGRIP.
140. Lindbeck, A. “The Sveriges Riksbank (Bank of Sweden) Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 1969-2000.” Web page, [accessed 27 February 2004]. Available at http://www.nobel.se/economics/articles/lindbeck/index.html.
141. Mansilla, V. B. and H. Gardner. 2003. Assessing Interdisciplinary Work at the Frontier. An Empirical Exploration of ‘Symptoms of Quality.” Interdisciplines http://www.interdisciplines.org/interdisciplinarity/papers/6.
142. Mar, B., W. T. Newell, and B. O. Saxberg. 1985. Managing High Technology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, North Holland-Elsevier, Amsterdam.
143. Marshall, L. H., W. A. Rosenblith, P. Gloor, G. Krauthamer, C. Blakemore, and S. Cozzens. 1996. Early History of IBRO: The Birth of Organized Neuroscience. Neuroscience 72, no. 1:283-306.
144. McCain, K. W., and P. J. Whitney. 1994. Contrasting Assessments of Interdisciplinarity in Emerging Specialties: The Case of Neural Networks Research. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 15, no. 3:285-306.
145. McCorcle, M. 1982. Critical Issues in the Functioning of Interdisciplinary Groups. Small Group Behavior 13:291-310.
146. McNeill, D. 1999. On Interdisciplinary Research: with particular reference to the field of environment and development. Higher Education Quarterly 53, no. 4:312-32.
147. Metzger, N. and R. N. Zare. 1999. Interdisciplinary Research: From Belief to Reality. Science 283, no. 5402:642.
148. Mey, H. 2001. Impact on Science Management and Science Policy. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Probelm Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. J. Thompson-Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Haberli, A. Bill, R.W. Scholz, and M. Welti, 253-59. Basel, Boston, Berlin: Birkhauser-Verlag.
149. Montgomery, S. 2004. Of Towers, Walls, and Fields: Perspectives on Language in Science. Science 303:1333-35.
150. Morgan, G. D., K. Kobus, K. K. Gerlach, C. Neighbors, C. Lerman, D. B. Abrams, and B. K. Rimer. 2003. Facilitating transdisciplinary research: The experience of the transdisciplinary tobacco use research centers. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 6, no. Suppl. 1:S11-S19.
151. Myers, G. 1993. Centering: Proposals for an Interdisciplinary Research center. Science, Technology, & Human Values 18, no. 4:433-59.
152. National Academy of Public Administration. 2004. “National Science Foundation: Governance and Management for the Future.” 2015-001. Washington, D.C.
153. National Research Council. 1990. Interdisciplinary Research: Promoting Collaboration Between the Life Sciences and Medicine and the Physical Sciences and Engineering . Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
154. Nealson, K. and W. A. Ghiorse. 2000. Geobiology: Exploring the Interface between the Biosphere and the Geosphere. American Academy of Microbiology.
155. Nilles, J. M. 1975. Interdisciplinary Research Management in the University Environment. Journal of the Society of Research Administrators VI, no. 4:9-16.
156. O’Toole, J. C., G. H. Toenniessen, T. Murashige, R. R. Harris, and R. W. Herdt. The Rockefeller Foundation’s International Program on Rice Biotechnology. Proceedings of the Fouth International Rice Genetics Symposium G. S. Khush, D. S. Brar, and B. Hardy.
157. Pain, E. 2003. Multidisciplinary Resources. Science’s Next Wave http://nextwave.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/s002/12/30/16.
158. Palmer, C. 2001. “Work at the Boundaries of Science.” Work at the Boundaries of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
159. Palmer, C. L. 1999. Structures and Strategies of Interdisciplinary Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science.
160. Palmer, C. L. and L. J. Neumann. 2002. The Information Work of Interdisciplinary Humanities Scholars: Exploration and Translation. Library Quarterly 72, no. 1:85-117.
161. Payne, S. L. 2001. Applying More Integrative Potenital for IDS Program Planning and Developemnt. Issues in Integrative Studies 19:149-69.
162. Pfirman, S. L., J. P. Collins, S. Lowes, and A. F. Michaels. in press. To Thrive and Prosper: Hiring, Supporting, and Tenuring Interdisciplinary Scholars.
163. Pinson, D. 2004. Urban planning: an ‘undisciplined’ discipline? Futures 36, no. 4:503-13.
164. Plater, W. M. 1995. Future work: Faculty time in the 21st century. Change 27, no. 3:23-33.
165. Porter, A. L. 1983. Interdisciplinary Research: Current Experience in Policy and Performance. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 8, no. 2:158-67.
166. Porter, A. L. and D. E. Chubin. 1985. An Indicator of Cross-Disciplinary Research. Scientometrics 8, no. 3-4:161-76.
167. Porter, A. L., and F. A. Rossini. 1985. Forty Interdisciplinary Research Projects: Multiple Skills and Peer Review. Managing High Technology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. B. W. Mar, W. T. Newell, and B. O. Saxberg, 103-12. New York: Elsevier.
168. Porter, A. L., and F. A. Rossini. 1984. Interdisciplinary research redefined: multi-skill problem-focussed research in the STRAP framework. R&D Management 14, no. 2:105-11.
169. Porter, A. L., and F. A. Rossini. 1986. Multiskill Research. Knowledge: Creating, Diffusion, Utilization 7, no. 3:219-46.
170. Porter, A. L., and F. A. Rossini. 1985. Peer Review of Interdisciplinary Research Proposals. Science Technology & Human Values 10, no. 3:33-38.
171. Pray, L. A. 2003. Interdisciplinarity in science and engineering: Academia in transition. Science’s Next Wave http://nextwave.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2003/01/15/5?
172. Qin, J., F. W Lancaster, and B. Allen. 1997. Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48, no. 10:893-916.
173. Ramadier, T. 2004. Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies. Futures 36, no. 4:423-39.
174. Rhoten, D. 2004. Interdisciplinary Research: Trend or Transition. Items and Issues 5, no. (1-2):6-11.
175. Rhoten, D. Final Report, National Science Foundation BCS-0129573: A Multi-Method Analysis of the Social and Technical Conditions for Interdisciplinary Collaboration. September 29, 2003. Available at: http://www.hybridvigor.net/interdis/pubs/hv_pub_interdis-2003.09.29.pdf.
176. Rhoten, D. 2002. Organizing change from the inside out: Emerging models of intra-organizational collabotation in philanthoropy. The Hybrid Vigor Institute http://www.hybridvigor.net/interdis/pubs/hv_pub_interdis-2002.10.30.pdf.
177. Rinia, E. J, Th. N. Van Leeuwen, H. G. van Vuren, and A. F. J van Raan. 2001. Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review ad bibliometric evaluations in physics research. Research Policy 30:357-61.
178. Roberston, D. W., D. K. Martin, and P. A. Singer. 2003. Interdisciplinary Reseach: Putting the methods under the microscope. Medical Research Methodology 3, no. 20.
179. Roberts, J. A., and R. E. Barnhill. 2001. Engineering Togetherness: An Incentive System for Interdisciplinary Research. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.
180. Rogers, J. 2000. The intellectual consequences of the research assessment exercise: A Response. History of the Human Sciences 13, no. 2:101-6.
181. Rogers, J. D. and B. Bozeman. 2002. A churn model of scientific knowledge value: Internet researchers as a knowledge value collective. Research Policy 31, no. 5:769-94.
182. Rossini, F., A. L. Porter, D. E. Chubin, and T. Connolly. 1984. Cross-Disciplinarity in the Biomedical Sciences: A Preliminary Analysis of Anatomy. Managing Interdisciplinary Research. S. R. Epton, R. L. Payne, and A. W. Pearson, 176-84. Chichester: Wiley.
183. Rossini, F. A. and A. L. Porter. 1979. Frameworks for integrating interdisciplinary research. Research Policy 8:70-79.
184. Russell, M. G. 1982. Enabling Interdisciplinary Research: Perspectives from Agriculture, Forestry, and Home Economics, Miscellaneous Publication #19. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.
185. Russell, M. G. 1985. Peer Review and Interdisciplinary Research: Flexibility and Responsiveness. Managing Interdisciplinary Research. S. R. Epton, R. L. Payne, and A. W. Pearson, 184-202. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
186. Russell, M. G. and R. J. Sauer. 1983. Creating Administrative Environments for Interdisciplinary Research. Journal of the Society of Research Administrators 14, no. 4:21-31.
187. Sackett, W. T. 1990. Interdisciplinary Research in a High-Technology Company. International Research Management. P. H. Birnbaum-More, Frederick A. Rossini, and Donald R. Baldwin, 60-72. New York: Oxford University Press.
188. Sanders, C. 2003. Breaking Down the Borders of Science. New York Times 1570:8.
189. Saxberg, B. O., W. T. Newell, and B. W. Mar. 1981. Interdisciplinary Research: A Dilemma for University Central Administration. Journal of the Society of Research Administrators 13:25-43.
190. Schneidewind, U. 2001. Mobilizing the Intellectual Capital of Universities. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. J. Thompson-Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Haberli, A. Bill, R.W. Scholz, and M. Welti, 94-100. Boston: Birkhauser-Verlag.
191. Sewell, W. H. 1989. Some Reflections on the Golden Age of Interdisciplinary Social Psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly 52, no. 2:88-97.
192. Shanken, E. A. “Bibliography of Interdisciplinary Collaboration.” Web page, [accessed 17 March 2004]. Available at http://www.artexetra.com/biblio_interdisciplinary.html.
193. Simonton, D. K. 2004. Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist. New York: Cambridge University Press.
194. Simonton, D. K. 2003. Scientific Creativity as Constrained Stochastic Behavior: The Integration of Product, Person, and Process Perspectives. Psychological Bulletin 129, no. 4:475-94.
195. Sjolander, S. 1985. “Long-term and Short-term Interdisciplinarity.” Inter-Disciplinarity Revisited, L. Levin, and I. Eds. Stockholm: Lind.
196. Smith, R., M. T. Spina, J. Grayson, and M. L. Zuzolo. 1997. Research Administration Through a Decade of Change. SRA Journal 29, no. 1,2:37-44.
197. Smoliner, C., R. Haberli, and M. Welti. 2001. Mainstreaming Transdisiplinarity: A Research-Political Campaign. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. J. Thompson-Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Haberli, A. Bill, R.W. Scholz, and M. Welti, 263-71. Boston: Birkhauser-Verlag.
198. Spiegel-Rosing, I. and D. de Solla Price. 1977. Science, Technology, and Society: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
199. Sproull, R., and H. Hall. 1987. “ Multidisciplinary Research and Education Programs in Universities.” Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
200. Steele, T. W. and J. C. Stier. 2000. The Impact of Interdisciplinary Research in the Environmental Sciences: A Forestry Case Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51, no. 5:476-84.
201. Steinheider, B. and G. Legrady. 2004. Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Digital Media Arts: A Psychological Perspective on the Production Process. Leonardo 37, no. 4: http://mitpress2.mit.edu/e-journals/Leonardo/isast/journal/toc374.html.
202. Stember, Marilyn. 1991. Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise. Social Science Journal 28, no. 1:1, 14.
203. Stokols, D., J. Fuqua, J. Gress, R. Harvey, K. Phillips, L. Baezconde-Garbanati, J. Unger, P. Palmer, M. A. Clark, S. M. Colby, G. Morgan, and W. Trochim. 2003. Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 6, no. Suppl. 1:S21-S39.
204. Stone, A. R. 1969. The Interdisciplinary Research Team. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences 5, no. 3:351-65.
205. Straus, R. 1973. Departments and Disciplines: Stasis and Change. Science 182, no. 4115:895-98.
206. Submcommittee on Research Business Models. 2003. Alignment of Funding Mechanisms with Scientific Opportunities. Regional Forum on Research Business Models White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) National Science and Technology Council (NSTC).
207. Suh, N. P. 1987. The ERCs: What Have We Learned. Engineering Education October: 16-18.
208. Suk, W. A., B. E. Anderson, C. L. Thompson, D. A. Bennett, and D. C. Vandermeer. 1999. Creating Multidisciplinary Research Opportunities. Environmental Science & Technology 33, no. 11:241A-4A.
209. Swoboda, W. W. 1979. Disciplines and Interdisciplinarity: A Historical Perspectives. Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education. Joseph Kockelmans, 49-84. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
210. Teagarden, M. B. 1998. Unbundling the intellectual joint venture process. The case of multinational, multifunctional interdisciplinary research consortia. Journal of Managerial Psychology 13, no. 3,4:178-87.
211. Trouillot, M-R. 1996. Open the Social Sciences. Crosscurrents 3, no. 2.
212. University of Michigan. 2001. New Openings for the Research University: Advancing Collaborative, Integrative, and Interdisciplinary Research and Learning: University of Michigan Special Emphasis Self Study, University of Michigan.
213. University of Washington. 2002. Self-Study: Program on the Environment, University of Washington.
214. Van Dusseldorp, S. and D. Wigboldus. 1994. Interdisciplinary Research for Integrated Rural Development in Developing Countries. Issues in Integrative Studies 12:93-138.
215. Waintraub, J. L. 1997. Institution wide reform through NSF supported projects. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.
216. Walsh, S., and T. Bartlett. 2003. U. of California-Merced Takes Interdisciplinary Approach; Virginia Tech Sends a Mixed Message. The Chronicle of Higher Education 49, no. 28:A10.
217. Weingart, P., and N. Stehr. 2000. Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
218. Whitley, R. 1982. The rise and decline of university disciplines in the sciences. Issues in Interdisciplinarity. J. H. P. Paelinck, 17-43. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Press.