National Academies Press: OpenBook

National Laboratories and Universities: Building New Ways to Work Together: Report of a Workshop (2005)

Chapter: Collaboration in National Security and Classified Research

« Previous: Building the S&E Workforce of Tomorrow
Suggested Citation:"Collaboration in National Security and Classified Research." National Research Council. 2005. National Laboratories and Universities: Building New Ways to Work Together: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11190.
×

Collaboration in National Security and Classified Research

The growing importance of national security issues and the scientific challenges to be addressed in this arena were raised as an important but potentially problematic area of collaborative research by several participants at the workshop. In addressing this topic, the first point made by presenters, echoed by many participants in the breakout sessions, is the importance of understanding the difference between national security research and classified research. Researchers are in general prohibited from working on classified research while in university facilities. However a significant portion of research relevant to national security challenges is actually unclassified and provides some opportunity for collaborative research. Trewhella pointed out the importance of idea sharing and peer review, embedded in unclassified research, in helping to maintain high-quality research activities in the classified arena. Unclassified research has significant inherent quality controls, demanded first because of the peer-reviewed competition required to obtain a grant and then because of the added review requirements to actually publish the research results. This same quality of science is highly desirable in classified work, but the same open mechanisms for ensuring quality cannot be implemented because of the closed nature of the work. Thus, to maintain the highest quality of research in a classified environment, researchers who operate in a classified world must be allowed to compete and be peer-reviewed in an unclassified environment, where their fundamental concepts, ideas, and approaches can be vetted by the community of scientists, before these ideas are brought to the classified world. Competitive, peer-reviewed, unclassified research in basic science provides an important quality check

Suggested Citation:"Collaboration in National Security and Classified Research." National Research Council. 2005. National Laboratories and Universities: Building New Ways to Work Together: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11190.
×

for classified work and also provides a more attractive career opportunity for scientists who are interested in the problems and programs of the classified world.1

David Mao from the Carnegie Institute of Washington described a specific set of projects in high-pressure physics and chemistry that demonstrated the power of this leverage between the classified and unclassified areas in basic sciences. His experience here has been that although universities do not participate directly in classified work, their understanding and knowledge, particularly in the theoretical area, have been of great value to the broader direction of defense programs.

Miriam John from Sandia National Laboratories pointed out that despite these ongoing relationships, there is a strong perception that “scientific collaborations between the NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration) labs and industry, universities and foreign scientists have dramatically declined.” The reality is that although the barriers to those collaborations are greater than they have ever been in the past (including new requirements governing visits by foreign nationals, conference attendance, and use of LDRD funds), labs such as Sandia have worked hard to maintain healthy foreign national postdoctoral and visitor programs. Even in the weapons program (e.g., the ASCI), the role of academic collaborative research remains strong. This interaction is critical to keeping the research quality and standards high in the classified arena and maintaining connection for researchers in the classified world with the broader scientific community.

While there are synergies that can be attained through appropriate interactions among researchers in the classified and unclassified arenas, according to Trewhella, capitalizing on these benefits requires the following systems to be put in place:

  • Effective processes for compartmentalizing the research and creating and maintaining barriers between what is open and what must be kept secret

  • Effective review mechanisms in all partitions

  • Strong partnerships with the best universities—focus on key skills

  • Strategic targeting of collaborations in open research areas that support national security S&T needs

Access issues were also raised as an important element in allowing workers to gather, share insights, and review research. Most of the labs are employing a “graded approach for site access” with specific visitor policies that allow open access to at least a small portion of the laboratory.

1  

This section draws heavily on remarks made by Jill Trewhella on “Conducting the Best Research in a Classified Environment” at the workshop.

Suggested Citation:"Collaboration in National Security and Classified Research." National Research Council. 2005. National Laboratories and Universities: Building New Ways to Work Together: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11190.
×
Page 23
Suggested Citation:"Collaboration in National Security and Classified Research." National Research Council. 2005. National Laboratories and Universities: Building New Ways to Work Together: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11190.
×
Page 24
Next: Comparison Study with Other Federal Agency Laboratories »
National Laboratories and Universities: Building New Ways to Work Together: Report of a Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This volume is a report of a workshop held in 2003 to address best practices and remaining challenges with respect to national laboratory-university collaborations.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!