National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Workshop Summary
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2005. Economic Models of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Adults: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11228.
×

REFERENCES

Briggs AH, O’Brien BJ, Blackhouse G. 2002. Thinking outside the box: Recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies. Annu Rev Public Health 23:377–401.


Chu KC, Tarone RE, Chow WH, Hankey BF, Ries L. 1994. Temporal patterns in colorectal cancer incidence, survival, and mortality from 1950 through 1990. J Natl Cancer Inst 86(13):997–1006.

Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Landefeld CS, Johanson JF, Rimm AA. 1995. A national population-based study of incidence of colorectal cancer and age: Implications for screening in older Americans. Cancer. 75(3):775–781.

Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, Palesch YY, Mauldin PD, Hoffman B, Vining DJ, Small WC, Affronti J, Rex D, Kopecky KK, Ackerman S, Burdick JS, Brewington C, Turner MA, Zfass A, Wright AR, Iyer RB, Lynch P, Sivak MV, Butler H. 2004. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291(14):1713–1719.

Curry S, Byers T, Hewitt M (eds). 2003. Fulfilling the Potential of Cancer Prevention and Early Detection. National Cancer Policy Board Institute of Medicine. Washington DC: The National Acadamies Press.


Devesa SS, Chow WH. 1993. Variation in colorectal cancer incidence in the United States by subsite of origin. Cancer 71(12):3819–3826.


Eddy DM. 1980. Screening for Cancer: Theory, Analysis and Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Eddy DM, Nugent FW, Eddy JF, Coller J, Gilbertsen V, Gottlieb LS, Rice R, Sherlock P, Winawer S. 1987. Screening for colorectal cancer in a high-risk population. Results of a mathematical model. Gastroenterol 92(3):682–692.

Edwards BK, Howe HL, Ries LAG, Thun MJ, Rosenberg HM, Yancik R, Wingo PA, Jemal A, Feigal EG. 2002. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1999, featuring implications of age and aging on U.S. cancer burden. Cancer 94(10):2766–2792.


Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM. 2000. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA 84(15):1954–1961.


Glick S, Wagner JL, Johnson CD. 1998. Cost-effectiveness of double-contrast barium enema in screening for colorectal cancer. AJR AM JRoentgeno 170(3):629–636.

Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Kramer BS, Hayes RB, Cornett JE. 1995. The prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial of the National Cancer Institute. Cancer 75(7 Suppl.): 1869–1873.

Gold MR, Siegel J, Russell L, Weinstein, M. 1996. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine New York: Oxford University Press.


Herdman R, Norton L (eds). 2005. Saving Women’s Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis. National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine. Washington DC: The National Acadamies Press.


Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. 2003. Using risk for advanced proximal colonic neoplasia to tailor endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 139(12):959–965.


Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. 2002. A randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: Results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds. Gu. 50(1):29–32.

Joseph AM, Crowson TW, Rich EC. 1988. Cost effectiveness of HemoQuant versus Hemoccult for colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 3(2):132–138.


Khandker RK, Dulski JD, Kilpatrick JB, Ellis RP, Mitchell JB, Baine WB. 2000. A decision model and cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance guidelines for average-risk adults. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16(3):799–810.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2005. Economic Models of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Adults: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11228.
×

Kowalczyk L. 2004, August 1. Colonoscopies tax health industry. The Boston Globe A-1.


Ladabaum U, Song K, Fendrick AM. 2004. Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: When, at what cost, and with what national impact? Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2(7):554–563.

Lieberman DA. 1995. Cost-effectiveness model for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterol 109(6): 1781–90.

Lieberman DA, Prindiville S, Weiss DG, Willett W. 2003. Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia and hyperplastic polyps in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 290(22):2959–2967.

Lieberman DA, Prindiville S, Weiss DG, Willett W, Imperiale T. 2004. Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia: From evidence to application. Evidence-Based Gastroenterology 5(3):86–87.

Loeve F, Boer R, Van Oortmarssen GJ, Van Ballegooijen M, Habbema JDF. 1999. The MISCAN-COLON simulation model for the evaluation of colorectal cancer screening. Comput Biomed Res 32(1):13–33.

Loeve F, Brown ML, Boer R, Van Ballegooijen M, Van Oortmarssen GJ, Habbema JDF. 2000. Endoscopic colorectal cancer screening: A cost-saving analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(7): 557–563.


Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH. 1999. Colorectal cancer mortality: Effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(5):434–437.

Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Ransohoff DF. 2004. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 141(4).


Neilson AR, Whynes DK. 1995. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer: A simulation model. IMA J Math Appl Med Biol 12(3–4):355–367.

Ness RM, Holmes AM, Klein R, Dittus R. 2000. Cost-utility of one-time colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer at various ages. Am J Gastroenterol 95(7):1800–1811.


Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR. 2003. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349(23):2191–2200.

Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerger T, Mandelblatt J. 2002. Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137(2):96–104.


Ransohoff DF. 2004. Virtual colonoscopy: What it can do vs what it will do. JAMA 291(14): 1772–1774.


Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, Bresalier RS, Church T, Prorok P, Gohagan JK. 2003. Results of repeat sigmoidoscopy 3 years after a negative examination. JAMA 290(1):41–48.

Scholefield JH, Moss S, Sufi F, Mangham CM, Hardcastle JD. 2002. Effect of faecal occult blood screening on mortality from colorectal cancer: Results from a randomised controlled trial. Gut 50(6):840–844.

Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. 2004. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 54(1):41–52.

Song K, Fendrick AM, Ladabaum U. 2004. Fecal DNA testing compared with conventional colorectal cancer screening methods: A decision analysis. Gastroenterol 126(5):1270–1279.

Sonnenberg A, Delco F. 2002. Cost-effectiveness of a single colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 162(2):163–168.

Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Inadomi JM. 2000. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 133(8):573–584.


Theuer CP, Wagner JL, Taylor TH, Brewster WR, Tran D, McLaren CE, Anton-Culver H. 2001. Racial and ethnic colorectal cancer patterns affect the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Gastroenterol 120(4):848–856.

Trochim WM. 2004. The Research Methods Knowledge Base. 2nd ed. [online] http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.htm.


United States General Accounting Office. 2004. Coverage of Common Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Is Common. Washington DC: United States General Accounting Office.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2005. Economic Models of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Adults: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11228.
×

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. 2002. Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137(2):132–141.


Vijan S, Hwang EW, Hofer TP, Hayward RA. 2001. Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance. Am J Med 111(8):593–601.


Wagner JL, Herdman RC, Wadhwa S. 1991. Cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the elderly. Ann Intern Med 115(10):807–817.

Wagner J, Tunis S, Brown M, Ching A, Almeida R. 1996. Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Adults. In: Young G, Rosen P, Levin B (eds). Prevention and Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer. Philadelphia: Saunders. Pp. 321–356.

Walker Jr B, Figgs LW, Zahm SH. 1995. Differences in cancer incidence, mortality, and survival between African Americans and whites. Environ Health Perspect 103(Suppl. 8):275–281.

Whynes DK. 2004. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer: Evidence from the Nottingham faecal occult blood trial. J Med Screen 11(1):11–15.

Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, Ganiats T, Levin T, Woolf S, Johnson D, Kirk L, Litin S, Simmang C. 2003. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale: Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterol 124(2):544–560.

Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, May Nah Ho, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, Ackroyd F, Shike M, Kurtz RC, Hornsby-Lewis L, Gerdes H, Stewart ET, Lightdale CJ, Edelman M, Fleisher M. 1993. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 329(27):1977–1981.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2005. Economic Models of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Adults: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11228.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2005. Economic Models of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Adults: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11228.
×
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2005. Economic Models of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Adults: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11228.
×
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2005. Economic Models of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Adults: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11228.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2005. Economic Models of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Adults: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11228.
×
Page 34
Next: Appendix A Workshop Agenda: Economic Models of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Adults »
Economic Models of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Adults: Workshop Summary Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $75.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The National Cancer Policy Board and the Board on Science, Engineering, and Economic Policy convened a workshop in January 2004 on “Economic Models of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening in Average-Risk Adults”. The purpose of the workshop was to explore the reasons for differences among leading cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) models of CRC screening, which public health policy makers increasingly rely on to help them sift through the many choices confronting them. Participants discussed the results of a collaborative pre-workshop exercise undertaken by five research teams that have developed and maintained comprehensive models of CRC screening in average-risk adults, to gain insight into each model’s structure and assumptions and possible explanations for differences in their published analyses. Workshop participants also examined the current state of knowledge on key inputs to the models with a view toward identifying areas where further research may be warranted. This document summarized the presentations and discussion at the workshop.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!