National Academies Press: OpenBook

Strengthening Long-Term Nuclear Security: Protecting Weapon-Usable Material in Russia (2006)

Chapter: Appendix B Specific Recommendations from Two Previous National Research Council Reports Concerning Indigenization of MPC&A

« Previous: Appendix A Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation Regarding Cooperation in the Area of Nuclear Material Physical Protection, Control, and Accounting
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Specific Recommendations from Two Previous National Research Council Reports Concerning Indigenization of MPC&A." National Research Council. 2006. Strengthening Long-Term Nuclear Security: Protecting Weapon-Usable Material in Russia. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11377.
×

B
Specific Recommendations from Two Previous National Research Council Reports Concerning Indigenization of MPC&A

PROLIFERATION CONCERNS: ASSESSING U.S. EFFORTS TO HELP CONTAIN NUCLEAR AND OTHER DANGEROUS MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION, 19971

Indigenize MPC&A Capabilities
  • Continue to emphasize the importance of materials protection, control, and accounting (MPC&A) as a nonproliferation imperative at the highest political levels in the former Soviet Union.

  • Prior to initiating MPC&A projects at specific facilities, obtain assurances at both the ministry and the institute levels that the upgrade programs will be sustained after improvements have been made. Financial incentives, such as support for related research activities, should be considered as a means of stimulating long-term commitments.

  • Involve institute personnel to the fullest extent possible in determining how to use available funds for upgrades.

1  

National Research Council (NRC). 1997. Proliferation Concerns: Assessing U.S. Efforts to Help Contain Nuclear and Other Dangerous Materials and Technologies in the Former Soviet Union, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Specific Recommendations from Two Previous National Research Council Reports Concerning Indigenization of MPC&A." National Research Council. 2006. Strengthening Long-Term Nuclear Security: Protecting Weapon-Usable Material in Russia. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11377.
×
  • Give greater emphasis to near-term training of local specialists.

  • Reward those institutes that are making good progress in upgrading MPC&A systems by giving them preference for participation in other U.S.-financed cooperative programs.

  • Encourage the establishment of new income streams that can provide adequate financial support for MPC&A programs in the long term, such as ear-marking for MPC&A programs a portion of the revenues from Russian sales of highly enriched uranium (HEU).

  • Rely increasingly on domestically produced and locally available equipment for physical protection, detection, analysis, and related MPC&A tasks.

PROTECTING NUCLEAR WEAPONS MATERIALS IN RUSSIA, 19992

Indigenize MPC&A Capabilities
  • Increase the percentage of available U.S. funding that is directed to financing activities of Russian organizations, with a steadily declining percentage directed to supporting U.S. participants in the program.

  • Expand efforts to utilize Russian equipment and services whenever possible and to encourage Russian enterprises and institutes to increase capabilities to provide high-quality equipment and associated warranties and services.

  • Use Russian specialists from institutes with well-developed MPC&A capabilities to replace some U.S. members of teams at Russian institutions with less developed capabilities.

  • Rely increasingly on Russian specialists to replace U.S. specialists in presenting MPC&A training programs at Obninsk and other training sites.

  • Encourage Moscow Engineering Physics Institute to increase student participation (and its income resulting from tuition payments) in its security-oriented courses by offering an industrial security as well as an MPC&A specialization.

  • Give greater attention, in both training and implementation activities, to developing personal commitments on the part of Russian managers, specialists, and guard forces to fulfill their responsibilities for ensuring the proper functioning of MPC&A systems.

  • Increase opportunities for Russian input in establishing priorities at specific sites and in preparing statements of work for individual projects.

2  

NRC. 1999. Protecting Nuclear Weapons Materials in Russia, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Specific Recommendations from Two Previous National Research Council Reports Concerning Indigenization of MPC&A." National Research Council. 2006. Strengthening Long-Term Nuclear Security: Protecting Weapon-Usable Material in Russia. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11377.
×
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Specific Recommendations from Two Previous National Research Council Reports Concerning Indigenization of MPC&A." National Research Council. 2006. Strengthening Long-Term Nuclear Security: Protecting Weapon-Usable Material in Russia. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11377.
×
Page 58
Next: Appendix C Committee Biographies »
Strengthening Long-Term Nuclear Security: Protecting Weapon-Usable Material in Russia Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $47.00 Buy Ebook | $37.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In July 2005, the National Academies released the report Strengthening Long-term Nuclear Security: Protecting Weapon-Usable Material in Russia. The report highlighted several obstacles in the transition from a U.S.-Russian cooperative program to a Russian-directed and Russian-funded fully indigenized program that will ensure the security of 600 tons of weapon-usable nuclear material at a level of international acceptability. Overcoming these obstacles requires an increased political commitment at a number of levels of the Russian Government to modern material protection, control, and accounting systems (MPC&A). Adequate resources must be provided to facilities where weapon-usable material is located for upgrading and maintaining MPC&A systems. Additionally, the technical security systems that are being installed through the cooperative program need to be fully embraced by Russian managers and specialists. The report recommends the establishment of a ten-year indigenization fund of about $500 million provided by Russia and its G-8 partners as a new mechanism for gradually shifting the financial burden of MPC&A to the Russian Government.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!