National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×

Technological Options for User-Authorized HANDGUNS

A Technology-Readiness Assessment

Committee on User-Authorized Handguns

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001

NOTICE: To arrive at the findings and recommendations of this report, the National Academy of Engineering has used a process that involves careful selection of a balanced and knowledgeable committee, assembly of relevant information, and peer review of the resultant report. Over time, this process has proven to produce authoritative and balanced results.

This study was supported in part by Grant No. 2002-24405 between the National Academy of Sciences and The David and Lucile Packard Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.

International Standard Book Number 0-309-09699-5

Additional copies of this report are available from the
National Academies Press,
500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu.

Copyright 2005 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Wm. A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Wm. A. Wulf are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.

www.national-academies.org

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×

COMMITTEE ON USER-AUTHORIZED HANDGUNS

LANCE A. DAVIS (NAE) chair,

National Academy of Engineering

LOUIS F. BEHLING,

Picatinny Arsenal (retired)

RICHARD L. COSTELLO,

Colt’s Manufacturing Co. (retired)

T. DIXON DUDDERAR (NAE),

Lucent Technologies (retired)

LAWRENCE O’GORMAN,

Avaya Laboratories

LAWRENCE C. KRAVITZ,

Allied Signal (retired)

DAVID MAHER,

InterTrust

KAREN W. MARKUS,

Zeus Strategies, LLC

JAMES J. MATTICE,

Universal Technology Corporation

LAURENCE C. SEIFERT (NAE),

AT&T Wireless (retired)

MARVIN H. WHITE (NAE),

Lehigh University

Project Staff

GREG PEARSON, Program Officer,

National Academy of Engineering (NAE)

RAY NASH, Consultant

CAROL R. ARENBERG, Managing Editor,

NAE

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×

Preface

This report is the final product of the Committee on User-Authorized Handguns, a group of experts on diverse subjects under the auspices of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE). The committee’s charge included examining the state of the art of technologies that might be used in the design of a reliable user-authorized handgun (UAHG) and estimating the costs and time required to achieve that goal. The project builds on a 2002 NAE workshop that touched on technical and non-technical issues associated with the development of a UAHG.

In order to make the task more manageable, the committee focused its analysis on two groups of users: those in law enforcement and those who store and intend to use their firearms at home. The choice to frame the problem in this way was motivated by the committee’s consideration of design constraints. In the law enforcement case, the firearm may have to operate in a variety of adverse conditions (e.g., involving cold temperature, water, mud, blood), which raises the bar significantly in terms of engineering challenges. In the case of homeowners, the requirements, while still imposing, are less difficult since such firearms would be used in relatively “clean” and uniform environmental conditions. There are, of course, many other categories of handgun user—for example, target shooters and individuals who possess a concealed-carry permit. In most of these cases, the technical requirements will align with those for law enforcement.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×

The committee hopes its report will inform ongoing discussions about the feasibility of developing handguns that may be less likely than standard-design firearms to be misused. Neither the report nor the committee takes a position regarding the desirability of producing a reliable UAHG.

Lance Davis, chair

Committee on User-Authorized Handguns

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×

Acknowledgments

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Academy of Engineering. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:

Steven M. Bellovin, Columbia University

Kevin G. Foley, Smith & Wesson

Kenneth D. Green, Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute

David Hemenway, Harvard School of Public Health

E. Dan Hirleman, Purdue University

William F. Parkerson, III, National Rifle Association

Edward Polkowski, American Competitiveness Institute

Charles F. Wellford, University of Maryland

John W. Wirsbinski, Sandia National Laboratories

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the findings nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Dale F. Stein, Michigan Technological University (emeritus). Appointed by the NAE president, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

In addition to the reviewers, the committee wishes to extend special thanks to the following individuals who provided particularly helpful input to the committee: Kevin Foley, Smith & Wesson; Donald Sebastian, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ed Schmitter, FN Manufacturing Inc.; Christopher Miles, National Institute of Justice; Bert Moore, Association for Automatic Identification and Mobility; Larry Keane, National Shooting Sports Foundation; and Mark Behrens, Esq., Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11394.
×
Page R10
Next: Executive Summary »
Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns: A Technology-Readiness Assessment Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Misuse of handguns is a significant factor in deaths, morbidity, and crime in the United States. One approach to reducing certain types of handgun misuse is to create a user-authorized handgun (UAHG), a firearm that can be operated only by an authorized user(s). Technological Options for User-Authorized Handguns clarifies the technical challenges of developing a reliable UAHG. This report determines the requirements and specifications of UAHGs for those concerned with public and/or personal safety, and identifies technologies that could satisfy these needs.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!