National Academies Press: OpenBook

Review of NOAA's Plan for the Scientific Data Stewardship Program (2005)

Chapter: Sustaining Climate Data Records Programs

« Previous: Climate Data Record Generating Elements
Suggested Citation:"Sustaining Climate Data Records Programs." National Research Council. 2005. Review of NOAA's Plan for the Scientific Data Stewardship Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11421.
×

SUSTAINING CLIMATE DATA RECORDS PROGRAMS

To meet the stated objectives of the SDS and CLASS programs, the production and maintenance of CDRs have to be long-term activities. The committee’s first report emphasized that “producing ongoing climate products (such as CDRs) is contingent on having stable funding both for obtaining data and for conducting the sustained scientific research that will necessarily underlie the production of CDRs” (NRC, 2004, p. 58). Specifically, the committee recommended that resources be made available for forward processing of data in near real time and for reprocessing the CDRs as new information and improved algorithms become available. Further, NOAA should make a long-term commitment of resources to the generation and archiving of CDRs and associated documentation and metadata in the context of national and international plans and standards.

NOAA is to be commended for its recognition of the importance of data management and preservation to a successful CDR program (NOAA, 2005, pp. 22-23). However, the implementation plan provides few details about how these goals would be achieved. In particular, responsibilities for creation of the metadata and documentation necessary to allow long-term understanding of the products, access to the data, and processes for external review need to be defined and periodically revisited.

The draft SDS Implementation Plan embraces this long-term commitment—for example in stating that the “overall goal of SDS is to create high-quality, long-term data sets of global climate conditions …” (NOAA, 2005, p. 17). The plan provides limited information about how NOAA plans to develop reasonable cost projections, what future resources will be available to the program, and how NOAA will prioritize among competing objectives given limited resources. Regarding cost projections, the plan briefly mentions a new cost estimation model that is under development; in briefings to the committee, NOAA representatives indicated that they did not feel that this model was sufficiently developed to present fully at this time. The President’s budget request for fiscal year (FY) 2006 includes $6,541,000 for CLASS (NOAA Blue Book, 2005, available at http://www.publicaffairs.noaa.gov/budget2006/pdf/bluebook2006.pdf). Although it is not included in the Blue Book, comments by the plan’s authors at the committee’s meeting indicate that the FY 2006 request for SDS was about half of this amount.

The current proposed NOAA budget establishing a separate line item for SDS is a significant accomplishment and will enable this new organization to begin to address a number of core CDRs. The plan does not specify which CDRs or other activities among the wide range of responsibilities of the SDS program will receive priority. A prioritization strategy is especially important because the full scope of FCDRs and TCDRs described in the plan clearly cannot be sustained within the current budget level. Based on experience with similar efforts in the Pathfinder programs and other NASA programs, such as the Sensor Intercomparison for Marine Biological and Interdisciplinary Ocean Studies (SIMBIOS) project, the committee concludes that the current budget cannot fulfill the expectations for a NOAA leadership role in generating CDRs. A prioritization strategy can also help NOAA make decisions about how to balance funding for internal versus external research, operations versus research, and climate versus shorter-term forecasting needs. A process for the specific prioritization of and methodologies for CDR generation, access, and preservation was described in the recommendations of the committee’s first report (NRC, 2004) and should be applied to ensure that the limited resources are employed most effectively.

If NOAA is to exert national leadership for satellite-based CDRs, it will have to address the growth of CDR programs resulting from the increased number of national and international satellites, an expanded suite of sensors, and more complex climate data products. SDS should plan for considerable growth beyond FY 2007 as NPOESS is launched and the United States takes on a larger role in the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) effort, as described in the Strategic Plan for the U.S. Integrated Earth Observations System (IWGEO, 2005). The SDS plan recognizes these needs and the need for integration of NOAA’s observing systems, data, and quality control with other nations’ efforts, especially through GEOSS. The SDS program should develop more

Suggested Citation:"Sustaining Climate Data Records Programs." National Research Council. 2005. Review of NOAA's Plan for the Scientific Data Stewardship Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11421.
×

detailed estimates of future resource needs and seek the funding necessary to meet its stated objectives. The committee expects that this growth in resources to support the SDS program will be needed primarily in its initial phase because future economies of scale, improvements in the quality and stability of climate sensors, and further experience at sustaining perpetual climate observing systems will allow for a leveling off of support in the future. Once this leveling off takes place, intermittent spikes in funding may be necessary to accommodate major new initiatives or responsibilities.

Suggested Citation:"Sustaining Climate Data Records Programs." National Research Council. 2005. Review of NOAA's Plan for the Scientific Data Stewardship Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11421.
×
Page 8
Suggested Citation:"Sustaining Climate Data Records Programs." National Research Council. 2005. Review of NOAA's Plan for the Scientific Data Stewardship Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11421.
×
Page 9
Next: Concluding Remarks »
Review of NOAA's Plan for the Scientific Data Stewardship Program Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $21.00 Buy Ebook | $16.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

To better understand our climate system, it is important that we have climate data records (CDRs)--time series of measurements of sufficient length, consistency, and continuity to determine climate variability and change--that possess the accuracy, longevity, and stability to facilitate credible climate monitoring. In 2004, the National Research Council (NRC) published Climate Data Records from Environmental Satellites to provide the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) with initial guidelines on how to develop and implement an effective CDR program. NOAA used this book to draft a plan for a new Scientific Data Stewardship (SDS) program, and then asked NRC to review it. The new program will be responsible for processing, archiving, and distributing observations from satellite and supporting ground-based platforms for monitoring, diagnosing, understanding, predicting, modeling, and assessing climate variation and change. The NRC review outlines several ways in which to improve NOAA's draft plan, most importantly by clarifying advisory mechanisms, providing more detail about how NOAA will coordinate with important partners in generating CDRs, articulating how the program will prioritize its activities, and developing ways to realistically project future costs. However, the draft plan is sound overall and NOAA should immediately begin implementing the SDS program while revising the plan as recommended in the book.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!