National Academies Press: OpenBook

Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway (2005)

Chapter: Appendix A – Water Resources Development Act of 2000

« Previous: References
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A – Water Resources Development Act of 2000." Transportation Research Board and National Research Council. 2005. Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11444.
×

Appendix A
Water Resources Development Act 2000 Public Law No. 106-541, of the 106th Congress

SEC. 216. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES STUDY

(a) DEFINITIONS—In this section, the following definitions apply:


(1) ACADEMY—The term “Academy” means the National Academy of Sciences.


(2) METHOD—The term “method” means a method, model, assumption, or other pertinent planning tool used in conducting an economic or environmental analysis of a water resources project, including the formulation of a feasibility report.


(3) FEASIBILITY REPORT—The term “feasibility report” means each feasibility report, and each associated environmental impact statement and mitigation plan, prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a water resources project.


(4) WATER RESOURCES PROJECT—The term “water resources project”' means a project for navigation, a project for flood control, a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, a project for emergency streambank and shore protection, a project for ecosystem restoration and protection, and a water resources project of any other type carried out by the Corps of Engineers.


(b) INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW OF PROJECTS—


(1) IN GENERAL—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall contract with the Academy to study, and make recommendations relating to, the independent peer review of feasibility reports.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A – Water Resources Development Act of 2000." Transportation Research Board and National Research Council. 2005. Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11444.
×

(2) STUDY ELEMENTS—In carrying out a contract under paragraph (1), the Academy shall study the practicality and efficacy of the independent peer review of the feasibility reports, including—


(A) the cost, time requirements, and other considerations relating to the implementation of independent peer review; and

(B) objective criteria that may be used to determine the most effective application of independent peer review to feasibility reports for each type of water resources project.


(3) ACADEMY REPORT—Not later than 1 year after the date of a contract under paragraph (1), the Academy shall submit to the Secretary, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that includes—


(A) the results of the study conducted under paragraphs (1) and (2); and

(B) in light of the results of the study, specific recommendations, if any, on a program for implementing independent peer review of feasibility reports.


(4) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $1,000,000, to remain available until expended.


(c) INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW OF METHODS FOR PROJECT ANALYSIS—


(1) IN GENERAL—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall contract with the Academy to conduct a study that includes—


(A) a review of state-of-the-art methods;

(B) a review of the methods currently used by the Secretary;

(C) a review of a sample of instances in which the Secretary has applied the methods identified under subparagraph (B) in the analysis of each type of water resources project; and

(D) a comparative evaluation of the basis and validity of state-of-the-art methods identified under subparagraph (A) and the methods identified under subparagraphs (B) and (C).


(2) ACADEMY REPORT—Not later than 1 year after the date of a contract under paragraph (1), the Academy shall transmit to the Secretary, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that includes—

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A – Water Resources Development Act of 2000." Transportation Research Board and National Research Council. 2005. Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11444.
×

(A) the results of the study conducted under paragraph (1); and

(B) in light of the results of the study, specific recommendations for modifying any of the methods currently used by the Secretary for conducting economic and environmental analyses of water resources projects.


(3) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $2,000,000. Such sums shall remain available until expended.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A – Water Resources Development Act of 2000." Transportation Research Board and National Research Council. 2005. Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11444.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A – Water Resources Development Act of 2000." Transportation Research Board and National Research Council. 2005. Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11444.
×
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A – Water Resources Development Act of 2000." Transportation Research Board and National Research Council. 2005. Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11444.
×
Page 50
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A – Water Resources Development Act of 2000." Transportation Research Board and National Research Council. 2005. Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11444.
×
Page 51
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A – Water Resources Development Act of 2000." Transportation Research Board and National Research Council. 2005. Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11444.
×
Page 52
Next: Appendix B – National Research Council Board Membership and Staff »
Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers recently completed its feasibility study for the Upper Mississippi River-Ilinois Waterway, which was one of the agency's longest and most complicated studies in its history. The first two reports from this WSTB committee reviewed analytical aspects of the Corps feasibility study. Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway considers the broader issue of managing the multiple resources of the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway, especially with regard to several, recently-issued NRC reports on Corps of Engineers planning procedures. The report finds that a key issue regarding planning decisions on these river systems is the ambiguity related to several different pieces of legislation and acts that govern river management, and thus recommends that the administration and Congress clarify the federal intent for managing this river and waterway system. The report recommends an independent, retrospective reivew of the experience with a federal inter-agency Principals Group, which was convened to provide guidance to the Corps study. It is also recommended that the Corps strive to incorporate flexible, adaptive management principles through its entire water planning program, including operations of the lock and dam system.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!