Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Mr. Mark Gilbertson February 14, 2008 Page 14 ATTACHMENT C REVIEWERS This report has been reviewed in draft form by persons chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Councilâs Report Review Committee. The purposes of this review are to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards of objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following for their participation in the review of this report: Robert J. Budnitz, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California Ken Czerwinski, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Tissa Illangasekare, Colorado School of Mines, Golden Milton Levenson, Bechtel International (retired), Menlo Park, California Paul Locke, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland Walter L. Robb, GE Corporate Research and Development Center (retired), Schenectady, New York Raymond Wymer, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (retired), Oak Ridge, Tennessee Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Chris G. Whipple, ENVIRON International Corporation. Appointed by the Division on Earth and Life Sciences, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the National Research Council.
