National Academies Press: OpenBook

The Role of Transit in Emergency Evacuation: Special Report 294 (2008)

Chapter: Appendix A Congressional Request for the Study

« Previous: 5 Enhancing Transit's Role
Page 139
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Congressional Request for the Study." Transportation Research Board. 2008. The Role of Transit in Emergency Evacuation: Special Report 294. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12445.
×
Page 139

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Appendix A Congressional Request for the Study SAFETEA-LU, Section 3046(a)(1) Public Transportation National Security Study.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a study and evaluation of the value major public transportation systems in the United States serving the 38 urbanized areas that have a population of more than 1,000,000 individuals provide to the Nation’s security and the ability of such systems to accommodate the evacuation, egress or ingress of people to or from critical locations in times of emergency. (B) ALTERNATIVE ROUTES.—For each system described in subpara- graph (A) the study shall identify— (i) potential alternative routes for evacuation using other transporta- tion modes such as highway, air, marine, and pedestrian activities; and (ii) transit routes that, if disrupted, do not have sufficient transit alter- natives available. (C) REPORT.—Not later than 24 months after the date of entry into the agreement, the Academy shall submit to the Secretary and the Commit- tee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representa- tives and the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs of the Senate a final report on the results of the study and evaluation, together with such recommendations as the Academy considers appropriate. (D) FUNDING.—For each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007 $250,000 shall be available to carry out this paragraph. [Note that Part B of the study request was dropped because of inadequate funding.] 139 37274mvp151 139 11/24/08 11:49:29 AM

Next: Appendix B Literature Review »
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!