Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Appendix C Bibliography Acs, Zoltan, and David Audretsch. 1990. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Advanced Technology Program. 2001. Performance of 50 Completed ATP Projects, Status Re- port Number 2. NIST Special Publication 950-2. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Advanced Technology Program and National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2003. Beyond Measure: A Profile of ATP Health Care Investments. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Advanced Technology Program and National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2003. Powering Our High-Speed Economy: A Profile of ATP Energy Investments. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Advanced Technology Program and National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2003. Survey of ATP Applicants 2000. NIST GCR 03-847. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Advanced Technology Program and National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2004. Measur- ing ATP Impact: 2004 Report on Economic Progress. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Advanced Technology Program and National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2005. A Profile of ATP Manufacturing Investments, Inspiring Innovations in Industry. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Advanced Technology Program and National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2005. Survey of ATP Applicants 2002. NIST GCR 05-876. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Aerts, Kris, and Dirk Czarnitzki. 2005. âUsing Innovation Survey Data to Evaluate R&D Policy: The Case of Flanders.â Catholic University of Leuven, Department of Applied Economics and Steunpunt O&O Statistieken. Aerts, Kris, and Dirk Czarnitski. 2006. âThe Impact of Public R&D Funding in Flanders.â IWT Â tudies 54. S 168
APPENDIX C 169 Aghion, Phillipe, Robin Burgess, Stephen Redding, and Fabrizio Zilibotti. 2003. âThe Unequal Effects of Liberalization: Theory and Evidence from India.â Washington, DC: Center for Eco- nomic Policy Research. Agrawal, A. and R. Henderson. 2002. âPutting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT.â Management Science 48(1):44-60. Ahluwalia, Montek Singh. 2001. âState Level Reforms Under Economic Reforms in India.â Stanford University Working Paper No. 96, March. Aizcorbe, A., K. Flamm, and A. Kurshid. 2002. âThe Role of Semiconductor Inputs in IT Hardware Price Decline: Computers vs. Communications.â Federal Reserve Finance and Economics Discussion Paper 2002-37. Washington, DC: The Federal Reserve Board of Governors. August 2002; revised 2004. Aizcorbe, A., S. Oliner, and D. Sichel. 2006. âShifting Trends in Semiconductor Prices and the Pace of Technological Progress.â Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Series Working Paper No. 2006-44. September. Alberts, David, John Garska, and Frederick Stein. 1999. Network Centric Warfare. Washington, DC: Department of Defense Command and Control Research Program. Available at <http://www. dodccrp.org/files/Alberts_NCW.pdf>. Alic, John A., Lewis M. Branscomb, Harvey Brooks, Ashton B. Carter, and Gerald L. Epstein. 1992. Beyond Spin-off: Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Allen, Stuart D., Albert N. Link, and Dan T. Rosenbaum. 2007. âEntrepreneurship and Human Capi- tal: Evidence of Patenting Activity from the Academic Sector.â Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 31(6):937-951. Allison, J., and M. Lemley. 1998. âEmpirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents.â AIPLA Quarterly Journal 26:185-277. Altenburg, Tilman, Hubert Schmitz, and Andreas Stamm. 2008. âBreakthrough: Chinaâs and Indiaâs Transition from Production to Innovation.â World Development 36(2):325-344. American Intellectual Property Law Association. 2004. Reply to the National Academies Report. Washington, DC: American Intellectual Property Law Association. Amsden, Alice H. 2001. The Rise of âthe Restâ: Challenges to the West from Late-industrializing Economies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Amsden, Alice H. and Wan-wen Chu. 2003. Beyond Late Development: Taiwanâs Upgrading Policies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Amsden, Alice H., Ted Tschang, and Akira Goto. 2001. âDo Foreign Companies Conduct R&D in Developing Countries?â Tokyo, Japan: ADB Institute. Anderson, Gary, Jeanne Powell, and Stephanie Shipp. 2003. âImproving the Advanced Technol- ogy Programâs Business Reporting SystemâA Firm-Level R&D Survey.â Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Government Statistics Section, [CD-ROM]. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Aoki, Reiko, and Sadao Nagaoka. 2004. âThe Consortium Standard and Patent Pools.â The Economic Review (Keizai Kenkyu) 55(4):345-356. Aoki, Reiko, and Sadao Nagaoka. 2005. âCoalition Formation for a Consortium Standard through a Standard Body and a Patent Pool: Theory and Evidence from MPEG2, DVD and 3G.â IIR Working Paper WP#05-01. February. Applied Research Institute, Inc. 2006. Survey of the Environment for Startups. Applied Research Institute. November. Archibugi, Danielle, Jeremy Howells, and Jonathan Michie, eds. 1999. Innovation Policy and the Global Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Argyres, N. S., and J. P. Liebeskind. 1998. âPrivatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology.â Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 35:427-454.
170 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Arora, A., and R. P. Merges. 2004. âSpecialized Supply Firms, Property Rights, and Firm Boundar- ies.â Industrial and Corporate Change 13(3):451-476. Arora, A., M. Ceccagnoli, and W. Cohen. 2001. âR&D and the Patent Premium.â Carnegie-Mellon University and INSEAD: paper presented at the ASSA Annual Meetings. January 2002. Atlanta, Georgia. Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, and A. Gambardella. 2003. âMarkets for Technology and Corporate Strategy.â In O. Granstrand, ed., Economics, Law, and Intellectual Property, Boston, MA: Kluwer Aca- demic Publishers. Arrow K. J. 2000. âIncreasing Returns: Historiographic Issues and Path Dependence.â European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 7(2):171-180. Arrow, Kenneth. 1962. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Uni- versity Press. Pp. 609-626. Arthur, W. 1989. âCompeting Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Small Events.â Economic Journal 99(2):116-131. Asheim, Bjorn T. et al., eds. 2003. Regional Innovation Policy for Small-medium Enterprises. C Â heltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Association of University Research Parks. 1998. âWorldwide Research & Science Park Directory 1998.â New York: BPI Communications. Association of University Research Parks. 2008 âThe Power of Place: A National Strategy for Build- ing Americaâs Communities of Innovation.â Tucson, AZ: Association of University Research Parks. Athreye, Suma S. 2000. âTechnology Policy and Innovation: The Role of Competition Between Firms.â In Pedro Conceicao et al., eds. Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy: Opportunities and Challenges for the Knowledge Economy. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Atkinson, Robert. 2004. The Past and Future of Americaâs EconomyâLong Waves of Innovation that Power Cycles of Growth. ÂCheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Atkinson, Robert. 2006. âIs the Next Economy Taking Shape?â Issues in Science and Technology. Winter. Audretsch, D. B., ed. 1998. Industrial Policy and Competitive Advantage, Volumes 1 and 2. Chelten- ham, UK: Edward Elgar. Audretsch, D. B. 1998. âAgglomeration and the Location of Innovative Activity.â Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14(2):18-29. Audretsch, D. B. 2001. âThe Prospects for a Technology Park at Ames: A New Economy Model for Industry-Government Partnership?â In National Research Council. A Review of the New Initia- tives at the NASA Ames Research Center. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Audretsch, D. B. 2006. The Entrepreneurial Society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman. 1996. âR&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.â American Economic Review 86(3):630-640. Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman. 1999. âInnovation in Cities: Science-based Diversity, Special- ization, and Localized Competition.â European Economic Review 43(2):409-429. Audretsch, D. B., B. Bozeman, K. L. Combs, M. P. Feldman, A. N. Link, D. S. Siegel, P. Stephan, G. Tassey, and C. Wessner. 2002. âThe Economics of Science and Technology.â Journal of Technology Transfer 27:155-203. Audretsch, D. B., H. Grimm, and C. W. Wessner. 2005. Local Heroes in the Global ÂVillage: Global- ization and the New Entrepreneurship Policies. New York: Springer. Auerswald, Philip E., Lewis M. Branscomb, Nicholas Demos, and Brian K. Min. 2005. Understand- ing Private-Sector Decision Making for Early-Stage Technology Development: A âBetween Invention and Innovation Projectâ Report. NIST GCR 02â841A. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
APPENDIX C 171 Augustine, Norman. 2007. Is America Falling Off the Flat Earth? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Baker, Stephen. 2005. âNew Yorkâs Big Hopes for Nano.â BusinessWeek February 4. Bakouros, Y. L., D. C. Mardas, and N. C. Varsakelis. 2002. âScience Parks, a High-Tech Fantasy? An Analysis of the Science Parks of Greece.â Technovation 22(2):123-128. Baldwin, J. R., P. Hanl, and D. Sabourin. 2000. âDeterminants of Innovative Activity in Canadian Manufacturing Firms: The Role of Intellectual Property Rights.â Statistics Canada Working Paper No. 122. March. Baldwin, John Russel, and Peter Hanel. 2003. Innovation and Knowledge Creation in an Open Economy: Canadian Industry and International Implications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Balzat, Markus, and Andreas Pyka. 2006. âMapping National Innovation Systems in the OECD Area.â International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 2(1-2):158-176. Baptista, R. 1998. âClusters, Innovation, and Growth: A Survey of the Literature.â In G. M. P. Swann, M. Prevezer, and D. Stout, eds. The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Bartzokas, Anthony, and Morris Teubal. 2002. âThe Political Economy of Innovation Policy Imple- mentation in Developing Countries.â Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11(4-5). Beinhocker, Eric D. 2007. Origin of WealthâEvolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School. Bennis, Warren, and Patricia Ward Biederman. 1997. Organizing Genius. New York: Basic Books. Berlin, Leslie. 2005. The Man Behind the Microchip: Robert Noyce and the Invention of Silicon Valley. New York: Oxford University Press. Bessen, J., and M. J. Meurer. 2005. âThe Patent Litigation Explosion,â Research on Innovation and Boston University School of Law: manuscript. August. BhidÃ©, Amar. 2006. âVenturesome Consumption, Innovation and Globalization.â Paper presented at the Centre on Capitalism & Society and CESifo Venice Summer Institute 2006, âPerspectives on the Performance of the Continentâs Economies,â 21-22 July 2006. Held at Venice International University. San Servolo, Italy. Biegelbauer, Peter S., and Susana Borras, eds. 2003. Innovation Policies in Europe and the U.S.: The New Agenda. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. Birch, David. 1981. âWho Creates Jobs?â The Public Interest 65:3-14. Blanpied, William A. 1998. âInventing U.S. Science Policy.â Physics Today 51(2):34-40. Block, Fred, and Matthew Keller. 2008. âWhere Do Innovations Come From? Transformations in the U.S. National Innovation System, 1970-2006.â The Information Technology and Innovation Forum. July. BlomstrÃ¶m, Magnus, Ari Kokko, and Fredrik SjÃ¶holm. 2002. âGrowth & Innovation Policies for a Knowledge Economy: Experiences from Finland, Sweden, & Singapore.â EIJS Working Paper, Series No. 156. Bloomberg News. 2006. âThe Next Green Revolution.â August 21. Bonvillian, William B. 2006. âPower Play, The DARPA Model and U.S. Energy Policy.â The Ameri- can Interest II(2):39-48. Booz Allen Hamilton. 2005. âBooz Allen Hamilton Global Innovation 1000: Money Isnât Everything.â Strategy + Business, 41. Borras, Susana. 2003. The Innovation Policy of the European Union: From Government to Gover- nance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Borrus, Michael, and Jay Stowsky. 2000. âTechnology Policy and Economic Growth.â In Charles Edquist and Maureen McKelvey, eds. Systems of Innovation: Growth, Competitiveness and Employment, Vol. 2. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Branscomb, L. M., and P. E. Auerswald. 2001. Taking Technical Risks: How Innovators, Executives, and Investors Manage High-Tech Risks. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
172 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Branscomb, Lewis M., and Philip E. Auerswald. 2002. Between Invention and Innovation: An Analy- sis of Funding for Early-Stage Technology Development. NIST GCR 02â841. Gathersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. November. Braudel, Fernand. 1973. Capitalism and Material Life 1400-1800. London, UK: Harper Colophon Books. Breschi, S. and F. Lissoin. 2001. ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ âKnowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey.â Industrial and Corporate Change 10(4):975-1005. Browning, L., and J. Shetler. 2000. SEMATECH: Saving the U.S. Semiconductor Industry. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press. Buchanan, James M. 1987. âAn Economic Theory of Clubs.â In Economics: Between a Predictive Science and Moral Philosophy. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press. Bush, Nathan. 2005. âChinese Competition Policy, It Takes More than a Law.â China Business Â eview. May-June. R Bush, Vannevar. 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Capron, Henri, and Michele Cincera. 2006. Strengths and Weaknesses of the Flemish Innovation System: An External Viewpoint. Brussels, Belgium: IWT. Caracostas, Paraskevas, and Ugur Muldur. 2001. âThe Emergence of the New European Union Research and Innovation Policy.â In P. Laredo and P. Mustar, eds. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: An International Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Castells, M., and P. Hall. 1994. Technopoles of the World. London, UK: Oxford University Press. Cebrowski, Arthur, and John Garska. 1998. âNetwork Centric Warfare: Its Origin and Future.â U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings. January. Chambers, John, ed. 1999. The Oxford Companion to American Military History. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Chan, K. F., and Theresa Lau. 2005. âAssessing Technology Incubator Programs in the Science Park: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.â Technovation 25(10):1215-1228. Chand, Satish, and Kunal Sen. 2002. âTrade Liberalization and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing.â Review of Development Economics 6, February. Chang, Connie, Stephanie Shipp, and Andrew Wang. 2002. The Advanced Technology Program: A Public-Private Partnership for Early-stage Technology Development. Venture Capital 4(4): 363-370. Chesbrough, Henry. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. April. China Daily. 2008. âChina Luring âSea Turtlesâ Home.â December 18. China Trade Extra. 2005. China Agrees to Delay Software Procurement Rule While Talking with U.S. July 11. Chinese Ministry of Finance. 2006. Opinions of the Ministry of Finance on Implementing Government Procurement Policies That Encourage Indigenous Innovation. Cai Ku  No. 47, June 13. ChordÃ , I. M. 1996. âTowards the Maturity State: An Insight into the Performance of French Techno- poles.â Technovation 16(3):143-152. Chuma, Hiroyuki. 2006. âIncreasing Complexity and Limits of Organization in the MicroÂlithography Industry: Implications for Science-based Industries.â Research Policy 35:394-411. Chuma, Hiroyuki, and Norikazu Hashimoto. 2007. âMooreâs Law, Increasing Complexity and Limits of Organization: Modern Significance of Japanese DRAM ERA.â NISTEP Discussion Paper No. 44. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy. Cimoli, Mario, and Marina della Giusta. 2000. âThe Nature of Technological Change and its Main Implications on National and Local Systems of Innovation.â IIASA Interim Report IR-98-029. Cincera, Michele. 2006. Comparison of Regional Approaches to Foster Innovation in the European Union: The Case of Flanders. Brussels, Belgium: IWT.
APPENDIX C 173 Cincera, Michele. 2006. R&D Activities of Flemish Companies in the Private Sector: An Analysis for the Period 1998-2002. Brussels, Belgium: IWT. Clark, B. 1995. Places of Inquiry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Clarke, P. 2004. âLETI, Crolles Alliance Open $350-million 32-nm Research Fab.â EE Times April 24. Clarke, P., M. LaPedus, and M. Santarini. 2005. âIBM-led Consortium to Build Fab in N.Y.â EE Times January 5. Clough, G. Wayne. 2007. âThe Role of the Research University in Fostering Innovation.â The Ameri- cas Competitiveness Forum. June 12. Coakes, Elayne, andÂ Peter Smith. 2007. âDeveloping Communities of Innovation by Identifying In- novation Champions.â The Learning Organization: An International Journal 14(1):74-85. Coburn, Christopher, and Dan Berglund. 1995. Partnerships: A Compendium of State and Federal Cooperative Programs. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. Cohen, W. 2002. âThoughts and Questions on Science Parks.â Presented at the National Science Foundation Science Parks Indicators Workshop. University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Cohen, W., R. Florida, and R. Goe. 1992. University-Industry Research Centers in the United States. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University. Cohen, W., R. Nelson, and J. Walsh. 2000. âProtecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not).â NBER Working Paper 7552. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Cohen, W. M., A. Goto, A. Nagata, R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh. 2002. âR&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States.â Research Policy 1425:1-19. Combs, Kathryn L., and Albert N. Link. 2003. âInnovation Policy in Search of an Economic ÂParadigm: The Case of Research Partnerships in the United States.â Technology Analysis & Strategic Â anagement 15(2). M Conant, Jennet. 2002. Tuxedo Park. New York: Simon & Shuster. Conant, Jennet. 2005. 109 East Palace. New York: Simon & Shuster. Council on Competitiveness. 2005. Innovate America: Thriving in a World of Challenge and Change. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness. Council on Government Relations. 2000. Technology Transfer in U.S. Research Universities: Dispel- ling Common Myths. Washington, DC: Council on Government Relations. Council for Science and Technology Policy. 2002. Reports on the Reform for Competitive Research Grants. (in Japanese). Council for Science and Technology Policy. 2003. Reform of Competitive Funding ÂSystem. Â(Kyousouteki Sikinseido no kaikaku). Tokyo, Japan: Council for Science and Technology Policy. April 15. Council for Science and Technology Policy. 2005. Reports of the Expert Panel on the Basic Policy. <http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/index.html>. Council for Science and Technology Policy. 2005. Report on S&T Basic Policy. (Kagaku-gijutu- ï¿½ kihon-seisaku-ni-tsuite ni-taisuru tousin). Tokyo, Japan: Council for Science and Technology ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ Policy. December 27. Crafts, N. F. R. 1995. âThe Golden Age of Economic Growth in Western Europe, 1950-1973.â Eco- nomic History Review 3:429-447. Czarnitzki, Dirk, and Niall OâByrnes. 2007. âInnovation and the Impact on Productivity in Flanders.â Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management 52(2). Dahlman, Carl J. 2005. India and the Knowledge Economy: Leveraging Strengths and Opportunities. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. Dahlman, Carl J., and Jean Eric Aubert. 2001. China and the Knowledge Economy: Seizing the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Dahlman, Carl, and Anuja Utz. 2005. India and the Knowledge Economy: Leveraging Strengths and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
174 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Daneke, Gregory A. 1998. âBeyond Schumpeter: Non-linear Economics and the Evolution of the U.S. Innovation System.â Journal of Socio-economics 27(1):97-117. Darby, Michael, Lynne G. Zucker, and Andrew J. Wang. 2002. ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ Program Design and Firm Success in the Advanced Technology Program: Project Structure and Innovation Outcomes. NISTIR 6943. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Das, Gurcharan. 2006. âThe India Model.â Foreign Affairs 85(4). Dasgupta, P., and P. David. 1994. âToward a New Economics of Science.â Research Policy 23: 487-521. Davidsson, Per. 1996. âMethodological Concerns in the Estimation of Job Creation in Different Firm Size Classes.â Working Paper, JÃ¶nkÃ¶ping International Business School. David, P. A. 1985. âClio and the Economics of QWERTY.â American Economic Review 75(2):332-337. Davis, Steven, John Haltiwanger, and Scott Schuh. 1993. âSmall Business and Job Creation: Dissect- ing the Myth and Reassessing the Facts.â Working Paper No. 4492. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Debackere, Koenraad, and WolfgangÂ GlÃ¤nzel. 2004. âUsing a Bibliometric Approach to Support ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ Research Policy Making: The Case of the Flemish BOF-key.â Scientometrics 59(2). Debackere, Koenraad, and Reinhilde Veugelers. 2005. âThe Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links.â Research Policy 34(3):321-342. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. 2003. DARPA Over The Years. Arlington, VA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. October 27. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. 2005. DARPAâBridging the Gap, Powered by Ideas. Arlington, VA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. February. Defense Science Board. 2005. High Performance Microchip Supply. February. de Jonquieres, Guy. 2004. âChina and India Cannot Fill the Worldâs Skills Gap.â Financial Times July 12. de Jonquieres, Guy. 2004. âTo Innovate, China Needs More than Standards.â Financial Times July 12. de Jonquieres, Guy. 2006. âChinaâs Curious Marriage of Convenience.â Financial Times July 19. De la Mothe, J., and Gilles Paquet. 1998.Â âNational Innovation Systems, âReal Economiesâ and Insti- tuted Processes.â Small Business Economics 11:101-111. De Proft, A. 2006. Presentation at symposium on âSynergies in Regional and National Policies in the Global Economy.â Leuven, Belgium. September. Doloreux, David. 2004. âRegional Innovation Systems in Canada: A Comparative Study.â Regional Studies 38(5):479-492. Domain-b.com. 2005. âNasscom-McKinsey: India to Face Skilled Workersâ Shortage by Next Decade.â December 12. Available online at <http://www.domain-b.com/organisation/nasscom/20051217_ shortage.html>. Dries, Ilse, Peer van Humbeek, and Jan Larosse. ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ 2005. âLinking Innovation Policy and Sustain- able Development in Flanders.â Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Dudas, J. 2005. âStatement of the Honorable Jon W. Dudas Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office before the Sub- committee on Intellectual Property, Committee on the Judiciary.â U.S. Senate. <http://judiciary. senate.gov>. Eaton, Jonathan, Eva Gutierrez, and Samuel Kortum. 1998. âEuropean Technology Policy.â NBER Working Papers 6827. The Economist. 2005. âCompeting Through Innovation.â December 17. Edler, J., and S. Kuhlmann. 2005. âTowards One System? The European Research Area Initiative, the Integration of Research Systems and the Changing Leeway of National Policies.âï¿½ TechnikÂ folgenabschÃ¤tzung: Theorie und Praxis 1(4):59-68.
APPENDIX C 175 EE Times. 2006. âChinese Province Pays to Get 300-mm Wafer Fab.â June 28. Ehlen, Mark A. 1999. Economic Impacts of Flow-Control Machining Technologies: Early Appli- cations in the Automobile Industry. NISTIR 6373. Gaithersburg, MD: ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ National Institute of Standards and Technologyï¿½ . Ehlers, Vernon J. 1998. Unlocking Our Future: Toward a New National Science Policy, A Report to Congress by the House Committee on Science. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Ehrenberg, R. 2000. Tuition Rising. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Eickelpasch, Alexander, and Michael Fritsch. ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ 2005. âContests for Cooperation: A New Approach in German Innovation Policy.â Research Policy 34:1269-1282. Electronic News. 2006. âSMIC Gets $3B Nod from Chainâs Wuhan Government.â May 22. Endquist, Charles, ed. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. London, UK: Pinter. EOS Gallup Europe. 2004. Entrepreneurship. Flash Eurobarometer 146. January. Accessed at <http:// ec.europa.eu/enterprise/enterprise_policy/survey/eurobarometer146_en.pdf>. European Commission. 2003. Innovation in Candidate Countries: Strengthening Industrial Perfor- mance. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, May. European Commission. 2003. âInvesting in Research: An Action Plan for Europe 2003.â Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. European Commission. 2003. 3rd S&T Indicators Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publica- tions of the European Communities. Evans, D., and Jovanovic, B. 1989. âAn Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice under Liquidity Constraints.â Journal of Political Economy 97:808-827. Evans, Sir Harold. 2005. They Made America. Sloan Foundation Project. New York: Little, Brown and Company. Faems, Dries, Bart Van Looy, and Koenraad Debackere. 2005. âInter-organizational Collaboration and Innovation: Toward a Portfolio Approach.â Journal of Product Innovation Management 22(3):238-250. Fan, W., and White, M. J. 2002. âPersonal Bankruptcy and the Level of Entrepreneurial Activity.â NBER Working Paper, Series 9340. Boston, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Fangerberg, Jan. 2002. Technology, Growth, and Competitiveness: Selected Essays. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Federal Register Notice. 2004. â2004 WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding China: Value- Added Tax on Integrated Circuits.â April 21. Federal Trade Commission. 2003. âTo Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Patent and Com- petition Law Policy.â Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. October. Feldman, Maryann, and Maryellen Kelley. 2001. Winning an Award from the Advanced Technology ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ Program. NISTIR-6577. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Feldman, Maryann and Albert N. Link. 2001. âInnovation Policy in the Knowledge-based Economy.â Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation Volume 23. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press. Feldman, Maryann P., Albert N. Link, and Donald S. Siegel. 2002. The Economics of Science and ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ Technology: An Overview of Initiatives to Foster Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press. Feldman, Maryann, Irwin Feller, Janet Bercovitz, and Richard Burton. 2002. âEquity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities.â Management Science 48(1):105-121. Feller, Irwin. 1994. âUniversity-Industry R&D Relationships.â In J. Schmandt and R. Wilson, eds., Growth Policy in the Age of High Technology. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman. Feller, Irwin. 1997. âTechnology Transfer from Universities.â In John Smart, ed., Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. XII. New York: Agathon Press.
176 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Feller, Irwin. 2004. A Comparative Analysis of the Processes and Organizational Strategies Engaged in by Research Universities Participating in Industry-University Research Relationships. Final report submitted to the University of California Industry-University Cooperative Research Pro- gram. Agreement No. M-447646-19927-3. Ferguson, R. and C. Olofsson. 2004. âScience Parks and the Development of NTBFs: Location, Survival and Growth.â Journal of Technology Transfer 29(1): 5-17. Field, A. J. 2003. âThe Most Technologically Progressive Decade of the Century.â American Eco- nomic Review (September):1406. The Financial Times. 2005. âWorld Leader in Patents Focuses on Incremental Innovations.â October 12. The Financial Times. 2006. âIndia Needs Big Infrastructure Drive.â February 23. Flamm, K. 1996. Mismanaged Trade: Strategic Policy and the Semiconductor Industry. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Flamm, K. 2003. âMicroelectronics Innovation: Understanding Mooreâs Law and Semiconductor Price Trends.â International Journal of Technology, Policy, and Management 3(2). Flamm, K. 2003. âThe New Economy in Historical Perspective: Evolution of Digital Technology.â In New Economy Handbook. St. Louis, MO: Academic Press. Flamm, Kenneth. 2003. âSEMATECH Revisited: Assessing Consortium Impacts on Semiconductor Industry R&D.â In National Research Council. Securing the Future: Regional and National Programs to Support the Semiconductor Industry. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Flamm, K. 2006. âThe Economics of Innovation in Microprocessors.â Draft. December. Florida, Richard, Tim Gulden, and Charlotta Mellander. 2007. âThe Rise of the Mega-Region.â October. Foerst, Ann. 2005. God in the Machine. New York: Penguin Books. Fogarty, Michael S., Amit K. Sinha, and Adam B. Jaffe. Forthcoming. ATP and the U.S. Innovation SystemâA Methodology for Identifying Enabling R&D Spillover Networks with Applications to Micro-electromechanical Systems (MEMS) and Optical Recording. Draft report submitted to ATP. Fonfria, Antonio, Carlos Diaz de la Guardia, and Isabel Alvarez. 2002. âThe Role of Technol- ogy and Competitiveness Policies: A Technology Gap Approach.â Journal of Interdisciplinary Â conomics 13(1-2-3):223-241. E Fong, Glenn R. 2001. âARPA Does Windows: The Defense Underpinning of the PC Revolution,â Business and Politics 3(3). Foray, Dominique, and Patrick Llerena. 1996. âInformation Structure and Coordination in Technology Policy: A Theoretical Model and Two Case Studies.â Journal of Evolutionary Economics 6(2). Fortune. 2006. âAmericaâs Most Admired Companies 2006.â Friedman, Thomas. 2005. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the 21st Century. New York: W. H. Freeman. Fujimura, Shuzo. 2000. âHandotai Rikkoku Futatabi.â (In Japanese.) Nikkann-Kogyo Shin-bun-sha. Fujimura, Shuzo, and Hiroyuki Chuma. 2006. âSemiconductor Consortia in Japan: Experiences and Lessons.â Presentation at the conference, 21st Century Innovation Systems for the United States and Japan: Lessons from a Decade of Change. Tokyo, Japan: The National Academies, NISTEP of Japan, and The Institute of Innovation Research of Hitotsubashi University. <http://www. nistep.go.jp/IC/ic060110/pdf/5-2.pdf>.Fukao, Kuoji, and Hyeog Ug Kwon. 2005. âWhy Did Japanâs TFP Growth Slow Down in the Lost Decade? An Empirical Analysis Bases on Firm- Level Data of Manufacturing Firmsâ RIETI Discussion Paper Series. 05-E-004. Fukugawa, N. 2006. âScience Parks in Japan and Their Value-Added Contributions to New Technol- ogy-based Firmsâ International Journal of Industrial Organization 24(2):381-400. Furman, Jeffrey L., Michael E. Porter, and Scott Stern. 2002. âThe Determinants of National Innova- tive Capacity.â Research Policy 31:899-933.
APPENDIX C 177 Gallaher, M. P., A. N. Link, and J. E. Petrusa. 2006. Innovation in the U.S. Service Sector. London, UK: Routledge. Geiger, R. 1986. To Advance Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press. Geiger, R. 1993. Research and Relevant Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press. George, Gerard, and Ganesh N. Prabhu. 2003. âDevelopmental Financial Institutions as Technology Policy Instruments: Implications for Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies.â Research Policy 32(1):89-108. Gibb, M. J. 1985. Science Parks and Innovation Centres: Their Economic and Social Impact. Am- sterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. Goldstein, H. A., and M. I. Luger. 1990. âScience/Technology Parks and Regional Development Theory.â Economic Development Quarterly 4(1):64-78. Goldstein, H. A., and M. I. Luger. 1992. âUniversity-based Research Parks as a Rural Development Strategy.â Policy Studies Journal 20(2):249-263. Good, Mary. 2005. Presentation at the National Academies Conference, âAccelerating Innovation.â Washington, DC. October 19. Goodwin, James C., et al. 1999. Technology Transition. Arlington, VA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Government of the Peopleâs Republic of China. 2004. Anticompetitive Practices of Multinational Companies and Countermeasures. Administration of Industry and Commerce, Office of Anti- monopoly, Fair Trade Bureau, State Administration of Industry and Commerce. May. Government of the Peopleâs Republic of China, Office of Anti-monopoly, Fair Trade Bureau, State Administration of Industry and Commerce. 2004. âAnticompetitive Practices of Multinational Companies in China and Countermeasures.â Journal of Administration of Industry and Com- merce. May. Government of the Peopleâs Republic of China. 2005. Article 10: Exemptions of Monopoly Agree- ments. Anti-Monopoly Law of the Peopleâs Republic of China. Revised July 27. Government of the Peopleâs Republic of China, Ministry of Information Industry. 2006. âOutline of the 11th Five-Year Plan and Medium-and-Long-Term Plan for 2020 for Science and Technology Development in the Information Industry.â Xin Bu Ke, No. 309, August 29. Government of the Peopleâs Republic of China, National Development and Reform Commission. 2006. The 11th Five-Year Plan. March 19. <http://english.gov.cn/2006-07/26/content_346731. htm>. Grande, Edgar. 2001. âThe Erosion of State Capacity and European Innovation Policy: A Comparison of German and EU Information Technology Policies.â Research Policy 30(6):905-921. Grayson, L. 1993. Science Parks: An Experiment in High-Technology Transfer London, UK: The British Library Board. Griffing, Bruce. 2001. âBetween Invention and Innovation, Mapping the Funding for Early-Stage Technologies.â Presentation at Carnegie Conference Center. Washington, DC. January 25. Griliches, Z. 1993. âThe Search for R&D Spillovers.â Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94(S): S29-S47. Grindley, Peter, David Mowery, and Brian Silverman. 1994. âSEMATECH and Collaborative Re- search: Lessons in the Design of High Technology Consortia.â Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13(4):723-758. Grove, A. 2001. Swimming Across. New York: Warner Books. Guellec, Dominique, and Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. 2001. âR&D and Productivity Growth: Panel Data Analysis of 16 OECD Countries.â Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. DSTI Working Papers 2001/314. June. Guo Ban Han No. 30. 2006. Letter from the General Office of the State Council on Approving the Formulation of the Rules for Implementation of the Several Supporting Policies for Implementa- tion of the Outline of the National Medium and Long-term Plan for Development of Science and Technology. Gazette of the State Council. Issue No. 17, Serial No. 1196, June 20.
178 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Guy, I. 1996. âA Look at Aston Science Park.â Technovation 16(5):217-218. Guy, I. 1996. âNew Ventures on an Ancient Campus.â Technovation 16(6):269-270. Hackett, S. M., and D. M. Dilts. 2004. âA Systematic Review of Business Incubation Research.â Journal of Technology Transfer 29(1):55-82. Hall, B. H. 2002. âThe Assessment: Technology Policy.â Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18(1):1-9. Hall, B. H. 2004. âExploring the Patent Explosion.â NBER Working Paper 10605. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Hall, B. H. 2005. âExploring the Patent Explosion.â Journal of Technology Transfer 30:35-48. Hall, B. H., and R. H. Ziedonis. 2001. âThe Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry. 1979-1995.â RAND Journal of Economics 32:101-128. Hall, B. H., A. N. Link, and J. T. Scott. 2001. âBarriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Uni- versities: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program.â Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1-2):87-98. Hall, B. H., A. N. Link, and J. T. Scott. 2003. âUniversities as Research Partners.â Review of Econom- ics and Statistics 85(2):485-491. Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. âMarket Value and Patent Citations.â RAND Journal of Economics 36:16-38. Halpern, Mark. 2006. âThe Trouble with the Turing Test.â The New Atlantis 11(Winter):42-63. Hane, G. 1999. âComparing University-Industry Linkages in the United States and Japan.â In L. Branscomb, F. Kodama, and R. Florida, eds. Industrializing Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Hansson, F., K. Husted, and J. Vestergaard. 2005. âSecond Generation Science Parks: From Struc- tural Holes Jockeys to Social Capital Catalysts of the Knowledge Society.â Technovation 25(9):1039-1049. Hart, David. 1998. Forged Consensus. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Hashimoto, T. 1999. âThe Hesitant Relationship Reconsidered: University-Industry Cooperation in Postwar Japan.â In Lewis M. Branscomb, Fumio Kodama, and Richard Florida, eds. Industri- alizing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkage in Japan and the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Hayashi, Fumio, and Edward C. Prescott. 2002. âThe 1990s in Japan: A Lost Decade.â Review of Economic Dynamics 5(1):206-235. Heller, M., and R. Eisenberg. 1998. âCan Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research.â Science 280:698. Henderson, J. V. 1986. âThe Efficiency of Resource Usage and City Size.â Journal of Urban Eco- nomics 19(1):47-70. Henderson, Jennifer A., and John J. Smith. 2002. âAcademia, Industry, and the Bayh-Dole Act: An Implied Duty to Commercialize.â White Paper. Center for the Integration of Medicine and In- novative Technology. Harvard University. October. Henderson, R., M. Trajtenberg, and A. Jaffe. 1998. âUniversities as a Source of Commercial Tech- nology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988.â Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1):119-127. Henderson, R., L. Orsenigo, and G. P. Pisano. 1999. âThe Pharmaceutical Industry and the Revolution in Molecular Biology: Interactions among Scientific, Institutional, and Organizational Change.â In D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson, eds. Sources of Industrial Leadership. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Hennessy, J. L., and D. A. Patterson 2002. Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach. 3rd edition. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. Hicks, D., T. Breitzman, D. Olivastro, and K. Hamilton. 2001. âThe Changing Composition of Innovative Activity in the U.S.âA Portrait Based on Patent Analysis.â Research Policy 30(4):681-704.
APPENDIX C 179 Hilpert, U., and B. Ruffieux. 1991. âInnovation, Politics and Regional Development: Technology Parks and Regional Participation in High-Technology in France and West Germany.â In U. ÂHilpert, ed. Regional Innovation and Decentralization: High-Technology Industry and ÂGovernment Policy. London, UK: Routledge. Himmelberg, C., and B. C. Petersen. 1994. âR&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries.â Review of Economics and Statistics 76(1):38-51. Holtz-Eakin, D., D. Joulfian, and H. Rosen. 1994. âStriking it Out: Entrepreneurial Survival and Liquidity Constraints.â Journal of Political Economy 102(1):53-75. Hoshi, Takeo, and Anil Kashyap. 2004. âJapanâs Economic and Financial Crisis: An Overview.â The Journal of Economic Perspectives Winter. Howell, Thomas. 2003. âCompeting Programs: Government Support for Microelectronics.â In Na- tional Research Council. Securing the Future: Regional and National Programs to Support the Semiconductor Industry. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Howell, Thomas, et al. 2003. Chinaâs Emerging Semiconductor Industry. San Jose, CA: Semiconduc- tor Industry Association, October. Hu, Zhijian. 2006. âIPR Policies In China: Challenges and Directions.â Presentation at Industrial Innovation in China. Levin Institute Conference. July 24-26. Huang, Yasheng, and Tarun Khanna. 2003. âCan India Overtake China?â Foreign Policy July-ÂAugust. Huddleson, Lillian, and Vicki Daitch. 2002. True GeniusâThe Life and Science of John Bardeen. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press. Hughes, Kent. 2005. Building the Next American Century: The Past and Future of American Eco- nomic Competitiveness. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. Chapter 14. Hughes, Kent H. 2005. âFacing the Global Competitiveness Challenge.â Issues in Science and Tech- nology XXI(4):72-78. Hulsink, W., H. Bouwman, and T. Elfring. 2007. ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ âSilicon Valley in the Polder? Entrepreneurial D Â ynamics, Virtuous Clusters and Vicious Firms in the Netherlands and Flanders.â ERIM Report Series Research in Management (ERS-2007-048-ORG). Hundley, Richard O. 1999. Past Revolutions, Future Transformations: What Can the History of Revo- lutions in Military Affairs Tell Us About Transforming the U.S. Military. Rand Corporation, National Research Institute. Iansati, Marco, and Roy Levien. 2005. The Keystone Advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Industrial Research Institute, Inc. 2001. âIndustry-University Intellectual Property.â Position Paper. External Research Directors Network. April. Inkpen, Andrew C. and Wang Pien. 2006. âAn Examination of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer: ChinaâSingapore Suzhou Industrial Park.â Journal of Management Studies 43(4):779-811. Inside U.S.-China Trade. 2006. Industry Worried China Backing out of Commitment to Join GPA. September 27. International Association of Science Parks (IASP). 2000. <http://www.iaspworld.org/information/ definitions.php>. International Herald Tribune. 2006. âStart-Ups Explore Abroad for IPOs.â December 25. Jacobs, Tom. 2002. âBiotech Follows Dot.com Boom and Bust.â Nature 20(10):973. Jaffe, A. B. 1989. âReal Effects of Academic Research.â American Economic Review 79(5): 957-970. Jaffe, A. B. 1997. Economic Analysis of Research Spillovers: Implications for the Advanced Tech- nology Program. NIST GCR 97-708. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Jaffe, A. B. 1998. âThe Importance of âSpilloversâ in the Policy Mission of the ATP.â Journal of Technology Transfer 23(1):11-19.
180 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Jaffe, A. B. 2000. âThe U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Pro- cess.â Research Policy 29:531-557. Jaffe, A. B., and J. Lerner. 2006. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Jaffe, A. B., J. Lerner, and S. Stern, eds. 2003. Innovation Policy and the Economy: Volume 3. Cam- bridge, MA: The MIT Press. Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. âGeographic Localization of Knowledge Spill- ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ overs as Evidenced by Patent Citations.â Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3):577-598. Japan Patent Office. 2003. Reports on Technology Trend and Patent Application: Life Science. (in Japanese). Japan Small Business Research Institute. 2002. Survey of the Environment for Startups. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Small Business Research Institute. Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 1997. Comparative Science and Technology Policy. Elgar Reference Collec- tion. International Library of Comparative Pubic Policy, Volume 5. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Jorgenson, D. W. 2001. âInformation Technology and the U.S. Economy.â American Economic Review 91(1) March. Jorgenson, D. W. 2001. âU.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age.â Issues in Science and Tech- nology Fall. Jorgenson, Dale, and Kevin Stiroh. 2002. âRaising the Speed Limit: Economic Growth in the Informa- tion Age.â In National Research Council. Measuring and Sustaining the New Economy. Dale Jorgenson and Charles Wessner, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Jorgenson, D. W., and K. Motohashi. 2003. âThe Role of Information Technology in the Economy: Comparison between Japan and the United States.â Prepared for RIETI/KEIO Conference on Japanese Economy: Leading East Asia in the 21st Century? Keio University. May 30. Joy, William. 2000. âWhy the Future Does Not Need Us.â Wired 8.04. April. Kaelble, Steve. 2004. âGood Neighbors: Indianaâs Certified-Technology-park Program.â Indiana Business Magazine July 1. Kapur, Devesh. 2003. âIndian Diaspora as a Strategic Asset.â Economic and Political Weekly 38(5):445-448. Kapur, Surinder. 2006. âNurture New Technology and Innovation, Stay Competitive.â The Financial Express November 16. The Kauffman Foundation and the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. 2007. The 2007 State New Economy Index. <http://www.kauffman.org/items.cfm?itemID=766>. Kawamoto, Takuji. 2004. âWhat Do the Purified Solow Residuals Tell Us about Japanâs Lost De- cade?â Bank of Japan IMES Discussion Paper Series. No. 2004-E-5. Tokyo, Japan: Bank of Japan. Kenney, Martin, ed. 2000. Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Kim, Yong-June. 2006. âA Korean Perspective on Chinaâs Innovation System.â Presentation at Indus- trial Innovation in China. Levin Institute Conference. July 24-26. Kneller, R. 2003. âUniversity-Industry Cooperation and Technology Transfer in Japan Compared with the U.S.: Another Reason for Japanâs Economic Malaise?â Journal of International Economic Law 24:329-450. Koizumi, Kei. 2007. âHistorical Trends in Federal R&D.â In AAAS Report XXXII: Research and De- velopment FY2008. AAAS Publication Number 07-1A. Washington, DC: American AssoÂciation for the Advancement of Science.
APPENDIX C 181 Kondo, Masayuki. 2003. âChinese Model to Create High-Tech Start-Ups from Universities and Research Institutes.â In M. von Zedtwitz, G. Haour, T. Khalil, and L. Lefebvre, eds. Manage- ment of Technology: Growth through Business, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press. Kondo, Masayuki. 2004. âPolicy Innovation in Science and Technology in Japanâfrom S&T Policy to Innovation Policy.â (In Japanese.) Journal of Science Policy and Research Management 19(3/4):132-140. Kondo, Masayuki. 2004. âUniversity spin-offs in Japan.â Asia Pacific Tech Monitor. March-April 2004. Pp. 37-43. Asian and Pacific Centre for Transfer of Technology, ESCAP, UN. Kondo, Masayuki. 2005. âSpin-offs from Public Research Institutes as Domestic Technology Trans- fer MeansâThe Case of RIKEN and Riken Industrial Group.â (In Japanese.) Development Engineering 11:31-41. Kondo, Masayuki. 2006. âUniversity-Industry Partnerships in Japan.â Presentation at the conference, 21st Century Innovation Systems for the United States and Japan: Lessons from a Decade of Change. Tokyo, Japan. The National Academies, NISTEP of Japan, and The Institute of Innova- tion Research of Hitotsubashi University. <http://www.nistep.go.jp/IC/ic060110/pdf/5-2.pdf>. Kortum, S., and J. Lerner. 1999. âWhat is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?â Research Policy 28:1-22. Koschatzky, Knut. 2003. âThe Regionalization of Innovation Policy: New Options for Regional Change?â In G. Fuchs and Phil Shapira, eds. Rethinking Regional Innovation: Path Dependency or Regional Breakthrough? London, UK: Kluwer. Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Krugman, Paul. 1994. âCompetitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession.â Foreign Affairs March/April. Kuhlmann, Stephan and Jakob Edler. 2003. âScenarios of Technology and Innovation Policies in Europe: Investigating Future GovernanceâGroup of 3.â Technological Forecasting & Social Change 70. Kumar, Deepak. 1995. Science and the Raj: 1857â1905. New York: Oxford University Press. Lall, Sanjaya. 2002. âLinking FDI and Technology Development for Capacity Building and Strategic Competitiveness.â Transnational Corporations 11(3):39-88. Lanjouw, J. O., and I. Cockburn. 2000. âDo Patents Matter? Empirical Evidence after GATT.â NBER Working Paper No. 7495. Lanjouw, J. O., and J. Lerner 1997. âThe Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Empirical Literature.â NBER Working Paper No. W6296. Available at <http://ssrn. com/abstract=226053>. Laredo, Philippe, and Philippe Mustar, eds. 2001. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: An International Perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Larosse, J. 2004. Towards a âThird Generationâ Innovation Policy in Flanders: Policy Profile of the Flemish Innovation. Brussels, Belgium: IWT. Lazowska, Edward D., and David Paterson. 2005. âAn Endless Frontier Postponed.â Science 308(5723):757. May 6. Lebra, Takie Sugiyama. 1971. âThe Social Mechanism of Guilt and Shame: The Japanese Case.â Anthropological Quarterly 44(4):241-255. Lehman, Nicholas. 2001. âDreaming About War.â The New Yorker July 16. Available at <http://www. comw.org/qdr/0107lemann.html>. Lembke, Johan. 2002. Competition for Technological Leadership: EU Policy for High Technology. C Â heltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Lemley, Mark. 2000. âRational Ignorance at the Patent Office.â Berkeley Program in Law and Eco- nomics Working Paper Series No. 19. Lemola, Tarmo. 2002. âConvergence of National Science and Technology Policies: The Case of Finland.â Research Policy 31(8-9):1481-1490.
182 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Lerner, J. 1995. âPatenting in the Shadow of Competitors.â Journal of Law and Economics 38(Oct):463-495. Lerner, Joshua. 1999. âPublic Venture Capital.â In National Research Council. The Small Business Innovation Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Lerner, J. 2002. âPatent Policy Shifts and Innovation Over 150 Years.â American Economic Review P&P. (May). Lerner, J., and J. Tirole. 2004. âEfficiency of Patent Pools.â American Economic Review 94(3):691-711. Leslie, Stuart, and Robert Kargon. 2006. âExporting MIT.â Osiris 21:110-130. Levin, R. C., A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson, and S. G. Winter. 1987. âAppropriating the Returns to Industrial R&D.â Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 783-820. Levitt, Rachelle, ed. 1987. The University/Real Estate Connection: Research Parks and Other Ventures.Â Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute. Lewis, James A. 2005. Waiting for Sputnik: Basic Research and Strategic Competition. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies. Leyden, D. P., A. N. Link, and D. S. Siegel. 2008. ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ âA Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Deci- sion to Locate on a University Research Park.â IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55(1):23-28. Li, Jianjun. 2006. âThe Development and Opening of Tianjin Binhai: New Area & Chinaâs Biotech- nical Innovations.â Presentation at Industrial Innovation in China. Levin Institute Conference. July 24-26. Licklider, J. C. R. 1960. âMan-Computer Symbiosis.â IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Elec- tronics. March. Lin, Otto. 1998. âScience and Technology Policy and its Influence on the Economic Development of Taiwan.â In Henry S. Rowen, ed., Behind East Asian Growth: The Political and Social Founda- tions of Prosperity. New York: Routledge. Lindh, T., and Ohlsson, H. 1996. âSelf-Employment and Windfall Gains: Evidence from the Swedish Lottery.â Economic Journal 106:1515-1526. LindelÃ¶f, P., and H. LÃ¶fsten. 2003. ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ âScience Park Location and New Technology-Based Firms in Swe- den: Implications for Strategy and Performance.â Small Business Economics 20(3):245-258. LindelÃ¶f, P. and H. LÃ¶fsten. 2004. ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ âProximity as a Resource Base for Competitive Advantage: University-Industry Links for Technology Transfer.â Journal of Technology Transfer 29(3-4): 311-326. Link, A. N. 1981. âBasic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing: Some Additional Evidence.â American Economic Review 71(5):1111-1112. Link, A. N. 1981. Research and Development Activity in U.S. Manufacturing. New York: Praeger. Link, A. N. 1995. A Generosity of Spirit: The Early History of the Research Triangle Park. Re- search Triangle Park, NC: University of North Carolina Press for the Research Triangle Park Foundation. Link, A. N. 2002. From Seed to Harvest: The Growth of the Research Triangle Park. Research Trian- gle Park, NC: University of North Carolina Press for the Research Triangle Park Foundation. Link, A. N., and K. R. Link. 2003. âOn the Growth of U.S. Science Parks.â Journal of Technology Transfer 28(1):81-85. Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 1998. Public Accountability: Evaluating Technology-Based Institutions. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2001. âPublic/Private Partnerships: Stimulating Competition in a Dynamic Market.â International Journal of Industrial Organization 19(5):763-794. Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2003. âThe Growth of Research Triangle Park.â Small Business Econom- ics 20(2):167-175.
APPENDIX C 183 Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2003. âU.S. Science Parks: The Diffusion of an Innovation and Its Effects on the Academic Mission of Universities.â International Journal of Industrial Organization 21(9):1323-1356. Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2005. âOpening the Ivory Towerâs Door: An Analysis of the Determinants of the Formation of U.S. University Spin-Off Companies.â Research Policy 34(7):1106-1112. Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2006. âU.S. University Research Parks.â Journal of Productivity Analysis 25(1):43-55. Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2007. âThe Economics of University Research Parks.â Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23(4):661-674. Link, A. N., and D. S. Siegel. 2003. Technological Change and Economic Performance. London, UK: Routledge. Litan, Robert E., and Lesa Mitchell. 2008. âShould Universities be Agents of Economic Develop- ment?â Astra Briefs 7(7-8). LÃ¶fsten, Hans, and Peter LindelÃ¶f. 2002. âScience Parks and the Growth of New Technology-based FirmsâAcademic-industry Links, Innovation and Markets.â Research Policy 31(6):859-876. Long, Guogiang. 2005. âChinaâs Policies on FDI: Review and Evaluation.â In Theodore H. Moran, Edward M. Graham, and Magnus BlomstrÃ¶m, eds., Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Luger, M. I. 2001. âIntroduction: Information Technology and Regional Economic Development.â Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research & Practice. Luger, M. I. 2007. âSmart Places for Smart People: Using Cluster-based Planning in the 21st Cen- tury.â In Creating Enterprise: Igniting Innovation through Business-University-Government Networks. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Luger, M. I., and H. A. Goldstein. 1991. Technology in the Garden. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. Luger, M. I., and Harvey A. Goldstein. 2006. Research Parks Redux: The Changing Landscape of the Garden. Washington, DC: U.S. Economic Development Administration. LundstÃ¶rm, A., and L. Stevenson. 2001. Entrepreneurship Policy for the Future. Stockholm, Sweden: FSF. Lynn, Leonard. 2006. âCollaborative Advantage and Chinaâs Evolving Position in the Global Tech- nology System.â Presentation at Industrial Innovation in China. Levin Institute Conference. July 24-26. Macher, Jeffrey, David Mowery, and David Hodges. 1999. âSemiconductors.â In National Research Council. U.S. Industry in 2000: Studies in Competitive Performance. David C. Mowery, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Maddison, Angus, and Donald Johnston. 2001. The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Malecki, E. J. 1991. Technology and Economic Development.Â New York:Â John Wiley. Mandel, Michael. 2008. âA Better Way to Track the Economy: A Groundbreaking Commerce Dept. Report Could Lead to New Yardsticks for Measuring Growth.â BusinessWeek (January 28):29. Mani, Sunil. 2004. âGovernment, Innovation and Technology Policy: An International Comparative Analysis.â International Journal of Technology and Globalization 1(1). Mansfield, E. 1986. âPatents and Innovation: An Empirical Study.â Management Science 32:173-181. Mansfield, E. 1996. Estimating Social and Private Returns from Innovations Based on the Advanced Technology Program: Problems and Opportunities. GCR 99-780. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Mansfield, E. 1996. âHow Fast Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?â Journal of Industrial Economics 34(2):217-224. Markoff, J. 2005. âClouds Over âBlue Skyâ Research Agency.â New York Times May 4. P. 12. Markoff, J. 2005. â3 Technology Rivals Join to Finance Research at Berkeley.â New York Times December 15. P. C5.
184 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Marshall, Andrew. 1993. âSome Thoughts on Military RevolutionsâSecond Version,â Memorandum for the Record. August 23. Mazuzan, George. 1988. The National Science Foundation: A Brief History (1950-1985). NSF 88-16. Arlington, VA: The National Science Foundation. McKibben, William. 2003. Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age. New York: Henry Holt & Co. Megginson, William L. 2004. âTowards a Global Model of Venture Capital?â Journal of Applied and Corporate Finance 16(1). Merges, R. P. 1996. âA Comparative Look at Intellectual Property Rights and the Software Industry.â In David C. Mowery, ed. The International Software Industry. New York: Oxford University Press. Merges, R. P. 1999. âAs Many as Six Impossible Patents before Breakfast: Property Rights for Busi- ness Concepts and Patent System Reform.â Berkeley Technology Law Journal. Merges, R., and R. R. Nelson. 1990. âOn the Complex Economics of Patent Scope.â Columbia Law Review 90:839-916. Merton, R. K. 1968. âThe Matthew Effect in Science.â Science 159(3810):56-63. METI (Small and Medium Enterprise Agency, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry). 2003. The 2003 White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan. Tokyo: Japan Small Business Research Institute. METI. 2005. The 2005 White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan. Tokyo: Japan Small Business Research Institute. MEXT. 2004. Annual Report on Science and Technology Promotion Measures 2004: White Paper on Science and Technology. (Heisei ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ 16 nendo Kagaku-Gijutu Sinkou-ni-kansuru Nenji-houkoku). MEXT. Meyer-Krahmer, Frieder. 2001. âThe German Innovation System.â Pp. 205-252 in P. LarÃ©do and P. Mustar, eds. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: An International Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Meyer-Krahmer, Frieder. 2001. âIndustrial Innovation and SustainabilityâConflicts and ÂCoherence.â Pp. 177-195 in Daniele Archibugi and Bengt-Ake Lundvall, eds. The Globalizing Learning Â conomy. New York: Oxford University Press. E Middleton, Andrew, and Steven Bowns. With Keith Hartley and James Reid. 2006. The Effect of Defense R&D on Military Equipment Quality, Defense and Peace Economics 17(2):117-139. April. Miller, Roger, and Marcel Cote. 1987. Growing the Next Silicon Valley: A Guide for Successful Re- gional Planning. Toronto: D. C. Heath and Company. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. 2006. New Economic Growth Strategies 2006. Tokyo, Japan: Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry. (In Japanese). Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. 2002. Visions of Pharmaceutical Industry in Japan. <http:// www.mhlw.go.jp/houdou/2002/04/h0409-1.html> (In Japanese). Mitra, Raja. 2006. âIndiaâs Potential as a Global R&D Power.â In Magnus Karlsson, ed. The Interna- tionalization of Corporate R&D. Ãstersund: Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies. Miyata, Shinpei. 1983. A Free Paradise for Scientists. (In Japanese.) Bungeishunju. Mody, Ashok, and Carl Dahlman. 1992. âPerformance and Potential of Information Technology: An International Perspective.â World Development 20(12):1703-1719. Moore, Gordon. 2003. âThe SEMATECH Contribution.â In National Research Council. Securing the Future: Regional and National Programs to Support the Semiconductor Industry. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Mooris, P. R. 1990. A History of The World Semiconductor Industry. Stevenage, UK: Peter Peregrinus Ltd. Morrow, Daniel S. 2003. Dr. J. Craig VenterâOral History. Computer World Honors Program. April 21. Available at <http://cwheroes.org/archives/histories/venter>.
APPENDIX C 185 Moser, P. 2001. âHow Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth Century World Fairs.â University of California at Berkeley: working paper. Motohashi, Kazuyuki. 2005. âUniversityâindustry Collaborations in Japan: The Role of New Technology-based Firms in Transforming the National Innovation System.â Research Policy 34:583-594. Motohashi, Kazuyuki, and Xiao Yun. 2007. âChinaâs Innovation System Reform and Growing Indus- try and Science Linkages.â Research Policy 36:1251-1260. Mowery, D. C., and B. N. Sampat. 2005. âThe Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University-Industry Tech- nology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments?â Journal of Technology Transfer 30(1/2):115-127. Mowery, D. C., and A. A. Ziedonis. 2002. âAcademic Patent Quality and Quantity Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States.â Research Policy 31(3):399-418. Mowery, D., R. Nelson, B. Sampat, and A. Ziedonis. 2001. âThe Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the BayhâDole Act of 1980.â Research Policy 30. Mowery, D., R. Nelson, B. Sampat, and A. Ziedonis. 2003. The Ivory Tower and Industrial Innova- tion. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Murali, Kanta. 2003. âThe IIT Story: Issues and Concerns.â Frontline 20(3). Murphy, L. M., and P. L. Edwards. 2003. Bridging the Valley of Death: Transitioning from Public to Private Sector Financing. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. May. Mustar, Phillipe, and Phillipe Laredo. 2002. âInnovation and Research Policy in France (1980â2000) or the Disappearance of the Colbertist State.â Research Policy 31:55-72. Nadiri I. 1993. Innovations and Technological Spillovers. NBER Working Paper No. 4423. Boston, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Nagaoka Sadao. 2005. âHow Does Priority Rule Work? Evidence from the Patent Examination Records in Japan.â A Paper Presented for Patent Statistics and Innovation Research Workshop, November 25. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo. Nagaoka, Sadao. 2006. âReform of Patent System in Japan and Challenges.â Presentation at the confer- ence, 21st Century Innovation Systems for the United States and Japan: Lessons from a Decade of Change. Tokyo, Japan. The National Academies, NISTEP of Japan, and The Institute of Innova- tion Research of Hitotsubashi University. <http://www.nistep.go.jp/IC/ic060110/pdf/5-2.pdf>. Nagaoka, Sadao. 2007. âAssessing the R&D Management of Firms by Patent Citation: Evidence from the U.S. Patents.â Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16(1). Nagaoka, Sadao, Naotoshi Tsukada, and Tomoyuki Shimbo. ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ 2006. âThe Emergence and Structure of Essential Patents of Standards: Lessons from Three IT Standards.â IIR Working Paper WP#06- 08. Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University. Nail, John, and Hayden Brown. Forthcoming. Classifying and Analyzing ATP Projects Using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). NISTIR 2005. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Nakamura, K., Y. Okada, and A. Tohei. 2006. âDoes the Public Sector Make a Significant Contribution to Biomedical Research in Japan? A Detailed Analysis of Government and University Patenting, 1991-2002.â Discussion Paper Series. Competition Policy Research Center. Fair Trade Commis- sion of Japan. CPDP25-E. <http://www.jftc.go.jp/cprc/DP/discussionpapers.html>. Nakayama, Yasuo, Mitsuaki Hosono, Nobuya Fukugawa, and Masayuki Kondo. 2005. âUniversity- Industry Cooperation: Joint Research and Contract Research.â (In Japanese.) NISTEP Research Material. No. 119. Tokyo, Japan: National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Nanotechwire. 2005. âGovernor Pataki Announces Historic Investments by IBM Global High-Tech Leaders in Nanoelectronics Manufacturing and Development.â January 6. Accessed at <http:// www.nanotechwire.com/news.asp?nid=1453>.
186 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS National Academy of Engineering. 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Academy of Sciences/National Academy of Engineering/Insitute of Medicine. 2007. Ris- ing Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy and Mitsubishi Research Institute. 2005. Govern- ment S&T Budget Analysis during the First and Second S&T Basic Plans. ï¿½Dai-ikki oyobi dai- ( niki Kagaku-Gijutu-Kihonkeikaku kikanchuu no kenkyuu-kaihatu-soushi no naiyou-bunseki). NISTEP Report No. 84. March. National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council. 2006. âThe National Strategy for Manufacturing.â New Delhi, India. March. National Research Council. 1982. Scientific Communication and National Security. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1987. Balancing the National Interest: U.S. National Security Export Controls and Global Economic Competition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1996. Conflict and Cooperation in National Competition for High- t Â echnology Industry. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1999. The Advanced Technology Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1999. Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Â esearch. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. R National Research Council. 1999. Industry-Laboratory Partnerships: A Review of the Sandia Science and Technology Park Initiative. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1999. New Vistas in Transatlantic Science and Technology Cooperation. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 1999. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2000. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: A Review of the Department of Defense Fast Track Initiative. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2000. U.S. Industry in 2000: Studies in Competitive Performance. David C. Mowery, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2001. Building a Workforce for the Information Economy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2001. Capitalizing on New Needs and New Opportunities: Government- Industry Partnerships in Biotechnology and Information Technologies. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2001. A Review of the New Initiatives at the NASA Ames Research Center. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2001. Trends in Federal Support of Research and Graduate Education. Stephen A. Merrill, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. 2002. Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies: Summary Report. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Acad- emies Press. National Research Council. 2003. Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies: Summary Report. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Acad- emies Press.
APPENDIX C 187 National Research Council. 2003. Securing the Future: Regional and National Programs to Support the Semiconductor Industry. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2004. Getting Up to Speed: The Future of Supercomputing. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2004. A Patent System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The Na- tional Academies Press. National Research Council. 2004. Productivity and Cyclicality in Semiconductors: Trends, Implica- tions, and Questions. Dale W. Jorgenson and Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2004. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Program Â iversity and Assessment Challenges. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National D Academies Press. National Research Council. 2005. Getting Up to Speed: The Future of Superconducting. Susan L. Graham, Marc Snir, and Cynthia A. Patterson, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2005. Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Post- doctoral Scholars in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2007. Enhancing Productivity Growth in the Information Age: Measuring and Sustaining the New Economy. Dale W. Jorgenson and Charles W. Wessner, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2007. Indiaâs Changing Innovation System. Charles W. Wessner and Sujai J. Shivakumar, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2007. Innovation Policies for the 21st Century. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2007. SBIR and the Phase III Challenge of Commercialization. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Science Foun- dation. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2008. Innovative Flanders: Innovation Policies for the 21st Century. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2009. 21st Century Innovation Systems for Japan and the United States: Lessons from a Decade of Change. Sadao Nagaoka, Masayuki Kondo, Kenneth Flamm, and Charles Wessner, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2009. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Institutes of Health. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2009. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Science Board. 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. National Science Board. 2006. Science and Engineering Indicators, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. National Science Board. 2008. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation. 2004. Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards: 2003. NSF 05-300. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
188 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Needham, Joseph. 1954-1986. Science and Civilization in China (five volumes). Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press. Nelson, R. R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. Nelson, R. R., and K. Nelson. 2002. âTechnology, Institutions, and Innovation Systems.â Research Policy 31:265-272. Nelson, R. R., and N. Rosenberg. 1993. âTechnical Innovation and National Systems.â In National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Richard R. Nelson, ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Nishimura, Kiyohiko, G., Takanobu Nakajima, and Kozo Kiyota. 2003. âDoes the Natural Selection Mechanism Still Work in Severe Recessions? Examination of the Japanese Economy in the 1990s.â Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 58:53-78. NISTEP (National Institute of Science and Technology Policy). 2004. Study for Evaluating the Achievements of the S&T Basic Plans in JapanâFY2003 Highlights. (In Japanese.) NISREP REPORT No. 74. NISTEP. 2005. Study for Evaluating the Achievements of the S&T Basic Plans in JapanâHighlights (In Japanese.) NISTEP REPORT No. 83. NISTEP. 2005. Survey on the Performance of the 1st and the 2nd Science and Technology Basic Plan. NISTEP Report No. 84. (In Japanese). NISTEP and MRI. 2004. Achievements and Issues of Major Policies for Industry-Academy-ÂGovernment Collaboration and Regional InnovationâStudy for FY2003. (In Japanese.) NISTEP REPORT No. 78. Odagari, H. 1999. âUniversity-Industry Collaboration in Japan: Facts and Interpretations.â In Lewis M. Branscomb, Fumio Kodama, and Richard Florida, eds. Industrializing Knowledge: Univer- sity-Industry Linkage in Japan and the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Odagiri, H., and A. Goto. 1993. âThe Japanese System of Innovation: Past, Present and Future.â In R. R. Nelson, ed. National Systems of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Odagiri, H., and A. Goto. 1996. Technology and Industrial Development in Japan: Building Capabili- ties by Learning, Innovation and Public Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Office of Pharmaceutical Industry Research. 2000. Seiyaku Sangyou Ron (Analyses on Pharmaceuti- cal Industry). Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association. (In Japanese). Ohkohchi Commemorative Foundation. 1954. Masatoshi Ohkohchi. (In Japanese.) Tokyo, Japan: Nikkan Kogyo Shimbunsha. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1999. Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1999. Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. The New Economy: Beyond the HypeâThe OECD Growth Project. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. Social Sciences and Innovation. Washington, DC: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2004. âSummary Report: Micro-policies for Growth and Productivity.â DSTI/IND(2004)7. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. October. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2006. Main Science and Technology Indicators. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Orszag, Peter, and Thomas Kane. 2003. âFunding Restrictions at Public Universities: Effects and Policy Implications.â Brookings Institution Working Paper. September.
APPENDIX C 189 Oughton, Christine. 1997. âCompetitiveness in the 1990s.â The Economic Journal 107(444): 1486-1503. Oughton,Â Christine, MikelÂ Landabaso, and KevinÂ Morgan. 2002. âThe Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy.â The Journal of Technology Transfer 27(1). Owens, William, with Edward Offley. 2001. Lifting the Fog of War. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Park, W. G., and J. C. Ginarte. 1997. âIntellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth.â Contem- porary Economic Policy XV(July):51-61. Patel, P., and K. Pavitt. 1994. âNational Innovation Systems: Why They are Important and How They Might Be Compared?â Economic Change and Industrial Innovation. Peck, M. J., R. C. Levin, and Akira Goto. 1988. âPicking Losers: Public Policy Toward Declining Industries in Japan.â In J. B. Shoven, ed. Government Policy Toward Industry in the United States and Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 165-239. Peek, Joe, and Eric S. Rosengren. 2005. âUnnatural Selection: Perverse Incentives and the MisÂ allocation of Credit in Japan.â The American Economic Review 95(4):114-1166. Pelsoci, Thomas. 2003. Low-Cost Manufacturing Process Technology for Amorphous Silicon Â etector Panels: Applications in Digital Mammography and Radiography. NIST GCR 03-844. D G Â aithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Pelsoci, Thomas. 2005. Photonic Technologies: Applications in Petroleum Refining, Building Con- trols, Emergency Medicine, and Industrial Materials Analysis. NIST GCR 05-879. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Penrose, E. 1951. The Economics of the International Patent System. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Perez, Carlota. 2002. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Phan, Phillip H., and Donald S. Siegel. 2006. âThe Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned from Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the U.S. and U.K.â Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics 0609. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Department of Economics. Phan, Phillip H., Donald S. Siegel, and Mike Wright. 2005. âScience Parks and Incubators: Observa- tions, Synthesis and Future Research.â Journal of Business Venturing 20(2):165-182. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Device Agency. 2007. Annual Report. (In Japanese). <http://www. pmda.go.jp/index.html>. Phillimore, J. 1999. âBeyond the Linear View of Innovation in Science Park Evaluation: An Analysis of Western Australian Technology Park.â Technovation 19(11):673-680. Polenske, Karen, Nicolas Rockler, et al. 2004. Closing the Competitive Gap: A Retrospective Analysis of the ATP 2mm Project. NIST GCR 03-856. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Popkin, Joel. 2003. Inter-Industry Diffusion of Technology That Results from ATP Projects: Prelimi- nary Research of the Potential Impacts of ATP Funding. NIST GCR 03-848. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Porter, M. E., 1998. âClusters and the New Economics of Competition.â Harvard Business Review 76(6):77-90. Porter, M. E., and M. Sakakibara. 2004. âCompetition in Japan.â The Journal of Economic Perspec- tives 18(1). Posen, Adam. 1998. Restoring Japanâs Economic Growth. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics. Posen, Adam S. 2001. âJapan.â In Benn Steil, David G. Victor, and Richard R. Nelson, eds. Techno- logical Innovation and Economic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Powell, Jeanne, and Francisco Moris. 2002. Different Timelines for Different Technologies. NISTIR 6917. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
190 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Presidentâs Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2004. âSustaining the Nationâs Innova- tion Ecosystems.â Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President. January. Presidentâs Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2004. âSustaining the Nationâs Innova- tion System: Report on Information Technology Manufacturing and Competitiveness.â Wash- ington, DC: Executive Office of the President. January. Presidentâs Information Technology Advisory Committee. 2005. âCybersecurity: A Crisis of Priori- tization.â Report to the President. February. PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2006. âChinaâs Impact on the Semiconductor Industry: 2005 Update.â New York: PricewaterhouseCoopers. Procassini, Andrew. 1995. Competitors in Alliance: Industry Associations, Global Rivalries, and Business-Government Relations. New York: Greenwood Publishing. Purvis, G. 2002. âMoving into the Real World.â Electronic Business. July 1. Raduchel, William. 2006. âThe End of Stovepiping.â In National Research Council. The Telecom- munications Challenge: Changing Technologies and Evolving Policies, Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Rai, Saritha. 2006. âIndia Becoming a Crucial Cog in the Machine at I.B.M.â The New York Times June 5. Rausser, Gordon C. 2000. Letter to the Editor. Atlantic Monthly. May 19. Accessed at <http://www. cnr.berkeley.edu/pdf/dean_rausser/Atl_ltr_edt_5_2000.pdf>. Reid, T. R. 2004. The United States of Europe: The New Superpower and the End of American Su- premacy. New York: Penguin Press. Reiko, ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ Yamada. 2001.ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ âUniversity Reform in the Post-massification Era in Japan: Analysis of Govern- ment Education Policy for the 21st Century.â Higher Education Policy 14(4). Reuters. 2006. âChina Sees No Quick End to Economic Boom.â February 21. Rich, Ben. 1996. Skunkworks. New York: Back Bay Books. Rodrik, Dani and Arvind Subramanian. 2004. âFrom âHindu Growthâ to Productivity Surge: The Mystery of the Indian Growth Transition.â NBER Working Paper 10376. Roland, Alex. Model Research: The National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1915-1958. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Available at <http://history. nasa.gov/SP-4103/>. Romanainen, Jari. 2001. âThe Cluster Approach in Finnish Technology Policy.â Pp. 377-388 in Edward M. Bergman, Pim den Hertog, and David Charles, eds. Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems. OECD Proceedings. Washington, DC: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Romer, Paul. 1990. âEndogenous Technological Change.â Journal of Political Economy 98:72-102. Rosenberg, N., and R. Nelson. 1994. âAmerican Universities and Technical Advance in Industry.â Research Policy 23:325-348. Rosenzweig, R., and B. Turlington. 1982. The Research Universities and Their Patrons. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Rothaermel, F. T., and M. C. Thursby. 2005. âIncubator Firm Failure or Graduation? The Role of University Linkages.â Research Policy 34(7):1076-1090. Rothaermel, F. T., and M. C. Thursby. 2005. âUniversity-Incubator Firm Knowledge Flows: Assessing Their Impact on Incubator Firm Performance.â Research Policy 34(3):302-320. Rowen, Henry S., and A. Maria Toyoda. 2002. âFrom Kiretsu to Start-ups: Japanâs Push for High Tech Entrepreneurship.â Asia-Pacific Research Center Working Paper. Stanford, CA. Ruegg, Rosalie, and Irwin Feller. 2003. A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment: Models, Methods, and Findings from ATPâs First Decade. NIST GCR 03-857. Gaithersburg, MD: Na- tional Institute of Standards and Technology. Ruttan, Vernon. 2002. Technology, Growth and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
APPENDIX C 191 Ruttan, Vernon W. 2006. Is War Necessary for Economic Growth, Military Procurement and TechÂ nology Development. New York: Oxford University Press. Ruttan, Vernon W. 2006. âWill Government Programs Spur the Next Breakthrough?â Issues in ÂScience and Technology Winter. Rutten, Roel, and Frans Boekema. 2005. âInnovation, Policy and Economic Growth: Theory and Cases.â European Planning Studies 13(8). Rycroft, Robert W., and Don E. Kash. 1999. âInnovation Policy for Complex Technologies.â Issues in Science and Technology Fall. Sakakibara, M., and L. Branstetter. 2001. âDo Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent law Reforms.â Rand Journal of Economics 32:77-100. Sakakibara, M., and L. Branstetter. 2002. Measuring the Impact of ATP-Funded Research Consortia on Research Productivity of Participating Firms, A Framework Using Both U.S. and Japanese Data. NIST GCR 02-830. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Sakamoto, Kozo, and Masayuki Kondo. 2004. âThe Analysis of University-Industry Research Col- laborations by Time Series and Corporate Characteristics.â (In Japanese.) Development Engi- neering 10:11-26. Saito, Ken. 1987. Research on a New Concern: RIKEN Industrial Group. (In Japanese.) Jichosha. Sapolsky, Harvey M. 1990. Science and the NavyâThe History of the Office of Naval Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Schaffer, Teresita. 2002. âBuilding a New Partnership with India.â Washington Quarterly 25(2):31â44. Scherer, F. M. 2001. âU.S. Government Programs to Advance Technology.â Revue dâEconomie Â ndustrielle 0(94):69-88. I Science Committee of the Council for Science and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Cul- ture, Sports, Science and Technology. 2005. Sciences Policy to Support Diversity in Research. ( Â Kenkyuu-no-tayousei wo-sasaeru Gakujutu-seisaku). October 13. Scotchmer, Suzanne. 1996. âProtecting Early Innovators: Should Second-Generation Products Be Patentable?â Rand Journal of Economics 27:322-331. Scotchmer, Suzanne. 2004. Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Semiconductor Fabtech. 2005. âIBM & AMD Aim Alliance at the 22nm Frontier.â November 1. Semiconductor Fabtech. 2006. âChinese Government Builds 300mm Fab.â June 28. Semiconductor Fabtech. 2006. âIBM and Partners Ready 45nm Low Power Process.â August 30. Semiconductor Fabtech. 2006. âIBM, Sony, Toshiba Take Technology Alliance Beyond 32nm.â December 1. Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. 2006. Form 20-F for Period Ending December 31, 2006. Semiconductor Manufacturing International. 2006. âQ1 2006 Earnings Conference Call.â April 27. Shane, S. 2004. Academic Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Shang, Yong. 2006. âInnovation: New National Strategy of China.â Presentation at Industrial Innova- tion in China. Levin Institute Conference. July 24-26. Shanghai Municipal Government. 2004. Notice of the Shanghai Municipal Government Regarding Dis- tributing the Outline of Shanghaiâs Intellectual Property Strategy (2004-2010). September 14. Shapiro, Carl. 2001. âNavigating the Patent Thicket: Cross License, Patent Pools and Standard- S Â etting.â In Adam Jaffe, Joshua Lerner, and Scott Stern, eds. Innovation Policy and the Econ- omy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Shearmur, R., and D. Doloreux. 2000. âScience Parks: Actors or Reactors? Canadian Science Parks in their Urban Context.â Environment and Planning 32(6):1065-1082. Sheehan, Jerry, and Andrew Wyckoff. 2003. âTargeting R&D: Economic and Policy Implications of Increasing R&D Spending.â DSTI/DOC(2003)8. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
192 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Shenzhen Daily. 2005. âNation May Introduce Antimonopoly Law.â December 30. Sherwin, Martin, and Kai Bird. 2005. American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Openheimer. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Shin, Roy W. 1997. âInteractions of Science and Technology Policies in Creating a Competitive Industry: Koreaâs Electronics Industry.â Global Economic Review 26(4):3-19. Shipp, Stephanie, Andrew Wang, Steve Campbell, Lorel Wisniewski, Kerry Levin, Jennifer OâBrien, and Westat. 2005. âMeasuring Behavior Additionality in ATP Joint Venture Projects: Findings from the U.S. Advanced Technology Program.â Paper presented at OECD Workshop on Behav- ioral Additionality, January 31-February 1, 2005. Vienna, Austria. Siegel, D. S., P. Westhead, and M. Wright. 2003. âAssessing the Impact of Science Parks on Research Productivity: Exploratory Firm-Level Evidence from the United Kingdom.â International Jour- nal of Industrial Organization 21(9):1357-1369. Siegel, Donald, David Waldman, and Albert Link. 2004. âToward a Model of the Effective Trans- fer of Scientific Knowledge from Academicians to Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence from the Commercialization of University Technologies.â Journal of Engineering and Technology Â anagement 21(1-2):115-142. M Singh, Manmohan. 2006. Remarks by the Chairman of the Planning Commission on the release of the 11th Plan Approach Paper. Accessed at <http://pmindia.nic.in/speech/content.asp?id=431> October 18. Skolnikoff, Eugene B. 1993. âKnowledge Without Borders? Internationalization of the Research Universities.â Daedalus 122(4). Small and Medium Enterprise Agency in Japan. 2002. âWhite Paper on Small and Medium Enter- prises in Japan.â Tokyo, Japan: Japan Small Business Research Institute. Small and Medium Enterprise Agency in Japan. 2003. âWhite Paper on Small and Medium Enter- prises in Japan.â Tokyo, Japan: Japan Small Business Research Institute. Smits, Ruud, and Stefan Kuhlmann. 2004. âThe Rise of Systemic Instruments in Innovation Policy.â International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1(1/2). Soete, Luc G., and Bastiann J. ter Weel. 1999. âInnovation, Knowledge Creation and Technology Policy: The Case of the Netherlands.â De Economist 147(3). September. Sofouli, E., and N. S. Vonortas. 2007. âS&T Parks and Business Incubators in Middle-Sized Coun- tries: The Case of Greece.â Journal of Technology Transfer 32(5):525-544. Solomon Associates. 1993. The Advanced Technology Program: An Assessment of Short-Term Im- pacts: First Competition Participants. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Solow, Robert. 2000. Growth Theory: An Exposition. New York: Oxford University Press. 2nd edition. Solow, Robert. 2000.âToward a Macroeconomics of the Medium Run.â Journal of Economic Per- spectives Winter. Spence, Michael. 1974. Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Spencer, William, and T. E. Seidel. 2004. âInternational Technology Roadmaps: The U.S. Semicon- ductor Experience.â In National Research Council. Productivity and Cyclicality in Semiconduc- tors: Trends, Implications, and Questions. Dale W. Jorgenson and Charles W. Wessner, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Spencer, W. J., L. Wilson, and R. Doering. 2004. âThe Semiconductor Technology Roadmap.â Future Fab International 18. Stanford University. 1999. Inventions, Patents and Licensing: Research Policy Handbook. Document 5.1. July 15. State Council of the Peoplesâ Republic of China. 2006. Outline of the National Medium- and Long- term Program on Scientific and Technological Development (2006-2020). February 9.
APPENDIX C 193 Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. 2005. Report on the Survey of Research and Development 2004. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Stephan, P. 2001. âEducational Implication of University-Industry Technology Transfer.â Journal of Technology Transfer 26:199-205. Sternberg, R. 1990. âThe Impact of Innovation Centres on Small Technology-based Firms: The Ex- ample of the Federal Republic of Germany.â Small Business Economics 2(2):105-118. Stiglitz, Joseph. 2005. âThe Ethical Economist.â Foreign Affairs. Council on Foreign Affairs. N Â ovember/December. Accessed at <http:www.foreignaffairs.org>. Stokes, Donald E. 1997. Pasteurâs Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washing- ton, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Strout, E. 2005. âGift of a Book Was a Key to Intel Founderâs Big Donation to City College of New York.â Chronicle of Higher Education. December 2. P. A27. Su, Yun-Shan, and Ling-Chun Hung. 2008. âSpontaneous vs. Policy-driven: The Origin and Evolution of the Biotechnology Cluster.â Technological Forecast and Social Change. Swann, G. M. P. 1998. âTowards a Model of Clustering in High-Technology Industries.â In G. M. P. Swann, M. Prevezer, and D. Stout, eds. The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Talele, Chitram J. 2003. âScience and Technology Policy in Germany, India and Pakistan.â Indian Journal of Economics and Business 2(1):87-100. Tanaka, Nobua. 2005. Presentation at the International Forum on Technology Foresight and National Innovation Strategies. Seoul, Republic of Korea. November 4. Tansley, A. G. 1939. âBritish Ecology During the Past Quarter Century: The Plant Community and the Ecosystem.â Journal of Ecology 27(2):513-530. Tassey, G. 1997. The Economics of R&D Policy. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Tassey, G. 2004. âPolicy Issues for R&D Investment in a Knowledge-based Economy.â Journal of Technology Transfer 29:153-185. Tassey, G. 2007. The Innovation Imperative. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Teubal, Morris. 2002. âWhat Is the Systems Perspective to Innovation and Technology Policy and How Can We Apply It to Developing and Newly Industrialized Economies?â Journal of Evo- lutionary Economics 12(1-2). Thelin, J. 2004. A History of American Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Thomas, J. R., and W. H. Schacht. 2008. âPatent Reform in the 110th Congress: Innovation Issues.â Report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Order Code RL33996. Thursby, J., and M. Thursby. 2002. âWho is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing.â Management Science 48:90-104. Thursby, J., and M. Thursby. 2004. âIndustry Perspectives on Licensing University Technologies: Sources and Problems.â AUTM Journal P. 2000. TMCNET. 2006. âChip Giant Quickens Steps of Expansion.â June 28. U.S.âChina Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT). 2005. Outcomes on Major U.S. Trade Concerns. Washington, DC: The Office of the United States Trade Representative. U.S. Congress. 1988. Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-418, codified in 15 U.S.C. 278n.) and later amended by the American Technology Preeminence Act of 1991 (P.L. 102-245, codified in 15 U.S.C. 3701). U.S. Congress. 2005. House Science Committee Hearing on the Future of Computer Science Research in the U.S. May 12. Testimony by Wm. A. Wulf, Pres., National Academy of Engineering, Prof. Thomas F. Leighton, Chief Scientist Akamai Tech. Inc., Joint Statement of the Computing Research Community, and Letters in Response to Committee Questions from Wm. Wulf and T. Leighton. July 2005.
194 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS U.S. Department of Commerce. 2008. Innovation Measurement: Tracking the State of Innovation in the Â merican Economy, Report to the Secretary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. January. A Available at <http://www.innovationmetrics.gov/Innovation%20Measurement%2001-08.pdf>. U.S. Department of Energy. 2006. Press Release. âDepartment Requests $4.1 Billion Investment as Part of the American Competitiveness Initiative: Funding to Support Basic Scientific Research.â February 2. U.S. General Accounting Office. 2002. Export Controls: Rapid Advances in Chinaâs Semiconductor Industry Underscore Need for Fundamental U.S. Policy Review. GAO-020620. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office. April. U.S. Small Business Administration. 2004. âSmall Business by the Numbers,â Office of Advocacy. Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business Administration. June. Vaidyanathan, G. 2008. âTechnology Parks in a Developing Country: The Case of India.â Journal of Technology Transfer 33(3):285-299. Van Atta, Richard. 2004. âEnergy and Climate Change Research and the DARPA Model.â Presenta- tion to the Washington Roundtable on Science and Public Policy. November 3. Van Atta, Richard. 2008. âFifty Years of Innovation and Discovery.â In DARPA: 50 Years of Bridging the Gap. Arlington, VA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. April. Van Atta, Richard, et al. 1991. DARPA Technical Accomplishments. Volumes I-V. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis. Van Atta, Richard, et al. 1991. DARPA Technological Accomplishments: An Historical Review of Selected DARPA Projects. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis. Van Atta, Richard, and Michael Lippitz. 2003. Transformation and Transition: DARPAâs Role in Fos- tering an Emerging Revolution in Military Affairs. Volume 1: Overall Assessment. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis. Van Looy, Bart, Marina Ranga, Julie Callaert, Koenraad Debackere, and Edwin Zimmermann. 2004. âCombining Entrepreneurial and Scientific Performance in Academia: Towards a Compounded and Reciprocal Matthew-effect?â Research Policy 33(3):425-441. Van Looy, Bart, K. Debackere, and T. Magerman. 2005. Assessing Academic Patent Activity: The Case of Flanders. Leuven, Belgium: SOOS. Vedovello, C. 1997. âScience Parks and University-Industry Interaction: Geographical Proximity between the Agents as a Driving Force.â Technovation 17(9):491-502. Vervliet, Greta. 2006. Science, Technology, and Innovation. Brussels, Belgium: Ministry of Flanders, Science and Innovation Administration. Vest, C. 2005. âIndustry, Philanthropy and Universities-The Roles and Influences of the Private Sector in Higher Education.â 2005 Clark Kerr Lecture. University of California at Berkeley. September 13. Veugelers, Reinhilde, Jan Larosse, Michele Cincera, Donald Carchon, and Roger Kalenga-Mpala. 2004. âR&D Activities of the Business Sector in Flanders: Results of the R&D Surveys in the Context of the 3% Target.â Brussels, Belgium: IWT-Studies (46). Wade, Robert. 1985. âThe Market for Public Office: Why the Indian State Is Not Better at Develop- ment.â World Development 13:467-497. Wadhwa, Vivek, and Gary Gereffi. 2005. âFraming the Engineering Outsourcing Debate.â Durham, NC: Duke University. Walcott, Susan M. 2003. Chinese Science and Technology Industrial Parks. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing. Waldrop, M. Mitchell. 1992. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster. Waldrop, M. Mitchell. 2001. The Dream Machine. New York: Viking Press. Walsh, J., A. Arora, and W. Cohen. 2003. âResearch Tool Patent and Licensing and Biomedical In- novation.â In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Wash- ington, DC: The National Academies Press.
APPENDIX C 195 Walsh, J. P., and W. M. Cohen. 2004. âDoes the Golden Goose Travel? A Comparative Analysis of the Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D in the U.S. and Japan.â Mimeo. Wang, Changyong. 2005. âIPR Sails Against Current Stream.â Caijing Magazine, October 17. Avail- able online at <http://caijing.hexun.com>. Wang, Liwei. 1993. âThe Chinese Traditions Inimical to the Patent Law.â Northwestern Journal of International Law and Commerce Fall. Warsh, David. 2006. Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations. New York: W. W. Norton. The Washington Post. 2006. âChinese to Develop Sciences, Technology.â February 10. P. A16. Wen, Jiang, and Shinichi Kobayashi. 2001. âExploring Collaborative R&D Network: Some New Evidence in Japan.â Research Policy 30:1309-1319. Wessner, Charles W. 2005. âEntrepreneurship and the Innovation Ecosystem.â In David B. Audretsch, Heike Grimm, and Charles W. Wessner, eds. Local Heroes in the Global Village: Globalization and the New Entrepreneurship Policies. New York: Springer. Westhead, P. 1995. âNew Owner-Managed Businesses in Rural and Urban Areas in Great Britian: A Matched Pairs Comparison.â Regional Studies 29(4):367-380. Westhead, P. 1997. âR&D âInputsâ and âOutputsâ of Technology-based firms Located On and Off Science Parks.â R&D Management 27(1):45-61. Westhead, P., and S. Batstone. 1998. âIndependent Technology-based Firms: The Perceived Benefits of a Science Park Location.â Urban Studies 35(12):2197-2219. Westhead, P., and M. Cowling. 1995. âEmployment Change in Independent Owner-Managed High- Technology Firms in Great Britain.â Small Business Economics 7(2):111-140. Westhead, P., and D. Storey. 1994. An Assessment of Firms Located On and Off Science Parks in the United Kingdom. London, UK: HMSO. Westhead, P., and D. Storey. 1997. âFinancial Constraints on the Growth of High-Technology Small Firms in the U.K.â Applied Financial Economics 7(2):197-201. Westhead, P., D. J. Storey, and M. Cowling. 1995. âAn Exploratory Analysis of the Factors Associated with the Survival of Independent High-Technology Firms in Great Britain.â In F. Chittenden, M. Robertson, and I. Marshall, eds. Small Firms: Partnerships for Growth. London, UK: Paul Chapman. White House. 2006. âFact Sheet: United States and India: Strategic Partnership.â Press Release. March 2. Wiener, Norbert. 1948. Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. World Bank. 2004. Innovation Systems: World Bank Support of Science and Technology Development. Vinod Kumar Goel, ed. Washington, DC: World Bank. World Bank. 2006. The Environment for Innovation in India. South Asia Private Sector Development and Finance Unit. Washington, DC: World Bank. World Bank. 2006. World Development Indicators. Accessed at <http://devdata.worldbank.org/ wdi2006/contents/cover.htm>. World Bank International Finance Corporation. 2006. Doing Business in 2006: Creating Jobs. Wash- ington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. World Trade Organization Working Party on the Accession of China. 2001. Report of the Working Party on the Accession of China. WT/MN(01)/3. November 10. Wu, Ching. 2006. China to Build 30 New Science and Technology Parks. SciDev.net. April 19. Yan, Dai. 2004. âAnti-Monopoly Legislation on the Way.â China Daily June 18. Yang, Lei, ed. 2006. âChinese WAPI Delegation Quits Prague Meeting.â Xinhua. June 8. Available at <http://news.xinhuanet.com>. Yasuda, T. 2005. âSeisakukinyuu no riyouâ (The Utilization of Public Finance). In Nippon no shinki kaigyou kigyou (Startup Enterprises in Japan). K. Kustuna and T. Yasuda, ed. Hakutousha. Yoshida, Fujio. 1967. âPreparation of Legal System for Capital Liberalization (Part 3).â Panel Discus- sion in Zaikei Shoho. July 17.
196 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS Yoshida, Junko. 2006. âGrenoble Lure: Un-French R&D.â EE Times June 12. Young, John. 2007. Info Memo for Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates. DoD Science and TechÂ nology Program. August 24. Yukio, Sato. 2001. âThe Structure and Perspective of Science and Technology Policy in Japan.â In Phillipe Laredo and Phillipe Mustar, eds. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: An International Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Zachary, G. Pascal. 1999. Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Zeigler, Nicholas J. 1997. Governing Ideas: Strategies for Innovation in France and Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Zemin, Jiang, General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee. 1999. Keynote Speech at the National Technological Innovation Conference, August 23. Ziedonis, R. H., and B. H. Hall. 2001. âThe Effects of Strengthening Patent Rights on Firms Engaged in Cumulative Innovation: Insights from the Semiconductor Industry.â In Gary Libecap, ed., Entrepreneurial Inputs and Outcomes: New Studies of Entrepreneurship in the United States. Vol. 13 of Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth. Am- sterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science. Zue, Victor. 2008. âIntroduction to CSAIL.â MIT. April 15.