National Academies Press: OpenBook

Cardiovascular Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings (2010)

Chapter: 16 Future Directions for Improving the Listings

« Previous: 15 Comorbidities
Suggested Citation:"16 Future Directions for Improving the Listings." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Cardiovascular Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12940.
×

16
Future Directions for Improving the Listings

In the course of its work, the committee encountered a number of knowledge gaps in evaluating the effectiveness of the cardiovascular listings. The gaps would be reduced, and the listings improved, by research in four areas, discussed in the following sections.

POLICY ISSUES

If health insurance reform increases access to health services, and if increased access helps ensure that tests and other procedures Social Security cannot provide because of high cost or risk, such as catheterization, are regularly performed, the cardiovascular listings could be revised to require such tests and other procedures to meet the Listings. Also, increased access may reduce the rate of decline in an individual’s health and the resultant inability to work caused by some impairments to the point that a listing is no longer needed. The Social Security Administration (SSA) should support research on the disability-related effects of health insurance reform, which are currently uncertain, to improve program planning and future updates of the Listings—not just the cardiovascular listings.

PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES

In evaluating the impact of the current Listings and alternatives for revising them, the committee had many questions that will be brought up the next time they are revised. Many of these questions could be addressed

Suggested Citation:"16 Future Directions for Improving the Listings." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Cardiovascular Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12940.
×

with data that SSA already produces routinely or could obtain from a sample of case files.

One important lack of information the committee faced consistently was the dearth of data on the relationship between severity of anatomical impairment or other markers in the medical record with the likelihood that a claimant with those characteristics are allowed, first at Step 3, then at Step 5. SSA itself has programmatic data that could be used to address this question. For example, a sample of Step 5 allowances for a specific impairment could be analyzed retrospectively to see if there is a common feature in the medical record. If so, that feature could be made a listing-level criterion and thus allow these claimants more quickly. Currently, for example, an ejection fraction of 30 percent or less with certain symptoms or signs or very serious limitations on activities of daily living meets the heart failure listing, and an ankle-brachial index (ABI) less than 0.50 meets the peripheral artery disease (PAD) listing. An analysis of claims process data could find that functionally limited claimants with heart failure with an ejection fraction of 35 percent are nearly always allowed at Step 5, or that claimants with PAD with an ABI of 0.55 are invariably allowed at Step 5, and the listings could be revised accordingly. Similar analyses could be done of allowances that equal a listing; for example, if the rate of allowances equaling the listing for a particular impairment was increasing unexpectedly, the research might find that the medical community has adopted a new test to diagnose or determine the severity of the condition, and that test could be added to the listing so claimants could more easily and reliably be allowed at Step 3.

Another critical area where research is needed is on the effects of comorbidities that claimants with a cardiovascular impairment often have. Again, SSA has data that can be analyzed to illuminate the impact of these effects. A research project along these lines was suggested in the conclusion of Chapter 15. The project would track the percentage of claims of heart failure with a diagnosis of major depression and various ejection fraction cutoff points, for example, 35 and 40 percent, that are allowed at Step 5. If the rate is very high for any of these cutoff points, that is, 95 percent or higher, SSA could create a listing criterion for major depression in combination with that specific ejection fraction value.

SSA could also pretest the impact of a proposed change in a listing by prospectively comparing a sample of claims while going through the regular process. The committee was pleased to learn that since the release of the 2007 Institute of Medicine report on improving the Social Security disability decision process (IOM, 2007), SSA has engaged a National Institutes of Health group in conducting such analyses of disability program data. Analyses of the use of the Listings are being done within SSA’s Office of Disability Programs.

Another area of interest would be to study the degree of variability among examiners, or interrater reliability, in applying the Listings, which

Suggested Citation:"16 Future Directions for Improving the Listings." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Cardiovascular Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12940.
×

would provide some insight into which listings need to be reconsidered and revised. For example, the same case or set of cases could be given to multiple adjudicators to review consistency in the decisions made.

CORRELATION OF IMPAIRMENTS AND FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS

SSA would benefit from research on the relationship among various degrees of anatomical impairment, which can be fairly objectively determined, and the functional limitations of individuals with those impairments. A body of research shows the average exercise limitations of individuals with a particular diagnosis, such as the limitations on the walking capacity of patients with PAD, defined as an ABI less than 0.90. However, little information is available on limitations by degree of severity, that is, an ABI less than 0.50 versus 0.40 versus 0.30, which would be more useful for validating and fine-tuning the criteria in the PAD listing.

In addition, little information is available on the relationship between functional assessment performed with a 10-minute treadmill or exercise bike test and the capacity to work an 8-hour workday. Well-validated and up-to-date information on the metabolic equivalents of task needed for various work-related activities is also needed. Current evidence is dated and limited to a small range of activities (Ainsworth et al., 2000).

TRUE PREVALENCE OF AND TRENDS IN IMPAIRMENTS THAT MEET THE SOCIAL SECURITY DEFINITION OF DISABILITY OR MEET THE LISTINGS

This information is needed for program planning and budget projections, but it would also be useful in validating the Listings. Currently, key information about the performance of the Listings is absent, such as sensitivity and specificity (or type 1 and type 2 errors), positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy, because the underlying rates of true disability are not known. SSA has begun and abandoned several efforts to determine the prevalence of disabilities that meet the statutory definition of disability and the validity of the Listings, probably because of the technical difficulties and cost. However, it seems that it ultimately would be cost effective to conduct this research, given the large dollar value of the benefits attached to disability determination decisions.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

SSA has a substantial in-house research program and supports some external research, but most of it is related to the Old Age and Survivors Insurance program and retirement behavior and trends rather than the Dis-

Suggested Citation:"16 Future Directions for Improving the Listings." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Cardiovascular Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12940.
×

ability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income programs and disability prevalence and trends. Recently, the agency has expanded its research efforts related to the Listings. To better assist the next round of revisions of the cardiovascular and other listings, SSA should sponsor, both in house and externally, a full and balanced program of research in the four areas listed above.

RECOMMENDATION 16-1. SSA should plan and sponsor a balanced program of research to improve the reliability, validity, and utility of the Listings in four areas: policy implications, programmatic issues, correlation of impairments and impairment severity with functional limitations related to work capacity, and the underlying prevalence of and trends in impairments in the population. This program would also enable SSA to enhance the other steps of the disability determination process.

REFERENCES

Ainsworth, B. E., W. L. Haskell, M. C. Whitt, M. L. Irwin, A. M. Swartz, S. J. Strath, W. L. O’Brien, D. R. Bassett Jr., K. H. Schmitz, P. O. Emplaincourt, D. R. Jacobs Jr., and A. S. Leon. 2000. Compendium of physical activities: An update of activity codes and MET intensities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 32(Suppl):S498–S516.

IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2007. Improving the Social Security disability decision process, edited by J. D. Stobo, M. McGeary, and D. K. Barnes. Committee on Improving the Disability Decision Process: SSA’s Listing of Impairments and Agency Access to Medical Expertise. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"16 Future Directions for Improving the Listings." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Cardiovascular Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12940.
×
Page 231
Suggested Citation:"16 Future Directions for Improving the Listings." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Cardiovascular Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12940.
×
Page 232
Suggested Citation:"16 Future Directions for Improving the Listings." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Cardiovascular Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12940.
×
Page 233
Suggested Citation:"16 Future Directions for Improving the Listings." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Cardiovascular Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12940.
×
Page 234
Next: Appendix A: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff »
Cardiovascular Disability: Updating the Social Security Listings Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $65.00 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Social Security Administration (SSA) uses a screening tool called the Listing of Impairments to identify claimants who are so severely impaired that they cannot work at all and thus immediately qualify for benefits. In this report, the IOM makes several recommendations for improving SSA's capacity to determine disability benefits more quickly and efficiently using the Listings.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!