National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Letter Report
Suggested Citation:"ATTACHMENT A REFERENCES." National Research Council. 2011. Letter Report Assessing the USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program's Science Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13094.
×

ATTACHMENT A
REFERENCES

Brakebill, J.W., S.W. Ator, and G.E. Schwarz. 2010. Sources of suspended-sediment flux in streams of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: A regional application of the SPAROW model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46: 757-776.

Brigham, M. E., D. A. Wentz, G. R. Aiken, and D. P. Krabbenhoft. 2009. Mercury Cycling in Stream Ecosystems. 1. Water Column Chemistry and Transport. Environmental Science & Technology 43 (8):2720-2725.

Chasar, L. C., B. C. Scudder, A. R. Stewart, A. H. Bell, and G. R. Aiken. 2009. Mercury cycling in stream ecosystems -3. Trophic dynamics and methylmercury Bioaccumulation. Environmental Science & Technology 43 (8):2733-2739.

Kolpin, D. W., E. T. Furlong, M. T. Meyer, E. M. Thurman, S. D. Zaugg, L. B. Barber, and H. T. Buxton. 2002. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000—A national reconnaissance. Environmental Science and Technology 36 (6): 1202-1211.

Gartner, J. W. 2004. Estimating suspended solids concentrations from backscatter intensity measured by acoustic Doppler current profiler in San Francisco Bay, California. Marine Geology 211: 169-187.

Gartner, J. 2002. Estimation of suspended solids concentrations based on acoustic backscatter intensity: theoretical background. Proceedings of the Turbidity and Other Sediment Surrogates Workshop, April 30 – May 2, 2002, Reno, NV.

Gartner, J. W., R. T. Cheng, P. F. Wang, and K. Richter. 2001. Laboratory and field evaluations of the LISST-100 instrument for suspended particle size determinations. Marine Geology 175: 199-219.

Lipp, E. K., N. Schmidt, M. E. Luther, and J. B. Rose. 2001. Determining the Effects of El Niño– Southern Oscillation Events on Coastal Water Quality Estuaries 24(4): 491–497.

National Research Council (NRC). 1990. A Review of the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Assessment Pilot Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and Boundaries. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 2002. Opportunities to Improve the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Assessment Program. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 2009. Towards a Sustainable and Secure Water Future: A Leadership Role for the USGS. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 2010. Letter Report Assessing the USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program’s Science Framework. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

Pasquale, M. M. D., M. A. Lutz, M. E. Brigham, D. P. Krabbenhoft, G. R. Aiken, W. H. Orem, and B. D. Hall. 2009. Mercury cycling in stream ecosystems. 2. Benthic methylmercury production and bed sediment-pore water partitioning. Environmental Science & Technology 43(8):2726-2732.

Schindler, D. 2010. Tar Sands Need Solid Science. Nature 468: 499-501.

Thorne, P. D., and D. M. Hanes. 2002. A review of acoustic measurement of small-scale sediment processes. Continental Shelf Research 22(4): 603-632.

U.S. EPA. 2009. National Water Quality Inventory: Report to Congress, 2004 Reporting Cycle.

Suggested Citation:"ATTACHMENT A REFERENCES." National Research Council. 2011. Letter Report Assessing the USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program's Science Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13094.
×

U.S. Geological Survey. 2007. Facing Tomorrow’s Challenges—U.S. Geological Survey Science in the Decade 2007-2017. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1309, 69 p. Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2007/1309/.

U.S. Geological Survey. 2010. The National Water-Quality Assessment Program—Science to Policy Management. June 30th, 2010. available at: http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/xrel.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"ATTACHMENT A REFERENCES." National Research Council. 2011. Letter Report Assessing the USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program's Science Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13094.
×
Page 9
Suggested Citation:"ATTACHMENT A REFERENCES." National Research Council. 2011. Letter Report Assessing the USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program's Science Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13094.
×
Page 10
Next: ATTACHMENT B COMMITTEE ON PREPARING FOR THE THIRD DECADE (CYCLE 3) OF THE NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM »
Letter Report Assessing the USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program's Science Plan Get This Book
×
 Letter Report Assessing the USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program's Science Plan
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In 2009, the U.S. Geological Survey requested that the National Research Council (NRC) review and provide guidance on the direction and priorities of the National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. This review would include perspective on past accomplishments and the current and future design and scope of the program as it moves into its third decade of water quality assessment (Cycle 3). The NRC has continued that advisory role authoring a letter report on the initial Cycle 3 planning document, the Science Framework (Letter Report Assessing the USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program's Science Framework). Based on advice contained in that letter report, input from stakeholders, and additional reflection from the NAWQA Cycle 3 Planning Team, the Science Framework evolved into the Cycle 3 Science Plan. The Science Plan is the high level planning document that will guide the NAWQA program through the next 10 years of water quality monitoring.

The NAWQA program has matured over its two decades and is at a point where it should not simply continue its previous work but should do the dynamic water quality monitoring that is proposed for Cycle 3. This is a compelling plan for the program that the committee strongly supports; in Cycle 3 NAWQA will advance the understanding of the dynamics of water quality change and forecast likely future conditions. The committee supports the Cycle 3 priority of dynamic water quality monitoring. The Science Plan is technically sound and the NAWQA program has the scientific capability to achieve the Science Plan objectives. Yet the concept of dynamic water quality monitoring needs further development in the Science Plan. For example, a strong justification for why dynamic water quality monitoring is important, why now and why the USGS via NAWQA can achieve this remains unwritten. Further defining program outputs and potential outcomes will also help frame the significance of dynamic water quality monitoring. Moreover, thinking through a dynamic, question-driven sampling strategy to execute this concept will serve the program well.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!