National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 Strategies for Meeting the Goals
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

References

Abberton, M. T. A. H. Marshall, M. W. Humphreys, J. H. Macduff, R. P. Collins, and C. L. Marley. 2008. Genetic improvement of forage species to reduce the environmental impact of temperate livestock grazing systems. Advances in Agronomy 98:311-355.

Agricultural Nutrient Policy Council. 2010. Analysis Finds Numbers Behind EPA’s Nutrient Diet for the Chesapeake Bay Could Be a Recipe for Disaster. December 29, 2010 Press Release. Available at http://www.nutrientpolicy.org/ANPC_News.html. Accessed March 5, 2011.

Allan, C., and A. Curtis. 2005. Nipped in the bud: Why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environmental Management 36(3):414-425.

American Farm Bureau. 2010. AFBF Lawsuit Challenges EPA’s Chesapeake Pollution Rule. Available at http://www.fb.org/index.php?fuseaction=newsroom.newsfocus&year=2011&file=nr0110h.html. Accessed March 5, 2011.

Anderson, D. M., P. M. Gilbert, and J. M. åBurkholder. 2002. Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication—Nutrient sources, composition and consequences. Estuaries 25:704-726. Asano, T., F. L. Burton, H. Leverenz, R. Tsuchihashi, and G. Tchobanoglous. 2007. Water Reuse: Issues, Technologies, and Applications. New York: McGraw Hill.

Bacon, S. C., L. E. Lanyon, and R. M. Schlauder, Jr. 1990. Plant nutrient flow in the managed pathways of an intensive dairy farm. Agronomy Journal 82:755-761.

Bailey, N., W. Magley, J. Mandrup-Poulsen, K. O’Donnell, and R. Peets. 2009. TMDL Report; Nutrient TMDL for the Caloosahatchee Estuary (WBIDs 3240A, 3240B, and 3240C). Tallahasse, FL: Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

Baker, D. B., and R. P. Richards. 2009. What changes have we seen in P coming out of tributaries. In Great Lakes Phosphorus Forum. Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Available at http://www.sera17.ext.vt.edu/Meetings/greatlakespforum/Session%202_2%20Baker%20GLPhos.Forum.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2010.

Balkcom, K. S., A. M. Blackmer, D. J. Hansen, T. F. Morris, and A. P. Mallarino. 2003. Testing soils and cornstalks to evaluate nitrogen management in the watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Quality 32:1015-1024.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

Barth, C. 1995. Nutrients: from the lawn to the stream. Watershed Protection Techniques 2(1):239-246.

Batie, Sandra S. 2009. Green Payments and the U.S. Farm Bill: Information and Policy Challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(7):380-388.

Baxter, C. A., B. C. Joern, D. Ragland, J. S. Sands, and O. Adeola. 2003. Phytase, high-available phosphorus corn, and storage effects on phosphorus levels in pig excreta. Journal of Environmental Quality 32:1481-1489.

Becker, J. G., and Graves, R. E. 2004. Ammonia Emissions and Animal Agriculture. CSREES Mid-Atlantic Regional Water Quality Program. Available at http://agenvpolicy.aers.psu.edu/Documents/BeckerGravesAmmonia101.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2011.

Birch, M. B. L., B. M. Gramig, W. R. Moomaw, O. C. Doering, and C. J. Reeling. 2011. Why metrics matter: Evaluating policy choices for reactive nitrogen in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Science and Technology 45(1):168-174.

Blankenship, K. 2006. Impact from watershed’s population growth may overtake gains in Bay cleanup. Chesapeake Bay Journal 16(8). Available at http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=2923. Accessed December 22, 2010.

Blankenship, K. 2008. Farm bill includes huge influx of new conservation funds for Bay watershed. Chesapeake Bay Journal (June). Available at http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=3348. Accessed January 23, 2011.

Blankenship, K. 2010. Public, in comments, weighs pros and cons of TMDL for Bay. Chesapeake Bay Journal (December). Available at http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=3977. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Blankenship, K. 2011. Study funded by ag group raises questions about Bay model. Chesapeake Bay Journal (April). Available at http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=4052. Accessed April 17, 2011.

Boesch, D. F. 2006. Scientific requirements for ecosystem-based management in the restoration of Chesapeake Bay and Coastal Louisiana. Ecological Engineering 26:6-26.

Boesch, D. R., and J. Greer, eds. 2003. Chesapeake Futures, Choices for the 21st Century. Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee Publication No. 03–001. Edgewater, MD: Chesapeake Research Consortium. Available at http://www.chesapeake.org/stac/futreport.html. Accessed December 22, 2010.

Boesch, D. F., R. B. Brinsfield, and R. E. Magnien. 2001. Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:303-320.

Boesch, D. F., V. J. Coles, D. G. Kimmel, and W. D. Miller. 2007. Coastal dead zones and global climate change: Ramifications of climate change for Chesapeake Bay hypoxia. In Regional Impacts of Climate Change: Four Case Studies in the United States. Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.

Boynton, W. R., J. H. Barber, R. Summers, and W. M. Kemp. 1995. Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries. Estuaries 18:285-314.

Boynton, W. R., J. D. Hagy, J. C. Cornwell, W. M. Kemp, S. M. Greene, M. S. Owens, J. E. Baker, and R. K. Larsen. 2008. Nutrient budgets and management actions in the Patuxent River estuary, Maryland. Estuaries and Coasts 31:623-651.

Bricker, S., B. Longstaff, W. Dennison, A. Jones, K. Boicourt, C. Wicks, and J. Woerner. 2007. Effects of Nutrient Enrichment in the Nation’s Estuaries—A Decade of Change: NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No. 26. Silver Spring, MD: National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science.

Brush, G. S. 2009. Historic land use, nitrogen, and coastal eutrophication: A paleoecological perspective. Estuaries and Coasts 32:18-28.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

Buda, A., P. Kleinman, R. Bryant, and A. Allen. 2010. Impact of legacy phosphorus sources on diffuse pollution from agriculture: lessons from the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Proceedings of the 14th International Water Association Conference on Diffuse Pollution Specialist Group: Diffuse Pollution and Eutrophication.

Carpenter, S. R., N. F. Caraco, D. L. Correll, R. W. Howarth, A. N. Sharpley, and V. H. Smith. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications 8:559-568.

Cassman K. G., A. D. Dobermann, and D. Walters. 2002. Agroecosystems, nitrogen management and economics. Ambio 31:132-140.

CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program). 1987. 1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement. Annapolis, MD: CBP.

CBP. 1992. Chesapeake Bay Agreement: 1992 Amendments. Annapolis, MD: CBP.

CBP. 2000. Chesapeake 2000. Annapolis, MD: CBP.

CBP. 2002. Memorandum of Understanding Among the State of Delaware, the District of Columbia, the State of Maryland, the State of New York, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth of Virginia, the State of West Virginia, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency Regarding Cooperative Efforts for the Protection of the Chesapeake Bay and Its Rivers. Available at http://www.chesapeakebay.net/content/publications/cbp_12085.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2011.

CBP. 2006. Best Management Practices for Sediment Control and Water Clarity Enhancement. Annapolis, MD: CBP.

CBP. 2007a. Chesapeake Bay 2006 Health and Restoration Assessment. Annapolis, MD: CBP. CBP. 2007b. Protecting the Forests of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Annapolis, MD: CBP. Available at http://www.chesapeakebay.net/content/publications/cbp_27761.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2011.

CBP. 2008. Strengthening the Management, Coordination, and Accountability of the Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, MD: CBP.

CBP. 2009a. Bay Barometer: A Health and Restoration Assessment of the Chesapeake Bay and Watershed in 2008. Annapolis, MD: CBP.

CBP. 2009b. 2011 Milestones for Reducing Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Annapolis, MD: CBP. Available at http://archive.chesapeakebay.net/pressrelease/EC_2009_allmilestones.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2011.

CBP. 2010a. Bay Barometer: A Health and Restoration Assessment of the Chesapeake Bay and Watershed in 2009. Annapolis, MD. Available at http://www.chesapeakebay.net/indicatorshome.aspx?menuitem=14871. Accessed February 10, 2011.

CBP. 2010b. Chesapeake Bay Program Indicator Framework. Annapolis, MD: CBP.

CBP WQGIT (Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team). 2010. Protocol for the Development, Review, and Approval of Loading and Effectiveness Estimates for Nutrient and Sediment Controls in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model. Available at http://archive.chesapeakebay.net/pubs/Nutrient-Sediment_Control_Review_Protocol.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2011.

Center for Watershed Protection and Horsley Witten Group. 2010. Impervious cover TMDL field survey and analysis report. Report prepared for the Center for Land Use Education and Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut. Cerco, C. F. 1995. Response of Chesapeake Bay to nutrient load reductions. Journal of Environmental Engineering 121(8):549-557.

Chesapeake Bay Foundation. 2010. The economic argument for cleaning up the Bay and its rivers. Available at http://www.cbf.org/Document.Doc?id=591. Accessed January 25, 2011.

City of Portland, Environmental Services. 2006. Stormwater Management Facilities Site Assessment Guide. Portland, OR: Portland Environmental Services.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

Claggett, P. 2007. Human population growth and land-use change. Chapter 2 in Synthesis of U.S. Geological Survey Science for the Chesapeake Bay Ecosystem and Implications for Environmental Management, S. W. Phillips, ed., Circular 1316. Washington, DC: USGS. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1316/index.html. Accessed December 22, 2010.

Cloern, J. E. 2001. Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 210:223-253.

Cooper, S. R., and G. S. Brush. 1991. Long term history of Chesapeake Bay anoxia. Science 254:992-996.

Copeland, C. 2010. Animal Waste and Water Quality: EPA Regulation of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Available at http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RL31851.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2011.

Couch, C., and P. Hamilton. 2002. Effects of Urbanization on Stream Ecosystems: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 042–02. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs04202/. Accessed December 22, 2010.

Courtant, C. C., and D. L. Benson. 1990. Summer habitat suitability for striped bass in Chesapeake Bay: Reflections on a population decline. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 199:757-778.

Cox, C. 2010. Precision Conservation in Agriculture: Science, Practice, and Policy. Available at http://www.aep.iastate.edu/water/2010/cox.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Cox, F. R., E. J. Kamprath, and R. E. McCollum. 1981. A descriptive model of soil test nutrient levels following fertilization. Soil Science Society of America Journal 45:529-532.

Crook, J. 2005. Irrigation of Parks, Playgrounds, and Schoolyards with Reclaimed Water: Extent and Safety. Alexandria, VA: WateReuse Foundation.

CT DEP (Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection). 2007. A total maximum daily load analysis for Eagleville Brook, Mansfield, CT. Hartford, CT: CT DEP.

Dale, V. H., C. Kling, J. L. Meyer, J. Sanders, H. Stallworth, T. Armitage, D. Wangsness, T. S. Bianchi, A. Blumberg, W. Boynton, D. J. Conley, W. Crumpton, M. B. David, D. Gilbert, R. W. Howarth, R. Lowrance, K. Mankin, J. Opaluch, H. Paerl, K. Reckhow, A. N. Sharpley, T. W. Simpson, C. Snyder, and D. Wright. 2010. Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. New York, NY: Springer.

DDOE (District of Columbia Department of the Environment). 2010. Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan. Available at http://ddoe.dc.gov/ddoe/frames.asp?doc=/ddoe/lib/ddoe/tmdl/Final_District_of_Coluimbia_WIP_Bay_TMDL.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2011.

De Clercq, P., and F. Sinabell. 2001. EU legislation and multinational environmental legislation with respect to nutrient management. In: Nutrient Management Legislation in European Countries, De Clercq, P., A. C. Gertsis, G. Hofman, S. C. Jarvis, J. J. Neeteson, and F. Sinabell, eds. Available at http://library.wur.nl/way/bestanden/clc/1759817.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2011.

DE DNREC (Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control). 2010. Delaware’s Phase I Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plan. Available at http://www.wr.dnrec.delaware.gov/Information/Pages/Chesapeake_WIP.aspx. Accessed March 3, 2011.

Dennis R. 1997. Using the regional acid deposition model to determine the nitrogen deposition alrshed of the Chesapeake Bay watershed. In: Atmospheric Deposition of Contaminants to the Great Lakes and Coastal Waters, J. E. Baker ed. Pensacola, FL: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Press.

Devereux, O. H. 2009. Preparing BMP data for reporting to the Chesapeake Bay Program using the NEIEN BMP Schema. Rockville, MD: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

Diaz, R. J., and R. Rosenberg. 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioral responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanographic Marine Biology Annual Review 33:245-303.

Diaz. R. J., and R. Rosenberg. 2008. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321:926-929.

Djojic, F., H. J. Montas, A. Shirmohammadi, L. Bergstrom, and B. Ulen. 2002. Decision support system for phosphorus management at watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:937-945.

DOD (U.S. Department of Defense). 2009. Stormwater Management at Federal Facilities &on Federal Lands in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. A Revised Report Fulfilling Section 202c of Executive Order 13508. Washington, DC: DOD.

DOI (U.S. Department of the Interior). 2009. Habitat and Research Activities to Protect and Restore Chesapeake Bay Living Resources and Water Quality. A Revised Report Fulfilling Section 202g of Executive Order 13508. Washington, DC: DOI.

DOI and DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 2009a. Responding to Climate Change in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. A Draft Report Fulfilling Section 202d of Executive Order 13508. Washington, DC: DOI and DOC.

DOI and DOC. 2009b. Landscape Conservation & Public Access in the Chesapeake Bay Region. A Revised Report Fulfilling Section 202e of Executive Order 13508. Washington, DC: DOI and DOC.

DOI and DOC. 2009c. Strengthening Science and Decision Support for Ecosystem Management in the Chesapeake Bay and its Watershed. A Revised Report Fulfilling Section 202f of Executive Order 13508. Washington, DC: DOI and DOC.

Duarte, C. M., D. J. Conley, J. Carstensen, and M. Sanchez-Camacho. 2009. Return to Neverland: Shifting baselines affect eutrophication restoration targets. Estuaries and Coasts 32:29-36.

Ebeling, A. M., L. G. Bundy, M. J. Powell, and T. W. Andraski. 2002. Dairy diet phosphorus effects in phosphorus losses in runoff from land-applied manure. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:284-291.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1983a. Chesapeake Bay: A Framework for Action. Philadelphia, PA: EPA.

EPA. 1983b. Chesapeake Bay: A Profile of Environmental Change. Philadelphia, PA: EPA.

EPA. 2002. Total Maximum Daily Loads for nutrients: San Diego Creek and Newport Bay, California. San Francisco, CA: EPA.

EPA. 2003. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen, Water Clarity and Chlorophyll a for the Chesapeake Bay and its Tidal Tributaries (Regional Criteria Guidance). EPA 903-R-03-002. Annapolis, MD: EPA.

EPA. 2006. Clarification Regarding “Phased” Total Maximum Daily Loads. EPA Guidance Memorandum dated August 2, 2006. Washington, DC: EPA.

EPA. 2007. Reducing Stormwater Costs Through Low Impact Development (LID) Strategies And Practices. EPA 841-F-07-006. Washington, DC: EPA.

EPA. 2008a. Strengthening the Management, Coordination, and Accountability of the Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, MD: EPA.

EPA. 2008b. Municipal Nutrient Removal Technologies Reference Document. Volume 1—Technical Report. EPA 832-R-o8-006. Washington, DC: EPA.

EPA. 2008c. Funding Stormwater Programs. EPA 833-F-07-012. Washington, DC: EPA.

EPA. 2009. The Next Generation of Tools and Actions to Restore Water Quality in the Chesapeake Bay. A Revised Report Fulfilling Section 202a of Executive Order 13508. Washington, DC: EPA.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

EPA. 2010a. Final Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load for Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sediment. Available at http://www.epa.gov/reg3wapd/tmdl/ChesapeakeBay/tmdlexec.html. Accessed February 6, 2011.

EPA. 2010b. Draft Chesapeake Bay Phase 5 Community Watershed Model: Section 1: Watershed Model Overview. Annapolis, MD: EPA. Available at ftp://ftp.chesapeakebay.net/modeling/P5Documentation/SECTION_1.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2011.

EPA. 2010c. Crediting Nutrient/Sediment Reductions from Agricultural Conservation Practices in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model: Frequently Asked Questions and Answers, December 1, 2010. Available at http://archive.chesapeakebay.net/pubs/Ag_Model_BMPs_Fact_Sheet.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2011.

EPA. 2010d. A Guide for EPA’s Evaluation of Phase I Watershed Implementation Plans. Available at http://archive.chesapeakebay.net/pubs/Guide_for_EPA_WIP_Evaluation_4-2-10.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2011.

EPA. 2010e. Guidance for Federal Land Management in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, EPA841-R-10-002. Washington, DC: EPA. Available at http://www.epa.gov/nps/chesbay502/pdf/chesbay_chap02.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2011.

EPA. 2010f. New York Balks, Other States Bend to EPA Pressures Over Bay WIPs, in Water Policy Report—11/22/2010. Washington, DC: EPA.

EPA. 2010g. Clean Watersheds Needs Survey 2008. Report to Congress. EPA-832-R-10-002. Washington, DC: EPA.

EPA. 2010i. What is a UAA? Available at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/waterquality/standards/uses/uaa/about_uaas.cfm Accessed March 5, 2011.

EPA, 2010j. Green Infrastructure Case Studies: Municipal Policies for Management Stormwater with Green Infrastructure. EPA-841-F-10.004. Washington, DC: EPA.

EPA. 2010k. Fact Sheet: Proposed Transport Rule Would Reduce Interstate Transport of Ozone and Fine Particle Pollution. Available at http://www.epa.gov/airquality/transport/pdfs/FactsheetTR7-6-10.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2011.

EPA OIG (EPA Office of Inspector General). 2007. Development Growth Outpacing Progress in Watershed Efforts to Restore the Chesapeake Bay. Report No. 2007-P-00031. Available at http://www.epa.gov/oig/reports/chesapeake.htm. Accessed December 22, 2010.

Ernst. H. R. 2003. Chesapeake Bay Blues: Science, Politics, and the Struggle to Save the Bay. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Ernst, H. 2006. More willpower, less wishful thinking needed for Bay cleanup. Chesapeake Bay Journal, November 2006. Available at http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=2725. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Ernst, H. R. 2009. Fight for the Bay: Why a Dark Green Environmental Awakening is Needed to Save the Chesapeake Bay. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Ertl, D. S., K. A. Young, and V. Raboy. 1998. Plant genetic approaches to phosphorus management in agricultural production. Journal of Environmental Quality 27:299-304.

ESA Policy News. 2010. Chesapeake Bay: NY Lawmakers Rebuke EPA Cleanup Plan. Ecological Society of America, October 18, 2010. Available at http://www.esa.org/pao/policyNews/pn2010/10182010.php. Accessed March 5, 2011.

Executive Order 13508: Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration. 2009. Available at http://executiveorder.chesapeakebay.net/BlogEngine.Web/file.axd?file=2009%2f8%2fChesapeake+Executive+Order.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2011.

FLC (Federal Leadership Committee for the Chesapeake Bay). 2010a. Fiscal Year 2011 Action Plan: Executive Order 13508, Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Washington, DC: FLC.

FLC. 2010b. Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. EPA-903-R-10-003. Washington, DC: FLC. Available at http://executiveorder.chesapeakebay.net/. Accessed August 3, 2010.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

Forsberg, C. W., J. P. Phillips, S. P. Golovan, M. Z. Fan, R. G. Meidinger, A. Ajakaiye, D. Hilborn, and R. R. Hacker. 2003. The Enviropig physiology, performance, and contribution to nutrient management advances in a regulated environment: The leading edge of change in the pork industry. Journal of Animal Science 81:E68-E77.

Franzen, A., and R. Meyer. 2010. Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review 26(2):219-234. Freedman, P. L., A. D. Nemura and D. W.Kilks. 2004. Viewing total maximum daily loads as a process, not a singular value: Adaptive watershed management. Journal of Environmental Engineering 130(6):695-702.

Fuss and O’Neill. 2010a. Draft Final Report: Evaluation of Connecticut’s Stormwater General Permits and Alternatives for Incorporation of Low Impact Development. Manchester, CT: Fuss & O’Neill.

Fuss and O’Neill. 2010b. Evaluating the Role of Stormwater Utility Districts in the Implementation of Low Impact Development. Manchester, CT: Fuss & O’Neill.

Galloway, J. N., F. J. Dentener, D. G. Capone, E. W. Boyer, R. W. Howarth, S. P. Seitzinger, G. P. Asner, C. Cleveland, P. Green, E. Holland, D. M. Karl, A. F. Michaels, J. H. Porter, A. Townsend, and C. Vörösmarty. 2004. Nitrogen Cycles: Past, Present and Future. Biogeochemistry 70:153-226.

Galloway, J. N., A. R. Townsend, J. W. Erisman, M. Bekunda, Z. Cai, J. R. Freney, L. A. Martinelli, S. P. Seitzinger, M. A. Sutton. 2008. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions and potential solutions. Science 320:889-892.

GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2005. Chesapeake Bay Program: Improved Strategies Are Needed to Better Assess, Report, and Manage Restoration Process. GAO-06-96. Washington, DC: GAO.

Gburek, W. J., and G. J. Folmar. 1999. Flow and chemical contributions to streamflow in an upland watershed—A baseflow survey. Journal of Hydrology 217(1-2):1-18.

Gillroy, J. M., and R. Y. Shapiro. 1986. The polls: Environmental protection. Public Opinion Quarterly 50:270-279.

Gray, J. S., R. S. Wu, and Y. Y. Or. 2002. Effects of hypoxia and organic enrichment on the coastal marine environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 238:249-279.

Greenhalgh, S., and P. Faeth. 2001. Trading on water: Trading can be a cheaper answer to water quality problems, creating a win-win solution for all. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy 16(1):71-77.

Greening, H., and C. Elfring. 2002. Local, state, regional and federal roles in coastal nutrient management. Estuaries 25:838-847.

Greening, H. S., and A. Janicki. 2006. Toward reversal of eutrophic conditions in a subtropical estuary—Water quality and seagrass response to nitrogen loading reductions in Tampa Bay, Florida, USA. Environmental Management 38:163-178.

Gregory, R., and L. Failing. 2002. Using decision analysis to encourage sound deliberation: Water use planning in British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21(3):492-499.

Gregory, R., D. Ohlson, and J. Arvai. 2006. Deconstructing adaptive management: Criteria for applications to environmental management. Ecological Applications 16(6):2411-2425.

Groffman, P. M., N. L. Law, K. T. Belt, L. E. Band, and G. T. Fisher. 2004. Nitrogen fluxes and retention in urban watershed ecosystems. Ecosystems 7:393-403.

Gunderson, L. 1999. Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management–antidotes for Spurious Certitide? Conservation Ecology 3(1):7. Available at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art7/. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Hagy, J. D., W. R. Boynton, C. W. Keefe, and K. V. Wood. 2004. Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950-2001: Long-term change in relation to nutrient loading and river flow. Estuaries 27:634-658.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

Halbert, C. L. 1993. How adaptive is adaptive management? Implementing adaptive management in Washington State and British Columbia. Reviews in Fisheries Science 3(3):261-283.

Harper, S. 2010. Virginia, U.S. at odds over new Chesapeake Bay rules. The Virginian-Pilot, July 20, 2010. Available at http://hamptonroads.com/2010/07/va-us-odds-over-new-chesapeake-bay-rules. Accessed March 5, 2011.

Havens, K. E. 2008. Cyanobacterial blooms: Effects on aquatic ecosystems: Proceedings, Interagency, International Symposium on Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms, Hudnell, H.K. ed. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 721-735.

Heathwaite, A. L., A. N. Sharpley, and W. J. Gburek. 2000. A conceptual approach for integrating phosphorus and nitrogen magagement at watershed scales. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:158-166.

Hilton, T. W., R. G. Najjar, L. Zhong, and M. Li. 2008. Is there a signal of sea-level rise in Chesapeake Bay salinity? Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 113(C9).

Hirsch, R.M., D.L. Moyer, and S.A. Archfield. 2010. Weighted regressions on time, discharge, and season (WRTDS), with an application to Chesapeake Bay river inputs. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 46(5): 857-880.

Holling, C. S., ed. 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Horton, T. 2008. Growing! Growing! Gone! The Chesapeake Bay and the Myth of Endless Growth. Baltimore, MD: The Abell Foundation. Available at http://www.abell.org/publications/pub_library.asp. Accessed December 22, 2010.

Howarth, R. W., E. W. Boyer, W. J. Pabich, and J. N. Galloway. 2002. Nitrogen use in the United States from 1961-2000 and potential future trends. Ambio 31:88-98.

IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2005. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Janicki, A. J., Wade, D. L., and Pribble, J. R. 2000. Developing and establishing a process to track the status of chlorophyll-a concentrations and light attenuation to support seagrass restoration goals in Tampa Bay. Tampa Bay Estuary Program Technical Publication No. 04-00. St. Petersburg, FL: Tampa Bay Estuary Program.

Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2008. Mastering the management system. Harvard Business Review 86(1):62-77.

Kellogg, R. L., C. H. Lander, D. C. Moffitt, and N. Gollehon. 2000. Manure nutrients relative to the capacity of cropland and pastureland to assimilate nutrients—Spatial and temporal trends for the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service and Economic Research Service, Resource Assessment and Strategic Planning Working Paper 98-1. Washington, DC: USDA.

Kemp, W. M., W. R. Boynton, J. E. Adolf, D. F. Boesch, W. C. Boicourt, G. Brush, J. C. Cornwell, T. R. Fisher, P. M. Glibert, J. D. Hagy, L. W. Harding, E. D. Houde, D. G. Kimmel, W. D. Miller, R. I. E. Newell, M. R. Roman, E. M. Smith, and J. C. Stevenson. 2005. Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historic trends and ecological interactions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 303:1-29.

Kemp, W. M., J. M. Testa, D. J. Conley, D. Gilbert, and J. D. Hagy. 2009. Temporal responses of coastal hypoxia to nutrient loading and physical controls. Biogeosciences 6(12):2985-3008.

Keshavarz, K. and R. E. Austic. 2004. The use of low-protein, low-phosphorus, amino acid-and phytase-supplemented diets on laying hen performance and nitrogen and phosphorus excretion. Poultry Science  83(1):75-83.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

Kimmell, R. J., G. M. Pierzynski, K. A. Janssen, and P. L. Barnes. 2001. Effects of tillage and phosphorus placement on phosphorus runoff losses in a grain sorghum-soybean rotation. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:1324-1330.

King, D. M., and P. J. Kuch. 2003. Will nutrient credit trading ever work? An assessment of supply and demand problems and institutional obstacles. Environmental Law Reporter. 33:10352-10368.

Klausner, S. D., D. G. Fox, C. N. Rasmussen, R. E. Pitt, T. Tylutki, P. E. Wright, L. E. Chase, and W. C. Stone. 1998. Improving dairy farm sustainability: An approach to animal and crop nutrient management planning. Journal of Production Agriculture 11:225-233.

Kleinman, P. J. A., A. N. Sharpley, B. G. Moyer, G. Elwinger. 2002. Effect of mineral and manure phosphorus sources on runoff phosphorus losses. Journal of Environmental Quality 2026-2033.

Kleinman, P. J. A., A. M. Wolf, A. N. Sharpley, D. B. Beegle, and L. S. Saporito. 2005. Survey of water extractable phosphorus in livestock manures. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69:701-708.

Knowler, D., and B. Bradshaw. 2007. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32(1):25-48.

Knowlton, K. F., J. M. McKinney, and C. Cobb. 2002. Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzyme formulation on nutrient intake, partitioning, and excretion in early and late lactation Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85:3328-3335.

Kovzelove, C., T. Simpson, and R. Korcak. 2010. Quantification and implications of surplus phosphorus and manure in major animal production Regions of Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. Annapolis, MD: Water Stewardship. Available at http://waterstewardshipinc.org/downloads/P_PAPER_FINAL_2-9-10.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Kronvang, B., E. Jeppesen, D. J. Conley, M. Søndergaard, S. E. Larsen, N. B. Ovesen, and J. Carstensen. 2005. Nutrient pressures and ecological responses to nutrient loading reductions in Danish streams, lakes and coastal waters. Journal of Hydrology 304:274-288.

Kyllingsbæk, A., and J. F. Hansen. 2007. Development in nutrient balances in Danish agriculture 1980-2004. Nutrient Cycling Agroecosystems 79:267-280.

Lanyon, L. E. 2000. Nutrient management: Regional issues facing the Chesapeake Bay. In: Agriculture and Phosphorus Management: The Chesapeake Bay, A. N. Sharpley, ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Lawrence, J. D. 2006. Expansion in the ethanol industry and its effect on the livestock industry. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. Available at http://www.extension.iastate.edu/ag/LawrencePresent.indd.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Lee, K. N. 1999. Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 3(2):3. Available at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art3/. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Lehman, J. T., D. W. Bell, and K. E. McDonald. 2009. Reduced river phosphorus following implementation of a lawn fertilizer ordinance. Lake and Reservoir Management 25c:307-312.

Levin, P. S., M. J. Fogarty, S. A. Murawski and D. Fluharty. 2009. Integrated ecosystem assessments: Developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean. PLoS Biology 7(1):e1000014.

Lichtenberg, E., and R. Smith-Ramirez. 2003. Cost-sharing, transaction costs, and conservation. Presentation at Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting July 27–30, 2003. Montreal, Canada: Agricultural Economics Association.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

LimnoTech. 2010. Comparison of Draft Load Estimates for Cultivated Cropland in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Available at http://tfi.org/misc/LimnoTech%20usda%20epa%20bay%20load%20estimate%20comparison%20-%20dec%209%202010.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Linde, D. L., and T. L. Watschke. 1997. Nutrients and sediment in runoff from creeping bentgrass and perennial ryegrass turf. Journal of Environmental Quality 26:1248-1254.

Lindsay, B. D., S. W. Phillips, C. A. Donnelly, G. K. Speiran, L. N. Plummer, J. K. Bohlke, M. J. Focoazio, W. C. Burton, and E. Busenberg. 2003. Residence times and nitrate transport in ground water discharging to stream in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report 03-4035. Washington, DC: USGS.

Linker, L. C, G. W. Shenk, R. Dennis, and J. Sweeney. 2000. Cross-media models of the Chesapeake Bay watershed and airshed. Water Quality and Ecosystem Modeling 1(1–4):91–122.

Linker, L., G. W. Shenk, P. Wang, K. J. Hopkins, and S. Pokharel. 2002. A Short History of Chesapeake Bay Modeling and the Next Generation of Watershed and Estuarine Models. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 14:569-582.

Linker, L. C., G. W. Shenk, P. Wang, and R. Batiuk. 2008. Integration of Modeling, Research, and Monitoring in the Chesapeake Bay Program. In: Management of Water Quality and Irrigation Techniques, J. Albiac, and A. Dinar, eds. London, England: Earthscan.

Macadam, I., A. J. Pitman, P. H. Whetton, and G. Abramowitz. 2010. Ranking climate models by performance using actual values and anomalies: Implications for climate change impact assessments. Geophysical Research Letters 37:L16704.

Maguire, R. O., J. T. Sims, W. W. Saylor, B. L. Turner, R. Angel, and T. J. Applegate. 2004. Influence of phytase addition to poultry diets on phosphorus forms and solubility in litters and amended soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 33:2306-2316.

Maguire, R. O., D. A. Crouse, and S. C. Hodges. 2007. Diet modification to reduce phosphorus surpluses: A mass balance approach. Journal of Environmental Quality 36:1235-1240.

Maguire, R. O., G. H. Rubaek, B. E. Haggard, and B. H. Foy. 2009. Critical evaluation of the implementation of mitigation options for phosphorus from field to catchment scales. Journal of Environmental Quality 38:1989-1997.

Mankin, K. R., J. K. Koelliker, and P. K. Kalita. 1999. Watershed and lake water quality assessment: An integrated modeling approach. Journal of American Water Resources Association 35:1069-1080.

Mankin, K. R., S. H. Wang, J. K. Koelliker, D. G. Huggins, and J. F. DeNoyelles. 2003. Watershed-lake water quality modeling: Verification and application. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 58:188-197.

Marx, P. 2004. Financing Chesapeake Bay restoration. Northeast Midwest Economic Review Spring-Summer:12-13.

McLain, R. J., and R. G. Lee. 1996. Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management 20(4):437-448.

McSweeney, C. S., B. P. Dalrymple, K. S. Gobius, P. M. Kennedy, D. O. Krause, R. I. Mackie, and G. P. Xue. 1999. The application of rumen biotechnology to improve the nutritive value of fibrous feedstuffs: pre- and post-ingestion. Livestock Production Science 59(2-3):265-283.

MD DNR (Maryland Department of Natural Resources). 2010a. Bay-Wide Blue Crab Winter Dredge Survey, 2010. Available at http://www.dnr.state.md.us/fisheries/crab/winter_dredge.html. Accessed March 1, 2011.

MD DNR. 2010b. Conservation Tracker Up and Running, Fall 2010. Available at http://www.dnr.state.md.us/naturalresource/. Accessed February 14, 2011.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

MDE (Maryland Department of the Environment), MDP (Maryland Department of Planning), MD DNR (Maryland Department of Natural Resources), and MDA (Maryland Department of Agriculture). 2010. Maryland’s Phase I Watershed Implementation Plan for the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load. Available at http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/Water/TMDL/TMDLHome/Pages/Final_Bay_WIP_2010.aspx. Accessed March 3, 2011.

MDA (Minnesota Department of Agriculture). 2007. Report to the Minnesota Legislature: Effectiveness of the Minnesota Phosphorus Lawn Fertilizer Law. Prepared by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division. Minneapolis, MN: MDA.

Murphy, R. R., Kemp, W. M., Ball, W. P. 2011. Long-term trends in Chesapeake Bay seasonal hypoxia, stratification, and nutrient loading. Estuaries and Coasts revised submission under review.

Najjar, R. G., C. R. Pyke, M. B. Adams, D. Breitburg, C. Hershner, M. Kemp, R. Howarth, M. R. Mulholland, M. Paolisso, D. Secor, K. Sellner, D. Wardrop, and R. Wood. 2010. Potential climate-change impacts on the Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 86(1):1-20.

Neff J. C., E. A. Holland, and F. J. Dentener, W. H. McDowell, and K. M. Russell. 2002. The origin, composition and rates of organic nitrogen deposition; a missing piece of the nitrogen cycle? Biogeochemistry 57:99-136.

NYS DEC (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation) and CT DEP (Conecticut Department of Environmental Protection). 2000. A total maximum daily load analysis to achieve water quality standards for dissolved oxygen in Long Island Sound. Albany, NY: NYS DEC.

NRC (National Research Council). 2000. Clean Coastal Waters—Understanding and Reducing the Effects of Nutrient Pollution. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2001. Assessing the TMDL Approach to Managing Water Quality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2007. Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades: The First Biennial Review–2006. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2008. Urban Stormwater Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2010. Toward Sustainable Agricultural Systems in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2010. Interim Practice Standard. Monitoring and Evaluation. Code 799. Available at http://www.mo.nrcs.usda.gov/news/news_releases/2010/MRBI%20Links/(799)%20Monitoring%20&%20Evaluation%20Interim%20Standard.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2011.

NYS DEC (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation). 2010. Final Phase I Nutrient and Sediment Water Quality Improvement and Protection Plan. Available at http://www.epa.gov/reg3wapd/pdf/pdf_chesbay/finalWIPS/NYFinalPhaseIWIP.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2011.

Orth, R. J., M. R. Williams, S. R. Marion, D. J. Wilcox, J. J. B. Catruthers, K. A. Moore, W. M Kemp, W. C. Dennison, N. Rybicki, P. Bergstrom, and R. A Batiuk. 2010. Long-term trends in submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) in Chesapeake Bay, USA, related to water quality. Estuaries and Coasts 33:1144-1163.

PA DEP (Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection). 2010. Pennsylvania Chesapeake Watershed Implementation Plan. Available at http://www.depwebstate.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/chesapeake_bay_program/10513. Accessed March 3, 2011.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

Paerl, H. W., R. L. Dennis, and D. R. Whithall. 2002. Atmospheric Deposition of Nitrogen Implications for Nutrient Over-enrichment of Coastal Waters. Estuaries 25:677-693.

Pegg, J. R. 2004. Lack of political will sinking Chesapeake Bay restoration. Environmental News Service. December 2, 2004. Available at http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/dec2004/2004-12-02-10.html. Accessed March 5, 2011.

Petersen, J. K., J. W. Hansen, M. B. Laursen, P. Clausen, J. Carstensen, and D. J. Conley. 2008. Regime shift in a coastal marine ecosystem. Ecological Applications 18(2):497-510.

Phillips, S. W., and B. D. Lindsey. 2003. The Influence of Groundwater on Nitrogen Delivery to the Chesapeake Bay. Available at http://md.water.usgs.gov/publications/fs-091-03/html/index.html. Accessed March 9, 2011.

Pielke, R. A. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Poulsen, H.D. 2000. Phosphorus utilization and excretion in pig production. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:24-27.

Powers, W. 2002. Emerging air quality issues and the impact on animal agriculture: Management and nutritional strategies. 49th Annual Maryland Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, Timonium, Maryland.

Propst, D. B., J. D. Wellman, H. R. Campa III, and M. H. McDonough. 2000. Citizen participation trends and their educational implications for natural resource professionals. In: Trends in outdoor recreation and tourism, D. W. Lime, W. C. Gartner, and J. Thompson eds. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CAB International.

Rabalais, N. N., R. J. Diaz, L. A. Levin, R. E. Turner, D. Gilbert, and J. Zhang. 2009. Dynamics and distribution of natural and human-caused coastal hypoxia. Biogeosciences Discussions 6:1-95.

Randall, G. W., J. A. Vetsch, and J. R. Huffman. 2003. Nitrate losses in subsurface drainage from a corn-soybean rotation as affected by time of nitrogen application and use of Nitrapyrin. Journal of Environmental Quality 32:1764-1772.

Reynolds, C. S. 2006. The Ecology of Phytoplankton. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ribaudo, M. O., R. Heimlich, and M. Peters. 2005. Nitrogen Sources and gulf hypoxia: Potential for environmental credit trading. Ecological Economics 52:159-168.

Richards, R. P., D. B. Baker, and D. J. Eckert. 2002a. Trends in agriculture in the LEASEQ watersheds, 1975-1995. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:17-24.

Richards, R. P., F. G. Calhoun, and G. Matisoff. 2002b. The Lake Erie agricultural systems for environmental quality project: An introduction. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:6-16.

Richards, R. P., D. B. Baker, and J. P. Crumrine. 2009. Improved water quality in Ohio tributaries to Lake Erie: A consequence of conservation practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 64(3):200-211.

Risse, M., M. L. Cabrera, A. J. Franzluebbers, J. W. Gaskin, J. E. Gilley, R. Killorn, D. E. Radcliffe, W. E. Tollner, and H. Zhang 2006. Land application of manure for beneficial reuse. In: Animal Agriculture and the Environment: National Center for Manure and Animal Waste Management White Papers, J. M. Rice, D. F. Caldwell and F. J. Humenik, eds. American Society of Agricultural Biology Engineering Publications 913C0306.

Ruhl, H. A., and N. B. Rybicki. 2010. Long-term reductions in anthropogenic nutrients link to improvements in Chesapeake Bay habitat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(38):16566-16570.

Schelde, K., L. W. de Jonge, C. Kjaergaard, M. Laegdsmand, and G. H. Rubæk. 2006. Effects of manure application and plowing on transport of colloids and phosphorus to tile drains. Vadose Zone Journal 5:445-458.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

Schertz, L. P., and O. Doering. 1999. The making of the 1996 farm act. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

Schreiber, E. S. G., A. Bearlin, S. J. Nicol and C. R. Todd. 2004. Adaptive management: A synthesis of current understanding and effective application. Ecological Management and Restoration 5(3):177-182.

Schueler, T., D. Hirschman, M. Novotney, and J. E. Zielinski. 2007. Appendix E: Derivation of Unit Costs for Stormwater Retrofits and Construction of New Stormwater Practices. In: Stormwater Retrofit Practices. Manual 3, Small Watershed Restoration Manual Series. Center for Watershed Protection. Ellicott City, MD: Center for Watershed Protection.

Schueler, T. 2009. Appendix B in Manual 3, Stormwater Retrofit Practices. Center for Watershed Protection. Ellicott City, MD: Center for Watershed Protection.

Schueler, T. 2010. The clipping point: Turf cover estimates for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and management implications. Chesapeake Stormwater Network Technical Bulletin #3. Ellicott City, MD: Center for Watershed Protection.

Scully, M. E. 2010a. The importance of climate variability to wind-driven modulation of hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Physical Oceanography 40(6):1435-1440.

Scully, M. E. 2010b. Wind modulation of dissolved oxygen in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries and Coasts 33(5):1164-1175.

Selman, M., E. Sprague, S. Walker, and B. Kittler. 2010. Nutrient Trading in the Chesapeake Bay Region: An Analysis of Supply and Demand. Washington, DC: Pinchot Institute for Conservation. Available at http://www.pinchot.org/gp/BayBank_markets. Accessed December 13, 2010.

Shabman, L., and K. Stephenson. 2007. Achieving nutrient water quality goals: bringing market-like principles to water quality management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43(4):1076-1089.

Shabman, L., K. Reckhow, M. B. Beck, J. Benaman, S. Chapra, P. Freedman, M. Nellor, J. Rudek, D. Schwer, T. Stiles, and C. Stow. 2007. Adaptive Implementation of Water Quality Improvement Plans: Opportunities and Challenges. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions Report #NI-R-07-03. Durham, NC: Duke University.

Sharpley, A. N., and S. Rekolainen. 1997. Phosphorus in agriculture and its environmental implications. In: Phosphorus Loss from Soil to Water, H. Tunney, O. T. Carton, P. C. Brookes, and A. E. Johnston, eds. Cambridge, England: CAB International Press.

Sharpley, A. N., R. W. McDowell, and P. J. A. Kleinman. 2001. Phosphorus loss from land and water: Integrating agricultural and environmental management. Plant and Soil 237:287-307.

Sharpley, A. N., J. L. Weld, and P. J. A. Kleinman. 2005. Assessment of best management practices to minimize the runoff of manure-bourne phosphorus in the United States. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Resources 47:461-477.

Sharpley, A. N., P. J. A. Kleinman, P. Jordan, L. Bergström, and A. L. Allen. 2009. Evaluating the success of phosphorus management from field to watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality 38:1981-1988.

Sherwood, E. T. 2009. Tampa Bay Water Quality Assessment, 2008. Tampa Bay Estuary Program Technical Publication No. 02-09. St. Petersburg, FL: Tampa Bay Estuary Program. Showalter, S., and S. Spigener. 2007. Pennsylvania’s Nutrient Trading Program: Legal Issues and Challenges. MASGP 07-007-13. University, MS: National Sea Grant Law Center.

Shuman, L. M. 2004. Runoff of nitrate nitrogen and phosphorus from turf grass after watering-in. Communications in Soil Science and Plant 35:9-24.

Simpson, T. W., A. N. Sharpley, R. W. Howarth, H. W. Paerl, and K. R. Mankin. 2008. The new gold rush: Fueling ethanol production while protecting water quality. Journal of Environmental Quality 37:318-324.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

Simpson, T., and S. Weammert. 2009. Developing Best Management Practice Definitions and Effectiveness Eeffectiveness stimates for Nitrogen, Pnitrogen, hosphorus and Dediment in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Mid-Atlantic Water Program.

Sims, J. T. 1997. Agricultural and environmental issues in the management of poultry wastes: Recent innovations and long-term challenges. In: Uses of by-products and wastes in agriculture, J. Rechcigl and H. C. MacKinnon, eds. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.

Smil, V. 1999. Nitrogen in crop production: an account of global flows. Global Biogeochemistry Cycles 13:647-662.

Smith, S. J., A. N. Sharpley, W. A. Berg, J. W. Naney, and G. A. Coleman. 1992. Water quality characteristics associated with Southern Plains grasslands. Journal of Environmental Quality 21:595-601.

STAC (Chesapeake Bay Program Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee). 1997. Integrated Analysis of Chesapeake Bay Monitoring Data. Available at www.chesapeake.org/stac/Pubs/Integrated%20Analysis.PDF. Accessed April 27, 2011.

STAC. 2005. Assessing Progress and Effectiveness through Monitoring Rivers and Streams. Available at www.chesapeake.org/stac/Pubs/NTWQMReport.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2011.

STAC. 2009. Development and Implementation of a Process for Establishing Chesapeake Bay Program’s Monitoring Program Priorities and Objectives. Available at http://www.chesapeake.org/stac/Pubs/STACReviewPrioritiesFinal3-09.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2011. STAC. 2010. Small Watershed Monitoring Designs. STAC Publication 10-004. Available at http://www.chesapeake.org/stac/stacpubs.html. Accessed March 7, 2011 Stankey, G. H., R. N. Clark and B. T. Bormann. 2005. Adaptive Management of Natural Resources: Theory, Concepts, and Management Institutions. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-654. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Available at http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/20657/. Accessed August 3, 2010.

Stephenson, K., and L. Shabman. 2010. Plan for nutrient trading to pay for agricultural BMPs an illusion. Chesapeake Bay Journal 20(11). Available at http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=3785. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Stephenson, K., S. Aultman, T. Metcalf, and A. Miller. 2010. An evaluation of nutrient nonpoint offset trading in Virginia: A role for agricultural nonpoint sources? Water Resources Research 46, Wo4519, doe: 10.1029/2009WR008228.

Stuart, B. 2010. EPA Pollution Regulations Raise Cost Questions. The News Virginian. October 17, 2010. Available at http://www2.newsvirginian.com/news/2010/oct/17/epa-pollution-regulations-raise-cost-questions-ar-568082/. Accessed March 5, 2011.

Sutton, R., and C. Cox. 2010. Bay Out of Balance. Environmental Working Group Report. Available at http://static.ewg.org/reports/2010/bayoutofbalance/pdf/bay_out_of_balance_full_report.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Tabe, L. M., C. M. Higgins, W. C. McNabb, and T. J. V. Higgins. 1993. Genetic engineering of grain and pasture legumes for improved nutritive value. Genetica 90(2-3):181-200.

TBEP (Tampa Bay Estuary Program). 2008. Technical Memorandum: Model-Based Estimates of Nitrogen Load Reductions Associated with Fertilizer Restriction Implementation. Tampa Bay Estuary Program Technical Publication #07-08. St. Petersburg, FL: TBEP.

The Monitor’s View. 2009. Chesapeake Bay Left Up a Creek. The Christian Science Monitor, January 12, 2009. Available at http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2009/0112/p08s01-comv.html. Accessed March 5, 2011.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

Thompson, B. 2004. Where’s the political will? Chesapeake Life Magazine. November 2004. Available at http://www.chesapeakelifemag.com/index.php/cl/features_article/fe_environment_n04/. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Thorme, M. A. 2001. Antibacksliding: Understanding one of the most misunderstood provisions of the Clean Water Act. Environmental Law Reporter 31:10322-10329.

Tilley, J., and T. Slonecker. 2006. Quantifying the components of impervious surfaces. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007–1008. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1008/. Accessed December 22, 2010.

U.S. Census of Agriculture. 2007. Mid-Atlantic Watershed Resource Region 02. Available at http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Online_Highlights/Watersheds/ma02.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2011.

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2009. Focusing Resources to Restore and Protect the Chesapeake Bay and its Tributary Waters. An Executive Order 13508, Section 202b Report. Washington, DC: USDA.

USDA. National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2010. National statistics for corn. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_Subject/result.php?0FB5C4D8-22CD-3971-9C07-0A7CE540A42D&sector=CROPS&group=FIELD%20CROPS&comm=CORN. Accessed April 27, 2011.

Valk, H., J. A. Metcalf, and P. J. A. Withers. 2000. Prospects for minimizing phosphorus excretion in ruminants by dietary manipulation. Journal of Environmental Quality 29(1):28-36.

VA DNR (Virginia Department of Natural Resources). 2010. Chesapeake Bay TMDL Phase Watershed Implementation Plan. Available at http://www.epa.gov/reg3wapd/pdf/pdf_chesbay/finalWIPS/VirginiaWIPPortfolioNov292010.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2011.

Walters, C. 1997. Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems. Conservation Ecology 1(2):1. Available at http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss2/art1/. Accessed April 29, 2011.

Walters, C. J., and C. S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71(6):2060-2068, Weller, D. E., T. E. Jordan, K. G. Sellner, K. Foreman, K. Shenk, P. Tango, S. W. Phillips and M. Dubin. 2010. Small Watershed Monitoring Designs. A report prepared for the Chesapeake Bay Program Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC). STAC Publication #10-004. Annapolis, MD: STAC.

Williams, B. K., R. C. Szaro and C. D. Shapiro. 2009. Adaptive Management: The U.S. Department of Interior Technical Guide. Adaptive Management Working Group, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.doi.gov/initiatives/AdaptiveManagement/documents.html. Accessed August 3, 2010.

Wood, P. 2010. The Chesapeake Bay at a Crossroads. The Capital HometownAnnapolis.com. March 21, 2010. Available at http://www.hometownannapolis.com/news/top/2010/03/21-42/The-Chesapeake-Bay-at-a-crossroads.html. Accessed March 5, 2011.

Wu, Z., L. D. Satter, A.J . Blohowiak, R. H. Stauffacher, and J. H. Wilson. 2001. Milk production, phosphorus excretion, and bone characteristics of dairy cows fed different amounts of phosphorus for two or more years. Journal of Dairy Science 84:1738-1748.

WV WIPDT (West Virginia WIP Development Team). 2010. West Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan. Available at http://www.wvca.us/bay/tmdl.cfm. Accessed March 3, 2011.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×

This page intentionally left blank

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 167
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 168
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 169
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 170
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 171
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 172
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 173
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 174
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 175
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 176
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 177
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 178
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 179
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 180
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 181
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2011. Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13131.
×
Page 182
Next: Appendixes »
Achieving Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: An Evaluation of Program Strategies and Implementation Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $55.00 Buy Ebook | $44.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Chesapeake Bay is North America's largest and most biologically diverse estuary, as well as an important commercial and recreational resource. However, excessive amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment from human activities and land development have disrupted the ecosystem, causing harmful algae blooms, degraded habitats, and diminished populations of many species of fish and shellfish. In 1983, the Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) was established, based on a cooperative partnership among the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the state of Maryland, and the commonwealths of Pennsylvania and Virginia, and the District of Columbia, to address the extent, complexity, and sources of pollutants entering the Bay. In 2008, the CBP launched a series of initiatives to increase the transparency of the program and heighten its accountability and in 2009 an executive order injected new energy into the restoration. In addition, as part of the effect to improve the pace of progress and increase accountability in the Bay restoration, a two-year milestone strategy was introduced aimed at reducing overall pollution in the Bay by focusing on incremental, short-term commitments from each of the Bay jurisdictions.

The National Research Council (NRC) established the Committee on the Evaluation of Chesapeake Bay Program Implementation for Nutrient Reduction in Improve Water Quality in 2009 in response to a request from the EPA. The committee was charged to assess the framework used by the states and the CBP for tracking nutrient and sediment control practices that are implemented in the Chesapeake Bay watershed and to evaluate the two-year milestone strategy. The committee was also to assess existing adaptive management strategies and to recommend improvements that could help CBP to meet its nutrient and sediment reduction goals.

The committee did not attempt to identify every possible strategy that could be implemented but instead focused on approaches that are not being implemented to their full potential or that may have substantial, unrealized potential in the Bay watershed. Because many of these strategies have policy or societal implications that could not be fully evaluated by the committee, the strategies are not prioritized but are offered to encourage further consideration and exploration among the CBP partners and stakeholders.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!