National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 3 Science and Technology at the Center
Suggested Citation:"4 Facilities and Human Resources." National Research Council. 2011. An Assessment of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Center for Neutron Research: Fiscal Year 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13252.
Page 19
Suggested Citation:"4 Facilities and Human Resources." National Research Council. 2011. An Assessment of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Center for Neutron Research: Fiscal Year 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13252.
Page 20

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

4 Facilities and Human Resources The NIST Center for Neutron Research has earned a reputation for reliable operation and outstanding service to the research community. In 2010, the NCNR successfully operated on 267 days, well above its target of 250 days. This performance is best in class among similar neutron research facilities. The NCNR is robustly staffed with reactor operators, reactor engineers, and technicians to support these activities. The staff has a healthy demographic composition, with a mix of very experienced personnel and recent hires, who will stay on after the upgrade is completed. This staffing asset positions the NCNR to maintain operational excellence in the future. The Director of the NCNR estimates that there are about 4 or 5 staff personnel supporting each instrument, which leads to a high level of satisfaction in the user community. The NCNR is about to suspend reactor operation for 10.5 months in order to complete its Expansion Project. Five new beam lines will increase its cold-neutron measurement capacity by more than 25 percent, and the reconfiguration of existing instruments will enable better optimization of their performance. The Expansion Project schedule is aggressive and has been analyzed in detail both by NCNR staff and by visiting advisory committees. The critical-path elements are well understood by staff. Removal of the CO2 seal on the BT-9 cold source (a remote handling project) could be problematic. Some of the reactor refurbishments that were planned for the Expansion Project have been deferred. A new refrigerator for the cold source and an upgrade of the control room will be done at a later time. Only 4 safety shim arms will be procured initially, rather than the planned 24. Detailed planning for these activities revealed that they are more complex than originally thought, and anticipated funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was redirected to other items at NIST. The NCNR management decided to reduce the scope of the Expansion Project in order to maintain the schedule. This adjustment demonstrates an admirable commitment to supporting the user community. However, it does increase the risk that equipment failure could force an unplanned interruption of reactor operations in the future. The NCNR Safety Assessment Committee (SAC) recently examined the safety culture of the NCNR. As indicated to the panel, the SAC reported that “the NCNR exhibits the highest regard for safety culture at every level and is implementing the Technical Specifications as required.”7 Coinciding with the NRC panel’s current review of the NCNR in March 2011, Japan was struggling to control four nuclear power reactors crippled in a magnitude 9.0 earthquake. Explosions blew the roofs off three of the Japanese reactors. Nearby residents were ordered to stay inside because of dangerous releases of radioactive material. This disaster will likely lead to an intense scrutiny of hazards associated with nuclear facilities. The NCNR should be prepared to answer questions about the 7 Robert Dimeo, NCNR Director, “NCNR Overview to the Panel on Neutron Research,” presentation to the panel, Gaithersburg, Maryland, March 14, 2011. 19

consequences of low-probability but extreme events that might exceed the design criteria of the reactor building that was built in 1967. The NCNR has established a system that seems to preserve all safety requirements while keeping the openness and accessibility needed for a user facility. Continuing to maintain a rational security program within the constraints of increasing security demands is critical in order to allow efficient use of the facility, especially as the number of users increases with the completion of the Expansion Project. Continuing concern about the security of nuclear facilities is driving the replacement of highly enriched uranium fuel with low enriched uranium (LEU) fuel in research reactors. No date for the conversion of the NIST reactor has been scheduled, but current projections by the Convert program of the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) suggest that conversion could take place in the 2015-2016 time frame. Changing to LEU fuel will reduce the neutron flux from the reactor, but the NNSA will mitigate this impact to performance by funding a D2 cold- source system to replace the current H2 cold source and refrigerator with the additional cooling capacity required for the D2 cold source. Additionally, refurbishing the control room and the planned development of a formal software quality program have broad applicability for contributing to safe operation and constitute a key element of a comprehensive security program. There is only one vendor for the fuel used in the NCNR reactor, and costs, which are increasing every year, will be substantially higher with the conversion to low enriched uranium. Additional operational funds will be required for the facility to maintain its high level of operating days and productivity. 20

Next: 5 The Center as a User Facility »
An Assessment of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Center for Neutron Research: Fiscal Year 2011 Get This Book
Buy Paperback | $23.00 Buy Ebook | $18.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Since 1959, the National Research Council (NRC), at the request of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has annually assembled panels of experts to assess the quality and effectiveness of the NIST measurements and standards laboratories. In 2011, the NRC evaluated three of the six NIST laboratories: the Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology (CNST), the NIST Center for Neutron Research (NCNR) and the Information Technology Laboratory (ITL). Each of these was addressed individually by a separate panel of experts; this report assesses NCNR.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook,'s online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!