National Academies Press: OpenBook

Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011 (2012)

Chapter: 3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership

« Previous: 2 Board and Standing Committees: Activities and Membership
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

3

Ad Hoc Study Committees:
Activities and Membership

When a sponsor requests that the Space Studies Board (SSB) conduct a study, an ad hoc committee is established for that purpose. The committee terminates when the study is completed. These study committees are subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Section 15, because they provide advice and recommendations to the federal government. The SSB and/or one of its standing committees provide oversight for ad hoc study committee activities. Eight ad hoc study committees were active during 2011; their activities and membership are summarized below.

In addition, one ad hoc committee released a report in 2010 and was formally disbanded in 2011—the report of the ad hoc Committee on the Assessment of Impediments to Interagency Cooperation on Space and Earth Science Missions, Assessment of Impediments to Interagency Collaboration on Space and Earth Science Missions, was summarized in the 2010 annual report and final books were printed in 2011. Also in 2011, work began on forming the Committee on the Implementation of a Sustained Land Imaging Program, a study sponsored by the U.S. Geological Survey.

ASSESSING REQUIREMENTS FOR SUSTAINED OCEAN COLOR
RESEARCH AND OPERATIONS

The Ocean Studies Board (OSB) formed the ad hoc Committee on Assessing Requirements for Sustained Ocean Color Research and Operations, in collaboration with the SSB, to identify the ocean color data needs for a broad range of end users, develop a consensus for the requirements, and outline options to meet these needs on a sustained basis. The committee held six meetings in 2010, and members of the SSB Committee on Earth Studies and SSB staff attended the June 28-30 meeting.

The report of the committee, Assessing Requirements for Sustained Ocean Color Research and Operations, was released on July 7, 2011. The report’s Summary is reprinted in Chapter 5.

Membership

James A. Yoder, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (chair)

David Antoine, Marine Optics and Remote Sensing Lab, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche, Villefranche-sur-Mer, Cedex, France

Carlos E. Del Castillo,* Johns Hopkins University

Robert H. Evans, Jr., University of Miami

Curtis Mobley, Sequoia Scientific, Inc.

_______________

*Resigned from the committee to take a position with NASA.

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

Jorge L. Sarmiento, Princeton University

Shubha Sathyendranath, Dalhousie University, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada

Carl F. Schueler, Orbital Sciences Corporation

David A. Siegel, University of California, Santa Barbara

Cara Wilson, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Staff

Claudia Mengelt, Senior Program Officer, OSB (study director)

Arthur A. Charo, Senior Program Officer, SSB

Heather Chiarello, Senior Program Assistant, OSB

Jeremy Justice, Senior Program Assistant, OSB

Emily Oliver, Program Assistant, OSB

ASSESSMENT OF NASA’S EARTH SCIENCE PROGRAM

The ad hoc Committee on the Assessment of NASA’s Earth Science Program was formed to review the alignment of the NASA Earth Science Division’s program with previous NRC advice, primarily the 2007 NRC decadal survey report, Earth Science and Applications from Space. In carrying out this study, the committee was directed to neither revisit or alter the scientific priorities or mission recommendations provided in the decadal survey and related NRC reports; however, the committee may provide guidance about implementing the recommended mission portfolio in preparation for the next decadal survey.

The committee began work in March 2011 and held meetings on April 27-29 at the National Academies’ Keck Center in Washington, D.C.; on July 6-8 in Seattle, Washington; and on September 21-23 at the National Academies’ Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center in Irvine, California. The committee continued its discussion, deliberation, and report development.

The committee’s report entered external peer review in late December 2011; release of an NRC-approved prepublication version of the committee’s report is anticipated in Spring 2012.

Membership

Dennis L. Hartmann, University of Washington (chair)

Mark R. Abbott, Oregon State University

Richard A. Anthes, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

Philip E. Ardanuy, Raytheon Intelligence and Information Systems

Stacey Boland, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Antonio J. Busalacchi, Jr., University of Maryland, College Park

Anny Cazenave, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES)

Ruth S. DeFries, Columbia University

Lee-Lueng Fu, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Bradford H. Hager, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Hung-Lung Allen Huang, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Anthony C. Janetos, University of Maryland, College Park

Dennis P. Lettenmaier, University of Washington

Jennifer A. Logan, Harvard University

Molly K. Macauley, Resources for the Future

Anne W. Nolin, Oregon State University

Joyce E. Penner, University of Michigan

Michael J. Prather, University of California, Irvine

David S. Schimel, National Ecological Observatory Network, Inc.

William F. Townsend, Independent Consultant

Thomas H. Vonder Haar, Colorado State University

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

Staff

Arthur A. Charo, Senior Program Officer, SSB (study director)

Lewis Groswald, Research Associate, SSB

Linda M. Walker, Senior Program Assistant, SSB

Danielle Piskorz, Lloyd V. Berkner Space Policy Intern

DECADAL STRATEGY FOR SOLAR AND SPACE PHYSICS (HELIOPHYSICS)

The Decadal Strategy for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) was formed to conduct a broadly based assessment decadal survey of the scientific priorities of the U.S. solar and space physics research enterprise for the period 2013-2022. The survey is composed of a steering committee supported by three discipline-oriented study panels. In addition, five “national capabilities working groups,” made up of community members who are willing to serve as unpaid consultants, assist the steering committee and panels in gathering information and providing context to the survey’s work in the following focus areas: Theory and Modeling and Data Exploitation; Explorers, Suborbital, and Other Platforms; Innovations: Technology, Instruments, Data Systems; Research to Operations/ Operations to Research (R2O/O2R); and Workforce and Education. In addition, the steering committee created several splinter study groups to address particular subjects of interest.

The NRC contracted with the Aerospace Corporation to perform cost and technical analysis of selected survey-developed concepts. Assisted by representatives of the panels and the steering committee, the Aerospace Corporation completed the first phase of this analysis during the first quarter.

During 2011, the survey steering committee held the following meetings: February 1-3, Irvine, California; April 12-14, Washington, D.C.; June 14-16, Boulder, Colorado; August 29-31, Irvine, California; and November 16-18, Irvine California. At the June meeting of the steering committee, the Aerospace Corporation presented initial cost and technical analysis of selected survey-developed concepts and presented their final results at the August meeting.

The three discipline-oriented study panels held the following meetings in 2011:

• Panel on Atmosphere-Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Interaction (AIM): January 12-14, Washington, D.C.; June 1-3, Woods Hole, Massachusetts;

• Panel on Solar and Heliospheric Physics (SH): January 10-12, Washington, D.C.; May 25-27, Boulder, Colorado;

• Panel on Solar-Wind-Magnetosphere Interactions (SWM): January 18-20, Santa Fe, New Mexico; June 20-21, Washington, D.C.

Several working groups also held meetings in 2011, and outreach events also occurred in connection with several NSF-sponsored summer schools.

The R2O/O2R working group was present at a survey-sponsored town hall meeting on February 7-8, where invited speakers, working group members, and the public were encouraged to express their view of topics pertaining to space weather research-to-operations and the inverse. A solicitation to the community for mission concepts and related activities that might be undertaken in the coming decade drew 288 responses. Panels reviewed these concepts and white papers at their first and second meetings and made recommendations to the steering committee regarding a small number of concepts that might go forward in an independent cost and technical evaluation.

In response to a request from NASA, the survey also broadened its workplan to include explicit consideration of “decision rules” relevant to the Solar Probe Plus (SPP) mission, which is currently planned for a 2018 launch. On August 11, 2011, the survey’s study group on SPP met in Washington, D.C., and received briefings from agency officials; SPP project and program scientists, many of whom are working at Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory; and all of the SPP instrument principal investigators.

As the third quarter ended, the three study panels were finalizing their submissions to the steering committee, as were the working groups and study groups. Preparations were also underway for the steering committee’s final meeting in November.

During the fourth quarter, following the steering committee’s November meeting, drafts of all sections of the report were complete and revisions and editing were underway to prepare the report for external review. Although the target date for approval of a prepublication report was March 31, 2012, a short delay to accommodate changes in the study’s work plan may be required.

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

Steering Committee Membership

Daniel N. Baker, University of Colorado, Boulder (chair)

Thomas H. Zurbuchen, University of Michigan (vice chair)

Brian J. Anderson, Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

Steven J. Battel, Battel Engineering

James F. Drake, Jr., University of Maryland, College Park

Lennard A. Fisk, University of Michigan

Marvin A. Geller, Stony Brook University

Sarah Gibson, National Center for Atmospheric Research

Michael A. Hesse, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

J. Todd Hoeksema, Stanford University

Mary K. Hudson, Dartmouth College

David L. Hysell, Cornell University

Thomas Immel, University of California, Berkeley

Justin Kasper, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

Judith L. Lean, Naval Research Laboratory

Ramon E. Lopez, University of Texas, Arlington

Howard J. Singer, NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center

Harlan E. Spence, University of New Hampshire

Edward C. Stone, California Institute of Technology

Staff

Arthur A. Charo, Senior Program Officer, SSB (study director)

Maureen Mellody, Program Officer, ASEB

Abigail Sheffer, Associate Program Officer, SSB

Lewis Groswald, Research Associate, SSB

Linda Walker, Senior Program Assistant, SSB

Terri Baker, Senior Program Assistant, SSB

Panel on Atmosphere-Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Interactions Membership

Jeffrey M. Forbes, University of Colorado, Boulder (chair)

James H. Clemmons, The Aerospace Corporation (vice chair)

Odile de la Beaujardiere, Air Force Research Laboratory

John V. Evans, COMSAT Corporation (retired)

Roderick A. Heelis, University of Texas, Dallas

Thomas Immel, University of California, Berkeley

Janet U. Kozyra, University of Michigan

William Lotko, Dartmouth College

Gang Lu, High Altitude Observatory

Kristina A. Lynch, Dartmouth College

Jens Oberheide, Clemson University

Larry J. Paxton, Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

Robert F. Pfaff, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Joshua Semeter, Boston University

Jeffrey P. Thayer, University of Colorado, Boulder

Panel on Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interactions Membership

Michelle F. Thomsen, Los Alamos National Laboratory (chair)

Michael Wiltberger, National Center for Atmospheric Research (vice chair)

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

Joseph Borovsky, Los Alamos National Laboratory

Joseph F. Fennell, The Aerospace Corporation

Jerry Goldstein, Southwest Research Institute

Janet C. Green, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Donald A. Gurnett, University of Iowa

Lynn M. Kistler, University of New Hampshire

Michael W. Liemohn, University of Michigan

Robyn Millan, Dartmouth College

Donald G. Mitchell, Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

Tai D. Phan, University of California, Berkeley

Michael Shay, University of Delaware

Harlan E. Spence, University of New Hampshire

Richard M. Thorne, University of California, Los Angeles

Panel on Solar and Heliospheric Physics Membership

Richard A. Mewaldt, California Institute of Technology (chair)

Spiro K. Antiochos, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (vice chair)

Timothy S. Bastian, National Radio Astronomy Observatory

Joe Giacalone, University of Arizona

George Gloeckler, University of Maryland, College Park

John W. Harvey, National Solar Observatory

Russell A. Howard, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory

Justin Kasper, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

Robert P. Lin, University of California, Berkeley

Glenn M. Mason, Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

Eberhard Moebius, University of New Hampshire

Merav Opher, George Mason University

Jesper Schou, Stanford University

Nathan A. Schwadron, Boston University

Amy Winebarger, Alabama A&M University

Daniel Winterhalter, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Thomas N. Woods, University of Colorado, Boulder

DECADAL SURVEY ON BIOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES IN SPACE

The Decadal Survey on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space was formed under the auspices of the SSB and the ASEB in response to a congressional request for a study to establish priorities and provide recommendations for life and physical sciences space research, including research that will enable exploration missions in microgravity and partial gravity for the 2010-2020 decade. The decadal survey will define research areas, recommend a research portfolio and a timeline for conducting that research, identify facility and platform requirements as appropriate, provide rationales for suggested program elements, define dependencies between research objectives, identify terrestrial benefits, and specify whether the research product directly enables exploration or produces fundamental new knowledge. These areas will be categorized as either those that are required to enable exploration missions or those that are enabled or facilitated because of exploration missions.

The steering committee’s interim report, Life and Physical Sciences Research for a New Era of Space Exploration: An Interim Report, was released in July 2010. Work on the final report continued during the steering committee’s October 2010 meeting.

Revisions to the report in response to comments from some 40 external peer reviewers was completed in January 2011, and the report received sign-off in February. Following editorial revisions, the prepublication version of the report, Recapturing a Future for Space Exploration: Life and Physical Sciences Research for a New Era, was delivered to NASA on March 28 and publicly released on April 5. A number of briefings with NASA and congressional staff were held in early April, including a joint briefing to the Office of Management and Budget and Office

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

of Science and Technology Policy staff, a briefing to the NASA Advisory Council, and a briefing to a European Science Foundation workshop.

During the fourth quarter, final publication of the report was completed and dissemination activities continued. Co-chair Betsy Cantwell gave an invited talk on the report at the International Space Station Utilization Workshop on December 16 in Tokyo, Japan.

Steering Committee Membership*

Elizabeth R. Cantwell, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (co-chair)

Wendy M. Kohrt, University of Colorado, Denver (co-chair)

Lars Berglund, University of California, Davis

Nicholas P. Bigelow, University of Rochester

Leonard H. Caveny, Independent Consultant

Vijay K. Dhir, University of California, Los Angeles

Joel Dimsdale, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine

Nikolaos A. Gatsonis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Simon Gilroy, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Benjamin D. Levine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Kathryn V. Logan, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Gabor A. Somorjai, University of California, Berkeley

Charles M. Tipton, University of Arizona

Jose L. Torero, University of Edinburgh, Scotland

Robert Wegeng, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Gayle E. Woloschak, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Staff

Sandra J. Graham, Senior Program Officer, SSB (study director)

Alan C. Angleman, Senior Program Officer, ASEB

Ian W. Pryke, Senior Program Officer, SSB

Robert L. Riemer, Senior Program Officer, Board on Physics and Astronomy

Maureen Mellody, Program Officer, ASEB

Lewis Groswald, Research Associate, SSB

Danielle Johnson-Bland, Senior Program Assistant, Committee on Law and Justice

Laura Toth, Senior Program Assistant, National Materials Advisory Board

Linda M. Walker, Senior Program Assistant, SSB

Eric Whittaker, Senior Program Assistant, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board

Animal and Human Biology Panel Membership

Kenneth M. Baldwin, University of California, Irvine (chair)

François M. Abboud, University of Iowa, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine

Peter R. Cavanagh, University of Washington

V. Reggie Edgerton, University of California, Los Angeles

Donna Murasko, Drexel University

John T. Potts, Jr., Massachusetts General Hospital

April E. Ronca, Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Charles M. Tipton, University of Arizona

John B. West, University of California, San Diego

_______________

*All terms expired on November 30, 2010.

Staff from other NRC boards who assisted with the survey.

All terms expired on May 31, 2011.

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

Applied Physical Sciences Panel Membership*

Peter W. Voorhees, Northwestern University (chair)

Nikolaos A. Gatsonis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Richard T. Lahey, Jr., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Richard M. Lueptow, Northwestern University

John J. Moore, Colorado School of Mines

Elaine S. Oran, Naval Research Laboratory

Amy L. Rechenmacher, University of Southern California

James S. T’ien, Case Western Reserve University

Mark M. Weislogel, Portland State University

Fundamental Physics Panel Membership*

Robert V. Duncan, University of Missouri (chair)

Nicholas P. Bigelow, University of Rochester

Paul M. Chaikin, New York University

Ronald G. Larson, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

W. Carl Lineberger, University of Colorado, Boulder

Ronald Walsworth, Harvard University

Human Behavior and Mental Health Panel Membership*

Thomas J. Balkin, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (chair)

Joel E. Dimsdale, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine

Nick Kanas, University of California, San Francisco

Gloria R. Leon, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

Lawrence A. Palinkas, University of California, San Diego

Integrative and Translational Research for the Human System Panel Membership*

James A. Pawelczyk, Pennsylvania State University (chair)

Alan R. Hargens, University of California, San Diego

Robert L. Helmreich, University of Texas, Austin (retired)

Joanne R. Lupton, Texas A&M University, College Station

Charles M. Oman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

David Robertson, Vanderbilt University

Suzanne M. Schneider, University of New Mexico

Gayle E. Woloschak, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Plant and Microbial Biology Panel Membership*

Terri L. Lomax, North Carolina State University (chair)

Paul Blount, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Robert J. Ferl, University of Florida

Simon Gilroy, University of Wisconsin, Madison

E. Peter Greenberg, University of Washington School of Medicine

Translation to Space Exploration Systems Panel Membership*

James P. Bagian, U.S. Air Force and University of Michigan (chair)

_______________

*All terms expired on May 31, 2011.

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

Frederick R. Best, Texas A&M University, College Station

Leonard H. Caveny, Independent Consultant

Michael B. Duke, Colorado School of Mines (retired)

John P. Kizito, North Carolina A&T State University

David Y. Kusnierkiewicz, Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

E. Thomas Mahefkey, Jr., Heat Transfer Technology Consultants

Dava J. Newman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Richard J. Roby, Combustion Science and Engineering, Inc.

Guillermo Trotti, Trotti and Associates, Inc.

Alan Wilhite, Georgia Institute of Technology

EVALUATION OF SPACE RADIATION CANCER RISK MODEL

The Committee for Evaluation of Space Radiation Cancer Risk Model was formed to review NASA’s risk model for radiation-induced cancer in astronauts. The committee held its first on meeting on June 13-15 in Washington, D.C. The committee heard a large number of briefings describing various aspects of the proposed NASA risk model for radiation- induced cancer in astronauts and on recent research relevant to that model. After a subsequent discussion of issues related to the model with NASA participants and invited speakers, the committee went into closed session on the second day. The committee reviewed the model and identified questions and areas where additional information was needed. A report outline and writing assignments were developed and plans were made for activities leading up to the next committee meeting.

On August 3-5 the committee met in Washington, D.C., to discuss and assess component modules in the NASA risk model for radiation-induced cancer in astronauts and to draft and revise sections of the committee report. One open session was held on the second day of the meeting, in which committee members closely questioned NASA radiation scientist Francis Cucinotta regarding aspects of the proposed model and saw a demonstration of the integrated model’s desktop graphical user interface. At the close of the meeting the committee submitted additional questions of clarification to NASA and set writing assignments and schedules.

The committee held its final meeting on September 12-14, at which time it reviewed the recently published final version of the NASA model, along with a number of resource materials it had requested from NASA. During the meeting the committee reviewed and extensively revised the integrated draft of the report and worked to develop its final conclusions and recommendations. Following the meeting, committee members continued to refine sections of the report and develop summary materials in preparation for external review.

During the fourth quarter, the committee continued to finalize its draft report, and the draft entered external review in late October. After receiving the comments of each reviewer, the committee continued to refine the report to address all issues raised and this work was completed in mid-December. The report was released in prepublication form in January 2012.

Membership

R. Julian Preston, Environmental Protection Agency (chair)

Joel S. Bedford, Colorado State University

Amy Berrington de Gonzalez, National Cancer Institute

B. John Garrick, Garrick Consulting

Dudley T. Goodhead, Medical Research Council, United Kingdom (emeritus)

Bernard A. Harris, Jr., Vesalius Ventures, Inc.

Kathryn D. Held, Massachusetts General Hospital

David G. Hoel, Medical University of South Carolina

Jack R. Jokipii, University of Arizona, Lunar and Planetary Laboratory

Insoo Jun, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

Charles E. Land, National Cancer Institute (retired)

Hans-Georg Menzel, CERN (retired)

Peter O’Neill, University of Oxford

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

Staff

Sandra J. Graham, Senior Program Officer, SSB (study director)

Amanda R. Thibault, Research Associate, ASEB

Rodney Howard, Senior Program Assistant, SSB

IMPLEMENTING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE
NEW WORLDS, NEW HORIZONS DECADAL SURVEY

The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) requested that the NRC convene a panel to consider whether NASA’s Euclid proposal is consistent with achieving the priorities, goals, and recommendations, and with pursuing the science strategy, articulated in 2010 astronomy and astrophysics decadal survey, New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics (NWNH). The ad hoc Panel on Implementing Recommendations from the New Worlds, New Horizons Decadal Survey was formed under the auspices of the Board on Physics and Astronomy (BPA) in collaboration with the SSB. The panel also investigated what impact NASA’s participation in Euclid might have on the prospects for the timely realization of the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) mission and other activities recommended by NWNH in view of the projected budgetary situation. A workshop was convened at the National Academies’ Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center in Irvine, California, on November 7, 2010, and included presentations from NASA, the European Space Agency, OSTP, the Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, and members of the domestic and foreign astronomy and astrophysics communities. In addition to the workshop, the panel met by teleconference call in 2010 on October 27, November 3, and November 16.

The report of the panel was released in prepublication form on December 10, 2010, and is reprinted in Chapter 5.

Membership*

Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University (co-chair)

Charles F. Kennel, Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego (co-chair)

Alan Dressler, Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science

Debra M. Elmegreen, Vassar College

Fiona A. Harrison, California Institute of Technology

Lynne Hillenbrand, California Institute of Technology

Steven M. Ritz, University of California, Santa Cruz

A. Thomas Young, Lockheed Martin Corporation (retired)

Staff

David B. Lang, Program Officer, BPA (study director)

Caryn J. Knutsen, Associate Program Officer, BPA

Teri Thorowgood, Administrative Coordinator, BPA

Beth Dolan, Financial Associate, BPA

PLANETARY PROTECTION STANDARDS FOR ICY BODIES IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM

The ad hoc Committee on Planetary Protection Standards for Icy Bodies in the Solar System was established to develop and recommend planetary protection policies for future spacecraft missions, including orbiters, landers, and subsurface probes, to the icy bodies in the outer solar system (asteroids, satellites, Kuiper belt objects, and comets) in light of current scientific understanding and ongoing improvements in mission-enabling capabilities and technologies.

Following several organizational conference calls held in the last quarter of 2010, the committee’s first and second meetings were held at the National Academies’ Keck Center in Washington, D.C., and the National Academies’ Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center in Irvine, California, on January 31-February 2, 2011, and March 16-18, 2011, respectively. Both meetings were devoted to gathering the necessary biological and planetological background to

_______________

*All terms ended on April 30, 2011.

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

undertake the study. A detailed outline of the committee’s report was drafted during the meeting in California. The committee held a conference call on May 13, 2011, and convened its third and final meeting at the Beckman Center on June 14-16, 2011.

A complete draft of the committee’s report was assembled during the summer months. The draft text was sent to nine external reviewers in late October. All reviews were received by late November, with the study director and committee chair meeting a final time in December to double-check facts and figures. The report has been revised in response to reviewer comments and is currently awaiting NRC approval. Delivery of a final NRC-approved document to NASA is scheduled for mid- to late March of 2012.

Membership

Mitchell L. Sogin, Marine Biological Laboratory (chair)

Geoffrey Collins, Wheaton College (vice chair)

Amy Baker, Technical Administrative Services

John A. Baross, University of Washington

Amy C. Barr, Brown University

William V. Boynton, University of Arizona

Charles S. Cockell, University of Edinburgh

Michael J. Daly, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

Joseph R. Fragola, Valador, Inc.

Rosaly M. Lopes, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Kenneth H. Nealson, University of Southern California

Douglas S. Stetson, Space Science and Exploration Consulting Group

Mark H. Thiemens, University of California, San Diego

Staff

David H. Smith, Senior Program Officer, SSB (study director)

Rodney N. Howard, Senior Program Assistant, SSB

Katie Daud, Lloyd V. Berkner Space Policy Intern

Danielle Piskorz, Lloyd V. Berkner Space Policy Intern

Heather D. Smith, NRC Mirzayan Science and Technology Policy Fellow

Anna B. Williams, NRC Mirzayan Science and Technology Policy Fellow

PLANETARY SCIENCES DECADAL SURVEY: 2013-2022

The Planetary Sciences Decadal Survey: 2013-2022 was established to develop a comprehensive science and mission strategy for planetary science that updates and extends the 2003 solar system exploration decadal survey, New Frontiers in the Solar System: An Integrated Exploration Strategy. The new decadal survey was designed to broadly canvas the planetary science community to determine the current state of knowledge and then identify the most important scientific questions expected to face the community during the interval 2013-2022. This 2-year study was initiated at the request of NASA and NSF in 2009.

To assist its activities, the decadal survey commissioned mission studies that were undertaken at the Applied Physics Laboratory, Goddard Space Flight Center, and Jet Propulsion Laboratory. In a related activity, the decadal survey engaged the services of the Aerospace Corporation to provide independent cost and technical evaluations of the highest-priority mission concepts resulting from these studies. The steering group and panel meetings and related community outreach activities began in the summer of 2009 and concluded in the summer of 2010.

The decadal survey’s report, Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the Decade 2013-2022, was delivered to NASA and NSF in prepublication form in late February 2011 and was released to the public on March 7 at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in The Woodlands, Texas. The report’s Summary is reprinted in Chapter 5.

Briefings about the report’s conclusions and recommendations were given to NASA, NSF, OMB, OSTP, and various congressional committees during the period of March 1-5.

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

Following the release of the report, members of the steering group made presentations about the report at the meetings of VEXAG, LEAG, OPAG, the European Geophysical Union, the NAC’s Planetary Science Subcommittee, and the NAC’s Science Committee. Other dissemination activities included a series of regional town hall meetings organized by the Division for Planetary Science of the American Astronomical Society, which included town halls in College Park, Maryland; Boulder, Colorado; Tucson, Arizona; Orlando, Florida; New York, New York; Pasadena, California; and St. Louis, Missouri. Papers on the survey’s origin, organization, and outcome and on the survey’s public outreach activities were delivered by NRC staff at the International Astronautical Congress (Cape Town, South Africa) and at the Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society (Nantes, France), respectively.

An illustrated version of the survey report intended for a popular audience is currently in preparation and is currently scheduled for publication early in 2012.

Steering Group Membership*

Steven W. Squyres, Cornell University (chair)

Laurence A. Soderblom, U.S. Geological Survey (vice chair)

Wendy M. Calvin, University of Nevada, Reno

Dale Cruikshank, NASA Ames Research Center

Pascale Ehrenfreund, George Washington University

G. Scott Hubbard, Stanford University

Margaret G. Kivelson, University of California, Los Angeles

B. Gentry Lee, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Jane Luu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lincoln Laboratory

Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute

Ralph L. McNutt, Jr., Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

Harry Y. McSween, Jr., University of Tennessee, Knoxville

George A. Paulikas, The Aerospace Corporation (retired)

Amy Simon-Miller, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

David J. Stevenson, California Institute of Technology

A. Thomas Young, Lockheed Martin Corporation (retired)

Staff

David H. Smith, Senior Program Officer, SSB (study director)

Dwayne A. Day, Program Officer, SSB

Abigail Sheffer, Associate Program Officer, SSB

Dionna Williams, Program Associate, SSB

Lewis Groswald, Research Associate, SSB

Rodney N. Howard, Senior Program Assistant, SSB

Satellites Panel Membership

John Spencer, Southwest Research Institute (chair)

David J. Stevenson, California Institute of Technology (vice chair)

Glenn Fountain, Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

Caitlin Ann Griffith, University of Arizona

Krishan Khurana, University of California, Los Angeles

Christopher P. McKay, NASA Ames Research Center

Francis Nimmo, University of California, Santa Cruz

Louise M. Prockter, Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

_______________

*All terms ended in August 2011.

Terms ended for the chair and vice chair in August 2011 and for members in October 2010.

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

Gerald Schubert, University of California, Los Angeles

Thomas R. Spilker, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Elizabeth P. Turtle, Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

Hunter Waite, Southwest Research Institute

Giant Planets Panel Membership*

Heidi B. Hammel, Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (chair)

Amy Simon-Miller, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (vice chair)

Reta F. Beebe, New Mexico State University

John R. Casani, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

John Clarke, Boston University

Brigette Hesman, University of Maryland

William B. Hubbard, University of Arizona

Mark S. Marley, NASA Ames Research Center

Philip D. Nicholson, Cornell University

R. Wayne Richie, NASA Langley Research Center (retired)

Kunio M. Sayanagi, California Institute of Technology

Inner Planets Panel Membership*

Ellen R. Stofan, Proxemy Research, Inc. (chair)

Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute (vice chair)

Barbara A. Cohen, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center

Martha S. Gilmore, Wesleyan University

Lori Glaze, Proxemy Research

David H. Grinspoon, Denver Museum of Nature and Science

Steven A. Hauck II, Case Western Reserve University

Ayanna M. Howard, Georgia Institute of Technology

Charles K. Shearer, University of New Mexico

Douglas S. Stetson, Space Science and Exploration Consulting Group

Edward M. Stolper, California Institute of Technology

Allan H. Treiman, Lunar and Planetary Institute

Mars Panel Membership*

Philip R. Christensen, Arizona State University (chair)

Wendy M. Calvin, University of Nevada, Reno (vice chair)

Raymond E. Arvidson, Washington University

Robert D. Braun, Georgia Institute of Technology

Glenn E. Cunningham, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (retired)

David Des Marais, NASA Ames Research Center

Linda T. Elkins-Tanton, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Francois Forget, University of Paris

John P. Grotzinger, California Institute of Technology

Penelope King, University of New Mexico

Philippe Lognonne, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris

Paul R. Mahaffy, Goddard Institute for Space Studies

Lisa M. Pratt, Indiana University

_______________

*Terms ended for the chair and vice chair in August 2011 and for members in October 2010.

Term ended February 8, 2010.

Term ended August 1, 2010.

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×

Primitive Bodies Panel Membership*

Joseph F. Veverka, Cornell University (chair)

Harry Y. McSween, Jr., University of Tennessee, Knoxville (vice chair)

Erik Asphaug, University of California, Santa Cruz

Michael E. Brown, California Institute of Technology

Donald E. Brownlee, University of Washington

Marc Buie, Southwest Research Institute

Timothy J. McCoy, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

Marc D. Rayman, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Edward Reynolds, Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

Mark Sephton, Imperial College London

Jessica Sunshine, University of Maryland, College Park

Faith Vilas, MMT Observatory

_______________

*Terms ended for the chair and vice chair in August 2011 and for members in October 2010.

Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 22
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 23
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 26
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 27
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 30
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"3 Ad Hoc Study Committees: Activities and Membership." National Research Council. 2012. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13329.
×
Page 34
Next: 4 Workshops, Symposia, Meetings of Experts, and Other Special Projects »
Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011 Get This Book
×
 Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The original charter of the Space Science Board was established in June 1958, 3 months before the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) opened its doors. The Space Science Board and its successor, the Space Studies Board (SSB), have provided expert external and independent scientific and programmatic advice to NASA on a continuous basis from NASA's inception until the present. The SSB has also provided such advice to other executive branch agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the National Science Foundation (NSF), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the Department of Defense, as well as to Congress.

Space Studies Board Annual Report 2011 covers a message from the chair of the SSB, Charles F. Kennel, where he expresses that 2011 was a challenging and uncertain year for NASA and the space science research communities. This report also explains the origins of the Space Science Board, how the Space Studies Board functions today, the SSB's collaboration with other National Research Council units, assures the quality of the SSB reports, acknowledges the audience and sponsors, and expresses the necessity to enhance the outreach and improve dissemination of SSB reports.

This report will be relevant to a full range of government audiences in civilian space research - including NASA, NSF, NOAA, USGS, and the Department of Energy, as well members of the SSB, policy makers, and researchers.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!