National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 8 Conclusion
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2012. Improving Measures of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13358.
×

References

Adams, J., and Z. Griliches. (1996). Measuring science: An exploration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93:12,644-12,670.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). AAAA Report: Research and Development FY 2012. Available: http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/rdreport2012/ [December 2011].

Association for Public and Land Grant University. (2011). Potential new measures of university contributions to regional economies: Introductory comments. White paper.

Barefoot, K.B., and R.J. Mataloni. (2011). Operations of U.S. multinational companies in the United States and abroad: Preliminary results from the 2009 Benchmark Survey. Survey of Current Business (November):29-48. Available: http://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2011/11%20November/1111_mnc.pdf [December 2011].

Boyd, D., and K. Crawford. (2011). Six Provocations for Big Data. A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926431 [December 2011].

Corrado, C., C. Hulten, and D. Sichel. (2005). Measuring Capital and Technology: An Expanded Framework. In Measuring Capital in the New Economy, C. Corrado, J. Haltiwanger, and D. Sichel, eds., Studies in Income and Wealth, 65. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Deutsche Bank Research. (2011). International Division of Labour in R&D: Research Follows Production. Available: http://www.dbresearch.de/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_ENPROD/PROD0000000000269346.pdf [December 2011].

Gallaher, M., A. Link, and J. Petrusa. (2005). Measuring Service-Sector Research and Development. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.

Gault, F. (2010). Innovation Strategies for a Global Economy: Development, Implementation, Measurement, and Management. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Griliches, Z. (1974). Errors in variables and other unobservables. Econometrica 42(6):971-998.

Griliches, Z. (1986). Economic data issues. In Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator, eds., Handbook of Econometrics 3:1,465-1,514.

Groves, R.M. (2011a). A Possible Data Future for the Observational Social Sciences. Paper presented at the COSSA 30th anniversary meeting, Washington, DC. http://www.cossa.org/annualmtg/2011/Robert-Groves.pdf [December 2011].

Groves, R.M. (2011b). Data futures for the observational social sciences. COSSA Update 30(20B) (November 10):13-14. http://www.cossa.org/volume30/Update_Volume_30_Issue_20-B.pdf [December 2011].

Haskel, J., and G. Wallis. (2009). What happened to the knowledge economy? ICT, intangible investment, and Britain’s productivity record revisited. The Review of Income and Wealth 55(3):686-716.

Hill, D. (2007). The post-scientific society. Issues in Science and Technology (Fall). Available: http://www.issues.org/24.1/c_hill.html [September 2011].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2012. Improving Measures of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13358.
×

 

International Monetary Fund. (2011). Sixth Edition of the IMF’s Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual. Available: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2007/bopman6.htm [December 2011].

Jaffe, A. (2011). Analysis of public research, industrial R&D, and commercial innovation: Measurement issues underlying the science of science policy. In K.H. Fealing, J. Lane, J.H. Marburger, III, and S. Shipp, eds., The Science of Science Policy: A Handbook. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Maiya, A.S., and T.Y. Berger-Wolf. (2011). Benefits of Bias: Towards Better Characterization of Network Sampling. KDD 2011: 17th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Diego, California. Available: http://arun.maiya.net/papers/maiya_etal-netbias.pdf [December 2011].

Mislove, A., M. Marcon, K.P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. (2007). Measurement and analysis of online social networks. Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM, Internet Measurement Conference, October 24-26. http://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2007/papers/imc170.pdf [December 2011].

Molitor, N-T., N. Best, C. Jackson, and S. Richardson. (2009). Using Bayesian graphical models to model biases in observational studies and to combine multiple sources of data: Applications to low birth weight and water disinfection by-products. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 72(3):615-637.

Moris, F. (2009). R&D exports and imports: New data and methodological issues. In M. Reinsdorf and M. Slaughter M, eds., International Flows of Invisibles: Trade in Services and Intangibles in the Era of Globalization. National Bureau of Economic Research, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 69. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

NASSCOM and Booz & Co. (2010). Global ER&D: Accelerating Innovation with Indian Engineering. Available: http://www.booz.com/media/uploads/NASSCOM_Booz_ESR_Report_2010.pdf [December 2011].

National Research Council. (2005). Measuring Research and Development Expenditures in the U.S. Economy. Panel on Research and Development Statistics at the National Science Foundation, Lawrence D. Brown, Thomas J. Plewes, and Marisa A. Gerstein, eds. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2007). Innovation Inducement Prizes at the National Science Foundation. Committee on the Design of an NSF Innovation Prize, Board of Science, Technology, and Economic Policy, and Policy and Global Affairs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2008). Using the American Community Survey for the National Science Foundation’s Science and Engineering Statistics Programs. Panel to Assess the Benefits of the American Community Survey for the National Science Foundation’s Engineering Workforce Statistics Programs, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2011). Communicating Science and Engineering Data in the Information Age. Panel on Communicating National Science Foundation Science and Engineering Information to Data Users, Committee on National Statistics and Computer

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2012. Improving Measures of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13358.
×

Science and Telecommunications Board, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Science Board. (2010). Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. NSB 10/01. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

National Science Board. (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. NSB 12/01. Arlington, VA: U.S. National Science Foundation.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2002). Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.oecd.org/document/6/0,3746,en_2649_34451_33828550_1_1_1_1,00.html [December 2011].

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Measuring Innovation: A New Perspective. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.oecd.org/document/22/0,3746,en_41462537_41454856_44979734_1_1_1_1,00.html [December 2011].

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011: Innovation and Growth in Knowledge Economies. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.oecd.org/document/10/0,3746,en_2649_33703_39493962_1_1_1_1,00.html#toc [December 2011].

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development-Eurostat. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Third Edition. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development-Eurostat. (2008). Manual on Business Demography Statistics. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

Petersen, D.R., and N. Ahmad. (2007). High-Growth Enterprises and Gazelles—Preliminary and Summary Sensitivity Analysis. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/4/39639605.pdf [December 2011].

Pianta, M. (2005). Innovation and employment. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R. Nelson, eds. (pp. 568-598). New York: Oxford University Press.

Roach, M., and W.M. Cohen. (2011). Lens or Prism? A Comparative Assessment of Patent Citations as Measure of Knowledge Flows from Public Research. Working paper. Available: http://www.nber.org/public_html/confer/2011/SI2011/PRIPP/Roach_Cohen.pdf [December 2011].

Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). Theory of Economic Development. [1st ed. 1911]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Shneiderman, B., C. Dunne, P. Sharma, and P. Wang. (2011). Innovation trajectories for information visualizations: Comparing treemaps, cone trees, and hyperbolic trees. Information Visualization, August 29. Available: http://hcil.cs.umd.edu/trs/2010-16/2010-16.pdf [December 2011].

Tassey, G. (2007). The Technology Imperative. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2012. Improving Measures of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13358.
×

 

Thomas, J., and S. Mohrman. (2011). A vision of data and analytics for the science of science policy. In The Science of Science Policy: A Handbook, K.H. Fealing, J. Lane, J.H. Marburger, III, and S. Shipp, eds., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

U.S. Department of Commerce. (2011). 2010 Business R&D and Innovation Survey. Economics and Statistics Administration and U.S. Census Bureau. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvyindustry/about/brdis/surveys/srvybrdis_2010.pdf [December 2011].

Van Reenen, J. (1997). Employment and technical innovation: Evidence from U.K. manufacturing firms. Journal of Labor Economics 15(2):255-284.

West, J., and C. Bergstrom. (2010). How to improve the use of metrics. Nature 465:870-872.

Zucker, L., and M. Darby. (2011). Legacy and new databases for linking Innovation to impact. In The Science of Science Policy: A Handbook, K.H. Fealing, J. Lane, J.H. Marburger, III, and S. Shipp, eds., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2012. Improving Measures of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13358.
×
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2012. Improving Measures of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13358.
×
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2012. Improving Measures of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13358.
×
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2012. Improving Measures of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13358.
×
Page 49
Next: Appendix A: Panel Workshop Agenda and Participants »
Improving Measures of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Interim Report Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $31.00 Buy Ebook | $24.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), at the U.S. National Foundation, is 1 of 14 major statistical agencies in the federal government, of which at least 5 collect relevant information on science, technology, and innovation activities in the United States and abroad. The America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 expanded and codified NCSES's role as a U.S. federal statistical agency. Important aspects of the agency's mandate include collection, acquisition, analysis, and reporting and dissemination of data on research and development trends, on U.S. competitiveness in science, technology, and research and development, and on the condition and progress of U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education.

Improving Measures of Science, Technology and Innovation: Interim Report examines the status of the NCSES's science, technology, and innovation (STI) indicators. This report assesses and provides recommendations regarding the need for revised, refocused, and newly developed indicators designed to better reflect fundamental and rapid changes that are reshaping global science, technology and innovation systems. The book also determines the international scope of STI indicators and the need for developing new indicators that measure developments in innovative activities in the United States and abroad, and Offers foresight on the types of data, metrics and indicators that will be particularly influential in evidentiary policy decision-making for years to come.

In carrying out its charge, the authoring panel undertook a broad and comprehensive review of STI indicators from different countries, including Japan, China, India and several countries in Europe, Latin America and Africa. Improving Measures of Science, Technology, and Innovation makes recommendations for near-term action by NCSES along two dimensions: (1) development of new policy-relevant indicators that are based on NCSES survey data or on data collections at other statistical agencies; and (2) exploration of new data extraction and management tools for generating statistics, using automated methods of harvesting unstructured or scientometric data and data derived from administrative records.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!