National Academies Press: OpenBook

Nuclear Physics: Exploring the Heart of Matter (2013)

Chapter: Highlight: Diagnosing Cancer with Positron Emission Tomography

« Previous: 2 Science Questions
Suggested Citation:"Highlight: Diagnosing Cancer with Positron Emission Tomography." National Research Council. 2013. Nuclear Physics: Exploring the Heart of Matter. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13438.
×

Highlight: Diagnosing Cancer with Positron Emission Tomography

Atomic nuclei with fewer neutrons than stable isotopes decay predominantly by emitting a positively charged electron, a positron, which is annihilated with electrons, emitting gamma-radiation. For more than 35 years positron emission tomography (PET) has been used as a research tool in neuroscience and in diagnosing cancer.1

PET imaging makes use of the self-collimating nature of positron decay (see Figure PET 1) as two nearly collinear photons are used to locate an annihilation event. PET cameras are typically made of a ring(s) of detectors that are in timed coincidence (resolving time of a few nanoseconds), allowing a line of response to define the chord along which the positron was annihilated (the location of the emission is not known because of the short distance the positron travels before annihilation, typically a few millimeters). By mathematically back-projecting the lines of response, a density map can be generated that reflects the distribution of the positron emitter.

Functional imaging using PET started as a research tool in neuroscience in the late 1970s and remains a major research tool for the neurosciences. However, its main impact recently has been in the diagnosis of cancer. Originally, simple tracer molecules such as water, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide were used. The first complex molecule to be used extensively was the glucose analog 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), developed at BNL in collaboration

image

FIGURE PET 1 Illustration of positron decay. One of the protons (red) in the unstable nucleus is converted into a neutron (blue) with the emission of a positive electron (positron). The positron travels a short distance until it is annihilated with a neighboring atomic electron, resulting in two photons (Ð-rays), each with an energy of 511 keV. The photons will travel at nearly 180° from each other to conserve momentum. SOURCE: T. Ruth, 2011, The uses of radiotracers in the life sciences, Reports on Progress in Physics 72: 016701. Printed with permission from IOP Publishing Ltd.

Suggested Citation:"Highlight: Diagnosing Cancer with Positron Emission Tomography." National Research Council. 2013. Nuclear Physics: Exploring the Heart of Matter. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13438.
×

with researchers at the NIH and the University of Pennsylvania around 1975. Since the human brain uses glucose as its primary energy source, the availability of the tracer led to groundbreaking studies of the human brain in health and disease. This effort was driven by the successful use of 14C-labeled deoxyglucose at the NIH by Louis Sokolov in the 1960s. Since 14C is not detectable from outside of the body, the effort went into developing a labeled analog that could be shipped from a cyclotron facility (BNL in this case) and the PET camera (the University of Pennsylvania). Thus 18F with its nearly 2-hour half-life became the radionuclide of choice.

Many more tracers are used to investigate the various neuronal systems, probing both the presynaptic and postsynaptic pathways. Several hundred tracers have been prepared and tested for their utility in investigating various enzymatic and receptor systems although only a handful are routinely used. There are tracers specifically designed to monitor cell proliferation, the hypoxic nature of cells, and cell apoptosis.

The heart of the PET camera is the detection system, which builds on scintillator detector systems developed by nuclear scientists. The vast majority of modern PET scanners make use of segmented inorganic scintillation crystals coupled to multiple photomultiplier tubes (PMT). The ideal crystal will have a high stopping power for the 511-keV annihilation photons (high photoelectric absorption), a high light output with wavelength matched to the PMT, and a fast decay time for the light, and it will be physically robust. For nearly two decades the detector material of choice was bismuth orthogermanate, a scintillator often used in basic nuclear science research. More recently, lutetium orthosilicate was introduced. Owing to its higher light output, the segmentation of the crystals could be finer, thus reducing the crystal element size from approximately (4 mm × 4 mm) to (2 mm × 2 mm). There are proposals to reduce the crystal elements to below 1 mm2. In order to accomplish such a task, the packing fraction of the crystals must be improved—in other words, the empty space between crystal elements must remain a small fraction of the total area.

The typical crystal is segmented into an 8 × 8 grid (or more) coupled to four PMTs. There is an algorithm to identify the location of the event by comparing the light sharing among the PMTs. While this scheme reduces the cost of the scanner, there is a loss in resolution owing to the approximate nature of the light-sharing approach. There are prototype scanners using avalanche photodiodes coupled to individual crystal elements, making the finer pixel identification better. Thus far such systems have been built only for small animal scanners.

As the physical limitations of detection are approached, the remaining avenue is to increase the signal to noise ratio by utilizing tracers that are uniquely suited to imaging the function in question and that otherwise clear rapidly from surrounding tissue. To this end, the development of more specific tracers is believed to be the most critical issue for PET.

One of the main strengths of PET compared to single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the ability to measure, directly, the attenuation effect of the object being viewed. This is the result of requiring that both photons be detected. Thus, if one photon of the pair is not observed, then there is no line of response. Along the path to the detectors, one or both photons (511 keV each, the rest mass of the electron) can undergo absorption. Thus, in order to be detected as an event, both photons must be detected in temporal coincidence. By using an external source of positron emitter, the attenuating (absorbing) extent of the object to be measured can be determined. All commercial PET cameras are now built with a CT scanner (X-ray tomography) so that a merged image of structure and function can be obtained. Since the CT image is a measure of electron density, it is used to calculate the necessary coefficients for attenuation correction. The primary function of the CT image is to provide a detailed view of the section of the body under investigation. Figure PET 2 illustrates the power of this approach.

There are several physical limitations inherent in PET technology. First, as the emitted positron has kinetic energy, varying from a few hundred keV to several MeV depending on

Suggested Citation:"Highlight: Diagnosing Cancer with Positron Emission Tomography." National Research Council. 2013. Nuclear Physics: Exploring the Heart of Matter. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13438.
×

which radionuclide is used, it will travel a few millimeters to centimeters before annihilating with an atomic electron. As such, the site of annihilation is not the site of emission, resulting in a limitation when defining the origin of the decay. Another limitation is the fact that the positron-electron pair is not at rest when the annihilation occurs; thus by virtue of the conservation of momentum, the two photons are not exactly collinear. Although the lack of collinearity becomes increasingly important with greater detector separation, this effect is ignored, for the most part, in existing tomographs because the detector ring diameter is less than a meter, at which distance the deviation from 180° is a fraction of a millimeter.

image

FIGURE PET 2 The three panels from left to right show a combined FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) image in transaxial, saggital, and coronal views. The colored hot metal image is the PET image and the gray image is from the CT camera. The combined image enables physicians to determine the precise location of abnormal function (high uptake in the mass visible on the chest wall in the CT image in this case). In addition, a metastatic tumor is visible in the pelvic region. SOURCE: T. Ruth, 2011, The uses of radiotracers in the life sciences, Reports on Progress in Physics 72: 016701. Photo courtesy of British Columbia Cancer Agency and reprinted with permission from IOP Publishing Ltd.

Because diagnostic imaging is driven by a digital approach (present/absent, yes/no), the desire to have uncluttered images resulting from PET is very important. Nevertheless, the true power of PET lies in its ability to track the distribution of a tracer over time and to extract detailed kinetic data, as in a physical chemistry experiment where rate constants are determined. So, the conflict between using PET technology for clinical diagnosis and using it as an in vivo biochemistry tool will not be easily resolved, nor should it be.

_________

1The information in this vignette is adapted from T.J. Ruth, 2009, The uses of radiotracers in the life sciences, Report on Progress in Physics 72: 016701. Permission granted by IOP Publishing, Ltd.

Suggested Citation:"Highlight: Diagnosing Cancer with Positron Emission Tomography." National Research Council. 2013. Nuclear Physics: Exploring the Heart of Matter. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13438.
×
Page 150
Suggested Citation:"Highlight: Diagnosing Cancer with Positron Emission Tomography." National Research Council. 2013. Nuclear Physics: Exploring the Heart of Matter. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13438.
×
Page 151
Suggested Citation:"Highlight: Diagnosing Cancer with Positron Emission Tomography." National Research Council. 2013. Nuclear Physics: Exploring the Heart of Matter. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13438.
×
Page 152
Next: 3 Societal Applications and Benefits »
Nuclear Physics: Exploring the Heart of Matter Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $64.00 Buy Ebook | $49.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The principal goals of the study were to articulate the scientific rationale and objectives of the field and then to take a long-term strategic view of U.S. nuclear science in the global context for setting future directions for the field. Nuclear Physics: Exploring the Heart of Matter provides a long-term assessment of an outlook for nuclear physics.

The first phase of the report articulates the scientific rationale and objectives of the field, while the second phase provides a global context for the field and its long-term priorities and proposes a framework for progress through 2020 and beyond. In the second phase of the study, also developing a framework for progress through 2020 and beyond, the committee carefully considered the balance between universities and government facilities in terms of research and workforce development and the role of international collaborations in leveraging future investments.

Nuclear physics today is a diverse field, encompassing research that spans dimensions from a tiny fraction of the volume of the individual particles (neutrons and protons) in the atomic nucleus to the enormous scales of astrophysical objects in the cosmos. Nuclear Physics: Exploring the Heart of Matter explains the research objectives, which include the desire not only to better understand the nature of matter interacting at the nuclear level, but also to describe the state of the universe that existed at the big bang. This report explains how the universe can now be studied in the most advanced colliding-beam accelerators, where strong forces are the dominant interactions, as well as the nature of neutrinos.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!