Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
1. FAA. New England Regional Aviation System Plan, October 2006. 2. Adler, T. Air Travelers 2002/2003: The New Realities? Resource Systems Group, March 2003. 3. Air Transport Action Group. The Americaâs Air Traffic: 1985-2011. Geneva, 1998. 4. Aaronson, R. Quoted in âWorldâs Airports Expect Nine Billion Passengers in 2025,â Travel Daily News, February 2007. www.traveldailynews.com/new.asp?newid=35188&subcategory_id=53 5. Southern California Association of Governments. âRegional Aviation Plan for the 2001 Regional Transportation Plan,â 2001. 6. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. Washington-Baltimore Regional Airport System Plan Ground Access Update, 2007. 7. Los Angeles World Airports. LAX Master Plan Documents. www.laxmasterplan.org 8. Wen, Y., K. Yan, X. Qiao, and J. Shi. âThe Characteristic Analysis of Passengersâ Selection of Ground Transport Mode Connecting Shanghai Pudong International Airport and the Downtown Area,â paper presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 2006, Washington, D.C., Compendium of Papers CD-ROM. 9. Noble, R., and the Mass Transit Railway Corporation. âHong Kongâs Airport Express: Lessons from the First Two Months Operations,â paper presented at the Air Rail 98 Conference, Frankfurt, Germany, 1998. 10. Hinz, G. âCTA Shelves Plans for Airport Express Trains,â Crainâs Chicago Business News, October 2006. 11. Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York, NY website (Planning Section). 12. Data for Oakland and San Francisco based on Metropolitan Transportation Commission Year 2002 surveys and San Francisco International Airport Ground Access Survey 2006. Oakland rail share calculated from AirBART ridership data. 13. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Ground Access Surveys, 2005. 14. MarketSense, from Massachusetts Port Authority Surveys, 2003. 15. National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board, Metropolitan Washington Council of Govern- ments, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, and Maryland Aviation Administration. 2005 Washington-Baltimore Regional Air Passenger Survey, January 2006. 16. Leigh Fisher Associates, M.A. Coogan, and MarketSense. TCRP Report 62: Improving Public Transportation Access to Large Airports. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. 17. MarketSense, from Atlanta Airport, 2005. 18. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, Division of Planning and Policy Development. 1990 Rail Passenger Study, p.14. 19. MarketSense, from Los Angeles World Airports, 2001. 20. Resource System Group. Chicago Origin-Destination Survey Report, January 2004. 21. Chicago Transit Authority, Strategic Planning Department. OâHare Airport Ground Travel Survey, June 1990. 22. MarketSense, from SEATAC Airport Surveys, 2006. 23. Jacobs Consultancy. Terminal Access Study, Portland International Airport, March 2005. 24. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Surveys, 1992 and 1997. 25. MarketSense, from Philadelphia International Airport Ground Access Survey. 26. Wilson, Hewitt & Associates. Philadelphia International Airport Ground Transportation Passenger Survey, Interpretation of Survey Results, 1986. 27. Meyer, K., C. Schmid, B. Steimann, R. Windisch. Vergleich internationaler FlughÃ¤fen, Projekt 42, Zurich Airport Authority, 2005. 28. MTRC. Personal communication, 2005. 29. Soo, E. âDetermining Passenger Demands and Customer Service Requirements,â paper presented at the Air Rail East West Conference, Hong Kong, 1998. 199 References
30. Civil Aviation Authority. CAA Passenger Survey Report 2004, Survey of Passengers at Gatwick, Heathrow, Luton, Manchester & Stansted Airports. 31. AÃ©roports de Paris. Personal communication. 32. International AirRail Organization (IARO). Schiphol Airport. 33. Munich Airport website, www.munich-airport.de/en/consumer/index.jsp. 34. Bayman, R. âPositioning Commuter Rail Services to Serve Airports: Who Needs the Metro?â Paper presented at the Air/Rail East West Conference, Frankfurt, Germany, 1998 35. Civil Aviation Authority. Surveys, 1997. 36. Pavaux, J. âRail/Air Complementarity in Europe: The Impact of High Speed Train Services.â Institute of Air Transport, Paris, 1991. 37. Sharp, A., and P. LeBlond. IARO Report 10.06: Check-in on Airport Railways; Draft for Consultation, Inter- national Air Rail Organisation, London. 38. Kriger, E., âDUS Rail Access, History Development, Experiences,â presentation at the eAirRail Conference, DÃ¼sseldorf, Germany, April 4, 2006 (Survey in 2002). 39. American Travel Survey, 1995. 40. GAO. Intermodal Transportation: Potential Strategies Would Redefine Federal Role in Developing Airport Intermodal Capabilities, 2005. 41. Jones, C. âRemote Baggage Checks Coming to Airport.â Las Vegas Review Journal, May 27, 2005. 42. Bags to Go Enterprises. www.baggagecheckin.com 43. New Jersey Transit. Ongoing program of monitoring. 44. I-95 Corridor Coalition. âIntermodal Service at the Newark Liberty International Airport Train Station: Observations and Lessons Learned,â October 2004. 184.108.40.206/pm/projectmanagement/Upfiles/reports/ full268.pdf 45. Elmore-Yalch, R. TCRP Report 36: A Handbook: Using Market Segmentation to Increase Transit Ridership, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998. 46. Blakenship, A.B., and G.E. Breen. State of the Art of Market Research. American Marketing Association, Chicago, 1996. 47. Leigh Fisher Associates, M.A. Coogan, and MarketSense. TCRP Report 83: Strategies for Improving Public Transportation Access to Large Airports, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002. 48. Lehr, F. âVienna International AirportâAirRail 2007.â Proceedings from International Air Rail Organi- zation, 2007. 200 Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation