Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
49 1. Janoo, V. C., and Korhonen, C. (1999). âPerformance Testing of Hot-Mix Asphalt Aggregates.â U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Special Report 99-20, Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH. 2. Saeed, A., Hall, J., and Barker, W. (2001). âPerformance-Related Tests of Aggregates for Use in Unbound Pavement Layers.â National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 453, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 3. Chowdhury, A., and Button, J. W. (2001). âFine Aggregate Angu- larity: Conventional and Unconventional Approach, Aggregate Contribution to Hot-Mix Asphalt HMA Performance.â American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Special Technical Publica- tion, No. 1412, 144â159. 4. Rao, C., and Tutumluer, E. (2000). âA New Image Analysis Approach for Determination of Volume of Aggregates.â Transportation Research Record 1721, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 73â80. 5. Meininger, R. C. (1998). âAggregate Tests Related to Perfor- mance of Portland Cement Concrete Pavements.â National Coop- erative Highway Research Program Project 4-20A Final Report. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 6. Yeggoni, M., Button, J. W., and Zollinger, D. G. (1996). âFractals of Aggregates Correlated With Creep in Asphalt Concrete.â Journal of Transportation Engineering (ASCE), 122 (1), 22â28. 7. Fowler, D. W., Zollinger, D. G., Carrasquillo, R. L., and Constantino, C. A. (1996). Aggregate Tests Related to Performance of Portland Cement Concrete, Phase 1 Unpublished Interim Report, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 4-20, Lincoln, NE. 8. Weingart, R. L., and Prowell, B. D. (1999). âSpecification Develop- ment Using the VDG-40 Videograder for Shape Classification of Aggregates.â Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium of the Inter- national Center for Aggregate Research (ICAR), University of Texas, Austin, TX. 9. Tutumluer, E., Rao, C., and Stefanski, J. (2000). âVideo Image Analysis of Aggregates.â Final Project Report, FHWA-IL-UI-278, Civil Engineering Studies UILU-ENG-2000-2015, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. 10. Maerz, N. H., and Lusher, M. (2001). âMeasurement of Flat and Elongation of Coarse Aggregate Using Digital Image Processing.â Transportation Research Board Proceedings, 80th Annual Meeting, Washington D.C., Paper No. 01-0177. 11. Maerz, N. H., and Zhou, W. (2001). âFlat and Elongated: Advances Using Digital Image Analysis.â Proceedings of the 9th Annual Symposium of the International Center for Aggregates Research (ICAR), Austin, TX. 12. Browne, C., Rauch, F. A., Haas, T. C., and Kim, H. (2001). âCom- parison Tests of Automated Equipment for Analyzing Aggregate Gradation.â Proceedings of the 9th Annual Symposium of the Inter- national Center for Aggregates Research (ICAR), Austin, TX. 13. Rittenhouse, G. (1943). âA Visual Method of Estimating Two Dimensional Sphericity.â Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 13(2), 79â81. 14. Wadell, H. (1932). âVolume, Shape, and Roundness of Rock Particles.â Journal of Geology, 40, 443â451. 15. Wadell, H. (1935). âVolume, Shape, and Roundness of Quartz Particles.â Journal of Geology, 43, 450â480. 16. Riley, N. A. (1941). âProjection Sphericity.â Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 11 (2), 94â97. 17. Powers, M. C. (1953). âA New Roundness Scale for Sedimentary Particles.â Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 23(2), 117â119. 18. Krumbein, W. C. (1941). âMeasurement and Geological Signifi- cance of Shape and Roundness of Sedimentary Particles.â Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 11(2), 64â72. 19. Johnson, R. A., and Wichern, D. W. (2002). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 20. Morrison, D. (2004). Multivariate Statistical Methods. Brooks/Cole Thomson Learning, Stamford, CT. 21. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY. 22. Garboczi, E. (2002). âThree-Dimensional Mathematical Analysis of Particle Shape Using X-Ray Tomography and Spherical Harmonics: Application to Aggregates Used in Concrete.â Cement and Concrete Research 32, 1621â1638. 23. Garboczi, E., Marty, N., Saleh, H., and Livingston, R. (2001). âAcquiring, Analyzing, and Using Complete Three-Dimensional Aggregate Shape Information.â Proceedings of International Center of Aggregate Research 2001 Annual Symposium. (CD-ROM) Publication. 24. Masad, E., Olcott, D., White, T., and Tashman, L. (2001). âCorrela- tion of Fine Aggregate Imaging Shape Indices with Asphalt Mixture Performance.â Transportation Research Record 1757. Transporta- tion Research Board, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., 148â156. 25. Fletcher, T., Chandan, C., Masad, E., and Sivakumar, K. (2003). âAggregate Imaging System (AIMS) for characterizing the shape of References
fine and coarse aggregates.â Transportation Research Record 1832, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C., 67â77. 26. Wedding, P. A., and Gaynor, R. D. (1961). âThe Effect of Using Crushed Gravel as the Coarse and Fine Aggregate in Dense-Graded Bituminous Mixtures.â Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proceedings, 30, 469â492. 27. Li, M. C., and Kett, I. (1967). âInfluence of Coarse Aggregate Shape on the Strength of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures.â Highway Research Record 178, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 93â106. 28. Parker, F., and Brown, R. E. âEffects of aggregate properties on flexible pavement rutting in Alabama.â ASTM Special Technical Publication, No. 1147, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1994, pp.68â89. 29. Kandhal, P. S., and Parker, F., Jr. (1998). âAggregate tests related to asphalt concrete performance in pavements.â National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 405, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 30. Chowdhury, A., Button, J. W., Kohale, V., and Jahn, D. (2001). âEvaluation of Superpave Fine Aggregate Angularity Specifica- tion.â International Center for Aggregates Research (ICAR) Report 201-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. 31. Masad, E. (2003). âThe Development of a Computer Controlled Image Analysis System for Measuring Aggregate Shape Properties.â National Cooperative Highway Research Program NCHRP-IDEA Project 77 Final Report, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. 50